[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7194) Threads are going in blocked state - OAK segment

2018-01-23 Thread Kshitiz Garg (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kshitiz Garg updated OAK-7194:
--
Summary: Threads are going in blocked state - OAK segment  (was: Threads 
are going in blocked state)

> Threads are going in blocked state - OAK segment
> 
>
> Key: OAK-7194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7194
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-tar
>Affects Versions: 1.6.2
>Reporter: Kshitiz Garg
>Priority: Critical
>
> We are using AEM and it internally is using OAK 1.6.2. Our application is 
> going to a choked state many a times. Our thread dump analysis is always 
> pointing to this stack trace with many blocked threads. Is it a known issue? 
> Or is there a setting to avoid it? We are using tar files based repository 
> underneath and are using default settings:
>  
> {noformat}
> - nativeId:0x1208 - state:BLOCKED
> stackTrace:
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId.getSegment(SegmentId.java:121)
> - waiting to lock <0x000414d8c250> (a 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.Record.getSegment(Record.java:70)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:160)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNodeState.getChildNode(SegmentNodeState.java:412)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.createChild(ImmutableTree.java:125)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:176)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:81)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionUtil.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionUtil.java:83)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionStoreImpl.java:132)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getNumEntries(PermissionStoreImpl.java:103)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryCache.getNumEntries(PermissionEntryCache.java:102)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.init(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:79)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:72)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:112)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.create(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:126)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getCompiledPermissions(PermissionProviderImpl.java:162)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getTreePermission(PermissionProviderImpl.java:151)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositeTreePermission.create(CompositeTreePermission.java:67)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositePermissionProvider.getTreePermission(CompositePermissionProvider.java:147)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:357)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.access$100(SecureNodeBuilder.java:49)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder$ReadablePropertyPredicate.apply(SecureNodeBuilder.java:377)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getProperty(SecureNodeBuilder.java:184)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.AbstractTree.getProperty(AbstractTree.java:249)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableTree.getProperty(MutableTree.java:128)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getStringInternal(TreeUtil.java:108)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getString(TreeUtil.java:101)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getNamespacesProperty(GlobalNameMapper.java:191)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getOakURIOrNull(GlobalNameMapper.java:187)
> - eliminated <0x00070c692f50> (a 
> 

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7183) Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1

2018-01-23 Thread Alex Deparvu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16336027#comment-16336027
 ] 

Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-7183:
---

I would need JCR-4249, to unblock some of the work needed on the Oak side.

> Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: parent
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7194) Threads are going in blocked state

2018-01-23 Thread Kshitiz Garg (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kshitiz Garg updated OAK-7194:
--
Description: 
We are using AEM and it internally is using OAK 1.6.2. Our application is going 
to a choked state many a times. Our thread dump analysis is always pointing to 
this stack trace with many blocked threads. Is it a known issue? Or is there a 
setting to avoid it? We are using tar files based repository underneath and are 
using default settings:

 
{noformat}
- nativeId:0x1208 - state:BLOCKED
stackTrace:
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId.getSegment(SegmentId.java:121)
- waiting to lock <0x000414d8c250> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.Record.getSegment(Record.java:70)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:160)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNodeState.getChildNode(SegmentNodeState.java:412)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.createChild(ImmutableTree.java:125)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:176)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:81)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionUtil.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionUtil.java:83)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionStoreImpl.java:132)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getNumEntries(PermissionStoreImpl.java:103)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryCache.getNumEntries(PermissionEntryCache.java:102)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.init(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:79)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:72)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:112)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.create(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:126)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getCompiledPermissions(PermissionProviderImpl.java:162)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getTreePermission(PermissionProviderImpl.java:151)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositeTreePermission.create(CompositeTreePermission.java:67)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositePermissionProvider.getTreePermission(CompositePermissionProvider.java:147)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:357)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.access$100(SecureNodeBuilder.java:49)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder$ReadablePropertyPredicate.apply(SecureNodeBuilder.java:377)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getProperty(SecureNodeBuilder.java:184)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.AbstractTree.getProperty(AbstractTree.java:249)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableTree.getProperty(MutableTree.java:128)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getStringInternal(TreeUtil.java:108)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getString(TreeUtil.java:101)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getNamespacesProperty(GlobalNameMapper.java:191)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getOakURIOrNull(GlobalNameMapper.java:187)
- eliminated <0x00070c692f50> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces.getNamespaceURI(SessionNamespaces.java:128)
- locked <0x00070c692f50> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionImpl.getNamespaceURI(SessionImpl.java:738)
at 
com.adobe.granite.repository.impl.CRX3SessionImpl.getNamespaceURI(CRX3SessionImpl.java:283)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.JcrNamespaceMangler.unmangleNamespaces(JcrNamespaceMangler.java:97)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.unmangleNamespaces(ResourceResolverImpl.java:1109)
at 

