[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8540) Effective policies should implememt PrincipalAccessControlList
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-8540:
Fix Version/s: 1.18.0
> Effective policies should implememt PrincipalAccessControlList
> --
>
> Key: OAK-8540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8540
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: authorization-principalbased
>Reporter: angela
>Assignee: angela
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> currently the policies returned upon
> {{AccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(String)}} and
> {{JackrabbitAccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(Set)}} are
> instances of {{ImmutableACL}}, which doesn't reflect the fact that the
> implementation handles {{PrincipalAccessControlList}}. This makes it a bit
> confising to 'read' in a composite setup in particular when comparing the
> return value of {{getPolicies}} with {{getEffectivePolicies}}.
> therefore i would suggest to introduce an extension of {{ImmutableACL}}
> implementing {{PrincipalAccessControlList}} and using this for the return
> value of both methods covering effective policies.
> [~stillalex], fyi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-8540) Effective policies should implememt PrincipalAccessControlList
angela created OAK-8540:
---
Summary: Effective policies should implememt
PrincipalAccessControlList
Key: OAK-8540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8540
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: authorization-principalbased
Reporter: angela
Assignee: angela
currently the policies returned upon
{{AccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(String)}} and
{{JackrabbitAccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(Set)}} are
instances of {{ImmutableACL}}, which doesn't reflect the fact that the
implementation handles {{PrincipalAccessControlList}}. This makes it a bit
confising to 'read' in a composite setup in particular when comparing the
return value of {{getPolicies}} with {{getEffectivePolicies}}.
therefore i would suggest to introduce an extension of {{ImmutableACL}}
implementing {{PrincipalAccessControlList}} and using this for the return value
of both methods covering effective policies.
[~stillalex], fyi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8540) Effective policies should implememt PrincipalAccessControlList
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-8540.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1865092.
> Effective policies should implememt PrincipalAccessControlList
> --
>
> Key: OAK-8540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8540
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: authorization-principalbased
>Reporter: angela
>Assignee: angela
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> currently the policies returned upon
> {{AccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(String)}} and
> {{JackrabbitAccessControlManager.getEffectivePolicies(Set)}} are
> instances of {{ImmutableACL}}, which doesn't reflect the fact that the
> implementation handles {{PrincipalAccessControlList}}. This makes it a bit
> confising to 'read' in a composite setup in particular when comparing the
> return value of {{getPolicies}} with {{getEffectivePolicies}}.
> therefore i would suggest to introduce an extension of {{ImmutableACL}}
> implementing {{PrincipalAccessControlList}} and using this for the return
> value of both methods covering effective policies.
> [~stillalex], fyi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8538) Incomplete recovery on long running merge with branch commits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-8538.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.18.0
Fixed in trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1865110
The recovery process now checks for branch commits that happened before the
current {{_lastRev}} and were merged after it. Those are the problematic
changes that must be included in the recovery as well.
> Incomplete recovery on long running merge with branch commits
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8538
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentmk
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
>Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> Recovery of a crashed cluster node that was unable to run a background update
> after a long running merge with branch commits is incomplete. The recovery
> will use a start date for the candidate documents that is too recent and not
> take all the documents of the branch commits into account.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8538) Incomplete recovery on long running merge with branch commits
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907200#comment-16907200 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8538: --- Added ignored tests: http://svn.apache.org/r1865108 > Incomplete recovery on long running merge with branch commits > - > > Key: OAK-8538 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8538 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentmk >Affects Versions: 1.16.0 >Reporter: Marcel Reutegger >Assignee: Marcel Reutegger >Priority: Major > > Recovery of a crashed cluster node that was unable to run a background update > after a long running merge with branch commits is incomplete. The recovery > will use a start date for the candidate documents that is too recent and not > take all the documents of the branch commits into account. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-8541) AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction : Include restriction name in error message
angela created OAK-8541:
---
Summary: AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction : Include
restriction name in error message
Key: OAK-8541
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8541
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: security-spi
Reporter: angela
Assignee: angela
Fix For: 1.18.0
when calling {{AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction}} with value
cardinality mismatch or values of the wrong type, the error message of the
{{AccessControlException}} doesn't indicate the name of restrictions causing
the error.
