Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jul 19 2008, John Devereux wrote: I am still finding errors in the result. Some of these are due to lines commented out with a leading % sign. In others parameter bracket nesting seems messed up. That's why there are these 2 lines: echo Starting editor, so you can manually improve the ConTeXt source. $EDITOR $OUT.tex In the normal case, you have to adjust only a few problems by hand. OK, I will give it a go... If you comment out normal text, because actually you want to delete it, but you don't really want to lose it forever, then consider using a version control system (subversion for example). Good point and I am already doing that anyway. The other reason is to quickly enable or disable something. Thanks, -- John Devereux ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
On Fri, Jul 18 2008, John Devereux wrote: Thanks, but this (your shell script) did not work well for me - there seem to be too many cases where the diff produces invalid tex code. Did you ever make an extended one? Yes. It's attached. Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ typeset-diff.sh Description: application/shellscript ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jul 18 2008, John Devereux wrote: Thanks, but this (your shell script) did not work well for me - there seem to be too many cases where the diff produces invalid tex code. Did you ever make an extended one? Yes. It's attached. Cheers, Peter Thanks. I am still finding errors in the result. Some of these are due to lines commented out with a leading % sign. In others parameter bracket nesting seems messed up. I will play with it some more. -- John Devereux ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jul 15 2008, John Devereux wrote: Is there a way to automatically highlight changes to a document, such that the resulting PDF has markers showing changed areas? Bars in the margin or some such. Or more generally some other way to easily communicate what has been changed (other than a diff on the source). I'm sorry, this _is_ a diff on the source: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20060806.143457.47021821.en.html But the result can be quite nice. Thanks, but this (your shell script) did not work well for me - there seem to be too many cases where the diff produces invalid tex code. Did you ever make an extended one? I've also a module, that makes a table to communicate some changes to the reader. It's attached. Typeset it with texexec --mode=demo t-changes. OK, thanks! -- John Devereux ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
2008/7/15 John Devereux [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Is there a way to automatically highlight changes to a document, such that the resulting PDF has markers showing changed areas? Bars in the margin or some such. Or more generally some other way to easily communicate what has been changed (other than a diff on the source). In the same idear, i realy miss something to highlight the « overfull hbox » Olivier. -- [Message tapé sur un clavier Bépo : http://www.clavier-dvorak.org ] http://nemolivier.blogspot.com ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Highlight changes
Hi, Is there a way to automatically highlight changes to a document, such that the resulting PDF has markers showing changed areas? Bars in the margin or some such. Or more generally some other way to easily communicate what has been changed (other than a diff on the source). -- John Devereux ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Highlight changes
On Tue, Jul 15 2008, John Devereux wrote:
Is there a way to automatically highlight changes to a document,
such that the resulting PDF has markers showing changed areas? Bars in
the margin or some such. Or more generally some other way to easily
communicate what has been changed (other than a diff on the source).
I'm sorry, this _is_ a diff on the source:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20060806.143457.47021821.en.html
But the result can be quite nice.
I've also a module, that makes a table to communicate some changes to the
reader. It's attached. Typeset it with texexec --mode=demo t-changes.
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
\ifx \iere \undefined \def\iere {\highordinalstr{re}} \fi
\def\In[#1,#2]{\doifsomething{#1}{\in[#1]}\if\relax#2\else, \In[#2]\fi}
\enableregime[utf]
\unprotect
\newcount\RevC
\def\Changes[#1]{%
[EMAIL PROTECTED], labels=, #1]% modif, labels, date
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@modif{%
\translate[fr=1\iere\ version,en=First version,de=Erste Version]}}%
\global\advance\RevC by 1 \bTR
\expanded{\bTD \the\RevC \eTD}%
\expanded{\bTD [EMAIL PROTECTED] \eTD}\expanded{\bTD [EMAIL PROTECTED] \eTD}%
\expandafter\bTD [EMAIL PROTECTED],\relax]\eTD
\eTR}
\def\startChanges{%
\bTABLE[option=stretch, textwidth=\textwidth]
\bTR[background=screen]
\bTD \translate[fr=Rév, en=Rev, de=Rev].\eTD
\bTD \translate[fr=Date, en=Date, de=Datum]\eTD
\bTD \translate[fr=Origine de la mise à jour, en=Reason for update,
de=Grund der Änderung]\eTD
\bTD \translate[fr=§ modifié, en=modified §, de=mod. §en]\eTD\eTR}
\def\stopChanges{\eTABLE}
\protect
\doifnotmode{demo}{\endinput}
%%
%D Usage example:
\usemodule[changes]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\starttext
\title{The big title}
\startChanges
\Changes[date=1.1.2001]
\Changes[date=2.2.2002, labels=sec:a, modif=Added text from Tufte]
\Changes[date=3.3.2003, labels=sec:b, modif=Added text from Knuth]
\Changes[date=4.4.2004, labels={sec:a,sec:b}, modif=Added even more text]
\stopChanges
\subject{Contents}
\placecontent
\section[sec:a]{First section}
\input tufte
more text
\section[sec:b]{Second section}
\input knuth
more text
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
