[jira] [Created] (OAK-10736) Collect DetailedGC Stats for DryRun mode
Rishabh Daim created OAK-10736: -- Summary: Collect DetailedGC Stats for DryRun mode Key: OAK-10736 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10736 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Reporter: Rishabh Daim Assignee: Rishabh Daim -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10695) oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10695. -- Resolution: Fixed > oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1 > > > Key: OAK-10695 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: benchmarks, it, osgi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] (OAK-10695) oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695 ] Julian Reschke deleted comment on OAK-10695: -- was (Author: reschke): trunk: [5e054a5fa1|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e054a5fa1a0f5c7c11427413f86ff2566a3512d] > oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1 > > > Key: OAK-10695 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: benchmarks, it, osgi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10695) oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17833266#comment-17833266 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10695: -- trunk: [089a42407f|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/089a42407f4b0429ce5d415b95553c1c8e4d7b64] [5e054a5fa1|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/5e054a5fa1a0f5c7c11427413f86ff2566a3512d] > oak-benchmarks/oak-it-osgi: update commons-compress dependency to 1.26.1 > > > Key: OAK-10695 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10695 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: benchmarks, it, osgi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10708) DocumentNodeStore: error-log failures to update the journal
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10708: - Fix Version/s: 1.64.0 (was: 1.62.0) > DocumentNodeStore: error-log failures to update the journal > > > Key: OAK-10708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10708 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.64.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10725) Upgrade jackson-databind dependency to 2.16.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10725. -- Resolution: Fixed > Upgrade jackson-databind dependency to 2.16.2 > - > > Key: OAK-10725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10725 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: parent >Reporter: Fabrizio Fortino >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.62.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10734) DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless older than sweep
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Egli resolved OAK-10734. --- Resolution: Done PR merged > DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless > older than sweep > > > Key: OAK-10734 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Assignee: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Labels: DetailedGC > > Entries in "_revisions" (for non root documents) could be referenced by > children in case of non branch commits. They must thus be kept. Unless older > than sweep. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10735) Release Oak 1.62.0
Julian Reschke created OAK-10735: Summary: Release Oak 1.62.0 Key: OAK-10735 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10735 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Reporter: Julian Reschke Assignee: Julian Reschke -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10682) [Indexing job] Improve Mongo regex filter to only use positive conditions (no negations)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nuno Santos resolved OAK-10682.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.62.0
Resolution: Done
> [Indexing job] Improve Mongo regex filter to only use positive conditions (no
> negations)
>
>
> Key: OAK-10682
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10682
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: indexing
> Environment: The current implementation of filtering excluded paths
> and custom regex is using a condition like
> {noformat}
> { _id: { $nin: [ /^[0-9]{1,3}:\/content\/dam\/.*$/ ]} {noformat}
> Mongo cannot evaluate this condition without retrieving the full document,
> because a value of {{_null}} would also match this condition and the index
> does not contain {{null}} values. Therefore, when the index contains excluded
> paths, the download will be much slower because Mongo has to retrieve every
> single document to evaluate the condition.
> As a workaround, we can transform the regex on an equivalent one that matches
> the complement of the original regex using [negative
> lookahead|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1240275/how-to-negate-specific-word-in-regex].
> This allows rewriting the filter condition using only positive conditions,
> which can be evaluated using only the index.
>Reporter: Nuno Santos
>Priority: Major
> Labels: indexing
> Fix For: 1.62.0
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10535) Clean up old revisions in a document
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17833215#comment-17833215 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-10535: --- [~corderob], I've now un-ignored the test case originally added that was blocked by OAK-10535, as we now have different variants and amongst them one that fixes it, so I'd like to have it unignored. The PR is [PR#1396|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1396] (it is against another PR of mine, but is otherwise just an unignore and adjustments in asserts) > Clean up old revisions in a document > > > Key: OAK-10535 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10535 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentmk >Reporter: José Andrés Cordero Benítez >Assignee: José Andrés Cordero Benítez >Priority: Minor > > Introduce a way to safely detect and delete old revisions in a document. This > could be useful to cleanup documents that sometimes grows above the supported > size in MongoDB (16MB). > It could be also integrate into the detailed GC. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10734) DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless older than sweep
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17833096#comment-17833096 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-10734: --- * created https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1393 > DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless > older than sweep > > > Key: OAK-10734 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Assignee: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Labels: DetailedGC > > Entries in "_revisions" (for non root documents) could be referenced by > children in case of non branch commits. They must thus be kept. Unless older > than sweep. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10734) DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless older than sweep
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Egli updated OAK-10734: -- Labels: DetailedGC (was: ) > DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless > older than sweep > > > Key: OAK-10734 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Assignee: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Labels: DetailedGC > > Entries in "_revisions" (for non root documents) could be referenced by > children in case of non branch commits. They must thus be kept. Unless older > than sweep. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10734) DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless older than sweep
Stefan Egli created OAK-10734: - Summary: DetailedGC must keep entries in "_revisions" for non branch commits, unless older than sweep Key: OAK-10734 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10734 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Components: documentmk Reporter: Stefan Egli Assignee: Stefan Egli Entries in "_revisions" (for non root documents) could be referenced by children in case of non branch commits. They must thus be kept. Unless older than sweep. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10546) Tika 1.28.5 references a vulnerable Guava version
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fabrizio Fortino resolved OAK-10546. Resolution: Won't Do The linked PR won't be enough to fix the issue that will be addressed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9752. > Tika 1.28.5 references a vulnerable Guava version > - > > Key: OAK-10546 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10546 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: oak-examples, oak-run, oak-search-elastic, oak-solr-core >Reporter: Fabrizio Fortino >Assignee: Fabrizio Fortino >Priority: Major > > Guava 31.1 has a critical vulnerability [0]. It is included as a transient > dependency of Tika 1.28.5 [1]. This is the latest 1.x available release of > Tika. Being EOL it won't receive any security-related updates [2]. > The work to upgrade to Tika 2.x would require some time. > If possible, we should find an alternative solution to avoid including this > vulnerable dependency. > [0] [https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2023-2976] > [1] [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tika/tika-parsers/1.28.5] > [2] [https://lists.apache.org/thread/yq6n7o01kw544dvj1jsoqk29g6yqjkp3] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10733) Filter out hidden properties from content in FlatFileStore
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nitin Gupta reassigned OAK-10733: - Assignee: Nitin Gupta > Filter out hidden properties from content in FlatFileStore > -- > > Key: OAK-10733 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10733 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Nitin Gupta >Assignee: Nitin Gupta >Priority: Major > > Currently we ignore/filter out hidden nodes while building the FFS but not > the hidden properties. > We however ignore any changes to hidden properties (using the VisibleEditor) > during async indexing cycles, so it makes little sense to have these in the > FFS. > > This task is to see if these can be removed, and if gives some benefit during > reindexing phase. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-10733) Filter out hidden properties from content in FlatFileStore
Nitin Gupta created OAK-10733: - Summary: Filter out hidden properties from content in FlatFileStore Key: OAK-10733 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10733 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Task Reporter: Nitin Gupta Currently we ignore/filter out hidden nodes while building the FFS but not the hidden properties. We however ignore any changes to hidden properties (using the VisibleEditor) during async indexing cycles, so it makes little sense to have these in the FFS. This task is to see if these can be removed, and if gives some benefit during reindexing phase. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
