[NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?
Hi,
I use \definesynonyms in several documents but it seems to be broken!
For testing purposes I use the folowing command:
\definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull]
\kind{to}{test one!}
\kind{t}{sonething else}
\definesynonyms[state][states][\infull]
\state{a}{anything}
\state{ab}{anything b}
\starttext
My test \infull{to}!
\stoptext
The \infull{to} in the My test.. line is empty, but if I remove the
\definesynonyms[state]... and \state commands the line says: My test
test one!! Isn't this very weird?
What has happened?
Regards,
Gerard Verhaag
P.S. I use ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.18 19:34 MKIV fmt: 2011.1.19 int:
english/english!
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?
Verhaag, G.C.H.M. verhaagg...@ziggo.nl writes: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull] Don't use the same command. Better: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull] -- Peter ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?
Peter Münster wrote: Verhaag, G.C.H.M. verhaagg...@ziggo.nl writes: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull] Don't use the same command. Better: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull] Hi, Thanks for the tip! I didn't know that I was free to choose the command representing the last parameter of the \definesynonyms command! So that's why I used \infull in both definitions, but your suggestion is of course THE solution. Regards, Gerard Verhaag ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] definesynonyms infull [mkiv]
Hi,
the following example works in mkii, but in mkiv the first 'infull' won't
appear:
\enableregime [utf]
\definesynonyms [StandardAbbrev] [StandardAbbrevs] [\infull]
\definesynonyms [TechAbbrev] [TechAbbrevs] [\infull]
\StandardAbbrev [DIN] {\kap{din}} {Deutsches Institut für Normung~e.\,V.}
\TechAbbrev [FAME] {\kap{fame}} {Fatty Acid Methyl Ester}
\starttext
\DIN\ (\infull{DIN})
\FAME\ (\infull{FAME})
\stoptext
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Thomas
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.60.1-2010052906 (Web2C 2010/pretest) (rev 3685)
ConTeXt ver: 2010.05.24 13:05 MKIV fmt: 2010.5.31 int: english/english
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
thanks for that hint Aditya!
Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Bernd Militzer wrote:
Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
thanks for that hint Aditya!
There is also this (more formal) solution:
\def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID}
\def\doPID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
The core internal macro \dodoubleempty creates empty []
groups if they are not provided in the input. There is
also \dosingleempty etc, upto \doseventupleempty
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Am 28.07.2006 um 16:34 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
There is also this (more formal) solution:
\def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID}
\def\doPID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
thanks Taco!
Cheers, Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Bernd Militzer wrote:
Thanks a Taco!
with PID[268]%
^
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
You can also do
\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]}
% #2 is to gobble spaces
\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}}
\def\getPID#1{\doGetPID{Fam}{#1}, \doGetPID{Vor}{#1}~(#1)}
with this both
\PID[268]
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
and
\PID[268][Fam=Rudolph,Nam=Rudluffen,Vor=Adam]
work.
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Thanks a Taco! with PID[268]% ^ [Fam=Rudolph, Nam=Rudluffen, Vor=Adam] all is ok. Bernd ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Am 24.07.2006 um 11:11 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
But it is probably easier to write a small database interface
layer. Somewhat like this (note that I had to change \doGeTPID
as well).
\def\PID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}}
\def\getPID#1{\doGetPID{Fam}{#1}, \doGetPID{Vor}{#1}~(#1)}
\PID[268]
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
Thanks Taco for that example, but sorry it dos not work.
Runaway argument?
268] [Fam=Rudolph, Nam=Rudluffen, Vor=Adam]
! Paragraph ended before \PID was complete.
to be read again
\par
l.57
I have no idea.
Bernd
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Bernd Militzer wrote:
Hi all,
for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a
lot of persons like you can see below.
QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs.
If you need only 4000 separate PIDs, that should work ok.
or has someone a better idea to handle those informations.
But it is probably easier to write a small database interface
layer. Somewhat like this (note that I had to change \doGeTPID
as well).
\def\PID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]}
\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}}
\def\getPID#1{\doGetPID{Fam}{#1}, \doGetPID{Vor}{#1}~(#1)}
\PID[268]
[Fam=Rudolph,
Nam=Rudluffen,
Vor=Adam]
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms
Bernd Militzer wrote: Hi all, for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a lot of persons like you can see below. QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs. a lot (as much as tex's hash + mem permits; the hash can be 100K) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] definesynonyms
Hi all,
for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a
lot of persons like you can see below.
QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs.
or has someone a better idea to handle those informations.
thanks for help!
