Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a 2to3 distutils command ?
2010/3/30 David Cournapeau da...@silveregg.co.jp: Currently, when building numpy with python 3, the 2to3 conversion happens before calling any distutils command. Was there a reason for doing it as it is done now ? This allowed 2to3 to also port the various setup*.py files and numpy.distutils, and implementing it this way required the minimum amount of work and understanding of distutils -- you need to force it to proceed with the build using the set of output files from 2to3. I would like to make a proper numpy.distutils command for it, so that it can be more finely controlled (in particular, using the -j option). It would also avoid duplication in scipy. Are you sure you want to mix distutils in this? Wouldn't it only obscure how things work? If the aim is in making the 2to3 processing reusable, I'd rather simply move tools/py3tool.py under numpy.distutils (+ perhaps do some cleanups), and otherwise keep it completely separate from distutils. It could be nice to have the 2to3 conversion parallelizable, but there are probably simple ways to do it without mixing distutils in. But if you think this is really worth doing, go ahead. Pauli ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a 2to3 distutils command ?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 2010/3/30 David Cournapeau da...@silveregg.co.jp: Currently, when building numpy with python 3, the 2to3 conversion happens before calling any distutils command. Was there a reason for doing it as it is done now ? This allowed 2to3 to also port the various setup*.py files and numpy.distutils, and implementing it this way required the minimum amount of work and understanding of distutils -- you need to force it to proceed with the build using the set of output files from 2to3. I would like to make a proper numpy.distutils command for it, so that it can be more finely controlled (in particular, using the -j option). It would also avoid duplication in scipy. Are you sure you want to mix distutils in this? Wouldn't it only obscure how things work? If the aim is in making the 2to3 processing reusable, I'd rather simply move tools/py3tool.py under numpy.distutils (+ perhaps do some cleanups), and otherwise keep it completely separate from distutils. It could be nice to have the 2to3 conversion parallelizable, but there are probably simple ways to do it without mixing distutils in. Out of curiosity, is there something wrong with the support for 2to3 that already exists within distutils? (Other than it just being distutils) http://bruynooghe.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-lib2to3-in-setuppy.html Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a 2to3 distutils command ?
ti, 2010-03-30 kello 07:18 -0600, Ryan May kirjoitti: Out of curiosity, is there something wrong with the support for 2to3 that already exists within distutils? (Other than it just being distutils) http://bruynooghe.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-lib2to3-in-setuppy.html That AFAIK converts only those Python files that will be installed, and I don't know how to tell it to disable some conversion on a per-file basis. (Numpy also contains some files necessary for building that will not be installed...) But OK, to be honest, I didn't look closely if one could make it work using the bundled 2to3 command. Things might be cleaner if it can be made to work. Pauli ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
