Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
A Friday 03 October 2008, Jarrod Millman escrigué: On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Chris Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Kern wrote: Superceded by the 1.2.0 release. See the thread ANN: NumPy 1.2.0. I thought I'd seen that, but when I went to: http://www.scipy.org/Download And I still got 1.1 I updated the page to point to the sourceforge page. Thanks for catching that. It would be nice if you can update the PYPI package index too. Perhaps having a list of places on where to announce NumPy on every release would be handy. Thanks! -- Francesc Alted ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Francesc Alted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be nice if you can update the PYPI package index too. Perhaps having a list of places on where to announce NumPy on every release would be handy. Done. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Jarrod Millman wrote: The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 what's the status of this? Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe this appears to be a dead link. thanks, -Chris ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 16:45, Chris Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jarrod Millman wrote: The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 what's the status of this? Superceded by the 1.2.0 release. See the thread ANN: NumPy 1.2.0. Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe this appears to be a dead link. Superceded by http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe -- Robert Kern I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. -- Umberto Eco ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Robert Kern wrote: Superceded by the 1.2.0 release. See the thread ANN: NumPy 1.2.0. I thought I'd seen that, but when I went to: http://www.scipy.org/Download And I still got 1.1 Superceded by http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe thanks, -Chris ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Chris Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Kern wrote: Superceded by the 1.2.0 release. See the thread ANN: NumPy 1.2.0. I thought I'd seen that, but when I went to: http://www.scipy.org/Download And I still got 1.1 I updated the page to point to the sourceforge page. Thanks for catching that. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
I hope you'll grab the updated docstrings before tagging. At least grab numpy.__doc__. The main numpy help string didn't adequately point users to alternatives to help() for the ufuncs. --jh-- ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope you'll grab the updated docstrings before tagging. At least grab numpy.__doc__. The main numpy help string didn't adequately point users to alternatives to help() for the ufuncs. That will have to wait until 1.2.1, which we will put out shortly. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Hi, What is the status of NumPy 1.2 and when can we expect the final version? Thanks Bruce Jarrod Millman wrote: Hello, The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 The source tarball is here: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2.tar.gz Here is the universal Mac binary: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.4.exe http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe Here are the release notes: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.2.0 Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Thanks, ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Bruce Southey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the status of NumPy 1.2 and when can we expect the final version? I hope to announce it on Friday or Saturday. The only thing I am looking into now is whether we should back port the fix to lookfor or not: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5862 Either way, I plan to tag later today. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
A Sunday 14 September 2008, Jarrod Millman escrigué: Hello, The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 The source tarball is here: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2.tar.gz Here is the universal Mac binary: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.4.exe http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe Here are the release notes: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.2.0 Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Seems that there is a small glitch here: == ERROR: Failure: ImportError (No module named scipy) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/nose-0.10.3-py2.5.egg/nose/loader.py, line 364, in loadTestsFromName addr.filename, addr.module) File /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/nose-0.10.3-py2.5.egg/nose/importer.py, line 39, in importFromPath return self.importFromDir(dir_path, fqname) File /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/nose-0.10.3-py2.5.egg/nose/importer.py, line 84, in importFromDir mod = load_module(part_fqname, fh, filename, desc) File /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/doc/__init__.py, line 10, in module __import__(__name__ + '.' + f) File /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/doc/example.py, line 27, in module import scipy as sp ImportError: No module named scipy -- Ran 1727 tests in 12.617s FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=1, errors=1) Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0.dev5825 