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7194) Threads are going in blocked state

2018-01-23 Thread Kshitiz Garg (JIRA)
Kshitiz Garg created OAK-7194:
-

 Summary: Threads are going in blocked state
 Key: OAK-7194
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7194
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: segment-tar
Affects Versions: 1.6.2
Reporter: Kshitiz Garg


We are using AEM and it internally is using OAK 1.6.2. Our application is going 
to a choked state many a times. Our thread dump analysis is always pointing to 
this stack trace with many blocked threads. Is it a known issue? Or is there a 
setting to avoid it? We are using tar files based repository underneath:

 
{noformat}
- nativeId:0x1208 - state:BLOCKED
stackTrace:
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId.getSegment(SegmentId.java:121)
- waiting to lock <0x000414d8c250> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentId)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.Record.getSegment(Record.java:70)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:160)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.MapRecord.getEntry(MapRecord.java:192)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNodeState.getChildNode(SegmentNodeState.java:412)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.createChild(ImmutableTree.java:125)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:176)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.ImmutableTree.getChild(ImmutableTree.java:81)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionUtil.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionUtil.java:83)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getPrincipalRoot(PermissionStoreImpl.java:132)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionStoreImpl.getNumEntries(PermissionStoreImpl.java:103)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryCache.getNumEntries(PermissionEntryCache.java:102)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.init(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:79)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionEntryProviderImpl.(PermissionEntryProviderImpl.java:72)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:112)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.CompiledPermissionImpl.create(CompiledPermissionImpl.java:126)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getCompiledPermissions(PermissionProviderImpl.java:162)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.permission.PermissionProviderImpl.getTreePermission(PermissionProviderImpl.java:151)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositeTreePermission.create(CompositeTreePermission.java:67)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.authorization.composite.CompositePermissionProvider.getTreePermission(CompositePermissionProvider.java:147)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:357)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getTreePermission(SecureNodeBuilder.java:360)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.access$100(SecureNodeBuilder.java:49)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder$ReadablePropertyPredicate.apply(SecureNodeBuilder.java:377)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.SecureNodeBuilder.getProperty(SecureNodeBuilder.java:184)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.AbstractTree.getProperty(AbstractTree.java:249)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableTree.getProperty(MutableTree.java:128)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getStringInternal(TreeUtil.java:108)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util.TreeUtil.getString(TreeUtil.java:101)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getNamespacesProperty(GlobalNameMapper.java:191)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.namepath.GlobalNameMapper.getOakURIOrNull(GlobalNameMapper.java:187)
- eliminated <0x00070c692f50> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces.getNamespaceURI(SessionNamespaces.java:128)
- locked <0x00070c692f50> (a 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionNamespaces)
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionImpl.getNamespaceURI(SessionImpl.java:738)
at 
com.adobe.granite.repository.impl.CRX3SessionImpl.getNamespaceURI(CRX3SessionImpl.java:283)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5506) reject node names with unpaired surrogates early

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335944#comment-16335944
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-5506:
-

The current patch is insufficient; we also need a check in 
{{Namespaces.isValidLocalName()}}.

