Re: [NTG-context] math: too big space between function and argument

2011-05-25 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Wed, 25 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:


On Di, 2011-05-24 at 09:56 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Tue, 24 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:



to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
argument, I defined the following command.

\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}

Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?


Getting these spaces is tricky; especially if you consider spaces before
and after the definition. Choose your pick:

\starttext
  \startformula
   A{\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
   A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
   A{\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC \right)\mathclose{}B \quad
   A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC \right)\mathclose{}B 
\quad
  \stopformula
\stoptext


That looks tricky and complex.


But can be easily hidden behind a macro.


Could you explain the advantage over `\!` which Wolfgang suggested at
least for the space after the definition.


\! only corrects the space between the P and (, not the spacing before P, 
and the space after ). Moreover, some of the math spacing rules change in 
\scriptstyle and \scriptscriptstyle; using \mathop, \mathopen, and 
\mathclose means that those rules are followed.



In addition, I think AMSTeX defines a command `\DeclareMathOperator` [1]
which takes care of these things


No. \DeclareMathOperator is just a fancy wrapper around 
\mathop{\operatorfont ...}. A similar result can be achieved in ConTeXt 
using


\declaremathcommand [...] [op] [\mfunction ...]

For defining user macros, I prefer \mathop{\mfunction{...}}.

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] math: too big space between function and argument

2011-05-25 Thread Paul Menzel
On Di, 2011-05-24 at 09:56 -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:

> > to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
> > argument, I defined the following command.
> >
> > \define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
> >
> > Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
> > my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
> 
> Getting these spaces is tricky; especially if you consider spaces before 
> and after the definition. Choose your pick:
> 
> \starttext
>   \startformula
>A{\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
>A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
>A{\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC \right)\mathclose{}B \quad
>A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC 
> \right)\mathclose{}B \quad
>   \stopformula
> \stoptext

That looks tricky and complex.

> Some information from the mathsets module (which does not work with MkIV).

I hope you or somebody will have time to port that module to MkIV.

> The entry is the latex bug database is not viewable now.
> 
> %D The \type{\left} and \type{\right} generate a math atom of type inner,
> %D while for math sets, we want a math open atom. To see the difference,
> %D consider
> %D
> %D \startbuffer
> %D \startformula
> %D  2\left(\frac {3}{4} \right) \qquad \hbox{ vs } \qquad
> %D  2\biggl( \frac {3}{4} \biggr)
> %D \stopformula
> %D
> %D and
> %D
> %D \startformula
> %D  \Pr\left(\frac {3}{4} \right) \qquad \hbox{ vs } \qquad
> %D  \Pr\biggl( \frac {3}{4} \biggr)
> %D \stopformula
> %D \stopbuffer
> %D \typebuffer
> %D
> %D which gives (notice the spacing before the parenthesis)
> %D
> %D \getbuffer
> %D
> %D I will assume that if \type{text} is something, then
> %D the default behaviour is desirable, if \type{text} is empty, then I add
> %D \type{\mathopen} and \type{\mathclose}.  Using \type{\mathopen} to correct
> %D the spacing is due to Frank Mittelbach, see
> %D 
> \hyphenatedurl{http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html?pr=latex/3853}
> %D
> %D Mathset module ensures that we get the correct spacing in both cases
> %D \startbuffer
> %D \definemathset[SET][left=(,right=)]
> %D \startformula
> %D  2\SET{\frac{3}{4}} \qquad \hbox{ and } \qquad
> %D  \PR{ \frac{3}{4} }
> %D \stopformula
> %D \stopbuffer
> %D \getbuffer[PR] \getbuffer which was typed as \typebuffer
> %D
> %D Also, if its argument is a single character, \type{\mathop} centers it 
> to
> %D with respect to the math||axis. Compare the outputs of
> %D
> %D \startbuffer
> %D \ruledhbox{$\mathop{y}\nolimits_x\left\{A\,\middle|\,B\right\}$}
> %D \ruledhbox{$\mathop{\kern\zeropoint 
> y}\nolimits_x\left\{A\,\middle|\,B\right\}$}
> %D \stopbuffer
> %D
> %D \typebuffer
> %D \getbuffer
> %D
> %D I have added a \type{\kern\zeropoint} to prevent that.

