Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-10 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:11 PM Henning Hraban Ramm  wrote:

>
>  a Lua pairs table, the order can be arbitrary.
>

sure ,  the *default*  __pairs gives pseudo-arbitrary order, but you can
always use metatable:
--
-- test.lua
--
local _c,_t=0,{}
local t = {}
setmetatable(t, {
   __newindex = function(tbl, k, v)
  _c=_c+1
  _t[_c]=k
  rawset(tbl, k, v)
   end,

  __pairs = function(tbl)
  local i = 1
  return function(tbl,k)
k = _t[i]
i=i+1
return k,tbl[k]
  end, tbl,nil
end,
})


t['a']= 'aaa'
t['3a']= '3aa'
t['b']= 'baa'
t['2b']= '2ba'
t['c']= 'caa'
t['2c']= '2ca'
t['d']= 'daa'
t['2d']= '2da'
t['e']= 'eaa'
t['2e']= '2ea'


for k,v in pairs(t) do print(k,v) end



$ mtxrun --script test.lua
a aaa
3a 3aa
b baa
2b 2ba
c caa
2c 2ca
d daa
2d 2da
e eaa
2e 2ea

--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-10 Thread Hans Hagen

On 1/10/2019 12:11 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

Am 2019-01-10 um 10:50 schrieb luigi scarso :


sections = { “1”, “2”, “2a” }

words = { [“1”] = { “a”, “b” },
   [“2a”] = { “c”, “d” } }

so I can iterate through ipairs(sections) in sequence and pick up the word 
lists for each section. In the greater scheme of things, as Hraban pointed out: 
if there were an “ordered table” structure in Lua, this is precisely what it 
would do behind the scenes; it would just make it easier for the user.


the point is that I believe that is also doable in lua...
maybe could be helpful to have a significative example in python, ton see if we 
can mimic it in lua  ?


The "minimal example" in Python is a collections.OrderedDict. It’s not about 
ordering the entries (anew), but keeping the order, i.e. retrieving the entries in the 
same order as you added them. If you iterate over a Python dict or a Lua pairs table, the 
order can be arbitrary.


I'll add this:

local t = table.orderedhash()

t["1"]  = { "a", "b" }
t["2"]  = { }
t["2a"] = { "a", "c", "d" }

for k, v in table.ordered(t) do
print(k)
inspect(v)
end

which gives

1
table={
 "a",
 "b",
}
2
table={
}
3
table={
 "a",
 "c",
 "d",
}



-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-10 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2019-01-10 um 10:50 schrieb luigi scarso :

>> sections = { “1”, “2”, “2a” }
>> 
>> words = { [“1”] = { “a”, “b” },
>>   [“2a”] = { “c”, “d” } }
>> 
>> so I can iterate through ipairs(sections) in sequence and pick up the word 
>> lists for each section. In the greater scheme of things, as Hraban pointed 
>> out: if there were an “ordered table” structure in Lua, this is precisely 
>> what it would do behind the scenes; it would just make it easier for the 
>> user.
>> 
> the point is that I believe that is also doable in lua...
> maybe could be helpful to have a significative example in python, ton see if 
> we can mimic it in lua  ?

The "minimal example" in Python is a collections.OrderedDict. It’s not about 
ordering the entries (anew), but keeping the order, i.e. retrieving the entries 
in the same order as you added them. If you iterate over a Python dict or a Lua 
pairs table, the order can be arbitrary.

Greetlings, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-10 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:27 AM Schmitz Thomas A. <
thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote:

>
>
> > On 10. Jan 2019, at 01:08, Hans Hagen  wrote:
> >
> > it all depends on use ... if you can be more specific ...
>
> Hans, Luigi,
>
> thanks for your hints on list sorting - they are appreciated, but I’ve
> been there many many times: it’s impossible to be more specific because
> numbering can be unexpectedly weird. Combinations of Greek and Roman
> letters, sometimes (for historic reasons) even lines that are out of
> numeric sequence. I’ve tried to catch these exceptions in sort functions,
> only to have to add even more ifs and buts when I was processing the next
> author. And I’m pretty sure that the solution is not in sorting a table
> index: the correct sequence is already in the source, it just has to be
> preserved. What I do now, in a nutshell: I have tables such as
>
> sections = { “1”, “2”, “2a” }
>
> words = { [“1”] = { “a”, “b” },
>   [“2a”] = { “c”, “d” } }
>
> so I can iterate through ipairs(sections) in sequence and pick up the word
> lists for each section. In the greater scheme of things, as Hraban pointed
> out: if there were an “ordered table” structure in Lua, this is precisely
> what it would do behind the scenes; it would just make it easier for the
> user.
>

the point is that I believe that is also doable in lua...
maybe could be helpful to have a significative example in python, ton see
if we can mimic it in lua  ?