[~stillalex], fyi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8531) Reading Azure Journal File while it's modified fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907161#comment-16907161
]
Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-8531:
--
[~tomek.rekawek], I was able to consistently reproduce the behaviour with a
slightly changed version of your IT, [^AzureJournalFileCouncurrencyITv2.java].
The only thing remaining now is that this test fails, although it shouldn't,
when the {{AZURE_CONNECTION}} environment variable is not set:
{noformat}
[INFO] Running
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT
[ERROR] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.09 s
<<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT
[ERROR] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT
Time elapsed: 0.089 s <<< ERROR!
org.junit.AssumptionViolatedException: got: <[null]>, expected: every item is
not null
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.connectToAzure(AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.java:54)
[ERROR] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT
Time elapsed: 0.09 s <<< ERROR!
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.cleanupContainer(AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.java:70)
{noformat}
I'm running this with Java 8:
{noformat}
java version "1.8.0_181"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_181-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.181-b13, mixed mode)
{noformat}
> Reading Azure Journal File while it's modified fails
>
>
> Key: OAK-8531
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8531
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: segment-azure
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Andrei Dulceanu
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.java,
> AzureJournalFileCouncurrencyITv2.java, OAK-8531.patch
>
>
> Trying to read the Azure Journal File while it's modified triggers the
> following exception:
> {noformat}
> java.io.IOException: com.microsoft.azure.storage.StorageException: The
> condition specified using HTTP conditional header(s) is not met.
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.ReverseFileReader.readBlock(ReverseFileReader.java:70)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.ReverseFileReader.readLine(ReverseFileReader.java:96)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFile$AzureJournalReader.readLine(AzureJournalFile.java:126)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFile$CombinedReader.readLine(AzureJournalFile.java:240)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.tool.SegmentStoreMigrator.migrateJournal(SegmentStoreMigrator.java:99)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.tool.SegmentStoreMigrator.migrate(SegmentStoreMigrator.java:84)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8531) Reading Azure Journal File while it's modified fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-8531:
-
Attachment: AzureJournalFileCouncurrencyITv2.java
> Reading Azure Journal File while it's modified fails
>
>
> Key: OAK-8531
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8531
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: segment-azure
>Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>Reporter: Andrei Dulceanu
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: AzureJournalFileConcurrencyIT.java,
> AzureJournalFileCouncurrencyITv2.java, OAK-8531.patch
>
>
> Trying to read the Azure Journal File while it's modified triggers the
> following exception:
> {noformat}
> java.io.IOException: com.microsoft.azure.storage.StorageException: The
> condition specified using HTTP conditional header(s) is not met.
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.ReverseFileReader.readBlock(ReverseFileReader.java:70)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.ReverseFileReader.readLine(ReverseFileReader.java:96)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFile$AzureJournalReader.readLine(AzureJournalFile.java:126)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureJournalFile$CombinedReader.readLine(AzureJournalFile.java:240)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.tool.SegmentStoreMigrator.migrateJournal(SegmentStoreMigrator.java:99)
> ! at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.tool.SegmentStoreMigrator.migrate(SegmentStoreMigrator.java:84)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8541) AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction : Include restriction name in error message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-8541.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1865112.
> AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction : Include restriction name in
> error message
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8541
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8541
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: security-spi
>Reporter: angela
>Assignee: angela
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> when calling {{AbstractRestrictionProvider.createRestriction}} with value
> cardinality mismatch or values of the wrong type, the error message of the
> {{AccessControlException}} doesn't indicate the name of restrictions causing
> the error.
