Re: [NTG-context] m-pstric

2007-08-19 Thread Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini
  - If dvi is not the default, what is the right switch?
  ('texexec --dvi ...' has no effect)
 
 --dvi would have been more intuitive, but it's --dvips.

That was the solution

Thank you Mojca!

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] m-pstric

2007-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini
Hallo,

I tried the example in the module pstric, but it is not working.

Running my 'tst.tex' loads the module and since it is in pdf-mode
a line

pstricks : using indirect method; enable write18

was written.

But in 'tst-texapp.log' appears the same line:

pstricks : using indirect method; enable write18

so 'tst-texapp.tex' was not run in dvi-mode and the pstricks macros 
are not loaded and \pspicture is unknown.

\startTEXapplication

has a line

\executesystemcommand{texexec ...}

So my question is:

- Is dvi-mode the default for texexec? (I know it was, but there were 
some opposite remarks on the list)

- If dvi is not the default, what is the right switch? 
('texexec --dvi ...' has no effect)

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] m-pstric

2007-08-18 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 8/18/07, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
 Hallo,

 I tried the example in the module pstric, but it is not working.

Hello Wolfgang,

my first suggestion would be: unless you have a strong reason for
using pstricks (like: extensive amount of code already written), why
not trying pgf/TikZ instead?

 Running my 'tst.tex' loads the module and since it is in pdf-mode
 a line

 pstricks : using indirect method; enable write18

 was written.

 But in 'tst-texapp.log' appears the same line:

 pstricks : using indirect method; enable write18

 so 'tst-texapp.tex' was not run in dvi-mode and the pstricks macros
 are not loaded and \pspicture is unknown.

First of all: do enable write18 if it's not already.

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/write18

 \startTEXapplication

 has a line

 \executesystemcommand{texexec ...}

Second of all (a question for Hans): the example only worked if I replaced
\executesystemcommand{texexec \bufferprefix\@@texapp.tex --once --batch}%
in page-app.tex with
\executesystemcommand{texexec --dvips \bufferprefix\@@texapp.tex
--once --batch}%

Are there any other cases where this would fail to work (I have a
feeling that the command is only meant for dvi-ps-pdf route)? If
not, would it make sense to add the --dvips switch? Minimal example to
test the difference:

\usemodule[pstric]
\starttext

\startPSTRICKS
\pspicture(0,0)(10,10)
\psline(0,0)(2,10)
\endpspicture
\stopPSTRICKS

\stoptext

 So my question is:

 - Is dvi-mode the default for texexec? (I know it was, but there were
 some opposite remarks on the list)

Not any more. dvi used to be the default mode until approximately two years ago.

 - If dvi is not the default, what is the right switch?
 ('texexec --dvi ...' has no effect)

--dvi would have been more intuitive, but it's --dvips.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___