NumPy is installed in /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy Python version 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Aug 1 2008, 00:37:21) [GCC 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036]] nose version 0.10.3 Using OpenSUSE GNU/Linux 11.0 64-bit and Python 2.5. I've been unable to run the tests with Python 2.6b3 (nose seems that does not work yet against Python 2.6). However, I've run the complete test suite of PyTables Pro (using Python 2.6 now) against NumPy 1.2 and everthing went fine: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= PyTables version: 2.1b2.devpro HDF5 version: 1.8.1 NumPy version: 1.2.0.dev5825 Zlib version: 1.2.3 LZO version: 2.02 (Oct 17 2005) BZIP2 version: 1.0.5 (10-Dec-2007) Python version:2.6b3 (r26b3:65922, Sep 8 2008, 18:38:56) [GCC 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036]] Platform: linux2-x86_64 Byte-ordering: little -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Performing the complete test suite! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Skipping Numeric test suite. Skipping numarray test suite. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [clip] ... -- Ran 52443 tests in 11592.913s OK Also, it seems that NumPy 1.2 is relatively free of leaks or such a huge test suite would have exploded violently. Good job! -- Francesc Alted ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Francesc Alted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A Sunday 14 September 2008, Jarrod Millman escrigué: Hello, The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 The source tarball is here: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2.tar.gz Here is the universal Mac binary: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.4.exe http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe Here are the release notes: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.2.0 Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Seems that there is a small glitch here: == ERROR: Failure: ImportError (No module named scipy) -- Traceback (most recent call last): Can you delete the installed numpy directory and try a clean install? I think you might be seeing stale files. Chuck ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
A Tuesday 16 September 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Francesc Alted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A Sunday 14 September 2008, Jarrod Millman escrigué: Hello, The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 The source tarball is here: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2.tar.gz Here is the universal Mac binary: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-py2.5-macosx10.5.d mg Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/nu mpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.4.exe http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/nu mpy- 1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe Here are the release notes: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.2.0 Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Seems that there is a small glitch here: === === ERROR: Failure: ImportError (No module named scipy) --- --- Traceback (most recent call last): Can you delete the installed numpy directory and try a clean install? I think you might be seeing stale files. You are right: -- Ran 1726 tests in 12.981s OK (KNOWNFAIL=1) Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0.dev5825 NumPy is installed in /usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy Python version 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Aug 1 2008, 00:37:21) [GCC 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036]] nose version 0.10.3 Excellent! -- Francesc Alted ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Sep 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Jarrod Millman wrote: Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Running on OS X 10.4 , testing with 'import numpy; numpy.test()' Ran 1726 tests in 7.544s OK (KNOWNFAIL=1) Also, I'm pleased to see that most of my patches for improved startup performance were applied. Here are timings for 1.2.0rc2 [josiah:~] dalke% time python -c 'import os' 0.014u 0.029s 0:00.04 75.0% 0+0k 0+1io 0pf+0w [josiah:~] dalke% time python -c 'import numpy' 0.067u 0.123s 0:00.19 94.7% 0+0k 0+9io 0pf+0w [josiah:~] dalke% Only 0.15s extra startup time. Vs. 0.34 seconds with 1.1.0: (sudo rm .../numpy; cd 1.1.0; setup.py install) [josiah:~] dalke% time python -c 'import os' 0.014u 0.028s 0:00.04 75.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w [josiah:~] dalke% time python -c 'import numpy' 0.160u 0.227s 0:00.38 100.0%0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w [josiah:~] dalke% About twice as fast. Programs that ran in under a second should now be at least 30% faster. :) Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On this system, both 1.2rc1 and rc2 hang on mtrand.c Linux thunder0 2.6.9-74chaos #1 SMP Wed Oct 24 08:41:12 PDT 2007 ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux attached is the log. numpy.LOG.