Re: [NTG-context] strange behaviour of \definedfont['Some Name'] in XeTeX
On 12/12/06, Hans Hagen wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hello, I'm probaby misusing the feature (most robably because I just didn't take time to study how to do it properly), but it behaves really strange. In XeTeX I first did \font\f='Some Name' \f which worked OK. But when I tried the same with \definedfont['Some Name'] it resulted in strange behaviour. For some fonts, metapost has been invoked and complained, but the resulting document had the proper font plus scaled 1000 written on the first page where the font has been selected. For other fonts it failed completely. What's actually the most clean way of including an uc-encoded font at a specific font size, but without the need of bold or any other typefaces (just for a title for example)? (Which basically means: I only want the same behaviour as the plain TeX expression above + uc encoding.) hm, that's Adam Lindsay's teritory; does bla work? (double quotes) No, I tried that as well. As far as I remember this code used to work already, but I might be wrong. Mojca ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] strange behaviour of \definedfont['Some Name'] in XeTeX
Hello, I'm probaby misusing the feature (most robably because I just didn't take time to study how to do it properly), but it behaves really strange. In XeTeX I first did \font\f='Some Name' \f which worked OK. But when I tried the same with \definedfont['Some Name'] it resulted in strange behaviour. For some fonts, metapost has been invoked and complained, but the resulting document had the proper font plus scaled 1000 written on the first page where the font has been selected. For other fonts it failed completely. What's actually the most clean way of including an uc-encoded font at a specific font size, but without the need of bold or any other typefaces (just for a title for example)? (Which basically means: I only want the same behaviour as the plain TeX expression above + uc encoding.) Thanks, Mojca ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] strange behaviour of \definedfont['Some Name'] in XeTeX
Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hello, I'm probaby misusing the feature (most robably because I just didn't take time to study how to do it properly), but it behaves really strange. In XeTeX I first did \font\f='Some Name' \f which worked OK. But when I tried the same with \definedfont['Some Name'] it resulted in strange behaviour. For some fonts, metapost has been invoked and complained, but the resulting document had the proper font plus scaled 1000 written on the first page where the font has been selected. For other fonts it failed completely. What's actually the most clean way of including an uc-encoded font at a specific font size, but without the need of bold or any other typefaces (just for a title for example)? (Which basically means: I only want the same behaviour as the plain TeX expression above + uc encoding.) hm, that's Adam Lindsay's teritory; does bla work? (double quotes) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
