subject:"Re\: \[NTG\-context\] Are nested sections possible\?"

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-05-19 Thread docent.einstein

Zdravim Lukasi,

Nejsem si jisty, zda se nemylim, ale pokud jsi z Brna, pak bych Te rad 
pozdravil.

Radek Pysny

__

Od: Procházka Lukáš Ing. <l...@pontex.cz>
Komu: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Datum: 14.03.2016 09:05
Předmět: Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Hello,

one more thing:

It would be nice to allow mixing:

- \section like commands (or \startsection ... \stopsection)
- AND \startsectionlevel ... \stopsectionlevel.

The main problem is that one may NEED to mix:

- (ancient) source files which use \section (deprecated) style
- with more versatile \start-\stopsectionlevel style in newer source files.

See the test attached - only the case 3 works universally with the 
\start-\stopstructurelevel;
any mixing of sectioning styles doesn't yield a desired result.

Best regards,

Lukas

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 01:53:18 +0100, Alan BRASLAU <alan.bras...@cea.fr> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100
> Pablo Rodriguez <oi...@gmx.es> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether
>> possible or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?
>>
>> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
>> must be my fault.)
>
> Think about including source in another source, for example.
>
> Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book,
> or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to
> add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the
> \start...\stop structure definitions.
>
> In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
> antiquated, isn't it?
>
> Alan
> 
___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context 
<http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> / 
http://tex.aanhet.net <http://tex.aanhet.net>
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ 
<http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/>
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net <http://contextgarden.net>
> 
___

--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o.      | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz 
<http://www.pontex.cz>
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4

Tel: +420 241 096 751
Fax: +420 244 461 038

--

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context 
<http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> / 
http://tex.aanhet.net <http://tex.aanhet.net>
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ 
<http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/>
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net <http://contextgarden.net>
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen


On 3/15/2016 8:09 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:10:27 +0100
"Thomas A. Schmitz"  wrote:


But don't let anyone
tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml
source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace
five levels of \startsectionlevels because you want to change the
structure of your document, you will rue the day you abandoned proper
names.


When you want to change the structure of your document when using
structure levels, all that you need do is add or subtract a level of
nesting. With named levels, it is easy to create complicated documents
that jump around in level, which would be pretty messy.


on the other hand, when you look at a piece of coded document you no 
longer know if you're in an important chapter or unimportant 
subsubsubsubsubsubsection


so, in the end it all boils down to circumstances and usage which is why 
we have several methods



What a nightmare it would be to add or subtract a named structure level
in a complicated document.

This being said, I still mostly use named structure levels myself, as
old habits are hard to change (but don't tell Hans this!).


ha, well, if i remember right this nested anonymous sectioning was added 
on your request .. so it is now one of those orphaned features


anyway, i tend to replace

\chapter{foo}

by

\startchapter[title=foo]

\stopchapter

but at a much lower level keep using \subsubsection and alike

(also because then with chapters one can more conveniently set other 
properties)


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen


On 3/15/2016 6:10 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

On 03/15/2016 05:54 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

Indeed, Hans, it would be nice to be able to nest sectionlevels within
a chapter...section... scheme (which is NOT depreciated, although
antiquated).


Oooh, shiny! In the TEI community, there are also people who repeat that
having s all the way down is modern, and  etc. is old
hat. Well, I like to think about the way I structure my texts before I
write them. I'm old fashioned that way...

But seriously: by all means, let's allow nesting. But don't let anyone
tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml
source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace
five levels of \startsectionlevels because you want to change the
structure of your document, you will rue the day you abandoned proper
names.


they are not antiquated at all

the main benefit from using \startchapter ... \stopchapter instead of 
\chapter is that we then know where something end which is handy when 
you want to finish things before starting something new (esp when 
grouping is involved it can get messy otherwise) ... it's also easier on 
the export


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-15 Thread Alan BRASLAU

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:10:27 +0100
"Thomas A. Schmitz"  wrote:

> But don't let anyone 
> tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml 
> source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace 
> five levels of \startsectionlevels because you want to change the 
> structure of your document, you will rue the day you abandoned proper
> names.

When you want to change the structure of your document when using
structure levels, all that you need do is add or subtract a level of
nesting. With named levels, it is easy to create complicated documents
that jump around in level, which would be pretty messy.

What a nightmare it would be to add or subtract a named structure level
in a complicated document.

This being said, I still mostly use named structure levels myself, as
old habits are hard to change (but don't tell Hans this!).

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-15 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz


On 03/15/2016 05:54 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

Indeed, Hans, it would be nice to be able to nest sectionlevels within
a chapter...section... scheme (which is NOT depreciated, although
antiquated).