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Charles Doutriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On this system, both 1.2rc1 and rc2 hang on mtrand.c Linux thunder0 2.6.9-74chaos #1 SMP Wed Oct 24 08:41:12 PDT 2007 ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux attached is the log. Interesting. What distribution are you running on that hardware? Any chance you could add your machine to the buildbots? Chuck ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Which version of gcc are you using? Do I remember correctly that you had the same failure with numpy 1.1.1 when using gcc 3.3 and that the problem went away when you used gcc 4.1. If you are using 3.3, could you try with 4.1 and let us know if you run into the same problem? Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Thanks Jarrod it's coming back now. I thought they had updated the system... but no luck... Ok that's the issue i'm using: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-8) Thanks again, C. Jarrod Millman wrote: Which version of gcc are you using? Do I remember correctly that you had the same failure with numpy 1.1.1 when using gcc 3.3 and that the problem went away when you used gcc 4.1. If you are using 3.3, could you try with 4.1 and let us know if you run into the same problem? Thanks, ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Charles Doutriaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jarrod it's coming back now. I thought they had updated the system... but no luck... Ok that's the issue i'm using: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-8) Glad to hear it is a known issue. By the way, does anyone know what version of gcc we require? Where is that documented? The only occurrence of a recommended gcc version is here: http://scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/BuildingGeneral And it states gcc 3.x compilers are recommended. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Jarrod Millman wrote: By the way, does anyone know what version of gcc we require? Where is that documented? The only occurrence of a recommended gcc version is here: http://scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/BuildingGeneral And it states gcc 3.x compilers are recommended. Those instructions are terribly outdated, but I don't know how to put a better one. The Gcc is IA-64 specific. Honestly, since this arch is hard to find and not available at many places, and that Gnu compilers are known to be bad and not really efficient on this arch, I don't feel like spending a lot of time on debugging remotely compilers bugs. cheers, David ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Hey, I would like to release 1.2.0 final soon, but I need to know whether anyone is having any problems with the rc2 binaries. Please test them and let me know whether or not you have any problems with them. Thanks, Jarrod On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, The 1.2.0rc2 is now available: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/tags/1.2.0rc2 The source tarball is here: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2.tar.gz Here is the universal Mac binary: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-py2.5-macosx10.5.dmg Here are the Window's binaries: http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.4.exe http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy/numpy-1.2.0rc2-win32-superpack-python2.5.exe Here are the release notes: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.2.0 Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Python 2.5 Superpack looks fine here. Alan ### Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Apr 18 2007, 08:51:08) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import numpy numpy.__version__ '1.2.0rc2' numpy.test() Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0rc2 NumPy is installed in C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy Python version 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Apr 18 2007, 08:51:08) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Int el)] nose version 0.10.1 .K..K... ...K Ignoring Python was built with Visu al Studio 2003; extensions must be built with a compiler than can generate compatible binaries. Visual Studio 2003 was not found on this system. If you have Cygwin installed, you can try compiling with MingW32, by passing -c mingw32 to setup.py. (one s hould fix me in fcompiler/compaq.py) .. == KNOWNFAIL: test_complex_longdouble (test_print.TestPrint) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\decorators.py, line 119, in skipper raise KnownFailureTest, msg KnownFailureTest: complex long double print is known to fail on windows == KNOWNFAIL: test_longdouble (test_print.TestPrint) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\decorators.py, line 119, in skipper raise KnownFailureTest, msg KnownFailureTest: long double print is known to fail on windows == KNOWNFAIL: test_umath.TestComplexFunctions.test_branch_cuts_failing -- Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 203, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) File C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\decorators.py, line 119, in skipper raise KnownFailureTest, msg KnownFailureTest: These branch cuts are known to fail -- Ran 1578 tests in 17.856s OK nose.result.TextTestResult run=1578 errors=0 failures=0 ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