-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-10 Thread Schmitz Thomas A.


> On 10. Jan 2019, at 01:08, Hans Hagen  wrote:
> 
> it all depends on use ... if you can be more specific ...

Hans, Luigi,

thanks for your hints on list sorting - they are appreciated, but I’ve been 
there many many times: it’s impossible to be more specific because numbering 
can be unexpectedly weird. Combinations of Greek and Roman letters, sometimes 
(for historic reasons) even lines that are out of numeric sequence. I’ve tried 
to catch these exceptions in sort functions, only to have to add even more ifs 
and buts when I was processing the next author. And I’m pretty sure that the 
solution is not in sorting a table index: the correct sequence is already in 
the source, it just has to be preserved. What I do now, in a nutshell: I have 
tables such as

sections = { “1”, “2”, “2a” }

words = { [“1”] = { “a”, “b” },
  [“2a”] = { “c”, “d” } }

so I can iterate through ipairs(sections) in sequence and pick up the word 
lists for each section. In the greater scheme of things, as Hraban pointed out: 
if there were an “ordered table” structure in Lua, this is precisely what it 
would do behind the scenes; it would just make it easier for the user.

Best

Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-09 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2019-01-09 um 20:57 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz :

> I've finished testing my lua script, and it does exactly what I need. I think 
> I'll write a small article about it for one of the next context group 
> proceedings,

Hi Thomas, since I’m just starting to work on the current CG journal (sorry, 
life happens...), I might fit your article in.
And a German version would be welcome for DANTE’s DTK.

> 3. Lua's handling of tables is very efficient and fast. For analyzing my 
> Greek texts, I have to use huge tables for morphological parsing, with more 
> than 900,000 entries. Looking up words in these tables is around 3x faster in 
> Lua than in python!

Nice to know. Maybe I should try to convert some of my Python code (esp. the 
ConTeXt related scripts)...

> One final thought: one limitation that I still find cumbersome to work around 
> is the fact that associative arrays ("pairs" in Lua speak) do not have an 
> order. When I analyze my texts, I want book numbers, chapters, paragraphs 
> preserved in the order in which they are read (entered into the table). In 
> many cases, it is not possible (or extremely awkward) to sort these numbers, 
> since chapters may be numbered something like 2, 2a, 3, 3α, 3β etc. python 
> has the OrderedDict() in its collections module. In Lua, the best I could 
> find was entering the chapter numbers into an array (ipair) and then retrieve 
> it from there. Maybe there is a better way?

Since Python’s usual dict is also unordered, I guess OrderedDict also just uses 
an index array under the hood.
Python makes it easy to create new classes (also data types) that behave like 
something known. Don’t know how that would look in Lua...

Python’s batteries are much bigger than Lua(TeX)’s. Of course Lua should be 
kept small, but there are always things missing.
My Lua library for invoices with ConTeXt e.g. uses an object model from an 
obscure Lua library. Probably it would make more sense to use Lua’s tables in a 
native way than to insist on objects. I also missed a good GUI library (with 
widgets); I chose tekui and added some GUI-from-configuration stuff, but got 
stuck, since I’m comfortable with my CLI scripts anyway...


Greetlings, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-09 Thread Hans Hagen

On 1/9/2019 9:38 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:

On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:57:21 +0100
"Thomas A. Schmitz"  wrote:


3. Lua's handling of tables is very efficient and fast. For analyzing my
Greek texts, I have to use huge tables for morphological parsing, with
more than 900,000 entries. Looking up words in these tables is around 3x
faster in Lua than in python!


I have found, in my limited use (and understanding) of lua for data analysis is 
that it is indeed VERY fast, and not only beats python without comparison, it 
also handles quite large data sets without choking.


and with a bit op optimization one can often squeeze out more


It has become fashionable to use hardware GPUs to speed-up parallel calculation 
tasks, and this is now often done using libraries having python bindings. I 
wonder if python becomes the limiting factor in those applications?

Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-09 Thread Hans Hagen

On 1/9/2019 8:57 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I've finished testing my lua script, and it does exactly what I need. I 
think I'll write a small article about it for one of the next context 
group proceedings, but wanted to just give a very brief summary that 
might be of interest to some:


Pure Lua is wonderful, but as the language is deliberately kept very 
small, one sometimes has to find rather cumbersome workarounds. If you 
run Lua under ConTeXt (with mtxrun --script), you get a version with 
batteries included, which is perfect for manipulating and analyzing 
text. Some areas that I found particularly impressive:


1. I've tried several times to make use of lpegs. Hans' code is full of 
it, and I know that it's fast and extremely versatile, but I found it 
difficult to wrap my head around its functioning and write useful code 
with lpegs. The ConTeXt wrapper makes this extremely easy; this is lpeg 
for the rest of us. It's really a delight to build patterns and see them 
work immediately!


2. The utf library and string manipulation with characters.(...) is 
absolutely necessary if you want to handle non-ASCII text because pure 
Lua gives very unexpected results in this area. These operations work 
wonderfully with the context libraries.


3. Lua's handling of tables is very efficient and fast. For analyzing my 
Greek texts, I have to use huge tables for morphological parsing, with 
more than 900,000 entries. Looking up words in these tables is around 3x 
faster in Lua than in python! >
One final thought: one limitation that I still find cumbersome to work 
around is the fact that associative arrays ("pairs" in Lua speak) do not 
have an order. When I analyze my texts, I want book numbers, chapters, 
paragraphs preserved in the order in which they are read (entered into 
the table). In many cases, it is not possible (or extremely awkward) to 
sort these numbers, since chapters may be numbered something like 2, 2a, 
3, 3α, 3β etc. python has the OrderedDict() in its collections module. 
In Lua, the best I could find was entering the chapter numbers into an 
array (ipair) and then retrieve it from there. Maybe there is a better way?


for k, v in table.sortedhash(t) do
  
end

or if it's sequential, you can add to an indexed

(of use the index sorted for complex cases)

it all depends on use ... if you can be more specific ...

All of this just to say how grateful I am for the way Hans, Taco, 
Wolfgang, Luigi, and the other developers have enhanced Lua. Thanks 
guys, you make my work much more pleasant and efficient!

Thanks

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
   tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-09 Thread Alan Braslau
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:57:21 +0100
"Thomas A. Schmitz"  wrote:

> 3. Lua's handling of tables is very efficient and fast. For analyzing my 
> Greek texts, I have to use huge tables for morphological parsing, with 
> more than 900,000 entries. Looking up words in these tables is around 3x 
> faster in Lua than in python!

I have found, in my limited use (and understanding) of lua for data analysis is 
that it is indeed VERY fast, and not only beats python without comparison, it 
also handles quite large data sets without choking.

It has become fashionable to use hardware GPUs to speed-up parallel calculation 
tasks, and this is now often done using libraries having python bindings. I 
wonder if python becomes the limiting factor in those applications?

Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

2019-01-09 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Thomas A. Schmitz 
wrote:

>
> One final thought: one limitation that I still find cumbersome to work
> around is the fact that associative arrays ("pairs" in Lua speak) do not
> have an order. When I analyze my texts, I want book numbers, chapters,
> paragraphs preserved in the order in which they are read (entered into
> the table). In many cases, it is not possible (or extremely awkward) to
> sort these numbers, since chapters may be numbered something like 2, 2a,
> 3, 3α, 3β etc. python has the OrderedDict() in its collections module.
> In Lua, the best I could find was entering the chapter numbers into an
> array (ipair) and then retrieve it from there. Maybe there is a better way?
>
>
table.sort (list [, comp])
Sorts list elements in a given order, in-place, from list[1] to
list[#list]. If comp is given, then it must be a function that receives two
list elements and returns true when the first element must come before the
second in the final order (so that, after the sort, i < j implies not
comp(list[j],list[i])). If comp is not given, then the standard Lua
operator < is used instead

-- 
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___