Hi Lars,
On 06/19/2018 03:19 AM, poesc...@lemonage.de wrote:
Hi!
I think I found a bug.
Commit 1d63b1d35 essentially breaks the sim900 driver for serial port
users.
Right. This looks like some wires being crossed. sim900 driver is only
meant for serial port usage. So listing it for 'option' isn't correct.
Also, setup_sim900 was renamed from setup_simcom (introduced in
f2bfaed17). Unfortunately I don't think we ever had a simcom driver
(e.g. plugins/simcom.c) for non-serial SIM COM modems until support for
SIM 7100 was added.
It adds a new entry in plugins/udevng.c driver_list with name "sim900".
There are two entries with the same name then: The new one which calls
the new setup_sim900 function and the old one which wants to call
the old setup_serial_modem function. Since driver_list is scanned
by name of the driver from top to button, serial driver users don't
have a chance to reach the entry with setup_serial_modem anymore.
Calling setup_sim900 does not work on a modem that was added through
add_serial_device, because the union serial/devices is written a
struct serial_device_info * that can not be used as GSList *.
Maybe I am missing something, but I think the new driver name in
driver_list should be different from the old one.
Right. I've gone ahead and pushed out
06f3a85ee3d187888640be71d5dd5293e6970d05 that should fix this. Please
let me know if it does.
It may be that the vid/pid "05c6/9000" meant for the simcom driver
should be handled by sim7100 or some unified simcom driver that handles
all SIM COM USB devices.
Regards,
-Denis
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
