Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-26 Thread Yue Wang
Hi:

 lua garbage collection on xp is somehow quite slow, when i switched to
 vista, the luatex test files (mk) that took forever on xp, ran smoothly
 on vista
OK. Today I got a copy of windows vista, so I installed it on the same
machine, and test the same tex file.

\usetypescript[myfont]
\setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,12pt]
\starttext
汉语 {\bf 汉语} {\tt 汉语}
\stoptext



mkiv lua stats : used config path  - C:/context/tex/texmf/web2c/texmf.cn
f
mkiv lua stats : used cache path   - C:/context/tex/texmf-cache
mkiv lua stats : modules/dumps/instances   - 90/24/1
mkiv lua stats : input load time   - 0.062 seconds
mkiv lua stats : fonts load time   - 5.632 seconds
mkiv lua stats : xml load time - 0.000 seconds, lpath calls: 0, cach
ed calls: 0
mkiv lua stats : lxml load time- 0.000 seconds preparation, backrefe
rences: 0
mkiv lua stats : mps conversion time   - 0.000 seconds
mkiv lua stats : node processing time  - 0.000 seconds including kernel
mkiv lua stats : kernel processing time- 0.000 seconds
mkiv lua stats : attribute processing time - 0.000 seconds
mkiv lua stats : language load time- 0.031 seconds, n=2
mkiv lua stats : graphics processing time  - 0.000 seconds including tex, n=0
mkiv lua stats : metapost processing time  - 0.000 seconds, loading: 0.000 secon
ds, execution: 0.000 seconds, n: 0
mkiv lua stats : current memory usage  - 499448604 bytes
mkiv lua stats : cleaned up reserved nodes - 19 nodes, 8 lists of 100
mkiv lua stats : node memory usage - 20 glue_spec, 2 dir
mkiv lua stats : loaded patterns   - us:us:pat:exc:2
mkiv lua stats : loaded fonts  - AdobeHeitiStd-Regular*features=zh,f
allbacks=serifbolditalicwhatever:otf AdobeHeitiStd-Regular*features=zh,fallbacks
=serifboldwhatever:otf AdobeKaitiStd-Regular*features=zh,fallbacks=monowhatever:
otf AdobeKaitiStd-Regular*features=zh,fallbacks=serifitalicwhatever:otf AdobeSon
gStd-Light*features=zh,fallbacks=serifwhatever:otf file:lmroman10-bolditalic*fea
tures=default,:otf file:lmroman10-italic*features=default,:otf file:lmroman12-bo
ld*features=default,:otf file:lmroman12-italic*features=default,:otf file:lmroma
n12-regular*features=default,:otf file:lmroman7-bold*features=default,:otf file:
lmroman7-regular*features=default,:otf file:lmroman9-bold*features=default,:otf
file:lmroman9-italic*features=default,:otf file:lmroman9-regular*features=defaul
t,:otf file:lmromancaps10-regular*features=default,:otf file:lmromanslant10-bold
*features=default,:otf file:lmromanslant10-regular*features=default,:otf file:lm
romanslant12-regular*features=default,:otf file:lmromanslant9-regular*features=d
efault,:otf lmex10:tfm lmmi12:tfm lmmi7:tfm lmmi9:tfm lmmono10-regular:otf lmrom
an10-bold:otf lmroman10-bolditalic:otf lmroman10-italic:otf lmroman10-regular:ot
f lmsy10:tfm lmsy7:tfm lmsy9:tfm msam10:tfm msam7:tfm msbm10:tfm msbm7:tfm rm-lm
r12:tfm rm-lmr7:tfm rm-lmr9:tfm
mkiv lua stats : runtime   - 59.904 seconds, 1 processed pages,
1 shipped pages, 0.017 pages/second

MtxRun | total runtime: 67.548

well, a bit faster than XP.

Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-26 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:

 MtxRun | total runtime: 67.548

first run? or when the windows cache is nicely filled?

how much memory? (vista needs some 2 gig at least)

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-14 Thread Yue Wang
I usually compose short documents (paper, homework, report etc.) which
usually runs 8-10 pages.
There will be considerable difference between traditional TeX (CJK for
LaTeX, or pdftex MKII using subfonts) and MKIV.
That means, every MKIV Chinese document I compile will spend 10
seconds loading the fonts and extra 5 seconds for compiling the
actual document.

For longer documents (more than 100 pages), I seldom compile them all.
ConTeXt user usually split the book into components. I compiled each
component (usually 10 pages) until I am satisfy in all components,
then I will compile the whole book. So, efficient on small document is
very important.


On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yue Wang wrote:

 (Of course, 15.854s runtime is still a bit too long, but that's tolerable)

 you should not take a one page document as benchmark, since then there's
 always the dominant overhead of loading fonts and writing resources to
 the pdf file


 -
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
 -
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-13 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:

 (Of course, 15.854s runtime is still a bit too long, but that's tolerable)

you should not take a one page document as benchmark, since then there's
always the dominant overhead of loading fonts and writing resources to
the pdf file


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 12.09.2008 um 16:30 schrieb Yue Wang:

 Hi:

 The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
 cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
 1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
 and running on the machine. I close all pre-installed software (like
 MSN, IE, etc.) and leave all extra memory for LuaTeX.

 Only 3 big chinese font, AdobeSongStd-Light, AdobeHeitiStd-Regular,
 AdobeKaitiStd-Regular are loaded. However, different approaches have
 different runtime, here, two cases are tested (zhfonts is attached in
 the mail):

All times for a normal ConTeXt run (2 runs) without intermediate from
a former run on a MacBook (2GB mem, 2.4 GHz).

 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
  你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 194.156

MtxRun | total runtime: 17.996

 \definefontfeature[zh][mode=node, script=hang, lang=zhs]
 \definefontsynonym[song][AdobeSongStd-Light][features=zh]
 \definefont[song][song at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[hei][AdobeHeitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[hei][hei at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[kai][AdobeKaitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[kai][kai at 12pt]
 \starttext
 {\song  你好}{\hei  你好}{\kai  你好}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 13.797

MtxRun | total runtime: 8.930

 This also applies to file which only one big font, AdobeSongStd-Light,
 is used, two cases are tested:

 \definefontfeature[zh][mode=node, script=hang, lang=zhs]
 \definefontsynonym[song][AdobeSongStd-Light][features=zh]
 \definefont[song][song at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[hei][AdobeHeitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[hei][hei at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[kai][AdobeKaitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[kai][kai at 12pt]
 \starttext
 {\song  你好}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 5.609

MtxRun | total runtime: 4.820

 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
  你好
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 135.125

MtxRun | total runtime: 16.326

 If no Chinese fonts are used, three cases are tested:
 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
 Hello
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 89.938

MtxRun | total runtime: 14.940

 \starttext
 Hello
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 2.594

MtxRun | total runtime: 2.902

 \definefontfeature[zh][mode=node, script=hang, lang=zhs]
 \definefontsynonym[song][AdobeSongStd-Light][features=zh]
 \definefont[song][song at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[hei][AdobeHeitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[hei][hei at 12pt]
 \definefontsynonym[kai][AdobeKaitiStd-Regular][features=zh]
 \definefont[kai][kai at 12pt]
 \starttext
 Hello
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 2.734

MtxRun | total runtime: 2.892

 In a typical chinese science book, usually 4 to 10 chinese
 truetype/opentype font are used. Magazines might use twenty or more.
 So if we want to use the standard way (use chinese font as body font,
 use virtual fonts mechanism to mix the font with latin fonts, use
 different alternatives for single chinese font)
 as the zhfonts.tex is presented, the running time here is usually
 intolerable (more than 3 minutes' loading time with very simple text
 for three fonts).

Enable \preloadtypescript in cont-sys.tex.

