Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed
Congratulations! This is definitely a big step for array-computing with Python. Working with the Python devs to implement a PEP can be a tremendous opportunity to increase your programming awareness and ability --- as well as make some good friends. This is a great way to get involved with both Python and the NumPy community and have a big impact. If you are in a position to devote several hours a week to the task, then you won't find a better opportunity to contribute. Best, -Travis On Apr 7, 2014 6:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Hey all, Guido just formally accepted PEP 465: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133819.html http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/#implementation-details Yay. The next step is to implement it, in CPython and in numpy. I have time to advise on this, but not to do it myself, so, any volunteers? Ever wanted to hack on the interpreter itself, with BDFL guarantee your patch will be accepted (if correct)? The todo list for CPython is here: http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/#implementation-details There's one open question which is where the type slots should be added. I'd just add them to PyNumberMethods and then if someone objects during patch review it can be changed. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed
Benjamin Peterson has posted a complete patch implementing the @ operator for Python 3.5: http://bugs.python.org/file34762/mat-mult5.patch Now we should implement matmul in numpy: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4464 ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Hey all, Guido just formally accepted PEP 465: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133819.html http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/#implementation-details Congratulations!! Getting a PEP through is very hard work, and you did a remarkable job. Thank you! Though I suspect that the most important part of my contribution may have just been my high tolerance for writing emails ;-). Many thanks for all your patience steering this through, as well as to everyone who contributed. The level and quality of the discussion was pretty impressive. Indeed -- this never would have happened without the contributions of many, many people, both during the conversations around the PEP this month, and over the previous years that set the stage for this to be possible. Thank you, everyone! -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