Oooh, shiny! In the TEI community, there are also people who repeat that 
having s all the way down is modern, and  etc. is old 
hat. Well, I like to think about the way I structure my texts before I 
write them. I'm old fashioned that way...


But seriously: by all means, let's allow nesting. But don't let anyone 
tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml 
source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace 
five levels of \startsectionlevels because you want to change the 
structure of your document, you will rue the day you abandoned proper names.


Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-15 Thread Alan BRASLAU

Indeed, Hans, it would be nice to be able to nest sectionlevels within
a chapter...section... scheme (which is NOT depreciated, although
antiquated).

Currently, \startsectionlevel will by default start a chapter. One
would like it to start a section if located within a chapter, a
subsection, if located within a section, etc. This should be possible.

Alan


On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:05:49 +0100
Procházka Lukáš Ing.  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> one more thing:
> 
> It would be nice to allow mixing:
> 
> - \section like commands (or \startsection ... \stopsection)
> - AND \startsectionlevel ... \stopsectionlevel.
> 
> The main problem is that one may NEED to mix:
> 
> - (ancient) source files which use \section (deprecated) style
> - with more versatile \start-\stopsectionlevel style in newer source
> files.
> 
> See the test attached - only the case 3 works universally with the
> \start-\stopstructurelevel; any mixing of sectioning styles doesn't
> yield a desired result.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lukas
> 
> 
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 01:53:18 +0100, Alan BRASLAU
>  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100
> > Pablo Rodriguez  wrote:
> >  
> >> Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether
> >> possible or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?
> >>
> >> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry,
> >> it must be my fault.)  
> >
> > Think about including source in another source, for example.
> >
> > Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a
> > book, or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might
> > decide to add an additional level of structure and not want to
> > change all of the \start...\stop structure definitions.
> >
> > In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
> > antiquated, isn't it?
> >
> > Alan
> > ___
> > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
> > entry to the Wiki!
> >
> > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage  :
> > http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive  :
> > http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki :
> > http://contextgarden.net
> > ___
> >   
> 
> 



-- 
Alan Braslau
CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC
CNRS UMR 3680
Orme des Merisiers
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE
tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15
fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86
mailto:alan.bras...@cea.fr
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-14 Thread Pablo Rodriguez

On 03/12/2016 01:53 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
>> must be my fault.)
> 
> Think about including source in another source, for example.
> 
> Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book,
> or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to
> add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the
> \start...\stop structure definitions.
> 
> In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
> antiquated, isn't it?

Many thanks for your reply, Alan.

The usual suspect was found guilty: it was my fault not realizing that
fixed sectioning commands are outdated.

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-14 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing .


Hello,

one more thing:

It would be nice to allow mixing:

- \section like commands (or \startsection ... \stopsection)
- AND \startsectionlevel ... \stopsectionlevel.

The main problem is that one may NEED to mix:

- (ancient) source files which use \section (deprecated) style
- with more versatile \start-\stopsectionlevel style in newer source files.

See the test attached - only the case 3 works universally with the 
\start-\stopstructurelevel;
any mixing of sectioning styles doesn't yield a desired result.

Best regards,

Lukas


On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 01:53:18 +0100, Alan BRASLAU  wrote:


On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez  wrote:


Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether
possible or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?

I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
must be my fault.)


Think about including source in another source, for example.

Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book,
or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to
add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the
\start...\stop structure definitions.

In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
antiquated, isn't it?

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___



--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o.  | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4

Tel: +420 241 096 751
Fax: +420 244 461 038

Str.mkiv
Description: Binary data


Str.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Alan BRASLAU

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez  wrote:

> Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether
> possible or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?
> 
> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
> must be my fault.)

Think about including source in another source, for example.

Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book,
or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to
add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the
\start...\stop structure definitions.

In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
antiquated, isn't it?

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Mica Semrick

Yes that looks like what I want. Thank you!