 A simple XeLaTeX file with three font embeding using XeCJK or
 zhspacing for interchartoken font switching  usually runs less than 8
 seconds. In this case, all the family (rm, ss, tt) parts (like bf, it,
 etc) in NFSS are defined.

 So, I think there should be a way to improve the font loading
 procedure. Maybe we had made deep copy to every fontsynonym defined
 here which made the loading time terribly long? Are there some way to
 mirror all the unchanged part of a new loading font B from a loaded
 time A and only leave the modified table when A and B points to same
 physical font? Thanks.

 Yue Wang

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:
 Hi:
 
 The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
 cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
 1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
 and running on the machine. I close all pre-installed software (like
 MSN, IE, etc.) and leave all extra memory for LuaTeX.
 
 Only 3 big chinese font, AdobeSongStd-Light, AdobeHeitiStd-Regular,
 AdobeKaitiStd-Regular are loaded. However, different approaches have
 different runtime, here, two cases are tested (zhfonts is attached in
 the mail):
 
 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
\dorecurse{100}{
   你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
\par}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 194.156

19.625 seconds, 100 processed pages, 100 shipped pages, 5.096 pages/second


btw, the AdobeKai is not on my system (so i took AdobeMyungjoStd-Medium)

-
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:

 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
   你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 194.156

 If no Chinese fonts are used, three cases are tested:
 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
  Hello
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 89.938

the reason for this is that including the files in the pdf files takes 
long; we suspect that there might be a memory issue there (not freed) so 
that on your system you end up with swapping (it is on the agenda to 
look into this)

 In a typical chinese science book, usually 4 to 10 chinese
 truetype/opentype font are used. Magazines might use twenty or more.
 So if we want to use the standard way (use chinese font as body font,
 use virtual fonts mechanism to mix the font with latin fonts, use
 different alternatives for single chinese font)

it's not virtual fonts at all, these fonts are used in parallel and 
fallbacks are applied by node list parsing; this also means that the 
fallback fonts have feature support (independent of the main font)

 as the zhfonts.tex is presented, the running time here is usually
 intolerable (more than 3 minutes' loading time with very simple text
 for three fonts).
 
 A simple XeLaTeX file with three font embeding using XeCJK or
 zhspacing for interchartoken font switching  usually runs less than 8
 seconds. In this case, all the family (rm, ss, tt) parts (like bf, it,
 etc) in NFSS are defined.
 
 So, I think there should be a way to improve the font loading
 procedure. Maybe we had made deep copy to every fontsynonym defined
 here which made the loading time terribly long? Are there some way to
 mirror all the unchanged part of a new loading font B from a loaded
 time A and only leave the modified table when A and B points to same
 physical font? Thanks.

at the lua end there is already a lot of sharing going on but eventually 
the font has to be fed into tex itself where there is no such sharing

anyhow, performance might improve over time

Hans


-
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Yue Wang
Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.

Is there a profile program in ConTeXt available? (I know there is a
Memory Performance chart module available).

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yue Wang wrote:
 Hi:

 The following cases all use second run of context. So there is no font
 cache time. I use a new installed Windows XP SP3 on a Core 2 Duo
 1.68GHz with 1GB mem machine. Only TeXWorks and ConTeXt are installed
 and running on the machine. I close all pre-installed software (like
 MSN, IE, etc.) and leave all extra memory for LuaTeX.

 Only 3 big chinese font, AdobeSongStd-Light, AdobeHeitiStd-Regular,
 AdobeKaitiStd-Regular are loaded. However, different approaches have
 different runtime, here, two cases are tested (zhfonts is attached in
 the mail):

 \usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
 \usetypescript[myfont]
 \setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
 \starttext
 \dorecurse{100}{
   你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
 \par}
 \stoptext
 MtxRun | total runtime: 194.156

 19.625 seconds, 100 processed pages, 100 shipped pages, 5.096 pages/second


 btw, the AdobeKai is not on my system (so i took AdobeMyungjoStd-Medium)

 -
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
 -
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:
 Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
 Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
 I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
 I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.
 
