Re: [Nuke-users] Simple Pixel Shift with wraparound...
Hi,
you might also use the UVTile node:
Group {
name Group1
selected true
xpos -98
ypos 77
addUserKnob {20 User}
addUserKnob {41 translate T UVTile3.translate}
addUserKnob {41 scale T UVTile3.scale}
addUserKnob {26 }
addUserKnob {41 samples T ScanlineRender2.samples}
}
Camera2 {
inputs 0
focal {{parent.Card2.lens_in_focal}}
haperture {{parent.Card2.lens_in_haperture}}
vaperture {{parent.Card2.in_vaperture}}
name Camera2
label haperture/vaperture: \[expression haperture/vaperture]
xpos 365
ypos 271
}
set N2e337100 [stack 0]
push $N2e337100
Input {
inputs 0
name Input1
xpos 248
ypos 75
}
Dot {
name Dot3
xpos 282
ypos 141
}
set N2e3377e0 [stack 0]
UVTile2 {
wrap_u repeat
wrap_v repeat
translate {0.5 0.5}
name UVTile3
xpos 355
ypos 214
}
push $N2e3377e0
Card2 {
z 10
lens_in_focal 14.2
lens_in_haperture 18
control_points {3 3 3 6
1 {-0.5 -0.5 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865 0} 0 {0 0
0} 0 {0 0 0}
1 {0 -0.5 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865
0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0.5 0 0}
1 {0.5 -0.5 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0.166865 0} 0 {0 0
0} 0 {1 0 0}
1 {-0.5 0 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0 {0
-0.166716 0} 0 {0 0.5 0}
1 {0 0 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0
{0 -0.166716 0} 0 {0.5 0.5 0}
1 {0.5 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0.166716 0} 0 {0
-0.166716 0} 0 {1 0.5 0}
1 {-0.5 0.5 0} 0 {0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 -0.166865
0} 0 {0 1 0}
1 {0 0.5 0} 0 {0.166716 0 0} 0 {-0.166716 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0
-0.166865 0} 0 {0.5 1 0}
1 {0.5 0.5 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {-0.166865 0 0} 0 {0 0 0} 0 {0 -0.166865
0} 0 {1 1 0} }
name Card2
label width/height: \[expression input.width/input.height]
xpos 465
ypos 132
addUserKnob {20 User}
addUserKnob {7 in_vaperture l lens-in vaperture R 0 50}
in_vaperture {{(\[value input.height]*\[value
lens_in_haperture])/\[value input.width]}}
}
ApplyMaterial {
inputs 2
name ApplyMaterial2
xpos 465
ypos 214
}
Scene {
inputs 2
name Scene2
xpos 475
ypos 271
}
push $N2e3377e0
Shuffle {
red black
green black
blue black
alpha black
name Shuffle6
xpos 248
ypos 363
}
ScanlineRender {
inputs 3
transparency false
ztest_enabled false
filter Impulse
samples 10
motion_vectors_type distance
name ScanlineRender2
selected true
xpos 465
ypos 363
}
Output {
name Output1
xpos 465
ypos 477
}
end_group
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Richard Bobo richb...@mac.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have found several gizmos that will do a simple pixel shift on an image
— x y offsets that wraparound. However, I keep searching in vain for a
way to do it with a built-in Nuke node. Isn’t there any way? I guess that’s
why these gizmos exist..?(8^\A big thank you to anyone who can tell
me about a Nuke node that can do it!
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Bobo
Senior VFX Compositor
Armstrong White
Email: rich.b...@armstrong-white.com
http://armstrong-white.com/
Email: richb...@mac.com
Mobile: (248) 840-2665
Web: http://richbobo.com/
The world stands aside to let anyone pass who knows where he is going.
- David Starr Jordan
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
[Nuke-users] STMap and filtering with values beyond 1
Hi, I'm trying to repeat a UVmap when values go beyond 1 or below 0 I insert an Expression node like r%1 and g%1 to repeat the normalized values, but I get very hard edges, as if the STMap didn't apply any filtering around the edges of the 0-1 loop I also tried to change the sampled area, putting r(x,y,3,3)%1 into the expression, but it doesn't seem to make a big difference is there a solution? thanks! marco ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] STMap and filtering with values beyond 1
I'm not sure how to do what you suggest: I'm trying to normalize the red
(u) and green (v) values, so that 1.8=0.8, 3.3=0.3, and so on
see the script below: i need to filter the jagged lines around the edges of
the 0-1 loop... a sort of multisample control?
