Re: Review Request 130171: Fix page-jumping-back-issue commonly encountered when in presentation mode

2017-07-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid


> On jul. 3, 2017, 9:07 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Sorry but no, you can't fix presentation mode by removing code out of 
> > pageview that you claim you don't know what it does. Debug more and come up 
> > with a better patch.
> 
> Alexander Schlarb wrote:
> Well, can you tell me what that code I'm trying to remove ought to do? 
> (Even a hunch would be super useful!)

Read the code of PageView::slotRequestVisiblePixmaps maybe?


- Albert


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/#review103404
---


On jul. 3, 2017, 8:54 p.m., Alexander Schlarb wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/
> ---
> 
> (Updated jul. 3, 2017, 8:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> This fixes an issue I've commonly encountered while quickly working myself 
> through large PDFs with many pages (such as 
> [this](https://storage.ninetailed.ninja/index.php/s/FS58uge8yKCvjlB)).
> 
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
> 
>  1. Open Okular
>  2. For easily reproducing the issue change *Settings* ? *Performance* ? 
> *Memory Usage* to *Greedy* (the issue can be reproduced without it, but it's 
> harder an alot more random)
>  3. Open a PDF with many pages
>  4. Immidiately go to presentation mode (*Ctrl*+*Shift*+*P*)
>  5. Click on the screen or press the left-arrow keyboard button
> 
> Expected behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide is shown
> 
> Actual behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide *is* indeed shown for a split second before the one is sent 
> back to the first slide (this keeps being the case until all slides have been 
> preloaded, then it stops)
>  * Interestingly enough (and I frankly have no idea why) everything works 
> normally if one quickly double-clicks to skip forward by two slides, slides 
> can be viewed normally after that as long as you don't go back to the second 
> slide again…?
> 
> 
> This patch fixes the problematic behaviour by removing code that looks its a 
> bogus fixi from something that shouldn't be a problem… maybe.
> Unfortunately the one attached comment isn't helpful at all in describing 
> what this check was originally supposed to do – just like the commit message 
> for that change (obtained through `git blame`):
> 
> commit d2d2fa3b2a4fa8f4b554b87ec13ee5a15b64f35d
> Author: Mailson Menezes 
> Date:   Sun Nov 11 23:09:12 2012 -0300
> 
> Refactoring PageView
> 
> I therefor can only hope that this solution doesn't break anything. Guidance 
> of somebody with in-depth knowledge of the code-base would be apprechiated on 
> this. :-)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   ui/pageview.cpp acacfb90 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Loaded a few different PDFs that had previously exibited the described 
> behaviour and verfied that they are fixed now. Also scrolled through them in 
> non-presentation mode, to verify that nothing else appears to be broken now.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Schlarb
> 
>



Re: Review Request 130171: Fix page-jumping-back-issue commonly encountered when in presentation mode

2017-07-03 Thread Alexander Schlarb


> On Juli 3, 2017, 11:07 nachm., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Sorry but no, you can't fix presentation mode by removing code out of 
> > pageview that you claim you don't know what it does. Debug more and come up 
> > with a better patch.

Well, can you tell me what that code I'm trying to remove ought to do? (Even a 
hunch would be super useful!)


- Alexander


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/#review103404
---


On Juli 3, 2017, 10:54 nachm., Alexander Schlarb wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Juli 3, 2017, 10:54 nachm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> This fixes an issue I've commonly encountered while quickly working myself 
> through large PDFs with many pages (such as 
> [this](https://storage.ninetailed.ninja/index.php/s/FS58uge8yKCvjlB)).
> 
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
> 
>  1. Open Okular
>  2. For easily reproducing the issue change *Settings* ? *Performance* ? 
> *Memory Usage* to *Greedy* (the issue can be reproduced without it, but it's 
> harder an alot more random)
>  3. Open a PDF with many pages
>  4. Immidiately go to presentation mode (*Ctrl*+*Shift*+*P*)
>  5. Click on the screen or press the left-arrow keyboard button
> 
> Expected behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide is shown
> 
> Actual behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide *is* indeed shown for a split second before the one is sent 
> back to the first slide (this keeps being the case until all slides have been 
> preloaded, then it stops)
>  * Interestingly enough (and I frankly have no idea why) everything works 
> normally if one quickly double-clicks to skip forward by two slides, slides 
> can be viewed normally after that as long as you don't go back to the second 
> slide again…?
> 
> 
> This patch fixes the problematic behaviour by removing code that looks its a 
> bogus fixi from something that shouldn't be a problem… maybe.
> Unfortunately the one attached comment isn't helpful at all in describing 
> what this check was originally supposed to do – just like the commit message 
> for that change (obtained through `git blame`):
> 
> commit d2d2fa3b2a4fa8f4b554b87ec13ee5a15b64f35d
> Author: Mailson Menezes 
> Date:   Sun Nov 11 23:09:12 2012 -0300
> 
> Refactoring PageView
> 
> I therefor can only hope that this solution doesn't break anything. Guidance 
> of somebody with in-depth knowledge of the code-base would be apprechiated on 
> this. :-)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   ui/pageview.cpp acacfb90 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Loaded a few different PDFs that had previously exibited the described 
> behaviour and verfied that they are fixed now. Also scrolled through them in 
> non-presentation mode, to verify that nothing else appears to be broken now.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Schlarb
> 
>



Review Request 130172: Add support for the forward and back mouse buttons

2017-07-03 Thread Alexander Schlarb

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130172/
---

Review request for Okular.


Repository: okular


Description
---

This one should be a lot less controversial ;-)

More information on this subject: 
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qt.html#MouseButton-enum


Diffs
-

  ui/presentationwidget.cpp 8035d38f 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130172/diff/


Testing
---

Yup, it works


Thanks,

Alexander Schlarb



Re: Review Request 130171: Fix page-jumping-back-issue commonly encountered when in presentation mode

2017-07-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/#review103404
---



Sorry but no, you can't fix presentation mode by removing code out of pageview 
that you claim you don't know what it does. Debug more and come up with a 
better patch.

- Albert Astals Cid


On jul. 3, 2017, 8:54 p.m., Alexander Schlarb wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/
> ---
> 
> (Updated jul. 3, 2017, 8:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> This fixes an issue I've commonly encountered while quickly working myself 
> through large PDFs with many pages (such as 
> [this](https://storage.ninetailed.ninja/index.php/s/FS58uge8yKCvjlB)).
> 
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
> 
>  1. Open Okular
>  2. For easily reproducing the issue change *Settings* ? *Performance* ? 
> *Memory Usage* to *Greedy* (the issue can be reproduced without it, but it's 
> harder an alot more random)
>  3. Open a PDF with many pages
>  4. Immidiately go to presentation mode (*Ctrl*+*Shift*+*P*)
>  5. Click on the screen or press the left-arrow keyboard button
> 
> Expected behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide is shown
> 
> Actual behaviour:
> 
>  * The next slide *is* indeed shown for a split second before the one is sent 
> back to the first slide (this keeps being the case until all slides have been 
> preloaded, then it stops)
>  * Interestingly enough (and I frankly have no idea why) everything works 
> normally if one quickly double-clicks to skip forward by two slides, slides 
> can be viewed normally after that as long as you don't go back to the second 
> slide again…?
> 
> 
> This patch fixes the problematic behaviour by removing code that looks its a 
> bogus fixi from something that shouldn't be a problem… maybe.
> Unfortunately the one attached comment isn't helpful at all in describing 
> what this check was originally supposed to do – just like the commit message 
> for that change (obtained through `git blame`):
> 
> commit d2d2fa3b2a4fa8f4b554b87ec13ee5a15b64f35d
> Author: Mailson Menezes 
> Date:   Sun Nov 11 23:09:12 2012 -0300
> 
> Refactoring PageView
> 
> I therefor can only hope that this solution doesn't break anything. Guidance 
> of somebody with in-depth knowledge of the code-base would be apprechiated on 
> this. :-)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   ui/pageview.cpp acacfb90 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Loaded a few different PDFs that had previously exibited the described 
> behaviour and verfied that they are fixed now. Also scrolled through them in 
> non-presentation mode, to verify that nothing else appears to be broken now.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Schlarb
> 
>



Review Request 130171: Fix page-jumping-back-issue commonly encountered when in presentation mode

2017-07-03 Thread Alexander Schlarb

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/
---

Review request for Okular.