> reject node names with unpaired surrogates early
> 
>
> Key: OAK-5506
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Components: core, jcr, segment-tar
>Affects Versions: 1.5.18
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Francesco Mari
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-5506-01.patch, OAK-5506-02.patch, 
> OAK-5506-name-conversion.diff, OAK-5506.diff, ValidNamesTest.java
>
>
> Apparently, the following node name is accepted:
>{{"foo\ud800"}}
> but a subsequent {{getPath()}} call fails:
> {noformat}
> javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: This item [/test_node/foo?] does not 
> exist anymore
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.ItemDelegate.checkAlive(ItemDelegate.java:86)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.operation.ItemOperation.checkPreconditions(ItemOperation.java:34)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.prePerform(SessionDelegate.java:615)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.perform(SessionDelegate.java:205)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.perform(ItemImpl.java:112)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.getPath(ItemImpl.java:140)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.NodeImpl.getPath(NodeImpl.java:106)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.nameTest(ValidNamesTest.java:271)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.testUnpairedSurrogate(ValidNamesTest.java:259)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source){noformat}
> (test case follows)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5506) reject node names with unpaired surrogates early

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-5506:

Labels:   (was: patch-available)

> reject node names with unpaired surrogates early
> 
>
> Key: OAK-5506
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Components: core, jcr, segment-tar
>Affects Versions: 1.5.18
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Francesco Mari
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-5506-01.patch, OAK-5506-02.patch, 
> OAK-5506-name-conversion.diff, OAK-5506.diff, ValidNamesTest.java
>
>
> Apparently, the following node name is accepted:
>{{"foo\ud800"}}
> but a subsequent {{getPath()}} call fails:
> {noformat}
> javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: This item [/test_node/foo?] does not 
> exist anymore
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.ItemDelegate.checkAlive(ItemDelegate.java:86)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.operation.ItemOperation.checkPreconditions(ItemOperation.java:34)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.prePerform(SessionDelegate.java:615)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.perform(SessionDelegate.java:205)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.perform(ItemImpl.java:112)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.getPath(ItemImpl.java:140)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.NodeImpl.getPath(NodeImpl.java:106)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.nameTest(ValidNamesTest.java:271)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.testUnpairedSurrogate(ValidNamesTest.java:259)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source){noformat}
> (test case follows)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7183) Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335805#comment-16335805
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7183:
-

We'll update when it's ready :).

> Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: parent
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7183) Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-7183:

Fix Version/s: (was: 1.9.0)

> Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: parent
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7183) Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1

2018-01-23 Thread Davide Giannella (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335778#comment-16335778
 ] 

Davide Giannella commented on OAK-7183:
---

Didn't actually check. Do we have anything in JR that requires us to update 
trunk? Otherwise I would wait for the first thing we need to take from JR for 
the actual update.

> Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: parent
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.10
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7183) Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1

2018-01-23 Thread Davide Giannella (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Davide Giannella updated OAK-7183:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.10
   1.9.0

> Update Oak trunk to Jackrabbit 2.17.1
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7183
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: parent
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.10
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Closed] (OAK-7167) 1.0: oak-lucene uses packages from oak-core that are not exported

2018-01-23 Thread Manfred Baedke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Manfred Baedke closed OAK-7167.
---

> 1.0: oak-lucene uses packages from oak-core that are not exported
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7167
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: core
>Affects Versions: 1.0.40
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0.41
>
>
> See comments in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5299.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Closed] (OAK-7170) Port OSGiIT.bundleStates() test back to 1.0

2018-01-23 Thread Manfred Baedke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Manfred Baedke closed OAK-7170.
---

> Port OSGiIT.bundleStates() test back to 1.0
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-7170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7170
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: it
>Affects Versions: 1.0.40
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0.41
>
>
> (this test was introduced for OAK-2402)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4982) Enable bundling of some more nodetypes by default

2018-01-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335688#comment-16335688
 ] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-4982:
---

Other candidates:
- {{nt:versionHistory}}, which always has a {{jcr:rootVersion}} and 
{{jcr:versionLabels}} child node.
- {{nt:version}} always has a single child node {{jcr:frozenNode}}

See attached [^OAK-4982.patch].

