Hi Eric,
> Am 15.12.2022 um 11:33 schrieb Éric Vyncke via Datatracker :
>
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-oauth-rar-20: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-rar/
>
>
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
>
> # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-oauth-rar-19
> CC @evyncke
>
> Thank you for the work put into this document. It is very easy to read and
> quite powerful.
>
> Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT point (rather a suggestion).
>
> Special thanks to Hannes Tschofenig for the shepherd's detailed write-up
> including the WG consensus ***but*** missing the justification of the intended
> status.
>
> I hope that this review helps to improve the document,
>
> Regards,
>
> -éric
>
> ## COMMENTS
>
> ### Section 1
>
> I like the use of EUR rather than USD ;-)
:-)
>
> Suggest to also add "bic" in addition to "iban" to be consistent with
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Euro_Payments_Area
added bic the example (even though it’s not required for German bank accounts
even cross border ;-))
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?difftype=--hwdiff=draft-ietf-oauth-rar-21.txt
thanks,
Torsten.
>
> ## Notes
>
> This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
> [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
> individual GitHub issues.
>
> [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
> [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
>
>
>
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
