[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10411) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-1.22 #70 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824842#comment-17824842 ] Hudson commented on OAK-10411: -- Previously failing build now is OK. Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-1.22 #108|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-1.22/108/] [console log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-1.22/108/console] > Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-1.22 #70 failed > --- > > Key: OAK-10411 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10411 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-1.22 #70 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-1.22 > #70|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-1.22/70/] > [console > log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-1.22/70/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10674) DocumentStore: verify that we could use Oak's Bloom filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824823#comment-17824823
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10674:
--
I did a quick-and-dirty comparison of the reported FPPs, and they look similar:
{noformat}
> tail filterlog2
17:06:42.659 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
5.58521124771789E-16
17:06:45.119 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.49993148742437E-16
17:06:47.496 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.49993148742437E-16
17:06:49.058 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.027729977973828E-16
17:06:50.443 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
5.170806488449498E-16
17:06:51.948 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.027729977973828E-16
17:06:54.048 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
7.003453622056256E-16
17:06:57.091 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
2.149670157403729E-22
17:06:58.974 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
1.1059431061104984E-29
17:07:00.383 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:65 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
1.1059431061104984E-29
> tail filterlog1
16:53:52.048 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
5.972603648104754E-16
16:53:53.387 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.947788484663496E-16
16:53:54.939 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.947788484663496E-16
16:53:56.132 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
5.90768467205E-16
16:53:57.328 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
5.060318133456302E-16
16:53:58.521 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
6.038133141734534E-16
16:54:00.075 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
7.022380607694912E-16
16:54:03.735 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
2.1557210612696467E-22
16:54:05.915 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
1.1062257632314335E-29
16:54:07.611 INFO [main] CacheChangesTracker.java:67 Disposing
CacheChangesTracker for key range: <000, ;>, filter fpp was:
1.1062257632314335E-29
{noformat}
> DocumentStore: verify that we could use Oak's Bloom filter
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10674
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> Test that we can use
> oak-run-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/flatfile/analysis/utils/BloomFilter.java
> (for now, by copying it over).
> Then decide about where to move it, and whether API changes are desired.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10375) Binary data in logs related to the haystack property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824820#comment-17824820
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10375:
--
Hm. We should be logging the contents of property values; this may be
confidential information.
> Binary data in logs related to the haystack property
>
>
> Key: OAK-10375
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10375
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: indexing
>Reporter: Nuno Santos
>Priority: Major
>
> When indexing documents with the {{haystack0}} property, some log messages
> contain the binary data of the property. In the log below, I replaced the
> binary data by {{{}{}}}, but it is usually very
> long.
> {noformat}
> 16:30:40.107 [main] ERROR o.a.j.o.p.i.l.LuceneDocumentMaker - could not index
> similarity field for property
> haystack0 =
> and definition
> PropertyDefinition\{name='jcr:content/metadata/imageFeatures/haystack0',
> propertyType=0, boost=1.0, isRegexp=false, index=true, stored=false,
> nodeScopeIndex=true, propertyIndex=true, analyzed=false, ordered=false,
> useInSuggest=false, useInSimilarity=true, nullCheckEnabled=false,
> notNullCheckEnabled=false, function=null}
> {noformat}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10701) Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.2.224
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10701: - Component/s: parent (was: core) > Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.2.224 > -- > > Key: OAK-10701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: parent >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10701) Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.2.224
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10701: - Summary: Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.2.224 (was: Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.1.224) > Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.2.224 > -- > > Key: OAK-10701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: core >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10701) Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.1.224
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10701: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.46.0) (was: 1.22.14) > Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.1.224 > -- > > Key: OAK-10701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: core >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10701) Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.1.224
Julian Reschke created OAK-10701: Summary: Upgrade h2db dependency to 2.1.224 Key: OAK-10701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10701 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: core Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke Fix For: 1.46.0, 1.22.14 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10694) Clarify state of oak-search-mt
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10694: - Fix Version/s: 1.62.0 > Clarify state of oak-search-mt > -- > > Key: OAK-10694 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10694 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: search-mt >Reporter: Manfred Baedke >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > > oak-search-mt depends on an artifact from the retired Apache Incubator > project > [Joshua|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/Apache+Joshua+Home], > which has a dependency to Guava 19. > May it be deprecated/removed? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824783#comment-17824783 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10698: -- trunk: [f9776cf827|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/f9776cf827a7c4ceed5d13e9dc97e924e9722195] > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > > ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > Passing "-Dtest.opts.memory=-Xmx2g" makes them succeed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10698: - Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > > ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > Passing "-Dtest.opts.memory=-Xmx2g" makes them succeed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10698. -- Fix Version/s: 1.62.0 Resolution: Fixed > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > > ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > Passing "-Dtest.opts.memory=-Xmx2g" makes them succeed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10700) update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824765#comment-17824765 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10700: -- trunk: [9d1980406a|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/9d1980406a15a180b606e34850709caf4d06dc48] > update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7 > - > > Key: OAK-10700 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: parent, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10700) update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10700: - Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7 > - > > Key: OAK-10700 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: parent, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10700) update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10700. -- Fix Version/s: 1.62.0 Resolution: Fixed > update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7 > - > > Key: OAK-10700 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: parent, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10700) update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7
