[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-5655: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.38.0) 1.40.0 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.40.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-5655: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.36.0) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.38.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-5655: - Fix Version/s: 1.38.0 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.36.0, 1.38.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: 1.16.0 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.14.0, 1.16.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.12.0) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.14.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: 1.14.0 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.12.0, 1.14.0 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.10.0) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.12 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5655: -- Fix Version/s: 1.12 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.10.0, 1.12 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: segment-reads.png > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.10 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png, segment-reads.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: 1.10 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig >Priority: Major > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.10 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs-reposize.m, > compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: data00053a.tar-reads.png > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, > data00053a.tar-reads.png, offrc.jfr, segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: offrc.jfr > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, offrc.jfr, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: compaction-time-vs.reposize.png > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: compaction-time-vs.reposize.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.8) > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.6) 1.7.8 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.8 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.3) 1.7.6 1.8 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.6 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Description: We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: * How is related content spread over segments? * What content do we consider related? * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are applied? * What changes do we consider typical? * What is the impact of compaction on locality? * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal operation and during compaction)? * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? * ... was: We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: * How is related content spread over segments? * What content do we consider related? * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are applied? * What changes do we consider typical? * What is the impact of compaction on locality? * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal operation and during compaction)? * ... > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.7.3 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * How good are checkpoints deduplicated? Can we monitor this online? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8) 1.7.3 > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.7.3 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5655) TarMK: Analyse locality of reference
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-5655: --- Attachment: segment-per-path.png segment-per-path-compacted.png segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png > TarMK: Analyse locality of reference > - > > Key: OAK-5655 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5655 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Michael Dürig > Labels: scalability > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: segment-per-path-compacted-nocache.png, > segment-per-path-compacted-nostringcache.png, segment-per-path-compacted.png, > segment-per-path.png > > > We need to better understand the locality aspects of content stored in TarMK: > * How is related content spread over segments? > * What content do we consider related? > * How does locality of related content develop over time when changes are > applied? > * What changes do we consider typical? > * What is the impact of compaction on locality? > * What is the impact of the deduplication caches on locality (during normal > operation and during compaction)? > * ... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