> Enable bundling of some more nodetypes by default
> -
>
> Key: OAK-4982
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4982
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-4982.patch
>
>
> For OAK-4975 [~mreutegg] suggested to bundle few more nodetypes
> * rep:NodeType for JCR node types under /jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes
> * rep:VersionStorage for intermediate version storage nodes under 
> /jcr:system. We would probably have to limit it to one level. Each 
> intermediate version storage node can have up to 255 child nodes.
> * oak:QueryIndexDefinition with one level that includes well known child 
> nodes like: :data, :status, indexRules, :references, :weakreferences. Maybe 
> include even more under indexRules?
> This issue is meant explore that



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4982) Enable bundling of some more nodetypes by default

2018-01-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-4982:
--
Attachment: OAK-4982.patch

> Enable bundling of some more nodetypes by default
> -
>
> Key: OAK-4982
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4982
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-4982.patch
>
>
> For OAK-4975 [~mreutegg] suggested to bundle few more nodetypes
> * rep:NodeType for JCR node types under /jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes
> * rep:VersionStorage for intermediate version storage nodes under 
> /jcr:system. We would probably have to limit it to one level. Each 
> intermediate version storage node can have up to 255 child nodes.
> * oak:QueryIndexDefinition with one level that includes well known child 
> nodes like: :data, :status, indexRules, :references, :weakreferences. Maybe 
> include even more under indexRules?
> This issue is meant explore that



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7186) avoid use of guava Iterators.emptyIterator()

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335579#comment-16335579
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7186:
-

trunk: [r1821983|http://svn.apache.org/r1821983] 
[r1821982|http://svn.apache.org/r1821982] 
[r1821981|http://svn.apache.org/r1821981] 
[r1821980|http://svn.apache.org/r1821980] 
[r1821979|http://svn.apache.org/r1821979] 
[r1821978|http://svn.apache.org/r1821978] 
[r1821977|http://svn.apache.org/r1821977] 
[r1821976|http://svn.apache.org/r1821976] 
[r1821975|http://svn.apache.org/r1821975]

> avoid use of guava Iterators.emptyIterator()
> 
>
> Key: OAK-7186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7186
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Trivial
>  Labels: candidate_oak_1_8
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-7186.diff
>
>
> Deprecated in Guava 19, removed in 20.
>  
> [https://google.github.io/guava/releases/19.0/api/docs/com/google/common/collect/Iterators.html#emptyIterator()]
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-7186) avoid use of guava Iterators.emptyIterator()

2018-01-23 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-7186.
-
   Resolution: Fixed
 Assignee: Julian Reschke
Fix Version/s: 1.10
   1.9.0

> avoid use of guava Iterators.emptyIterator()
> 
>
> Key: OAK-7186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7186
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Trivial
>  Labels: candidate_oak_1_8
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-7186.diff
>
>
> Deprecated in Guava 19, removed in 20.
>  
> [https://google.github.io/guava/releases/19.0/api/docs/com/google/common/collect/Iterators.html#emptyIterator()]
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6254) DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size

2018-01-23 Thread Amit Jain (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335544#comment-16335544
 ] 

Amit Jain commented on OAK-6254:


[~tmueller]
bq. Much faster would be to calculate the size during garbage collection.
Yes that is certainly feasible and the storage could be in the metadata space 
in the datastore already being used for other things.

> DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> The estimated size of the datastore (on disk) is needed to:
> * monitor growth over time, or growth of certain operations
> * monitor if garbage collection is effective
> * avoid out of disk space
> * estimate backup size
> * statistical purposes (for example, if there are many repositories, to group 
> them by size)
> Datastore size: we could use the following heuristic: We could read the file 
> sizes in ./datastore/00/00 (if it exists) and multiply by 65536; or 
> ./datastore/00 and multiply by 256. That would give a rough estimation 
> (within about 20% for repositories with datastore size > 50 GB).
> I think this is mainly important for the FileDataStore. The S3 datastore, if 
> there is a simple and fast S3 API to read the size, then that would be good 
> as well, but if there is none, then returning "unknown" is fine for me.
> As for the API, I would use something like this: {{long 
> getEstimatedStorageSize(int accuracyLevel)}} with accuracyLevel 1 for 
> inaccurate (fastest), 2 more accurate (slower),..., 9 precise (possibly very 
> slow). Similar to 
> [java.util.zip.Deflater.setLevel|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/zip/Deflater.html#setLevel(int)].
>  I would expect it takes up to 1 second for accuracyLevel 0, up to 5 seconds 
> for accuracyLevel 1, and possibly hours for level 9. With level 1, I would 
> read files in 00/00, with level 2 - 8 I would read files in 00, and with 
> level 9 I would read all the files. For level 1, I wouldn't stop; for level 
> 2, if it takes more than 5 seconds, I would stop and return the current best 
> estimate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6254) DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size

2018-01-23 Thread Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335543#comment-16335543
 ] 

Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-6254:
--

bq. The size could be stored in a file, and updated whenever datastore GC is 
run.

