[Nuke-users] IBK and crunchy black edges

[Darren Coombes]

Hi All.

Got some footage where the plate has a well lit greenscreen, nice and even.

Trying to use ibk to get soft edge detail which normally works a treat, but 
it's getting black crunchy edges, which i think is something to do with the 
internal despill algorithm of the ibk.



The footage is 10bit dpx, which is read in as logi then converted into scene 
linear.



Anyone else had this issue with getting soft edge key with IBK?

Thanks.

Darren.

Check out some of my work...
www.vimeo.com/darrencoombes

Mob:  +61 418 631 079
Skype:  darrencoombes
Twitter:  @durwood81
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Email not in spam test - please respond

[Carlos Trijueque]

A little progress. It doesn't go straight to Spam but Gmail told me that
it is because of my filters (I have your email address whitelisted) and
still flags it as Spam.

./charlie
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Email not in spam test - please respond

[Nico Dufort]

Still going to spam for me.

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Bruno-Pierre Jobin 
wrote:

>  Spam for me.
>
>
> > On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Martin Constable 
> wrote:
> >
> > Not spam for me.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 14 Mar 2016, at 7:55 AM, Hugo Léveillé  wrote:
> >>
> >> Not spam for me
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Howard Jones 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Could anyone tell me if this is not in spam please? Only need a couple
> of replies, before this gets too noisey.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Howard___
> >>> Nuke-users mailing list
> >>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> >> ___
> >> Nuke-users mailing list
> >> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> > ___
> > Nuke-users mailing list
> > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>



-- 
"Attention, attention. Here and now, boys," the mynah repeated. "Here and
now, boys."
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Email not in spam test - please respond

[Bruno-Pierre Jobin]

 Spam for me. 


> On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Martin Constable  wrote:
> 
> Not spam for me. 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 14 Mar 2016, at 7:55 AM, Hugo Léveillé  wrote:
>> 
>> Not spam for me
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Howard Jones  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Could anyone tell me if this is not in spam please? Only need a couple of 
>>> replies, before this gets too noisey.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Howard___
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> ___
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Email not in spam test - please respond

[Martin Constable]

Not spam for me. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Mar 2016, at 7:55 AM, Hugo Léveillé  wrote:
> 
> Not spam for me
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Mar 13, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Howard Jones  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Could anyone tell me if this is not in spam please? Only need a couple of 
>> replies, before this gets too noisey.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Howard___
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

[Nuke-users] Email not in spam test - please respond

[Howard Jones]

Hi

Could anyone tell me if this is not in spam please? Only need a couple of 
replies, before this gets too noisey.

Thanks

Howard___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users