On March 11, 2016 1:43:27 AM PST, Hans Hagen  wrote:
>On 3/11/2016 9:08 AM, m...@silentumbrella.com wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Is it possible to have
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> \startchapter
>> Hey a chapter!
>> \startsection
>> something.one
>> \startsection
>> someting.one.one
>> \startsection
>> something.one.one.one
>> \stopsection
>> \stopsection
>> \stopsection
>>
>>
>> \stopchapter
>>
>> \stoptext
>>
>> render as:
>>
>> 1. Hey a chapter!
>> 1.1 something.one
>> 1.1.1 something.one.one
>> 1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one
>
>do you mean something like
>
>sections/levels-001.tex
>sections/levels-002.tex
>
>in the test suite?
>
>\starttext
>
>\startstructurelevel [title=first top level]
>
> \startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
> test
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
>
> \startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
> test
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
>
>\stopstructurelevel
>
>\stoptext
>
>and
>\starttext
>
>\startstructurelevel [title=first top level]
>
> \startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
> test
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
>
> \startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
> \startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
> test
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
> \stopstructurelevel
>
>\stopstructurelevel
>
>\stoptext
>
>
>-
>   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
>-
>___
>If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
>to the Wiki!
>
>maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
>http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Hans Hagen


On 3/11/2016 9:08 AM, m...@silentumbrella.com wrote:

Greetings,

Is it possible to have

\starttext

\startchapter
Hey a chapter!
\startsection
something.one
\startsection
someting.one.one
\startsection
something.one.one.one
\stopsection
\stopsection
\stopsection


\stopchapter

\stoptext

render as:

1. Hey a chapter!
1.1 something.one
1.1.1 something.one.one
1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one


do you mean something like

sections/levels-001.tex
sections/levels-002.tex

in the test suite?

\starttext

\startstructurelevel [title=first top level]

\startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
test
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel

\startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
test
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel

\stopstructurelevel

\stoptext

and
\starttext

\startstructurelevel [title=first top level]

\startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
test
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel

\startstructurelevel [title=first lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=second lower level]
\startstructurelevel [title=third lower level]
test
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel
\stopstructurelevel

\stopstructurelevel

\stoptext


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Andreas Schneider


You probably want automatic levels.
Take a look at strc-lev.mkvi.

\startsectionlevel[title=outer]
\startsectionlevel[title=inner]
\startsectionlevel[title=yet another]

\stopsectionlevel
\stopsectionlevel
\stopsectionlevel

If you need more levels than the default (which ranges from chapter to 
subsubsubsubsection), you may need to define your own using 
\definesectionlevels.


Best regards
Andreas


Am 2016-03-11 09:08, schrieb m...@silentumbrella.com:

Greetings,

Is it possible to have

\starttext

\startchapter
Hey a chapter!
\startsection
something.one
\startsection
someting.one.one
\startsection
something.one.one.one
\stopsection
\stopsection
\stopsection


\stopchapter

\stoptext

render as:

1. Hey a chapter!
1.1 something.one
1.1.1 something.one.one
1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one

Thanks,
Mica

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Mica Semrick

Hi Pablo,

Sorry for the brevity of my original message, it is quite late.

I'm working on styling an XML dialect, where nesting can go, and often does 
quite deep, and several different section level elements can be allowed to nest 
within each other. If nested sections were possible, I wouldn't have to write 
code to try and figure out how deep a nested is; ConTeXt would know and would 
number the sections accordingly.

-m 

On March 11, 2016 12:36:01 AM PST, Pablo Rodriguez  wrote:
>On 03/11/2016 09:08 AM, m...@silentumbrella.com wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Is it possible to have
>> [...] 
>> render as:
>> 
>> 1. Hey a chapter!
>> 1.1 something.one
>> 1.1.1 something.one.one
>> 1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one
>
>Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether
>possible
>or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?
>
>I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
>must be my fault.)
>
>Let me know what I am missing. Best wishes,
>
>Pablo
>-- 
>http://www.ousia.tk
>___
>If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
>to the Wiki!
>
>maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
>http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
>archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
>wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread Pablo Rodriguez

On 03/11/2016 09:08 AM, m...@silentumbrella.com wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Is it possible to have
> [...] 
> render as:
> 
> 1. Hey a chapter!
> 1.1 something.one
> 1.1.1 something.one.one
> 1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one

Sorry, Mica, but which is the gain in nesting sections (whether possible
or not) over using subsections and subsubsections?

I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
must be my fault.)

Let me know what I am missing. Best wishes,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-11 Thread josephcanedo

Hello,


Normally for this purpose you’d use subsection, subsubsection etc … I guess.



Best regards


Joseph





From: m...@silentumbrella.com
Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎March‎ ‎11‎, ‎2016 ‎9‎:‎08‎ ‎AM
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl





Greetings,

Is it possible to have

\starttext

\startchapter
Hey a chapter!
\startsection
something.one
\startsection
someting.one.one
\startsection
something.one.one.one
\stopsection
\stopsection
\stopsection


\stopchapter

\stoptext

render as:

1. Hey a chapter!
1.1 something.one
1.1.1 something.one.one
1.1.1.1 something.one.one.one

Thanks,
Mica

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
__
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

15 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information