NUTCH-684 [was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Nutch 1.0]

2009-03-09 Thread Sami Siren

Dog(acan Güney wrote:

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 20:25, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote:
  

Hello,

I have packaged the first release candidate for Apache Nutch 1.0 release at

http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-1.0/rc0/

See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made from tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/nutch/tags/release-1.0-rc0/?pathrev=751480

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.0. The vote is open
for the next 72 hours. Only votes from Lucene PMC members are binding, but
everyone is welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval
or disapproval. The vote  passes if at least three binding +1 votes are
cast.

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Nutch 1.0
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

Thanks!




That's great!

I would like to see NUTCH-684 in but I guess I was too late :)

Anyway, my non-binding +1.
  


uh, I missed that one, sorry. Do you think it's ready to be included? 
(IMO that's an important feature) It's not a big deal for me to rebuild 
the package with that feature included.


--
Sami Siren



Re: NUTCH-684 [was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Nutch 1.0]

2009-03-09 Thread Doğacan Güney



On 09.Mar.2009, at 11:05, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote:


Doğacan Güney wrote:


On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 20:25, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote:


Hello,

I have packaged the first release candidate for Apache Nutch 1.0  
release at


http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-1.0/rc0/

See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents  
and latest

changes. The release was made from tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/nutch/tags/release-1.0-rc0/?pathrev=751480

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.0. The  
vote is open
for the next 72 hours. Only votes from Lucene PMC members are  
binding, but
everyone is welcome to check the release candidate and voice their  
approval
or disapproval. The vote  passes if at least three binding +1  
votes are

cast.

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Nutch 1.0
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

Thanks!



That's great!

I would like to see NUTCH-684 in but I guess I was too late :)

Anyway, my non-binding +1.



uh, I missed that one, sorry. Do you think it's ready to be  
included? (IMO that's an important feature) It's not a big deal for  
me to rebuild the package with that feature included.




I only tested it on a small crawl. Still, I believe it is important  
too so I would like to include it. Worst case we release a 1.0.1 soon  
after:)



--
 Sami Siren



Re: NUTCH-684 [was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Nutch 1.0]

2009-03-09 Thread Sami Siren

Doğacan Güney wrote:



On 09.Mar.2009, at 11:05, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com 
mailto:ssi...@gmail.com wrote:



Doğacan Güney wrote:

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 20:25, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com 
mailto:ssi...@gmail.com wrote:
  

Hello,

I have packaged the first release candidate for Apache Nutch 1.0 release at

http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-1.0/rc0/ 
http://people.apache.org/%7Esiren/nutch-1.0/rc0/

See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made from tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/nutch/tags/release-1.0-rc0/?pathrev=751480

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.0. The vote is open
for the next 72 hours. Only votes from Lucene PMC members are binding, but
everyone is welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval
or disapproval. The vote  passes if at least three binding +1 votes are
cast.

[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Nutch 1.0
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

Thanks!



That's great!

I would like to see NUTCH-684 in but I guess I was too late :)

Anyway, my non-binding +1.
  


uh, I missed that one, sorry. Do you think it's ready to be included? 
(IMO that's an important feature) It's not a big deal for me to 
rebuild the package with that feature included.




I only tested it on a small crawl. Still, I believe it is important 
too so I would like to include it. Worst case we release a 1.0.1 soon 
after:)
I am fine either way. So if you think it's good enough to go in just 
commit it and I'll build another rc. If not then we can release it later 
too when it's ready.


--
Sami Siren





--
 Sami Siren





Re: NUTCH-684 [was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Nutch 1.0]

2009-03-09 Thread Doğacan Güney
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 17:46, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Doğacan Güney wrote:


 On 09.Mar.2009, at 11:05, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com
 mailto:ssi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Doğacan Güney wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 20:25, Sami Siren ssi...@gmail.com
 mailto:ssi...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hello,

 I have packaged the first release candidate for Apache Nutch 1.0
 release at

 http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-1.0/rc0/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Esiren/nutch-1.0/rc0/

 See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and
 latest
 changes. The release was made from tag:

 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/nutch/tags/release-1.0-rc0/?pathrev=751480

 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.0. The vote is
 open
 for the next 72 hours. Only votes from Lucene PMC members are binding,
 but
 everyone is welcome to check the release candidate and voice their
 approval
 or disapproval. The vote  passes if at least three binding +1 votes are
 cast.

 [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Nutch 1.0
 [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...

 Thanks!



 That's great!

 I would like to see NUTCH-684 in but I guess I was too late :)

 Anyway, my non-binding +1.


 uh, I missed that one, sorry. Do you think it's ready to be included?
 (IMO that's an important feature) It's not a big deal for me to rebuild the
 package with that feature included.


 I only tested it on a small crawl. Still, I believe it is important too so
 I would like to include it. Worst case we release a 1.0.1 soon after:)

 I am fine either way. So if you think it's good enough to go in just commit
 it and I'll build another rc. If not then we can release it later too when
 it's ready.


Committed, thanks for waiting :)

 --
 Sami Siren



 --
  Sami Siren






-- 
Doğacan Güney