Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Marcin Borkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! I have a feature request (or a question how to do it;)) concerning itemizations. Currently, they are much like LaTeX (say, with the enumitem package). I think this is not the best idea. I can hardly imagine using more than two levels of itemize in my documents; on the other hand, I like to introduce different kinds of itemize on the _first_ level. Imagine I'm typesetting a paper on mathematics (which I'm doing all the time;)). I want another kind of itemize for lists of: * equivalent conditions (as in: the following are equivalent: ...); * statements connected by an or clause (as in: at least one of these holds: ...; * statements connected by an and clause (as in: assume that these conditions are satisfied: ...). What I usually do (in LaTeX) is to define a few environments, like equivenumerate, orenumerate, andenumerate etc., and make them use (a), (b), ..., (i), (ii), ..., or (1), (2), ... respectively. This way I have a clear visual clue in my papers on what's going where, and on the other hand, I separate content and presentation. Would it be possible in ConTeXt? If yes, how to do this? Maybe it's worth mentioning in the new manual? (As usual, I'll try to post the answer on the wiki when I have some spare time!) Take a look at page 20. http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf The source is also available: http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/baytex Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
Am 2008-08-27 um 10:12 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf Really nice! I should steal that to renew my own presentations... ;-) Unfortunately it's full of typos. Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
Hi there! I have a feature request (or a question how to do it;)) concerning itemizations. Currently, they are much like LaTeX (say, with the enumitem package). I think this is not the best idea. I can hardly imagine using more than two levels of itemize in my documents; on the other hand, I like to introduce different kinds of itemize on the _first_ level. Imagine I'm typesetting a paper on mathematics (which I'm doing all the time;)). I want another kind of itemize for lists of: * equivalent conditions (as in: the following are equivalent: ...); * statements connected by an or clause (as in: at least one of these holds: ...; * statements connected by an and clause (as in: assume that these conditions are satisfied: ...). What I usually do (in LaTeX) is to define a few environments, like equivenumerate, orenumerate, andenumerate etc., and make them use (a), (b), ..., (i), (ii), ..., or (1), (2), ... respectively. This way I have a clear visual clue in my papers on what's going where, and on the other hand, I separate content and presentation. Would it be possible in ConTeXt? If yes, how to do this? Maybe it's worth mentioning in the new manual? (As usual, I'll try to post the answer on the wiki when I have some spare time!) -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.faculty.fmcs.amu.edu.pl) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Marcin Borkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! I have a feature request (or a question how to do it;)) concerning itemizations. Currently, they are much like LaTeX (say, with the enumitem package). I think this is not the best idea. I can hardly imagine using more than two levels of itemize in my documents; on the other hand, I like to introduce different kinds of itemize on the _first_ level. Imagine I'm typesetting a paper on mathematics (which I'm doing all the time;)). I want another kind of itemize for lists of: * equivalent conditions (as in: the following are equivalent: ...); * statements connected by an or clause (as in: at least one of these holds: ...; * statements connected by an and clause (as in: assume that these conditions are satisfied: ...). What I usually do (in LaTeX) is to define a few environments, like equivenumerate, orenumerate, andenumerate etc., and make them use (a), (b), ..., (i), (ii), ..., or (1), (2), ... respectively. This way I have a clear visual clue in my papers on what's going where, and on the other hand, I separate content and presentation. Would it be possible in ConTeXt? If yes, how to do this? Maybe it's worth mentioning in the new manual? (As usual, I'll try to post the answer on the wiki when I have some spare time!) Take a look at page 20. http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Take a look at page 20. http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf Wolfgang Hey, that's an excellent presentation. When/where did you give it? Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Take a look at page 20. http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf Wolfgang Hey, that's an excellent presentation. When/where did you give it? 2. August in Erlangen (footer right margin ;-) http://home.vr-web.de/was/stammtisch.html#bayerntreff Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: \newitemize or something like this
Dnia Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:12:16AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a): On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Marcin Borkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I usually do (in LaTeX) is to define a few environments, like equivenumerate, orenumerate, andenumerate etc., and make them use (a), (b), ..., (i), (ii), ..., or (1), (2), ... respectively. This way I have a clear visual clue in my papers on what's going where, and on the other hand, I separate content and presentation. Would it be possible in ConTeXt? If yes, how to do this? Maybe it's worth mentioning in the new manual? Take a look at page 20. http://wolfgang.schuster.googlepages.com/erlangen.pdf Wolfgang Hey, that's just WOW!!! It's a pity it's in German - I'll have to recall what I learned about that language a looong time ago... But thanks, thanks a million times! Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.faculty.fmcs.amu.edu.pl) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