BackdropNode {
inputs 0
name BackdropNode1
tile_color 0x8e8e3800
label normalize values
note_font_size 20
selected true
xpos -110
ypos -131
bdwidth 213
bdheight 228
}
push $cut_paste_input
Reformat {
format 512 512 0 0 512 512 1 square_512
name Reformat7
selected true
xpos 249
ypos -119
}
set N2f869150 [stack 0]
Roto {
replace true
curves {{{v x3f9a}
{f 0}
{n
{layer Root
{f 512}
{t x4380 x4380}
{a}
{curvegroup Rectangle1 512 bezier
{{cc
{f 8192}
{px
{1 x4248}
{{0}
{0}}
{{x4254 x43a84cce}
{x43e31998 x43862664}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{x4341cccd x43eeccce}
{x43e31998 x43862664}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{x4344ccc3 x43f04cca}
{x439d0889 x43002aa9}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{0}
{0}}
{{x4251dde4 x43a82224}
{x439d0889 x43002aa9}}
{{0}
{0 idem}
{tx 1 x43a3f333 x43c3f333}
{a ft x4040 str 1 spx x4380 spy x4380 sb 1 tt x4110
opc x3f051eb8}}
toolbox {selectAll {
{ selectAll str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 }
{ createBezier str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 4 }
{ createOpenSpline str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createBezierCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createBSpline str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createEllipse str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 8 }
{ createRectangle str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 9 }
{ createRectangleCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ brush str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ eraser src 2 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ clone src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ reveal src 3 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ dodge src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ burn src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ blur src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ sharpen src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ smear src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
} }
toolbar_brush_hardness 0.20003
toolbar_source_transform_scale {1 1}
toolbar_source_transform_center {256 256}
colorOverlay {0 0 0 0}
opacity 0.519809
lifetime_type all frames
motionblur_shutter_offset_type centred
feather_type smooth
source_black_outside true
createNewTrack {{-1} -1\t(none)\t-1 1000\tNew Track Layer\t1000}
name Roto2
selected true
xpos 322
ypos -65
}
Blur {
size 73
name Blur2
selected true
xpos 322
ypos -17
}
push $N2f869150
Expression {
expr0 x/width
expr1 y/height
name Expression10
selected true
xpos 172
ypos -63
}
Merge2 {
inputs 2
operation plus
name Merge4
selected true
xpos 172
ypos -11
}
Expression {
expr0 r(x,y, 3, 3)%1
expr1 g(x,y, 3, 3)%1
channel2 {-rgba.red -rgba.green -rgba.blue none}
channel3 {none none none -rgba.alpha}
name Expression11
selected true
xpos -41
ypos -11
}
ColorBars {
inputs 0
format 512 512 0 0 512 512 1 square_512
name ColorBars1
selected true
xpos -304
ypos -135
}
STMap {
inputs 2
uv rgb
name STMap4
selected true
xpos -304
ypos 217
}
Viewer {
frame 31
colour_sample_bbox {0.6171875 0.921875 0.62109375 0.92578125}
samplepoints {{1.51171875 0.61328125}
}
input_process false
name Viewer1
selected true
xpos -304
ypos 346
}
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Elias Ericsson Rydberg
elias.ericsson.rydb...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you not tile your texture before applying it?
2014-04-28 17:35 GMT+02:00 marlor.l...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm trying to repeat a UVmap when values go beyond 1 or below 0
I insert an Expression node like r%1 and g%1 to repeat the normalized
values, but I get very hard edges, as if the STMap didn't apply any
filtering around the edges of the 0-1 loop
I also tried to change the sampled area, putting r(x,y,3,3)%1 into the
expression, but it doesn't seem to make a big difference
is there a solution?
thanks!
marco
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 8 scopes....
Also, it would be great if you could zoom in / zoom out, like you do with professional scopes, for example if you need to expand the RGB Parade to show and focus black levels --- m On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Sam Marrocco smarro...@ringsidecreative.com wrote: The Nuke 8 scopes are a welcome addition. Is it possible to deactivate the color bars lines that appear in the waveform monitor (in non-stack mode) as a reference? Also, it would be handy if the left edge of the waveform display did not draw over the graticule number scale, but started with the horizontal graticule lines. -- sam marrocco | chief technical officer ringside.cutters.picnic.moonlink 248 548 2500 w 248 910 3344 c ringsidecreative.com ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke to Shake/Fusion roto
Tracksperanto or IXIR software? I remember that one of them allowed you to export masks: http://guerilla-di.org/tracksperanto http://www.ixirdigital.com/trackeditor.php --- m On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:06 AM, J Bills jbillsn...@flickfx.com wrote: no, no nuke import. only export. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Deke Kincaid dekekinc...@gmail.comwrote: I haven't used Silhouette in a while. Did they ever add a Rotopaint importer? I ask because then you could export shake from it. -deke On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 22:25, teidenzero nuke-users-re...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote: ** Hello everyone, I was wondering if there is a way to export Nuke roto files into Shake or Fusion without having to render out the matte. I heard about exporting ASCII but I'm not really sure what that means and how needs to be done. Can anyone help? Thank you very much ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
[Nuke-users] Quadro 4000 (no display attached) for Nuke - like Davinci Resolve
Hi, i was quite impressed by the Davinci Resolve peformance with a Mac Pro using a Radeon HD 5770 in slot one connected to display, with NVIDIA Quadro 4000 for Mac in second slot with no display attached: http://www.blackmagic-design.com/media/1764189/DaVinci_Resolve_8.0_Mac_Config_Guide.pdf Nuke has some nodes optimized for Cuda and GPU acceleration. But I'm not sure whether I'd loose some Quadro 4000 performance using only the Radeon attached to the monitors. Do you think that the Radeon/Quadro-slave configuration could be an efficient solution for Nuke? best, m ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