Julian Reschke created OAK-10700: Summary: update testcontainer dependency to 1.19.7 Key: OAK-10700 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10700 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: parent, test Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10699) Migrate tests to JUnit 5
Steffen Van created OAK-10699: - Summary: Migrate tests to JUnit 5 Key: OAK-10699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10699 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Reporter: Steffen Van Upgrading to JUnit 5 has many advantages. See here: [https://blogs.oracle.com/javamagazine/post/migrating-from-junit-4-to-junit-5-important-differences-and-benefits] for just one overview of the key differences and advantages of migrating from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 By using JUnit 5, we can significantly reduce the time to fix tests. This is especially relevant when we update to a package or version that requires changes across all tests within that package. And it just makes it easier to upgrade -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6766) Convert oak-lucene to OSGi R7 annotations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824434#comment-17824434
]
Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6766 at 3/8/24 11:25 AM:
--
https://github.com/jsedding/osgi-ds-metatype-diff gives:
{code}
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProviderService
Declarative Services
References
statisticsProvider
- bind = bindStatisticsProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindStatisticsProvider (String)
+ field = statisticsProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
checkpointMBean
- bind = bindCheckpointMBean (String)
- unbind = unbindCheckpointMBean (String)
+ field = checkpointMBean (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
asyncIndexInfoService
- bind = bindAsyncIndexInfoService (String)
- unbind = unbindAsyncIndexInfoService (String)
+ field = asyncIndexInfoService (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
indexPathService
- bind = bindIndexPathService (String)
- unbind = unbindIndexPathService (String)
+ field = indexPathService (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
nodeStore
- bind = bindNodeStore (String)
- unbind = unbindNodeStore (String)
+ field = nodeStore (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
nodeAggregator
- bind = bindNodeAggregator (String)
- unbind = unbindNodeAggregator (String)
+ field = nodeAggregator (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
mountInfoProvider
- bind = bindMountInfoProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindMountInfoProvider (String)
+ field = mountInfoProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
extractedTextProvider
- bind = bindExtractedTextProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindExtractedTextProvider (String)
+ field = extractedTextProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
augmentorFactory
- bind = bindAugmentorFactory (String)
- unbind = unbindAugmentorFactory (String)
+ field = augmentorFactory (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
blobStore
- bind = bindBlobStore (String)
- unbind = unbindBlobStore (String)
+ field = blobStore (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
MetaType
Attributes
- namespace = http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/metatype/v1.0.0 (String)
+ namespace = http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/metatype/v1.2.0 (String)
ObjectClassDefinitions
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProviderService
- description = Description for
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProviderService
(String)
+ description = (String)
{code}
which is fine IMHO
was (Author: baedke):
https://github.com/jsedding/osgi-ds-metatype-diff gives:
{code}
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProviderService
Declarative Services
References
statisticsProvider
- bind = bindStatisticsProvider (String)
- unbind = unbindStatisticsProvider (String)
+ field = statisticsProvider (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
checkpointMBean
- bind = bindCheckpointMBean (String)
- unbind = unbindCheckpointMBean (String)
+ field = checkpointMBean (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
asyncIndexInfoService
- bind = bindAsyncIndexInfoService (String)
- unbind = unbindAsyncIndexInfoService (String)
+ field = asyncIndexInfoService (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
indexPathService
- bind = bindIndexPathService (String)
- unbind = unbindIndexPathService (String)
+ field = indexPathService (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
nodeStore
- bind = bindNodeStore (String)
- unbind = unbindNodeStore (String)
+ field = nodeStore (String)
+ field-option = replace (String)
nodeAggregator
- bind = bindNodeAggregator (String)
- unbind = unbindNodeAggregator (String)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10698: - Description: ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. Passing "-Dtest.opts.memory=-Xmx2g" makes them succeed. was: ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > > ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > Passing "-Dtest.opts.memory=-Xmx2g" makes them succeed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10698: - Description: ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > > ...because we currently run tests with 512MB. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10698: - Summary: DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM (was: DocumentStore: disable max property size tests for RDB due to potential OOM) > DocumentStore: max property size tests can fail with OOM > > > Key: OAK-10698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk, test >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10698) DocumentStore: disable max property size tests for RDB due to potential OOM
Julian Reschke created OAK-10698: Summary: DocumentStore: disable max property size tests for RDB due to potential OOM Key: OAK-10698 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10698 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: documentmk, test Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-6772) Convert oak-solr-core to OSGi R7 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-6772: --- Assignee: Manfred Baedke > Convert oak-solr-core to OSGi R7 annotations > > > Key: OAK-6772 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6772 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: solr >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Assignee: Manfred Baedke >Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-6741: --- Assignee: (was: Manfred Baedke) > Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations > -- > > Key: OAK-6741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Attachments: OAK-6741-proposed-changes-chetans-feedback.patch, > osgi-metadata-1.7.8.json, osgi-metadata-trunk.json > > > We should remove the 'old' Felix SCR annotations and move to the 'new' OSGi > R7 annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-6741: --- Assignee: Manfred Baedke > Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations > -- > > Key: OAK-6741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Assignee: Manfred Baedke >Priority: Major > Attachments: OAK-6741-proposed-changes-chetans-feedback.patch, > osgi-metadata-1.7.8.json, osgi-metadata-trunk.json > > > We should remove the 'old' Felix SCR annotations and move to the 'new' OSGi > R7 annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10694) Clarify state of oak-search-mt
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17824653#comment-17824653 ] Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-10694: -- > So what do we do in 1.22? Remove as well? Yes. I think that is simpler. > Clarify state of oak-search-mt > -- > > Key: OAK-10694 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10694 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: search-mt >Reporter: Manfred Baedke >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > > oak-search-mt depends on an artifact from the retired Apache Incubator > project > [Joshua|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/Apache+Joshua+Home], > which has a dependency to Guava 19. > May it be deprecated/removed? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
