[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

2023-10-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1834#comment-1834
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10509:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1237|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1237/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1237/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1228|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Created] (OAK-10517) Consistently clean membership when switch between default and dynamic sync

2023-10-20 Thread Angela Schreiber (Jira)
Angela Schreiber created OAK-10517:
--

 Summary: Consistently clean membership when switch between default 
and dynamic sync 
 Key: OAK-10517
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10517
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: auth-external
Reporter: Angela Schreiber
Assignee: Angela Schreiber


When dynamic sync is turned on for an existing oak repository any group 
membership previously synchronized with the default sync context will be clean 
up to comply with the new dynamic representation. However, this only works for 
the first switch. If the configuration is switched back to default and again to 
dynamic, the cleanup will be skipped.

cc: [~nscendoni]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

2023-10-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1759#comment-1759
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10509:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1236|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1236/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1236/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1228|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1736#comment-1736
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-9459:
-

trunk: (1.44.0) 
[bb73fe474d|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/bb73fe474d83709f224229dea668a99d9c80c198]
1.22: (1.22.10) 
[fa4d1b3648|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/fa4d1b3648d35bf6dadf2ccc5346d228847cbaf0]

...in retired branches:
1.8: (1.8.25) 
[1cf3c5f499|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/1cf3c5f4996e296f652f21acd9e5aaad90c0ce1e]
1.6: (1.6.22) 
[4838f00cfd|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/4838f00cfdec6f9f3b59e7191b9cfa0dd3978dae]


> ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node 
> has a property definition unknown by the frozen node
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-9459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jcr
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Manfred Baedke
>Priority: Major
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4680
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 473, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 12.546 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.tck.VersionIT
> [ERROR] 
> testRestoreRemovesMixin(org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest)  
> Time elapsed: 0.087 s  <<< ERROR!
> javax.jcr.RepositoryException: 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakVersion: 
> Unexpected RepositoryException
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest.testRestoreRemovesMixin(RestoreTest.java:1486)
> Caused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: 
> OakVersion: Unexpected RepositoryException
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest.testRestoreRemovesMixin(RestoreTest.java:1486)
> Caused by: javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: No matching 
> property definition found for jcr:title
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest.testRestoreRemovesMixin(RestoreTest.java:1486)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10437) Deprecate all download strategies except PIPELINED

2023-10-20 Thread Nuno Santos (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nuno Santos resolved OAK-10437.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.60.0
   Resolution: Done

> Deprecate all download strategies except PIPELINED
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10437
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: indexing
>Reporter: Nuno Santos
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: Indexing
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>
> Deprecate these strategies: STORE_AND_SORT, TRAVERSE_WITH_SORT, 
> MULTITHREADED_TRAVERSE_WITH_SORT.
>  
> When they are used, print a log message saying clearly that they are 
> deprecated for removal and suggest using PIPELINED.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10505) Make PIPELINED the default download strategy in the indexing job

2023-10-20 Thread Nuno Santos (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nuno Santos resolved OAK-10505.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.60.0
   Resolution: Done

> Make PIPELINED the default download strategy in the indexing job
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10505
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10505
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: indexing
>Reporter: Nuno Santos
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

2023-10-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1710#comment-1710
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10509:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1235|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1235/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1235/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1228|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6760) Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1687#comment-1687
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6760:
-

trunk: 
[8d307fcdaa|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/8d307fcdaa8d43d4259cb18a9367a4e4d132600c]

> Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud
>Reporter: Robert Munteanu
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-6760) Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-6760.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.60.0
   Resolution: Fixed

> Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud
>Reporter: Robert Munteanu
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6760) Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1685#comment-1685
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6760:
-

Using https://github.com/jsedding/osgi-ds-metatype-diff I see:

{noformat}
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.datastore.S3DataStore
Declarative Services
References
statisticsProvider
- bind = bindStatisticsProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindStatisticsProvider (String)
+ field = statisticsProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)

org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.datastore.SharedS3DataStore
Declarative Services
References
statisticsProvider
- bind = bindStatisticsProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindStatisticsProvider (String)
+ field = statisticsProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
{noformat}

...which IMHO is expected and correct.

> Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud
>Reporter: Robert Munteanu
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10503) Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step

2023-10-20 Thread Nitin Gupta (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nitin Gupta reassigned OAK-10503:
-

Assignee: Nitin Gupta

> Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10503
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
>
> There could be a case where a node was moved/renamed which apparently results 
> the incremental FFS to have 2 entries.
>  
> For example, 
> NodeA | \{"prop":"value"} 
> renamed to NodeB | \{"prop":"value"}
>  
> then the incremental FFS has entries - 
> NodeA | \{"prop":"value"}  | D
> NodeB | \{"prop":"value"} | M
>  
> The second entry's operand should be A and not M. 
> The above analysis is an assumption from some observations during some tests 
> on a large repository.
> A more detailed test case needs to be written to investigate this further.
>  
> But the impact of this is that merge for this inc store fails here 
> [https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/GRANITE-48075#:~:text=https%3A//github.com/apache/jackrabbit%2Doak/blob/trunk/oak%2Drun%2Dcommons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/incrementalstore/MergeIncrementalFlatFileStore.java%23L118]
>  . 
>  
> A simple solution could be to treat modification same as addition.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10503) Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step

2023-10-20 Thread Nitin Gupta (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1675#comment-1675
 ] 

Nitin Gupta commented on OAK-10503:
---

trunk :  
[https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/e904e4594274f28fd7499ec1620648893b43d6b0]
 , wasn't able to reproduce with a test case, but the fix of not throwing 
exception is harmless and should work. Keeping this open to try and write the 
reproducible test case as well.

> Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10503
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
>
> There could be a case where a node was moved/renamed which apparently results 
> the incremental FFS to have 2 entries.
>  
> For example, 
> NodeA | \{"prop":"value"} 
> renamed to NodeB | \{"prop":"value"}
>  
> then the incremental FFS has entries - 
> NodeA | \{"prop":"value"}  | D
> NodeB | \{"prop":"value"} | M
>  
> The second entry's operand should be A and not M. 
> The above analysis is an assumption from some observations during some tests 
> on a large repository.
> A more detailed test case needs to be written to investigate this further.
>  
> But the impact of this is that merge for this inc store fails here 
> [https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/GRANITE-48075#:~:text=https%3A//github.com/apache/jackrabbit%2Doak/blob/trunk/oak%2Drun%2Dcommons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/incrementalstore/MergeIncrementalFlatFileStore.java%23L118]
>  . 
>  
> A simple solution could be to treat modification same as addition.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

2023-10-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1660#comment-1660
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10509:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1234|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1234/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1234/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1228|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10435) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to "latest"

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10435.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.60.0
   Resolution: Fixed

(see subtasks)

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to "latest"
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10435
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10435
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>
> Although the old Microsoft SDK is now retired, until we replace it with 
> something new we should try to use the latest Guava.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10516) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1644#comment-1644
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10516:
--

trunk: 
[bb98a83554|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/bb98a835545bd35fa821b939056a1f579bf8741d]

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10516
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10516) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10516.
--
Resolution: Fixed

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10516
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10516) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3

2023-10-20 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-10516:
-
Fix Version/s: 1.60.0

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to 32.1.3
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10516
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10516
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Technical task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.60.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

2023-10-20 Thread Hudson (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1602#comment-1602
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10509:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1233|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1233/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1233/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1228|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1228/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)