Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Chris Barker]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Charles R Harris 
wrote:

> Do line endings in the scripts matter?
>

I have no idea if powershell cares about line endings, but if you are using
git, then you'll want to make sure that your repo is properly configured to
normalize line endings -- then there should be no problems. And you realy
want that anyway for any multi-platform project.

-CHB

-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R(206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115   (206) 526-6317   main reception

chris.bar...@noaa.gov
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Robert McGibbon]

I develop on linux and osx, and I haven't experienced any Appveyor problems
related to line endings, so I assume it's normalized somehow.

-Robert
On Mar 5, 2015 5:08 PM, "Charles R Harris" 
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Robert McGibbon 
> wrote:
>
>> From my experience, it's pretty easy, assuming you're prepared to pick up
>> some powershell.
>> Some useful resources are
>>
>>  - Olivier Grisel's example.
>> https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo
>>  - I made a similar example, using conda.
>> https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example
>>
>> One problem is that appveyor is often quite slow compared to TravisCI, so
>> this can be a little annoying. But it's better than nothing.
>>
>
> Do line endings in the scripts matter?
>
> Chuck
>
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Charles R Harris]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Robert McGibbon  wrote:

> From my experience, it's pretty easy, assuming you're prepared to pick up
> some powershell.
> Some useful resources are
>
>  - Olivier Grisel's example.
> https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo
>  - I made a similar example, using conda.
> https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example
>
> One problem is that appveyor is often quite slow compared to TravisCI, so
> this can be a little annoying. But it's better than nothing.
>

Do line endings in the scripts matter?

Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Robert McGibbon]

>From my experience, it's pretty easy, assuming you're prepared to pick up
some powershell.
Some useful resources are

 - Olivier Grisel's example.
https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo
 - I made a similar example, using conda.
https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example

One problem is that appveyor is often quite slow compared to TravisCI, so
this can be a little annoying. But it's better than nothing.

-Robert
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Charles R Harris]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Stefan van der Walt 
wrote:

> Hi Chuck
>
> On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris
>  wrote:
> > Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is
> > this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows
> > machines? It is free for open source.
>
> We already use this for scikit-image, and you are welcome to grab
> the setup here:
>
> https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/master/appveyor.yml
>
> GitHub now also supports multiple status reporting out of the box:
>
>
> https://github.com/blog/1935-see-results-from-all-pull-request-status-checks
>
>
Thanks. Anything tricky about setting up an appveyor account?

Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Denis-Alexander Engemann]

Same for MNE-Python:

https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/blob/master/appveyor.yml

Denis

2015-03-05 20:42 GMT+01:00 Stefan van der Walt :

> Hi Chuck
>
> On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris
>  wrote:
> > Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is
> > this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows
> > machines? It is free for open source.
>
> We already use this for scikit-image, and you are welcome to grab
> the setup here:
>
> https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/master/appveyor.yml
>
> GitHub now also supports multiple status reporting out of the box:
>
>
> https://github.com/blog/1935-see-results-from-all-pull-request-status-checks
>
> Stéfan
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Stefan van der Walt]

Hi Chuck

On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris 
 wrote:
> Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is 
> this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows 
> machines? It is free for open source.

We already use this for scikit-image, and you are welcome to grab 
the setup here:

https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/master/appveyor.yml

GitHub now also supports multiple status reporting out of the box: 

https://github.com/blog/1935-see-results-from-all-pull-request-status-checks

Stéfan
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

[Charles R Harris]

Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is this something
we could use to test/build numpy on windows machines? It is free for open
source.

Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion