Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
what about fixing http://scipy.org/scipy/scipy/ticket/812 ? this is actually a scipy-numpy compatibility problem, where numpy is wrong IMO. it is a one-line fix, I think. thank you! tiziano ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:04:25 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: [clip] Talking about the things I have worked on for 1.3, I did not have the time to finish everything. The things which I would like to be done before a 1.3.0 release are: - fix formatting issues that Pauli and me worked on (for locale independence and all): I believe it is mostly a matter of merging the changes in the trunk, and testing. Pauli, do you agree ? Agree, I think it should be OK, and IIRC tests passed also on Windows (well, Wine to be accurate). I don't recall anything more that would be required to do. It might be nice also to address this wart: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/883 for Numpy 1.3. But it's a separate issue from the locale and formatting problems. Pauli ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
Scott Sinclair wrote: There are a bunch of documentation patches that should to be reviewed and applied to SVN before the release (especially those marked 'Needs review' or better). http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/patch/ In my mind, documentations fixes are much less important than code, not because documentation matters less, but because it can be handled at the last moment much more easily - there is little chance that a doc change breaks on windows only, for example. David ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
Scott Sinclair scott.sinclair...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/4 David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote: All, When can we expect numpy 1.3 to be released ? I think official 2.6 support (with binaries for the platforms where we support binaries), x64 support and everything which has been done already would be enough to make a release. I'd like to see a self-consistent and reasonably recent numpy/scipy make the Ubuntu 9.04 FeatureFreeze deadline of 19 February. Is this possible? One of the reasons we had discussed doing more frequent releases was to get consistent and recent packages in the mainstream Linuxes, and Ubuntu is very popular in our community. There are a bunch of documentation patches that should to be reviewed and applied to SVN before the release (especially those marked 'Needs review' or better). http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/patch/ At this point, we're focussing on getting semi-decent drafts of as many docstrings as possible rather than on polishing the ones we have as drafts, on the basis of something is always better than nothing as long as it's not wrong. So, please don't hold up a release for review, just get as many drafts in as possible. Also, it has become clear that we need separate technical and writing reviews, as a number of pages marked as reviewed are deficient in one or the other area, probably the one that wasn't the strength of the reviewer. That entails discussion and revamping of the site, which can happen once we have a larger percentage of the docstrings in draft form. (Any discussion on the merits of this should take place on scipy-dev, which is the home of doc discussions.) --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
2009/2/4 David Cournapeau da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp: Scott Sinclair wrote: There are a bunch of documentation patches that should to be reviewed and applied to SVN before the release (especially those marked 'Needs review' or better). http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/patch/ In my mind, documentations fixes are much less important than code, not because documentation matters less, but because it can be handled at the last moment much more easily - there is little chance that a doc change breaks on windows only, for example. Sure. Just trying to encourage a few more reviews and documentation contributions. Cheers, Scott ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM, j...@physics.ucf.edu wrote: Scott Sinclair scott.sinclair...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/4 David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote: All, When can we expect numpy 1.3 to be released ? I think official 2.6 support (with binaries for the platforms where we support binaries), x64 support and everything which has been done already would be enough to make a release. I'd like to see a self-consistent and reasonably recent numpy/scipy make the Ubuntu 9.04 FeatureFreeze deadline of 19 February. Is this possible? One of the reasons we had discussed doing more frequent releases was to get consistent and recent packages in the mainstream Linuxes, and Ubuntu is very popular in our community. That deadline is pretty close ;) There has been a dearth of developer time these last few months, what with work, holidays, and dissertations, and I don't know when that is going to get better. Chuck ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM, j...@physics.ucf.edu wrote: Scott Sinclair scott.sinclair...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/4 David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote: All, When can we expect numpy 1.3 to be released ? I think official 2.6 support (with binaries for the platforms where we support binaries), x64 support and everything which has been done already would be enough to make a release. I'd like to see a self-consistent and reasonably recent numpy/scipy make the Ubuntu 9.04 FeatureFreeze deadline of 19 February. Is this possible? One of the reasons we had discussed doing more frequent releases was to get consistent and recent packages in the mainstream Linuxes, and Ubuntu is very popular in our community. That deadline is pretty close ;) I think it is safe to say it will not be possible to release numpy for that date. Concerning Ubuntu, it sounds more realistic to make sure it is updated to 1.2.1, and if possible to release 0.7.0. David ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.3 release date ?
All, When can we expect numpy 1.3 to be released ? Sincerely, P. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
