Re: [Nut-upsuser] usbhid-ups: Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)
On 04/08/2017 08:08 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Stuart Gathman writes: > >> >> I also had this problem with this unit. My hacky solution solution is >> here: https://github.com/sdgathman/trippfix > What would be the symptoms of this that I would be seeing? I don't see > anything in syslog, only usbhid-ups getting a periodic timeout, but > each time it successfully reconnects via USB. The main symptom in my unit is that the UPS drops off the USB bus entirely, not responding in any way, not even rebooting the host helps. However, unplugging the USB cable resets the USB interface on the UPS, and it then starts working again for some random number of days. My work around lets the host reset the UPS by removing power from the port - electronically unplugging the USB cable. > > It is not entirely unprecedented for manufacturers to quitely fix > defects in their hardware, then simply continue to ship it as the same > model. It's been about a week since this unit has been plugged in, > with the only issue being these usbhid-ups timeouts, which it now > apparently recovers from it. You know it. It's especially annoying when they use a completely different chipset on a USB device, and expect it to be no problem because it ships with new Windows drivers... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] usbhid-ups: Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)
Stuart Gathman writes: On 04/07/2017 09:15 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Charles Lepple writes: > >> >> Full gory details here: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/122 > > This particular new unit came with its own USB cable, and this unit is > plugged into a relatively old server. The motherboard is about ten > years old. > I also had this problem with this unit. My hacky solution solution is here: https://github.com/sdgathman/trippfix I'm convinced that the USB interface on these units is braindead - despite their other excellent qualities (excellent handling of outages). Many other people have the same problem with this unit, including Windows users with the supplied proprietary monitoring software, so I think it is hardware. What would be the symptoms of this that I would be seeing? I don't see anything in syslog, only usbhid-ups getting a periodic timeout, but each time it successfully reconnects via USB. It is not entirely unprecedented for manufacturers to quitely fix defects in their hardware, then simply continue to ship it as the same model. It's been about a week since this unit has been plugged in, with the only issue being these usbhid-ups timeouts, which it now apparently recovers from it. pgpZOFlEmqH3P.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] usbhid-ups: Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)
On 04/07/2017 09:15 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Charles Lepple writes: > >> >> Full gory details here: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/122 > > This particular new unit came with its own USB cable, and this unit is > plugged into a relatively old server. The motherboard is about ten > years old. > I also had this problem with this unit. My hacky solution solution is here: https://github.com/sdgathman/trippfix I'm convinced that the USB interface on these units is braindead - despite their other excellent qualities (excellent handling of outages). Many other people have the same problem with this unit, including Windows users with the supplied proprietary monitoring software, so I think it is hardware. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] usbhid-ups: Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Sam Varshavchikwrote: > Having trouble configuring nut 2.7.4 on Fedora 25, with a new Tripp Lite > UPS. > > I'm running XFCE, and XFCE's Power Manager sees the UPS just fine. lsusb > gives: > > Bus 006 Device 002: ID 09ae:3016 Tripp Lite I'm still catching up on mail, so apologies if this was covered on a more recent GitHub issue, but Tripp Lite PID 3016 is extra-sensitive to certain combinations of USB cables and newer motherboards. If you take NUT and XFCE power manager out of the equation, but the UPS still generates a lot of disconnect/timeout/reconnect traffic in the kernel logs, you might be up against this issue. Full gory details here: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/122 -- - Charles Lepple ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
[Nut-upsuser] usbhid-ups: Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)
Having trouble configuring nut 2.7.4 on Fedora 25, with a new Tripp Lite UPS. I'm running XFCE, and XFCE's Power Manager sees the UPS just fine. lsusb gives: Bus 006 Device 002: ID 09ae:3016 Tripp Lite nut-scanner -U has no issues either: # nut-scanner -U Scanning USB bus. [nutdev1] driver = "usbhid-ups" port = "auto" vendorid = "09AE" productid = "3016" product = "TRIPP LITE UPS" serial = "2643FVLSM871900817" vendor = "Tripp Lite" bus = "006" I took this and placed it in ups.conf, but upsdrvctl fails to start. Following the bread crumbs, I arrived at: # /usr/sbin/usbhid-ups -D -D -D -a nutdev1 ... 0.054668 Checking device (09AE/3016) (006/002) 0.054764 Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied) Running this with strace I see this: write(2, "Checking device (09AE/3016) (006/002)\n", 38) = 38 open("/dev/bus/usb/006/002", O_RDWR)= -1 EACCES (Permission denied) write(2, " 0.054764\t", 12) = 12 write(2, "Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied)\n", 53) = 53 write(2, " 0.054830\t", 12) = 12 Can't open the USB device. I have SELinux set to permissive, so this isn't the issue. pgp56yDBclU4S.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser