Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg

2010-12-10 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Aki,

 Hence the reason for my pointed questions.  I'm a big proponent of
 moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for
 both ISI and AT modems.
 
 Right, so you agree to this TODO item?

I agree in principle, I'm just worried about the feasibility.  Ideally
I'd like us to do a bit more due diligence first or reword the task to
include words like 'feasibility' and 'study'.

Regards,
-Denis
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono


Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg

2010-12-09 Thread Aki Niemi
Hi Denis,

2010/12/9 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
 The NITZ notification does indeed arrive unsolicited.  However, no AT
 modem that I know of reports the received NITZ name.  This is only
 reported via COPS.  The best you can do is call COPS again after the
 driver reports ofono_netreg_time_notify.

Then that could work, but this probably needs some prototyping. We
have a test network that actually implements NITZ names, so I can give
it a try.

 Hence the reason for my pointed questions.  I'm a big proponent of
 moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for
 both ISI and AT modems.

Right, so you agree to this TODO item?

Cheers,
Aki
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono


Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg

2010-12-08 Thread Aki Niemi
Hi Denis,

2010/12/3 Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com:
 Out of curiosity, how do you plan to support this on AT modems?  I have
 yet to see any AT modem report the NITZ network name via a proprietary
 command.

Are you sure? In my experience, the NITZ name may be received moments
after registration, so it would make sense to have an unsolicited
notification of it.

 Besides, all AT modems report the NITZ name via COPS.  So in effect
 oFono already fulfills this task...

Well, not with ISI modems it doesn't. Also, if we move PLMN name
handling over to oFono, how can you determine if the name reported by
COPS is indeed the NITZ name and as such should take precedence over
the core's PLMN name?

Cheers,
Aki
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono


[PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg

2010-12-03 Thread Aki Niemi
---
 TODO |   10 ++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 6cf7202..457c9a1 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -497,3 +497,13 @@ Miscellaneous
   Priority: Medium
   Complexity: C2
   Owner: Sjur Br??ndeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com
+
+- Add NITZ name support to the network registration atom.  One of the many
+  inputs to the final display name on the UI is a name given in a NITZ
+  indication from the network.  This task adds a notify function to the network
+  registration atom, and modifies the logic in get_operator_display_name() to
+  use the NITZ name if available.
+
+  Priority: Medium
+  Complexity: C1
+  Owner: Aki Niemi aki.ni...@nokia.com
-- 
1.7.1

___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono


Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg

2010-12-03 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Aki,

On 12/03/2010 08:02 AM, Aki Niemi wrote:
 ---
  TODO |   10 ++
  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
 index 6cf7202..457c9a1 100644
 --- a/TODO
 +++ b/TODO
 @@ -497,3 +497,13 @@ Miscellaneous
Priority: Medium
Complexity: C2
Owner: Sjur Brændeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com
 +
 +- Add NITZ name support to the network registration atom.  One of the many
 +  inputs to the final display name on the UI is a name given in a NITZ
 +  indication from the network.  This task adds a notify function to the 
 network
 +  registration atom, and modifies the logic in get_operator_display_name() to
 +  use the NITZ name if available.
 +
 +  Priority: Medium
 +  Complexity: C1
 +  Owner: Aki Niemi aki.ni...@nokia.com
 

Out of curiosity, how do you plan to support this on AT modems?  I have
yet to see any AT modem report the NITZ network name via a proprietary
command.

Besides, all AT modems report the NITZ name via COPS.  So in effect
oFono already fulfills this task...

Regards,
-Denis
___
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono