1.Gold price soars on S African power cuts
<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/d5cacc02-cb23-11dc-97ff-000077b07658.html>

Mines close on 'national electricity emergency' - 18:41

   - China tops global gold mining
   <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/fc29dd94-c52d-11dc-811a-0000779fd2ac.html>

2. SocGen postmortem

Published: January 25 2008 09:30 | Last updated: January 25 2008 18:40

There are two central questions in the case of Jérôme Kerviel and Société
Générale.

What was the precise nature of his position?

And does it explain the sharp decline in European equities between January
21 and 23? The best assessment is as follows.

Mr Kerviel's supposed job was to arbitrage small discrepancies between
equity derivatives and cash equity prices.

However, starting on January 7, Mr Kerviel made a series of bets that
Germany's Dax index, the French Cac40, and the Euro Stoxx 50 would rise.

He bought futures contracts, as normal, but did not hedge against market
falls. (Hedging would usually involve selling the underlying shares, or
over-the-counter derivative contracts with clients.)

Eleven days later, internal controls finally identified suspicious activity.


By then the Euro Stoxx 50 had fallen by a cumulative 7 per cent, and the
position had generated, SocGen has indicated, a loss of between €1.5bn and
€2bn.

This implies Mr Kerviel had taken a notional long exposure of €21 - €29bn.

The margin payments on this position might have been more than €1bn. This
sounds too big to avoid detection, but may have seemed normal given the
desk's legitimate activity of very high volume and low- risk trades.

On Monday, a shaken SocGen began to liquidate the position over three days,
bringing its total loss to €4.9bn.

Did it move the market?

Over the period the total value of trading in index futures and the cash
market for the Euro Stoxx 50 was €544bn.

That suggests the unwinding of Mr Kerviel's rogue position accounted for 5
per cent or less of activity.

Clearly a determined seller does not go unnoticed by traders in a jittery
market.

But it seems likely that the main explanation for the market rout in Europe
was earlier sharp declines in Asia, general concerns over the US economy and
specific worries about the monoline insurance crisis.

*One man damaged SocGen severely but it seems unlikely that he moved global
equity markets significantly.*
EDITOR'S CHOICEThe rogue trader who cost SocGen €5bn
<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/bd9f55d6-ca4b-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html> - Jan-25
Video: John Plender on trading
scandals<http://www.ft.com/cms/84d2eba2-2a26-11dc-9208-000b5df10621.html?_i_referralObject=627705323&fromSearch=n>-
Jan-24
Lex: Société 
Générale<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/fb8e5590-ca5f-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html>-
Jan-24
Home-grown issues concern Chinese
investors<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3c733a50-cb6c-11dc-97ff-000077b07658.html>-
Jan-25
Lombard: Thank God he's not
British<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/e6f1d6dc-ca98-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html>-
Jan-24
Editorial comment: Future
shocks<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/88e011d0-cab6-11dc-a960-000077b07658.html>-
Jan-24

Kirim email ke