Could you explain the advantage over `\!` which Wolfgang suggested at
least for the space after the definition.

In addition, I think AMSTeX defines a command `\DeclareMathOperator` [1]
which takes care of these things.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Advanced_Mathematics#Custom_operators


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] math: too big space between function and argument

2011-05-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Tue, 24 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:


Dear ConTeXt folks,


to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
argument, I defined the following command.

\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}

Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?


Getting these spaces is tricky; especially if you consider spaces before 
and after the definition. Choose your pick:


\starttext
 \startformula
  A{\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
  A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
  A{\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC \right)\mathclose{}B \quad
  A\mathop{\kern\zeropoint\mathbf P}\mathopen{}\left( ABC \right)\mathclose{}B 
\quad
 \stopformula
\stoptext

Some information from the mathsets module (which does not work with MkIV). 
The entry is the latex bug database is not viewable now.


%D The \type{\left} and \type{\right} generate a math atom of type inner,
%D while for math sets, we want a math open atom. To see the difference,
%D consider
%D
%D \startbuffer
%D \startformula
%D  2\left(\frac {3}{4} \right) \qquad \hbox{ vs } \qquad
%D  2\biggl( \frac {3}{4} \biggr)
%D \stopformula
%D
%D and
%D
%D \startformula
%D  \Pr\left(\frac {3}{4} \right) \qquad \hbox{ vs } \qquad
%D  \Pr\biggl( \frac {3}{4} \biggr)
%D \stopformula
%D \stopbuffer
%D \typebuffer
%D
%D which gives (notice the spacing before the parenthesis)
%D
%D \getbuffer
%D
%D I will assume that if \type{text} is something, then
%D the default behaviour is desirable, if \type{text} is empty, then I add
%D \type{\mathopen} and \type{\mathclose}.  Using \type{\mathopen} to correct
%D the spacing is due to Frank Mittelbach, see
%D 
\hyphenatedurl{http://www.latex-project.org/cgi-bin/ltxbugs2html?pr=latex/3853}
%D
%D Mathset module ensures that we get the correct spacing in both cases
%D \startbuffer
%D \definemathset[SET][left=(,right=)]
%D \startformula
%D  2\SET{\frac{3}{4}} \qquad \hbox{ and } \qquad
%D  \PR{ \frac{3}{4} }
%D \stopformula
%D \stopbuffer
%D \getbuffer[PR] \getbuffer which was typed as \typebuffer
%D
%D Also, if its argument is a single character, \type{\mathop} centers it 
to

%D with respect to the math||axis. Compare the outputs of
%D
%D \startbuffer
%D \ruledhbox{$\mathop{y}\nolimits_x\left\{A\,\middle|\,B\right\}$}
%D \ruledhbox{$\mathop{\kern\zeropoint 
y}\nolimits_x\left\{A\,\middle|\,B\right\}$}
%D \stopbuffer
%D
%D \typebuffer
%D \getbuffer
%D
%D I have added a \type{\kern\zeropoint} to prevent that.


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] math: too big space between function and argument

2011-05-24 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 24.05.2011 um 13:14 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> Dear ConTeXt folks,
> 
> 
> to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
> argument, I defined the following command.
> 
>   \define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
> 
> Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
> my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?

You can insert negative kerning with “\!”.

\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\!\left(#1\right)}

BTW: You redefine the already existing \P (expands to ¶) command.

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] math: too big space between function and argument

2011-05-24 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear ConTeXt folks,


to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
argument, I defined the following command.

\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}

Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?


Thanks,

Paul


mathbold.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
\starttext
The following equation contains probabilities.

\placeformula
\startformula
\P{A ∪ B} = \P{A} + \P{B} - \P{A ∩ B}
\stopformula
\stoptext


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___