[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10275) oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730250#comment-17730250 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10275: -- trunk: [0e7ff58d14|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/0e7ff58d14b26beda86f311787c2418af067f7cd] > oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6 > --- > > Key: OAK-10275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Trivial > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Introduced in > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10275) oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10275. -- Resolution: Fixed > oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6 > --- > > Key: OAK-10275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Introduced in > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10275) oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10275: - Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6 > --- > > Key: OAK-10275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Trivial > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Introduced in > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10277) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #977 failed
Hudson created OAK-10277: Summary: Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #977 failed Key: OAK-10277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10277 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Components: continuous integration Reporter: Hudson No description is provided The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #977 has failed. First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #977|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/977/] [console log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/977/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10276) switch oak-upgrade to shaded guava
Julian Reschke created OAK-10276: Summary: switch oak-upgrade to shaded guava Key: OAK-10276 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10276 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Technical task Components: elastic-search Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke Fix For: 1.54.0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10276) switch oak-upgrade to shaded guava
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10276: - Component/s: upgrade (was: elastic-search) > switch oak-upgrade to shaded guava > -- > > Key: OAK-10276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10276 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10275) oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10275: - Summary: oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6 (was: remove workraround for Java 1.6) > oak-upgrade: remove workaround for Java 1.6 > --- > > Key: OAK-10275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Introduced in > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10275) remove workraround for Java 1.6
Julian Reschke created OAK-10275: Summary: remove workraround for Java 1.6 Key: OAK-10275 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10275 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: upgrade Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke Fix For: 1.54.0 Introduced in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-1719) Missing commit hooks in upgrade
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730142#comment-17730142 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-1719: - trunk: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.22: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] ...in retired branches: 1.10: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.8: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.6: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.4: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.2: (1.1.0) [35a8cc69a0|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/35a8cc69a0e4b4692c892bbf4e57aebaae3d4cb6] [5e6906ad61|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e6906ad61e8c2b1486712588563a596180ca215] [08d7b1b2e7|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/08d7b1b2e751a91098d79657e144f54d1e505368] [e511fa75c9|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e511fa75c9d7bf17f49b06290219811aff033877] [697a3289a8|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/697a3289a85d1261724cdb3bcf727fe9ca1425ff] [97fbc1eab2|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/97fbc1eab20d69a42289e73c19404123701d970d] 1.0: (1.0.0) [f5b5e15097|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/f5b5e150978c585d222e00b58f1e3e040cee9309] [dc5b422c2d|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/dc5b422c2d6b1f77b0c06a708f57a88b00836422] > Missing commit hooks in upgrade >
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10274) oak-core-spi: remove Guava from public API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10274: - Component/s: core-spi (was: commons) > oak-core-spi: remove Guava from public API > -- > > Key: OAK-10274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10274 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: core-spi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10274) oak-core-spi: remove Guava from public API
Julian Reschke created OAK-10274: Summary: oak-core-spi: remove Guava from public API Key: OAK-10274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10274 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Technical task Components: commons Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10273) Index-definition json created during oak-run reindex should be flushed in chunks
Mohit Kataria created OAK-10273: --- Summary: Index-definition json created during oak-run reindex should be flushed in chunks Key: OAK-10273 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10273 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement Components: indexing Reporter: Mohit Kataria Assignee: Mohit Kataria For large repositories, running oak-run reindex command lead to OOME as index-definition created during process is serialised as whole. One solution would be to flush the serialised index-definition in chunks to avoid OOME. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10264) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #965 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730107#comment-17730107 ] Hudson commented on OAK-10264: -- Previously failing build now is OK. Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #976|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/976/] [console log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/976/console] > Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #965 failed > - > > Key: OAK-10264 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10264 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #965 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk > #965|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/965/] > [console > log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/965/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10252) Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type interfaces
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730080#comment-17730080 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10252: -- trunk: [dd6d968c80|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/dd6d968c80c5d4f94c4202ccacead697820e2cad] > Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type > interfaces > --- > > Key: OAK-10252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-api >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Assignee: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Currently there is almost no annotation related to Provider or Consumer type > maintained on the interfaces of > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-jackrabbit-api. > That leads to a default of almost all interfaces being assumed ConsumerType > and therefore requiring all backwards-incompatible changes (for > implementations) a major version increment (which breaks every consuming > bundle). > For ProviderType interfaces > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a provider type normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change. > However, a non-binary-compatible change affecting a protected access member > only requires incrementing the minor version of the type's package. This > change will require all providers to be updated to handle the change, but > consumers will not require changes since they only use, and do not extend, > the provider type and thus could not access protected access members of the > provider type. > While for ConsumerType interfaces (the default) > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a consumer type or a binary-compatible > change to a consumer type affecting an abstract method normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change > since consumers that implement or extend the consumer type and all providers > must understand the change in the consumer type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10252) Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type interfaces