> [~stillalex], fyi
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8542) Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-8542: -- Summary: Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout (was: Build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 failed) > Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout > - > > Key: OAK-8542 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8511) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-8511. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8511 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8511 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2299|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2299/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2299/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Closed] (OAK-8511) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger closed OAK-8511. - > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8511 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8511 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2299 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2299|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2299/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2299/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8513) Concurrent index access via CopyOnRead directory can lead to reading directly off of remote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907284#comment-16907284
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8513:
-
[~catholicon] sorry for the late review! Just saw it now. The logic seems
correct, as we discussed. I think it's OK to ignore the interrupted exception
for now.
> Concurrent index access via CopyOnRead directory can lead to reading directly
> off of remote
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-8513
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8513
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> Even with prefetch enabled having 2 CopyOnRead directories pointing to same
> index can lead to one of the instance reading index files directly off of
> remote index.
> The reason this happens is because {{COR#copyFilesToLocal}} explicitly
> chooses to work with remote if index copier reports that a copy is in
> progress.
> This wasn't a problem earlier when COR was only used via IndexTracker so
> concurrent COR instances weren't expected (COR's avoid local for conc copy
> was probably worried about non-prefetch case).
> But with OAK-8097, {{DefaultDirectoryFactory}} also uses COR to bring the
> files. Which means that if there's a query against an index which is getting
> updated as well then either of COR instance could read directly from remote.
> The condition should only be relevant during early app start up but since
> this can happen in default configuration, we should attempt to fix this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-8542) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 failed
Hudson created OAK-8542: --- Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 failed Key: OAK-8542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Components: continuous integration Reporter: Hudson No description is provided The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed. First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak #2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Closed] (OAK-8527) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger closed OAK-8527. - > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8527 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8527 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2308|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2308/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2308/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8527) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-8527. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8527 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8527 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2308 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2308|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2308/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2308/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8542) Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-8542:
--
Description:
No description is provided
The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed.
First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
#2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console]
{noformat}
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.directory.ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout(ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.java:154)
{noformat}
was:
No description is provided
The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed.
First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
#2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console
log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console]
Component/s: lucene
[~catholicon], it looks like this test was added for OAK-8513. I'm able to
reproduce this issue when I let my IDE run the tests in this class in a loop.
After a few iterations, the test then fails with the NPE.
> Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, lucene
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console]
> {noformat}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.directory.ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout(ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.java:154)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8516) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-8516. --- Resolution: Duplicate > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8516 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8516 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2302|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2302/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2302/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Closed] (OAK-8516) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 failed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger closed OAK-8516. - > Build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 failed > - > > Key: OAK-8516 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8516 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > > No description is provided > The build Jackrabbit Oak #2302 has failed. > First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak > #2302|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2302/] [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2302/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-8542) Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh reassigned OAK-8542:
--
Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, lucene
>Reporter: Hudson
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console]
> {noformat}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.directory.ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout(ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.java:154)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-8542) Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh resolved OAK-8542.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.18.0
Thanks for looking into it [~mreutegg]. Fixed incorrectly initialized list that
was failing the test at [r1865136|https://svn.apache.org/r1865136].
> Test failure: ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout
> -
>
> Key: OAK-8542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8542
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, lucene
>Reporter: Hudson
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #2318 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #2318|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2318/console]
> {noformat}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.directory.ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.concurrentPrefetchWithTimeout(ConcurrentCopyOnReadDirectoryTest.java:154)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-8543) Javadoc of IndexCopier#waitForCopyCompletion refers to boolean return
Vikas Saurabh created OAK-8543:
--
Summary: Javadoc of IndexCopier#waitForCopyCompletion refers to
boolean return
Key: OAK-8543
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8543
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Documentation
Components: lucene
Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
As noted by [~frm] at https://twitter.com/frm1025/status/1161640994787536896,
javadoc of {{IndexCopier#waitForCopyCompletion}} shouldn't talk about false
return when the method returns void.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
