Re: [NTG-context] Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary?
Problem: memory violoating error under Linux while running mp From: "Patrick Gundlach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > > 2. 'Memory violating' error while compiling nested mp code (under Linux) -- > > still can't find the answer... > > that is really strange. If you are brave and experienced, you might > trace the mpost run with strace to see where the error occurs. > > Please post the logfile of the bad run. As I mentioned, created 'mpgraph.log' file has zero length... > >> you don't need --automprun. Everything should work fine w/o. > > > > I tried to omit this option, but without that MetaPost doesn't run at all. > > could you post the output of texexec --verbose and the logfile of a > simple ConTeXt file with mp code in it? Ahh, to late! Finally I decided to remove tl7 installation (just before i recived your answer) and try to make an upgrade. So if the problem will occur again, I will report it to you. Thanks, Pawe/l ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary?
At 23:41 08/10/2003, you wrote: Hi again, ... > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I remember, > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > files? If you have the same system on both sides, I think you are safe. It looks as if web2c systems can share formats if the web2c version number is identical. indeed and this is what makes tex live such a nice system however, here i organize my binaries like texmf-mswin texmf-linux etc because i often have more modern pdftex's on windows -) Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary?
Hi again, ... > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I remember, > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > files? If you have the same system on both sides, I think you are safe. It looks as if web2c systems can share formats if the web2c version number is identical. Patrick -- You are your own rainbow! ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary?
Hi, > Pawe/l wrote about: > 1. System error while compiling nested mp code (under Windows) -- > regenerating metafun format solves that good to hear. > 2. 'Memory violating' error while compiling nested mp code (under Linux) -- > still can't find the answer... that is really strange. If you are brave and experienced, you might trace the mpost run with strace to see where the error occurs. Please post the logfile of the bad run. > 3. Missed mp graphics in output PDF -- solved of course... sorry for that > silly question, I've taken the first example appearing in ConTeXt manual > assuming that it is the basic one. This question was not silly at all. I am still confused by the plethora of ways to run mp. >> you don't need --automprun. Everything should work fine w/o. > > I tried to omit this option, but without that MetaPost doesn't run at all. could you post the output of texexec --verbose and the logfile of a simple ConTeXt file with mp code in it? > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I remember, > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > files? I'd like to know, too. > Surely I will! Which version has tl2003 binarises: linux, windows or both? > By the way, does anybody know if tl2003 binaries are frozen already? http://www.tug.org/texlive/> For TeX Live 2003, the last update of packages and programs was made on 20 September 2003. For the latest versions, please consult CTAN . Patrick -- You are your own rainbow! ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