 Is there a profile program in ConTeXt available? (I know there is a
 Memory Performance chart module available).

lua garbage collection on xp is somehow quite slow, when i switched to
vista, the luatex test files (mk) that took forever on xp, ran smoothly
on vista

Hans


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Yue Wang wrote:
 Oh, My God. What's wrong on my system? Umm...
 Can you give me a hint to find what's wrong here?
 I use the minimals GUI installer, and after installation,
 I copy the fonts to texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype.

when you set fonts.trace=true you will see that many fonts are defined

at some point we might make this an option: no \tfa..d etc at all since
in styles one might prefer to use hard coded fonts for titles or just
switch the bodyfont (is relatively fast with typefaces); the reason for
these extra sizes are convenience and speed (at least that was the case
10 years ago)

for the moment, a way out of your problem is (please wikify this)

  \synchronizemathfontsfalse

or less intrusive

  \let\synchronizetext\relax

you should keep in mind that the context font mechanisms evolved over
time and that they support rather complex mixted usage of fonts (i.e.
mixing complete sets of different typefaces and such); this comes at a
price (normally goes unnoticed)

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Mohamed Bana
I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX.  Has
anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Mohamed Bana wrote:

 I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX.  Has
 anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?

(1) luajit is non portable (not on all architectures) so for the moment 
it's no option

(2) luatex will always be slower, because we do many things in lua ... 
it's the price of flexibility and opening up

(3) although we do our best to speed up luatex and mkiv as much as 
possible it's not our intention to compete in speed with pdftex (only 
type 1, frozen funtionality, etc) and xetex (depencency of libraries, 
closed engine, etc)

(4) at some point (and there are already a few areas where this si true) 
  luatex/mkiv will be faster than a traditional tex engine where all 
happens in macros (or is hadcodes)

(5) machines become faster and mem cheaper

(6) you're free to use the engine you like most

[our benchmark docs are not that much slower than for instance pdftex 
esp when one consideres the extra functionality available]

Hans

-
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz

On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:

 (4) at some point (and there are already a few areas where this si  
 true)
  luatex/mkiv will be faster than a traditional tex engine where all
 happens in macros (or is hadcodes)

Just a very short remark: I'm testing my presentation stuff  
extensively these days, and there's a lot of metapost graphics  
involved. mkiv is amazingly fast, while both mkii and xetex take very  
long to compile my test files (and clutter the directory with all the  
intermediate files). Font loading tends to be long at first run and  
quite efficient thereafter.

Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Yue Wang
Hi:


 for the moment, a way out of your problem is (please wikify this)

  \synchronizemathfontsfalse

Woo... It is much faster! Thanks for your magic.

 你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好} use 24.750s,
 你好  use 11.766s,
 Hello World use 6.438s.

I will wikify this together with a short introduction for chinese
typesetting in MKIV.


 lua garbage collection on xp is somehow quite slow, when i switched to
 vista, the luatex test files (mk) that took forever on xp, ran smoothly
 on vista

@@ buying a copy of vista is not on my budget too expansive.
I will test this on GNU/Linux later.


Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Can we make font loading much faster?

2008-09-12 Thread Yue Wang
Hi:

 @@ buying a copy of vista is not on my budget too expansive.
 I will test this on GNU/Linux later.

The result on the same machine running 32bit GNU/Linux.

\usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
\usetypescript[myfont]
\setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
\starttext
 你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
\stoptext
MtxRun | total runtime: 15.854


 \synchronizemathfontsfalse
\usetypescriptfile[zhfonts]
\usetypescript[myfont]
\setupbodyfont[myfont,rm,11pt]
\starttext
 你好 {\it 你好} {\bf 你好}
\stoptext
MtxRun | total runtime: 7.066

You are right, Hans. This is a XP specific problem.
(Of course, 15.854s runtime is still a bit too long, but that's tolerable)


Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___