Re: [NTG-context] Wiki: MkIV vs. MkII
Hi, So I seems to me to be good: - to provide both compilation engines, MkII and MkIV, - to provide a context attribute, e.g. context engine=mkiv or context mark=iv or something like this to force the specified Ctx to compile. We are planning to think about considering to install MKIV on the garden server. But this will take some time. We are currently in the progress of handling the ownership / server to other people and machines, and after that new things may come. If there are some able system administrators with enough spare time, we could possibly combine efforts. Patrick :) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Wiki: MkIV vs. MkII
Hello, I encountered a problem running an example by MkII (which seems to be default) rather than by MkIV (see related discussion on http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/058369.html). Although in many examples (I mean context ... /context wiki source code) in doesn't matter which Ctx version is being used for compilation, sometimes it may make a difference. So I seems to me to be good: - to provide both compilation engines, MkII and MkIV, - to provide a context attribute, e.g. context engine=mkiv or context mark=iv or something like this to force the specified Ctx to compile. Best regards, Lukas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
