Re: [NTG-context] register: spurious space & one more entry level ask
Vit Zyka wrote: > Jupi! > > Both patches (space & 4-level entry) work well as I can test them till > now. I will do some testing on a real and big document in a near future. > > Do you intend to incorporate both patches to the distribution? well, i always do such things directly in the source files so ... - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] register: spurious space & one more entry level ask
Jupi!
Both patches (space & 4-level entry) work well as I can test them till
now. I will do some testing on a real and big document in a near future.
Do you intend to incorporate both patches to the distribution?
Thank you Hans for extremely quick solutions
Vit
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Vit Zyka wrote:
>> Dear ConTeXters,
>>
>> there are 3 topics dealing with register (index):
>>
>> 1. [Spurious space] There are entries like
>> \registerpage{index}{,}{5}{2--1-1-0-1-0-0-0--1}{2}
>> in a *.tuo file. Since the definition (core-reg.tex)
>> \def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
>> {\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
>> {\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
>> {}}
>> there will be a spurious space between page number like
>> Entry 23 , 67
>> instead of
>> Entry 23, 67
>>
>> Solution:
>> \def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
>> {\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
>> {\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
>> {}\ignorespaces}
>
> interesting that no one noticed this before ... in core-uti.tex pushing
> the line ending was messed up when changing to catcode tables (well,
> pseudo ones in mkii)
>
> \long\def\doutilities#1#2#3#4#5% % introduceren in utility file
> {\resetutilities
>% more than one utility thing can be handled in one pass,
>% for instance lists, so we process ##1 as list
>\def\douticommand##1{\csname\s!set##1\endcsname}%
>\processcommacommand[#1]\douticommand
>\begingroup
>\def\currentutilityfilename{#2}%
>\notesenabledfalse
>\doinpututilitiestrue
>\global\utilitydonefalse
>\pushcatcodetable
>\setcatcodetable\ctxcatcodes
>\pushendofline % <
>\ifunprotectutilities % nog nodig ?
> \unprotect
>\fi
>
>
>> 2. [feature request] Current register implementation enable upto three
>> entry level (\index{level 1+level 2+level 3}). My custommer require 4
>> levels. Please could the entry number be extended?
>
> not trivial, since we then need to adapt texutil too + a bunch of
> macros; adapting mkiv may be easier
>
>> 3. [not important, just for info] Formating of the register entries is
>> not much user friendly. See \hangindent1em in a following definition:
>>
>>\def\dosetpageregisterentrya#1#2%
>> {\flushseenregisterpage
>> \edef\currententrylevel{1}%
>> \global\let\c!entryb\relax
>> \global\let\c!entryc\relax
>> \gdef\c!entrya
>> {\iffirstregisterentry\else\endgraf\fi % new
>> \global\firstregisterpagetrue
>> \hangindent1em\noindent\c!entryreference
>> \dohandlepageregisterentry{#1}{#2}%
>> \global\firstregisterentryfalse
>> \global\firstsubentrytrue
>> \global\firstsubsubentrytrue}}
>>
>> So, when one want the change formating he has to redefine this
>> definition. It is against a ConTeXt spirit.
>
> some day there will be a better interface (probably only in mkiv)
>
> Hans
>
> -
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
> | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] register: spurious space & one more entry level ask
Vit Zyka wrote:
> Dear ConTeXters,
>
> there are 3 topics dealing with register (index):
>
> 1. [Spurious space] There are entries like
> \registerpage{index}{,}{5}{2--1-1-0-1-0-0-0--1}{2}
> in a *.tuo file. Since the definition (core-reg.tex)
> \def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
> {\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
> {\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
> {}}
> there will be a spurious space between page number like
> Entry 23 , 67
> instead of
> Entry 23, 67
>
> Solution:
> \def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
> {\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
> {\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
> {}\ignorespaces}
interesting that no one noticed this before ... in core-uti.tex pushing
the line ending was messed up when changing to catcode tables (well,
pseudo ones in mkii)
\long\def\doutilities#1#2#3#4#5% % introduceren in utility file
{\resetutilities
% more than one utility thing can be handled in one pass,
% for instance lists, so we process ##1 as list
\def\douticommand##1{\csname\s!set##1\endcsname}%
\processcommacommand[#1]\douticommand
\begingroup
\def\currentutilityfilename{#2}%
\notesenabledfalse
\doinpututilitiestrue
\global\utilitydonefalse
\pushcatcodetable
\setcatcodetable\ctxcatcodes
\pushendofline % <
\ifunprotectutilities % nog nodig ?
\unprotect
\fi
> 2. [feature request] Current register implementation enable upto three
> entry level (\index{level 1+level 2+level 3}). My custommer require 4
> levels. Please could the entry number be extended?
not trivial, since we then need to adapt texutil too + a bunch of
macros; adapting mkiv may be easier
> 3. [not important, just for info] Formating of the register entries is
> not much user friendly. See \hangindent1em in a following definition:
>
>\def\dosetpageregisterentrya#1#2%
> {\flushseenregisterpage
> \edef\currententrylevel{1}%
> \global\let\c!entryb\relax
> \global\let\c!entryc\relax
> \gdef\c!entrya
> {\iffirstregisterentry\else\endgraf\fi % new
> \global\firstregisterpagetrue
> \hangindent1em\noindent\c!entryreference
> \dohandlepageregisterentry{#1}{#2}%
> \global\firstregisterentryfalse
> \global\firstsubentrytrue
> \global\firstsubsubentrytrue}}
>
> So, when one want the change formating he has to redefine this
> definition. It is against a ConTeXt spirit.
some day there will be a better interface (probably only in mkiv)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] register: spurious space & one more entry level ask
Dear ConTeXters,
there are 3 topics dealing with register (index):
1. [Spurious space] There are entries like
\registerpage{index}{,}{5}{2--1-1-0-1-0-0-0--1}{2}
in a *.tuo file. Since the definition (core-reg.tex)
\def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
{\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
{\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
{}}
there will be a spurious space between page number like
Entry 23 , 67
instead of
Entry 23, 67
Solution:
\def\dosetpageregisterpage#1#2#3#4#5#6%
{\doifreglevelelse[#5]%
{\dodosetpageregisterpage{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%
{}\ignorespaces}
Test file:
--
\starttext
Text\index{test}.
\page[yes]
Paragraph\index{test}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
--
2. [feature request] Current register implementation enable upto three
entry level (\index{level 1+level 2+level 3}). My custommer require 4
levels. Please could the entry number be extended?
3. [not important, just for info] Formating of the register entries is
not much user friendly. See \hangindent1em in a following definition:
\def\dosetpageregisterentrya#1#2%
{\flushseenregisterpage
\edef\currententrylevel{1}%
\global\let\c!entryb\relax
\global\let\c!entryc\relax
\gdef\c!entrya
{\iffirstregisterentry\else\endgraf\fi % new
\global\firstregisterpagetrue
\hangindent1em\noindent\c!entryreference
\dohandlepageregisterentry{#1}{#2}%
\global\firstregisterentryfalse
\global\firstsubentrytrue
\global\firstsubsubentrytrue}}
So, when one want the change formating he has to redefine this
definition. It is against a ConTeXt spirit.
Best
Vit
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