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10252: - Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type > interfaces > --- > > Key: OAK-10252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-api >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Assignee: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Currently there is almost no annotation related to Provider or Consumer type > maintained on the interfaces of > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-jackrabbit-api. > That leads to a default of almost all interfaces being assumed ConsumerType > and therefore requiring all backwards-incompatible changes (for > implementations) a major version increment (which breaks every consuming > bundle). > For ProviderType interfaces > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a provider type normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change. > However, a non-binary-compatible change affecting a protected access member > only requires incrementing the minor version of the type's package. This > change will require all providers to be updated to handle the change, but > consumers will not require changes since they only use, and do not extend, > the provider type and thus could not access protected access members of the > provider type. > While for ConsumerType interfaces (the default) > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a consumer type or a binary-compatible > change to a consumer type affecting an abstract method normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change > since consumers that implement or extend the consumer type and all providers > must understand the change in the consumer type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10252) Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type interfaces
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10252. -- Fix Version/s: 1.54.0 Resolution: Fixed > Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type > interfaces > --- > > Key: OAK-10252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-api >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Assignee: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > > Currently there is almost no annotation related to Provider or Consumer type > maintained on the interfaces of > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-jackrabbit-api. > That leads to a default of almost all interfaces being assumed ConsumerType > and therefore requiring all backwards-incompatible changes (for > implementations) a major version increment (which breaks every consuming > bundle). > For ProviderType interfaces > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a provider type normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change. > However, a non-binary-compatible change affecting a protected access member > only requires incrementing the minor version of the type's package. This > change will require all providers to be updated to handle the change, but > consumers will not require changes since they only use, and do not extend, > the provider type and thus could not access protected access members of the > provider type. > While for ConsumerType interfaces (the default) > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a consumer type or a binary-compatible > change to a consumer type affecting an abstract method normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change > since consumers that implement or extend the consumer type and all providers > must understand the change in the consumer type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10267) oak-search-elastic: index should be more lenient when a field cannot be converted to the mapped type
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fabrizio Fortino resolved OAK-10267. Fix Version/s: 1.54.0 Resolution: Fixed > oak-search-elastic: index should be more lenient when a field cannot be > converted to the mapped type > > > Key: OAK-10267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10267 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: elastic-search, indexing >Reporter: Fabrizio Fortino >Assignee: Fabrizio Fortino >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.54.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10252) Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type interfaces
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730066#comment-17730066 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10252: -- Merged PR. > Distinguish in oak-jackrabbit-api between provider and consumer type > interfaces > --- > > Key: OAK-10252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10252 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-api >Reporter: Konrad Windszus >Assignee: Konrad Windszus >Priority: Major > > Currently there is almost no annotation related to Provider or Consumer type > maintained on the interfaces of > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-jackrabbit-api. > That leads to a default of almost all interfaces being assumed ConsumerType > and therefore requiring all backwards-incompatible changes (for > implementations) a major version increment (which breaks every consuming > bundle). > For ProviderType interfaces > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ProviderType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a provider type normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change. > However, a non-binary-compatible change affecting a protected access member > only requires incrementing the minor version of the type's package. This > change will require all providers to be updated to handle the change, but > consumers will not require changes since they only use, and do not extend, > the provider type and thus could not access protected access members of the > provider type. > While for ConsumerType interfaces (the default) > (https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html) > bq. A non-binary-compatible change to a consumer type or a binary-compatible > change to a consumer type affecting an abstract method normally requires > incrementing the major version of the type's package. This change will > require all providers and all consumers to be updated to handle the change > since consumers that implement or extend the consumer type and all providers > must understand the change in the consumer type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10022) ReadOnlyFileStore#collectBlobReferences throws NullPointerException if azure blob with binary references is missing in the tar directory
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17730014#comment-17730014 ] Carlo Jelmini commented on OAK-10022: - This fix should be reversed, as explained in OAK-10272. > ReadOnlyFileStore#collectBlobReferences throws NullPointerException if azure > blob with binary references is missing in the tar directory > > > Key: OAK-10022 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10022 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: segment-azure >Affects Versions: 1.44.0, 1.46.0 >Reporter: Miroslav Smiljanic >Assignee: Miroslav Smiljanic >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.48.0 > > Attachments: OAK-10022_test.patch > > > The test case that illustrates the problem: [^OAK-10022_test.patch] > This is caused by changes introduced in OAK-9914, where for the read-only Oak > process, TAR reader is not initiating archive recovery for the unclosed > archive. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10272) Reverse #OAK-10022
Carlo Jelmini created OAK-10272: --- Summary: Reverse #OAK-10022 Key: OAK-10272 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10272 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: segment-azure Affects Versions: 1.48.0 Reporter: Carlo Jelmini The changes introduced in OAK-10022, where the binary references file (.brf) is updated on every flush should be reverted. They were introduced to fix a NullPointerException thrown in ReadOnlyFileStore#collectBlobReferences because of the absence of the .brf file in the last open archive. However this fix was not enough and a new fix was needed (OAK-10212). This means the changes in OAK-10022 are no longer necessary. Given that updating the brf file in-place frequently on Azure can impact write performance and backup tooling, it's better to roll them back. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
