Re: [Nuke-users] The "New" 2k

[Ian Northrop]

I think I've seen UHD used to describe this format.  

> El nov 28, 2016, a las 4:52 PM, Andrew Mumford  escribió:
> 
> Is there a standard term for 2048x1152 yet people are using ?
> 
> 2K_HD / HD_2K ?
> ---
> Andrew Mumford
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] extend edge pixels

[Ian Northrop]

http://www.nukepedia.com/gizmos/filter/edgemod

> El sept 20, 2016, a las 12:48 PM, Gary Jaeger  escribió:
> 
> Anybody have a good way of extending the edge pixels of a premulted image? 
> for instance, if I had an image masked by a circle, just to take the edge 
> pixels and extend them out xx amount? Sort of like an unpremult but more :0 
> Does that make sense?
> 
> Gary Jaeger / 650.728.7957 direct / 415.518.1419 mobile
> http://corestudio.com
> 
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Ananorphic VFX, any issues / consideration?

[Ian Northrop]

Maybe someone would care to expand on this, but I think you have options 
regarding pixel aspect ratio with your VFX  plates - leaving them non-square, 
or precomping them, "baking-in" square pixels.  Can't remember the 
benefits/disadvantages to either, but maybe this gets a talking-point started. 

Ian

> El 25 oct 2015, a las 11:51 AM, John Mangia  escribió:
> 
> Probably want to allow extra time for tracking and also shoot grids for every 
> lens. If there are lens flares in shots be prepared with tools or plugins to 
> replicate them or shoot reference.  
> 
> John Mangia
> j...@johnmangia.com
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 25, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Mads Lund  wrote:
>> 
>> Going to start planning on a 4K anamorphic feature film. And I must say that 
>> I don't have too much experience working with anamorphic plates.
>> 
>> Are there any issues that I should take note of or any other considerations?
>> ___
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> ___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

[Ian Northrop]

Hi Daniel,

It can average out the noise that distracts individual tracks, giving you a 
cleaner track.  Think of it like the track equivalent of a temporal blur.  

Best,
Ian



> El oct 23, 2015, a las 4:42 AM, Daniel Hartlehnert  escribió:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> maybe i am missing something, but i don't really understand the usefulness of 
> the "average tracks" button in the tracker.
> I know what it does, but isn't that the same as having the T, R and S buttons 
> activated for each individual tracker? They will get averaged as well to 
> calculate the resulting transforms won't they?
> So whats the benefit of having one averaged tracker then?
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel___
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

[Ian Northrop]

Here is my workflow (though this was more necessary before degraining became so 
good):  If I had a really noise plate, and my tracker was jumping around a lot, 
due to the grain, I would track the same feature a minimum of 3 times with 3 
different trackers (1 node).  because they are started on a different pixel, 
but in the same feature-region, they would all get affected differently by the 
plate's grain, but stay "on-track" to the feature being tracked.  After this, 
you can select all 3, hit "average trackers," and the resulting single tracker 
that Nuke will give you is essentially a much better single tracker, with the 
effects of the grain averaged out. 


 On Friday, October 23, 2015 12:08 PM, Deke Kincaid  
wrote:
   

 If you want to bake to a cornerpin or a transform?  It's a lot faster then 
typing an expression?

___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

  ___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

[Nuke-users] Histogram

[Ian Northrop]

Hello,

Is anyone else experiencing the Histogram being quite diminished in height, in 
the data's representation?  I am on NukeX 9.0v7 and I would say that the peaks 
of the graph only fill about 15% of the vertical space of its window.  


___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users