Re: [NTG-context] no 'D' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom wrote: In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] into \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["44] ok, fixed, Apparently this beautiful font is severely underused to allow this typo to survive! or maybe the D is not used that much (those chars are only used alone, not in words, so if one can do with A-C the D is never hit) Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] no 'D' in math-eul.tex
In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] into \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["44] Apparently this beautiful font is severely underused to allow this typo to survive! Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden "What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite" - Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Thanks, I already repaired it, I just thought it should not be propagated further ... -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden "What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite" -- Bertrand Russell - Original Message - From: Adam Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 11:50 am Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex > OKAY! > Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been "distracted" by > this EU > project meeting where I'm sitting. > > You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix > thiswith a patch like the following, in your favourite patch- > putting-place: > > \starttypescript[math][euler][special] > \startmathcollection [eul] > \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["64] > \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["44] > \stopmathcollection > \stoptypescript > > I don't have anything against the letter 'd'. Honest! > > aeam linesay > > Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: > > >In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser > >dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the > following lines > >occur > > > >... > >\definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] ["63] > >\definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["65] > >\definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] ["65] > >\definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] ["66] > >... > > > >and > > > >... > >\definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] ["43] > >\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] > >\definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] ["45] > >\definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] ["46] > >... > > > >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a > >mistake? > > > >Regards, Johan > > > >-- > >Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh > >t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm > >m +46735521477 Sweden > >"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the > >will to find out, which is the exact opposite" > >-- Bertrand Russell > > > >___ > >ntg-context mailing list > >ntg-context@ntg.nl > >http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 > Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > ___ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
OKAY! Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been "distracted" by this EU project meeting where I'm sitting. You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix this with a patch like the following, in your favourite patch-putting-place: \starttypescript[math][euler][special] \startmathcollection [eul] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["64] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["44] \stopmathcollection \stoptypescript I don't have anything against the letter 'd'. Honest! aeam linesay Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: >In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser >dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines >occur > >... >\definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] ["63] >\definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["65] >\definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] ["65] >\definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] ["66] >... > >and > >... >\definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] ["43] >\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] >\definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] ["45] >\definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] ["46] >... > >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a >mistake? > >Regards, Johan > >-- >Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh >t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm >m +46735521477 Sweden >"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the >will to find out, which is the exact opposite" >-- Bertrand Russell > >___ >ntg-context mailing list >ntg-context@ntg.nl >http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom wrote: In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] ["63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] ["66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] ["43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] ["46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? indeed, should be "64 and "44 hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Hmm, disturbing. What system/engine are you using? Could you email me with your output (off-list is best), and include \showfont[zeurm10] as well? cheers, adam Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 11:01:51 +0200: >If 'c' and 'C' in your example are changed to >'d' and 'D', it illustrates the point. I also have >the fonts installed following your excellent guide. > >Johan > >-- >Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh >t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm >m +46735521477 Sweden >"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the >will to find out, which is the exact opposite" >-- Bertrand Russell > >- Original Message ----- >From: Adam Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am >Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex > >> Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: >> >> >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a >> >mistake? >> >> Huh? I think those hex values are correct. >> Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for >> me (I >> have the EulerVM fonts installed): >> >> \definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec] >> \definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05] >> \setupbodyfont[cheu] >> >> \starttext >> \startformula >> A + B + C = A^{B^C} >> \stopformula >> \startformula >> a + b + c = a^{b^c} >> \stopformula >> >> \stoptext >> >> -- >> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 >> Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> >> ___ >> ntg-context mailing list >> ntg-context@ntg.nl >> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> > >___ >ntg-context mailing list >ntg-context@ntg.nl >http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
If 'c' and 'C' in your example are changed to 'd' and 'D', it illustrates the point. I also have the fonts installed following your excellent guide. Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden "What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite" -- Bertrand Russell - Original Message - From: Adam Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex > Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: > > >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a > >mistake? > > Huh? I think those hex values are correct. > Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for > me (I > have the EulerVM fonts installed): > > \definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec] > \definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05] > \setupbodyfont[cheu] > > \starttext > \startformula > A + B + C = A^{B^C} > \stopformula > \startformula > a + b + c = a^{b^c} > \stopformula > > \stoptext > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 > Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > ___ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200: >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a >mistake? Huh? I think those hex values are correct. Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for me (I have the EulerVM fonts installed): \definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec] \definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05] \setupbodyfont[cheu] \starttext \startformula A + B + C = A^{B^C} \stopformula \startformula a + b + c = a^{b^c} \stopformula \stoptext -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex
In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur ... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] ["63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] ["66] ... and ... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] ["43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] ["46] ... making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake? Regards, Johan -- Johan Sandblom N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh t +46851776108 17176 Stockholm m +46735521477 Sweden "What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite" -- Bertrand Russell ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context