Warning, errors, and failures here on XP Pro (numpy installed with the python 2.5 superpack). Just passing it along, and apologies if these have already been caught. import numpy numpy.__version__ '1.2.0rc2' numpy.test() Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0rc2 NumPy is installed in C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy Python version 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] nose version 0.10.3 ... Warning (from warnings module): File C:\Python25\lib\unittest.py, line 507 return self.suiteClass(map(testCaseClass, testCaseNames)) DeprecationWarning: NumpyTestCase will be removed in the next release; please update your code to use nose or unittest Warning (from warnings module): File C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy\core\tests\test_ma.py, line 18 NumpyTestCase.__init__(self, *args, **kwds) DeprecationWarning: NumpyTestCase will be removed in the next release; please update your code to use nose or unittest ... Warning (from warnings module): File C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy\core\ma.py, line 609 warnings.warn(Cannot automatically convert masked array to \ UserWarning: Cannot automatically convert masked array to numeric because data is masked in one or more locations. F...E..K..K..KIgnoring Python was built with Visual Studio 2003; extensions must be built with a compiler than can generate compatible binaries. Visual Studio 2003 was not found on this system. If you have Cygwin installed, you can try compiling with MingW32, by passing -c mingw32 to setup.py. (one should fix me in fcompiler/compaq.py) .. == ERROR: test_ma.testta -- Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\Lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 182, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) TypeError: testta() takes exactly 2 arguments (0 given) == ERROR: test_ma.testtb -- Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\Lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 182, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) TypeError: testtb() takes exactly 2 arguments (0 given) == ERROR: test_ma.testtc -- Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\Lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 182, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) TypeError: testtc() takes exactly 2 arguments (0 given) == ERROR: test_ma.testf -- Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\Lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 182, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) TypeError: testf() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given) == ERROR: test_ma.testinplace -- Traceback (most recent call last): File c:\python25\Lib\site-packages\nose\case.py, line 182, in runTest self.test(*self.arg) TypeError: testinplace() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given)
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Warning, errors, and failures here on XP Pro (numpy installed with the python 2.5 superpack). Just passing it along, and apologies if these have already been caught. Thanks for testing this. It looks like you have some old files sitting around (e.g., numpy\core\tests\test_ma.py). Could you delete C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy and reinstall 1.2.0rc2? Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
OK..thanks. That did the trick. All clear now, save for 3 known failures. Again, thanks for letting me know about this. -Mark On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Warning, errors, and failures here on XP Pro (numpy installed with the python 2.5 superpack). Just passing it along, and apologies if these have already been caught. Thanks for testing this. It looks like you have some old files sitting around (e.g., numpy\core\tests\test_ma.py). Could you delete C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy and reinstall 1.2.0rc2? Thanks, -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK..thanks. That did the trick. All clear now, save for 3 known failures. Excellent. Thanks for testing this. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
all ok on python 2.4 WindowsXP sse2 scipy test results are the same as with numpy 1.1.0 C:\Josef\work-oth\sort\pypipython Python 2.4.3 (#69, Mar 29 2006, 17:35:34) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import numpy numpy.version.version '1.2.0rc2' numpy.test() Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0rc2 NumPy is installed in c:\programs\python24\lib\site-packages\numpy Python version 2.4.3 (#69, Mar 29 2006, 17:35:34) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] nose version 0.10.3 ..K..K.. K... .Ignoring The .NET Framework SDK needs to be installed before building extensions for Python. (one should fix me in fc ompiler/compaq.py) .. -- Ran 1575 tests in 10.125s OK (KNOWNFAIL=3) nose.result.TextTestResult run=1575 errors=0 failures=0 (doesn't show details of known fails) import scipy scipy.version.version '0.6.0' scipy.test() Ran 1862 tests in 8.984s FAILED (failures=4, errors=2) unittest._TextTestResult run=1862 errors=2 failures=4 ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please test this release ASAP and let us know if there are any problems. If there are no show stoppers, this will become the 1.2.0 release. Looks OK on Ubuntu 8.04 x86_64. Thanks for your continued work! $ python -c 'from numpy import test; test()' Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.2.0rc2 NumPy is installed in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy Python version 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:31:22) [GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] nose version 0.10.3 ...K.. -- Ran 1726 tests in 8.813s OK (KNOWNFAIL=1) -- Nathan Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://graphics.cs.uiuc.edu/~wnbell/ ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
