Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py and pygtk on windows
On 24 March 2012 13:28, David Froger david.fro...@gmail.com wrote: I've had similar problem in the past (but on Gnu/Linux), which was solve to by setting the LC_ALL environnement variable to C. (never undersant why). (with Bash: export LC_ALL=C) This rings a bell. I have a feeling importing pygtk can change the Python default encoding (sys.getdefaultencoding()). That's never normally changed, so Python 2 code can assume it's always ascii. I guess pygtk sets the encoding from the system locale, so if it's set to C, it will use ascii, and the problem won't appear. Thomas ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] verbose output when running python script?
On 5 March 2012 15:27, Chao YUE chaoyue...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry this is not the good place to ask but I think there must be someone who has done this before. Is there any way to see the execution of python script line by line as the verbose model of shell script? this can be done either in ipython or by running the python script in a shell script? Depending on what you want this for, you might look into IPython's demo mode: http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/interactive/reference.html#interactive-demos-with-ipython Thomas ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] IPython 0.12 just entered Debian Testing
On 1 March 2012 08:37, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote: Just to start the new month on a light happy topic : IPython 0.12 has entered Debian Testing ! Thanks to Julian Taylor for handling Debian packaging. IPython 0.12 is also in the upcoming Ubuntu 12.04. Thomas ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy governance update
If I can chime in as a newcomer on this list: I don't think a conflict of interest is at all likely, but I can see the point of those saying that it's worth thinking about this while everything is going well. If any tension does arise, it will be all but impossible to decide on a fair governance structure, because everyone will root for the system that looks likely to produce their favoured outcome. It strikes me that the effort everyone's put into this thread could have by now designed some way to resolve disputes. ;-) It could be as simple as 'so-and-so gets to make the final call', through to committees, voting systems, etc. So long as everything's going well, it shouldn't restrict anyone, and it would reassure anyone who does have concerns (justified or not) about conflicts of interest. Thanks, Thomas ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
