Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
Le 13 janvier à 23:47:12 Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
| > :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
| > this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
| >
| > \catcode`\_ = 11
>
| or ...
>
| \nonknuthmode
>
| (there's also \donkunthmode -)
>
[...]
As far as I can see, \nonknuthmode_ or \nonknuthmode{_} produces a wider "_"
than
\textunderscore{} does.
--
Jean
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Hans Hagen wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: > >> :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow >> this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say >> >> \catcode`\_ = 11 > > or ... > > \nonknuthmode > > (there's also \donkunthmode -) Hey, somehow never noticed this one before. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
Aditya Mahajan wrote: > :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow > this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say > > \catcode`\_ = 11 or ... \nonknuthmode (there's also \donkunthmode -) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Gour wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:39 -0500 (EST)
> Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
>
> See https://mail.gna.org/public/muse-el-discuss/2008-01/msg1.html
> thread.
This is just a mistake of the parser. Either _ should be translated to
"\textunderscore "(\textunderscore followed by a space) or more precisely
by \textunderscore{} or \_ .
> I do not remember having ever problem with underscore in LaTeX.
Read the documentation of underscore.sty and you will know the trouble of
using underscore in LaTeX (some of those are true for ConTeXt also).
>> Shouldn't such function names be written as \type{gtk_} when muse
>> converts the document to ConTeXt? In that case the _ will be
>> preserved.
>
> Right. They will fix default in muse and use \type{_} as value for
> underscore.
No, the default should either be \_ or \letterunderscore{} (with the
brackets). \type{_} will be influenced by \setuptype (or \setuptyping) and
can give colored output also.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:39 -0500 (EST)
Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
See https://mail.gna.org/public/muse-el-discuss/2008-01/msg1.html
thread.
> :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt
> follow this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
>
> \catcode`\_ = 11
>
> on the top of your file and then _ will be a letter in both text and
> math mode (which basically means that you will have to use \sb to get
> subscript in math mode.
Hmm, not ideal...
> It is possible to define something along the lines of underscore.sty
> in latex, so that _ is treated as a letter in text mode, and as a
> subscript indicator in math mode, but, read below.
I do not remember having ever problem with underscore in LaTeX.
> Shouldn't such function names be written as \type{gtk_} when muse
> converts the document to ConTeXt? In that case the _ will be
> preserved.
Right. They will fix default in muse and use \type{_} as value for
underscore.
Thank you for your input.
Sincerely,
Gour
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting underscore
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Gour wrote:
> Yesterday I played a bit with emacs' muse mode which has option to
> 'publish' to ConTeXt, but its output was wailing when texeexec-ing due
> to use of \textunderscore (option in muse).
Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
> Today I discussed the issue on muse mailing list, got help and the
> following remark: '...Context gurus don't seem to imagine you can use
> "_" elsewhere than in math mode btw'.
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
\catcode`\_ = 11
on the top of your file and then _ will be a letter in both text and math
mode (which basically means that you will have to use \sb to get subscript
in math mode.
It is possible to define something along the lines of underscore.sty in
latex, so that _ is treated as a letter in text mode, and as a subscript
indicator in math mode, but, read below.
> I looked at ConTeXt docs (excursion and manual), as well as wiki on
> contextgarden, but was not able to find more about what is the status
> of underscore '_' char in ConTeXt and is the above remark true?
>
> My usage of '_' in muse document was for preparing tables of some
> library functions and, as it is often the case in software, there is
> usually some prefix for all library functions as eg. gtk_x for GTK+
> toolkit.
Shouldn't such function names be written as \type{gtk_} when muse
converts the document to ConTeXt? In that case the _ will be preserved.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