It may be better to store the unstructured data in NodeStore itself under 
specific node. 

> DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> The estimated size of the datastore (on disk) is needed to:
> * monitor growth over time, or growth of certain operations
> * monitor if garbage collection is effective
> * avoid out of disk space
> * estimate backup size
> * statistical purposes (for example, if there are many repositories, to group 
> them by size)
> Datastore size: we could use the following heuristic: We could read the file 
> sizes in ./datastore/00/00 (if it exists) and multiply by 65536; or 
> ./datastore/00 and multiply by 256. That would give a rough estimation 
> (within about 20% for repositories with datastore size > 50 GB).
> I think this is mainly important for the FileDataStore. The S3 datastore, if 
> there is a simple and fast S3 API to read the size, then that would be good 
> as well, but if there is none, then returning "unknown" is fine for me.
> As for the API, I would use something like this: {{long 
> getEstimatedStorageSize(int accuracyLevel)}} with accuracyLevel 1 for 
> inaccurate (fastest), 2 more accurate (slower),..., 9 precise (possibly very 
> slow). Similar to 
> [java.util.zip.Deflater.setLevel|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/zip/Deflater.html#setLevel(int)].
>  I would expect it takes up to 1 second for accuracyLevel 0, up to 5 seconds 
> for accuracyLevel 1, and possibly hours for level 9. With level 1, I would 
> read files in 00/00, with level 2 - 8 I would read files in 00, and with 
> level 9 I would read all the files. For level 1, I wouldn't stop; for level 
> 2, if it takes more than 5 seconds, I would stop and return the current best 
> estimate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6254) DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size

2018-01-23 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16335540#comment-16335540
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6254:
-

Much faster would be to calculate the size during garbage collection. [~amjain] 
do you think it would be feasible? The size could be stored in a file, and 
updated whenever datastore GC is run.

We could also store a histogram, for different file sizes, as follows (for each 
size: total number of files, total file size): up to 2 KB, up to 16 KB, up to 
128 KB, up to 1 MB, up to 8 MB,...

> DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> The estimated size of the datastore (on disk) is needed to:
> * monitor growth over time, or growth of certain operations
> * monitor if garbage collection is effective
> * avoid out of disk space
> * estimate backup size
> * statistical purposes (for example, if there are many repositories, to group 
> them by size)
> Datastore size: we could use the following heuristic: We could read the file 
> sizes in ./datastore/00/00 (if it exists) and multiply by 65536; or 
> ./datastore/00 and multiply by 256. That would give a rough estimation 
> (within about 20% for repositories with datastore size > 50 GB).
> I think this is mainly important for the FileDataStore. The S3 datastore, if 
> there is a simple and fast S3 API to read the size, then that would be good 
> as well, but if there is none, then returning "unknown" is fine for me.
> As for the API, I would use something like this: {{long 
> getEstimatedStorageSize(int accuracyLevel)}} with accuracyLevel 1 for 
> inaccurate (fastest), 2 more accurate (slower),..., 9 precise (possibly very 
> slow). Similar to 
> [java.util.zip.Deflater.setLevel|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/zip/Deflater.html#setLevel(int)].
>  I would expect it takes up to 1 second for accuracyLevel 0, up to 5 seconds 
> for accuracyLevel 1, and possibly hours for level 9. With level 1, I would 
> read files in 00/00, with level 2 - 8 I would read files in 00, and with 
> level 9 I would read all the files. For level 1, I wouldn't stop; for level 
> 2, if it takes more than 5 seconds, I would stop and return the current best 
> estimate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7193) DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size estimation)

2018-01-23 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller updated OAK-7193:

Fix Version/s: 1.10

> DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size estimation)
> 
>
> Key: OAK-7193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7193
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> Extension of OAK-6254: in addition to retrieving the size, it would be good 
> to retrieve the estimated number and total size per file type. A simple (and 
> in my view sufficient) solution is to use the first few bytes ("magic 
> numbers", 2 bytes should be enough) to get the file type. That would allow to 
> estimate, for example, the number of, and total size, of PDF files, JPEG, 
> Lucene index and so on. A histogram would be nice as well, but I think is not 
> needed.
> To speed up calculation, the blob ID could be extended with the first 2 bytes 
> of the file content, that is: #@ where magic is the 
> first two bytes, in hex. That would allow to quickly get the data from the 
> blob ids (no need to actually read content).
> Sampling should be enough. The longer it takes, the more accurate the data. 
> We could store the data while doing datastore GC, in which case the returned 
> data would be somewhat stale; that's OK.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (OAK-7193) DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size estimation)

2018-01-23 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)
Thomas Mueller created OAK-7193:
---

 Summary: DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size 
estimation)
 Key: OAK-7193
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7193
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: blob
Reporter: Thomas Mueller


Extension of OAK-6254: in addition to retrieving the size, it would be good to 
retrieve the estimated number and total size per file type. A simple (and in my 
view sufficient) solution is to use the first few bytes ("magic numbers", 2 
bytes should be enough) to get the file type. That would allow to estimate, for 
example, the number of, and total size, of PDF files, JPEG, Lucene index and so 
on. A histogram would be nice as well, but I think is not needed.

To speed up calculation, the blob ID could be extended with the first 2 bytes 
of the file content, that is: #@ where magic is the first 
two bytes, in hex. That would allow to quickly get the data from the blob ids 
(no need to actually read content).

Sampling should be enough. The longer it takes, the more accurate the data. We 
could store the data while doing datastore GC, in which case the returned data 
would be somewhat stale; that's OK.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6254) DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size

2018-01-23 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller updated OAK-6254:

Fix Version/s: 1.10

> DataStore: API to retrieve approximate storage size
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6254
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> The estimated size of the datastore (on disk) is needed to:
> * monitor growth over time, or growth of certain operations
> * monitor if garbage collection is effective
> * avoid out of disk space
> * estimate backup size
> * statistical purposes (for example, if there are many repositories, to group 
> them by size)
> Datastore size: we could use the following heuristic: We could read the file 
> sizes in ./datastore/00/00 (if it exists) and multiply by 65536; or 
> ./datastore/00 and multiply by 256. That would give a rough estimation 
> (within about 20% for repositories with datastore size > 50 GB).
> I think this is mainly important for the FileDataStore. The S3 datastore, if 
> there is a simple and fast S3 API to read the size, then that would be good 
> as well, but if there is none, then returning "unknown" is fine for me.
> As for the API, I would use something like this: {{long 
> getEstimatedStorageSize(int accuracyLevel)}} with accuracyLevel 1 for 
> inaccurate (fastest), 2 more accurate (slower),..., 9 precise (possibly very 
> slow). Similar to 
> [java.util.zip.Deflater.setLevel|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/zip/Deflater.html#setLevel(int)].
>  I would expect it takes up to 1 second for accuracyLevel 0, up to 5 seconds 
> for accuracyLevel 1, and possibly hours for level 9. With level 1, I would 
> read files in 00/00, with level 2 - 8 I would read files in 00, and with 
> level 9 I would read all the files. For level 1, I wouldn't stop; for level 
> 2, if it takes more than 5 seconds, I would stop and return the current best 
> estimate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7192) Remove package export for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks

2018-01-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-7192:
--
Summary: Remove package export for 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks  (was: [RTC] Remove package export 
for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks)

> Remove package export for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks
> 
>
> Key: OAK-7192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7192
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: composite
>Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> It appears the package {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks}} is only 
> used internally by the oak-store-composite module and should not be exported.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7192) [RTC] Remove package export for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks

2018-01-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-7192:
--
Summary: [RTC] Remove package export for 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks  (was: Remove package export for 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks)

> [RTC] Remove package export for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks
> --
>
> Key: OAK-7192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7192
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: composite
>Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10
>
>
> It appears the package {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks}} is only 
> used internally by the oak-store-composite module and should not be exported.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (OAK-7192) Remove package export for org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks

2018-01-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
Marcel Reutegger created OAK-7192:
-

 Summary: Remove package export for 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks
 Key: OAK-7192
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7192
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: composite
Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
 Fix For: 1.10


It appears the package {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.composite.checks}} is only 
used internally by the oak-store-composite module and should not be exported.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)