Bernd
% -- snip
%
\definesynonyms[PID][PIDs][\doGetPID]
\PID{Fam268}{Rudolph}
\PID{Nam268}{Rudluffen}
\PID{Vor268}{Adam}
\PID{Ruf268}{Adam}
\PID{Geb268}{k.A.}
\PID{GebOrt268} {Oberkoskau}
\PID{Tau268}{19. Mai 1725}
\PID{TauOrt268} {Unterkoskau}
\PID{Hei268}{17. November 1755}
\PID{HeiOrt268} {Willersdorf}
% \PID{Amt268} {}
% \PID{AmtOrt268} {}
\PID{Tod268}{14. Februar 1781}
\PID{TodOrt268} {Oberkoskau}
\PID{Alt268}{55 Jahre, 9 Monate, 3 Tage}
\PID{Urs268}{nach dreitägiger Krankheit}
\PID{Grab268} {14. Februar 1781}
\PID{GrabOrt268}{Unterkoskau}
\PID{Ber268}{Müller}
\PID{Zus268}{Besitzer der Obermühle}
%
\PID{Fam2112} {Militzer}
\PID{Nam2112} {Mielitzer}
\PID{Vor2112} {Adam}
\PID{Ruf2112} {Adam}
\PID{Geb2112} {k.A.}
\PID{GebOrt2112}{Unterkoskau}
\PID{Tau2112} {16. November 1670}
\PID{TauOrt2112}{Unterkoskau}
\PID{Hei2112} {21. Mai 1694}
\PID{HeiOrt2112}{Unterkoskau}
% \PID{Amt2112} {}
% \PID{AmtOrt2112} {}
\PID{Tod2112} {27. Juni 1699}
\PID{TodOrt2112}{Unterkoskau}
\PID{Alt2112} {28 Jahre, 6 Monate, 21 Tage}
\PID{Urs2112} {k.A}
\PID{Grab2112} {k.A.}
\PID{GrabOrt2112} {Unterkoskau}
\PID{Ber2112} {k.A.}
\PID{Zus2112} {Epidemie im Jahr 1699, da viele Todesf‰lle}
%
%
% Familienname, Vorname(n) (000)
\def\getPID#1{\doGetPID{Fam#1}, \doGetPID{Vor#1}~(#1)}
\def\titPID#1{{\it \doGetPID{Fam#1}, \doGetPID{Vor#1}~(#1)}}
% für Überschriften
\def\getPIDGeb#1{\doGetPID{Fam#1}, \doGetPID{Vor#1}~(#1) -- Geburt}
\def\getPIDHei#1{\doGetPID{Fam#1}, \doGetPID{Vor#1}~(#1) -- Heirat}
\def\getPIDTod#1{\doGetPID{Fam#1}, \doGetPID{Vor#1}~(#1) -- Tod}
%
\def\getGeburt#1{\doGetPID{Geb#1}} % Geburtsdatum
\def\getGebOrt#1{\doGetPID{GebOrt#1}}
\def\getTaufe#1{\doGetPID{Tau#1}} % Taufdatum
\def\getTauOrt#1{\doGetPID{TauOrt#1}}
\def\getHeirat#1{\doGetPID{Hei#1}} % Kirchliche Heirat
\def\getHeiOrt#1{\doGetPID{HeiOrt#1}}
\def\getAmt#1{\doGetPID{Amt#1}} % Standesamtliche Heirat
\def\getAmtOrt#1{\doGetPID{AmtOrt#1}}
\def\getTod#1{\doGetPID{Tod#1}} % Sterbedatum
\def\getTodOrt#1{\doGetPID{TodOrt#1}}
\def\getUrsache#1{\doGetPID{Urs#1}} % Todesursache
\def\getAlter#1{\doGetPID{Alt#1}} % Alter bei Tod
\def\getGrab#1{\doGetPID{Grab#1}} % Datum des Begräbnisses
\def\getGrabOrt#1{\doGetPID{GrabOrt#1}}
\def\getBeruf#1{\doGetPID{Ber#1}} % Beruf
\def\getZusatz#1{\doGetPID{Zus#1}} % Zusatzinformation
%
% Vorname(n) Familienname
\def\getNamen#1{\doGetPID{Vor#1}~\doGetPID{Fam#1}}
\def\titNamen#1{{\it \doGetPID{Vor#1}~\doGetPID{Fam#1}}}
%
\def\getNameN#1{\doGetPID{Vor#1}~\doGetPID{Fam#1}~(#1)}
\def\titNameN#1{{\it \doGetPID{Vor#1}~\doGetPID{Fam#1}}~(#1)}
%
%
% Familienname
\def\getFamilie#1{\doGetPID{Fam#1}}
\def\titFamilie#1{{\it \doGetPID{Fam#1}}}
% Geburtsname (exakte Schreibweise)
\def\getExakt#1{\doGetPID{Nam#1}}
\def\titExakt#1{{\it \doGetPID{Nam#1}}}
% Vorname
\def\getVor#1{\doGetPID{Vor#1}}
\def\titVor#1{{\it \doGetPID{Vor#1}}}
%
\def\getRuf#1{\doGetPID{Ruf#1}}
\def\titRuf#1{{\it \doGetPID{Ruf#1}}}
%
%
\starttext
Testtext\crlf
\getNamen{2112}\ starb am \getTod{2112} im Alter von \getAlter{2112}n
in \getTodOrt{2112}.
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