Repository: okular


Description
---

This fixes an issue I've commonly encountered while quickly working myself 
through large PDFs with many pages (such as 
[this](https://storage.ninetailed.ninja/index.php/s/FS58uge8yKCvjlB)).

Steps to reproduce the issue:

 1. Open Okular
 2. For easily reproducing the issue change *Settings* ? *Performance* ? 
*Memory Usage* to *Greedy* (the issue can be reproduced without it, but it's 
harder an alot more random)
 3. Open a PDF with many pages
 4. Immidiately go to presentation mode (*Ctrl*+*Shift*+*P*)
 5. Click on the screen or press the left-arrow keyboard button

Expected behaviour:

 * The next slide is shown

Actual behaviour:

 * The next slide *is* indeed shown for a split second before the one is sent 
back to the first slide (this keeps being the case until all slides have been 
preloaded, then it stops)
 * Interestingly enough (and I frankly have no idea why) everything works 
normally if one quickly double-clicks to skip forward by two slides, slides can 
be viewed normally after that as long as you don't go back to the second slide 
again…?


This patch fixes the problematic behaviour by removing code that looks its a 
bogus fixi from something that shouldn't be a problem… maybe.
Unfortunately the one attached comment isn't helpful at all in describing what 
this check was originally supposed to do – just like the commit message for 
that change (obtained through `git blame`):

commit d2d2fa3b2a4fa8f4b554b87ec13ee5a15b64f35d
Author: Mailson Menezes 
Date:   Sun Nov 11 23:09:12 2012 -0300

Refactoring PageView

I therefor can only hope that this solution doesn't break anything. Guidance of 
somebody with in-depth knowledge of the code-base would be apprechiated on 
this. :-)


Diffs
-

  ui/pageview.cpp acacfb90 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130171/diff/


Testing
---

Loaded a few different PDFs that had previously exibited the described 
behaviour and verfied that they are fixed now. Also scrolled through them in 
non-presentation mode, to verify that nothing else appears to be broken now.


Thanks,

Alexander Schlarb



D6268: HiDPI Support for Okular

2017-07-03 Thread David Edmundson
davidedmundson added a comment.


  qApp->DPR can change within the lifespan of the app; for example plugging in 
a new monitor can change things.  
  This does mean it's very important to keep the metadata of the pixmap's dpr 
with the pixmap. It ends up simpler and safer overall.
  
  Doesn't mean we need to break ABI though.
  
  ---
  
  @hetzenecker
  
  There are two breaks RequestPixmap::RequestPixmap and Page::_o_nearest
  
  ---
  
  For requestPixmap we're sure to not process any screen events in the 
meantime, so you can use qApp->devicePixelRatio() in the two places in document 
and in the line in generator.
  
  For use of Page::_o_nearest you can't.
  However, there is an easy way to keep ABI for this sort of thing.
  
  If you have
  someMethod(int a) and want to change it to someMethod(int a, qreal dpr)
  
  keep both, but make the first method simply call the second with a default 
parameter.
  
  -

INLINE COMMENTS

> generator.cpp:106
> +QPixmap *p = new QPixmap( QPixmap::fromImage( img ) );
> +p->setDevicePixelRatio( p->devicePixelRatioF() );
> +request->page()->setPixmap( request->observer(), p, 
> request->normalizedRect() );

sure about this one?

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6268

To: hetzenecker, davidedmundson, aacid
Cc: sander, anthonyfieroni, #okular, aacid


D6268: HiDPI Support for Okular

2017-07-03 Thread Lukas Hetzenecker
hetzenecker added a comment.


  Thanke for your feedback.
  
  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D6268#121135, @aacid wrote:
  
  > I would very much prefer if you didn't break the ABI of the files in core/
  >
  > Also not sure why you need to pass the devicepixel ratio up and down, isn't 
it the same basically in all the app?
  
  
  Yes and no. While it would be possible to use `qApp->devicePixelRatio()` (as 
I've done in `mobile/components`), this would return the highest pixel ratio in 
the system, in case there are more physical screens with different Scale 
Factors connected. 
  So, as alternative `QScreen::devicePixelRatio` could be used to return the 
DPR of the screen the application is shown. I'm not sure yet if this is 
possible without changing the ABI, but I'll try to.

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6268

To: hetzenecker, davidedmundson, aacid
Cc: sander, anthonyfieroni, #okular, aacid