[okular] [Bug 466521] Characters such as "⑥" cannot be copied as in Chrome, but can only be pasted as "6"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466521 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/-/commit/322fd2 ||d54e4226f6dbb4fb357a86931a5 ||c790340 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 322fd2d54e4226f6dbb4fb357a86931a5c790340 by Sune Vuorela, on behalf of Wendi Gan. Committed on 24/05/2024 at 10:02. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. fix Unicode Normalization: replace NFKC to NFC Use NFC in copy, makeWord, and export functions, and NFKC for search operations. NFKC may alter characters when copied or exported. For example ⑥ in pdf will be pasted as 6. So most instances are replaced with NFC. To simplify matching during search operation, NFKC is used. Related: bug 473495 M +12 -9core/textpage.cpp M +1-1generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/322fd2d54e4226f6dbb4fb357a86931a5c790340 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 473495] Give an option not to apply compatibility decomposition when copying
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473495 --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 322fd2d54e4226f6dbb4fb357a86931a5c790340 by Sune Vuorela, on behalf of Wendi Gan. Committed on 24/05/2024 at 10:02. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. fix Unicode Normalization: replace NFKC to NFC Use NFC in copy, makeWord, and export functions, and NFKC for search operations. NFKC may alter characters when copied or exported. For example ⑥ in pdf will be pasted as 6. So most instances are replaced with NFC. To simplify matching during search operation, NFKC is used. Related: bug 466521 M +12 -9core/textpage.cpp M +1-1generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/322fd2d54e4226f6dbb4fb357a86931a5c790340 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 487346] Feature Request: Speak beginning from current page
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487346 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Keywords||junior-jobs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 486680] Okular does not accept blank certificate password when digitally signing PDFs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486680 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi What does the version in 'about okular' report? If it is 24.02, you likely need to actually click the certificate even if it looks selected. It is a bug fixed in 24.05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 484938] Okular sidebar will not save
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484938 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||follow...@163.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- *** Bug 486186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 486186] The visibility of the sidebar and the corresponding UI items not consistent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486186 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Thank you for your bug report. It was also reported a couple of weeks ago and already fixed. Will be fixed in 24.05. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 484938 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 485747] PDF signature dialog should preselect (only) certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485747 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Frank Siegert from comment #0) > When signing a PDF document with Okular, and even with only one certificate > being available, no certificate is preselected. This leads to unnecessary > work, but more importantly, it leads to a spurious error message if the user > does not notice this being inactive: "Enter certificate password" (even if > there is no password for the certificate). Should be fixed in master around 6 weeks ago; there are no further 24.02 branch releases planned, so will be available with 24.05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482500] Installing Okular from snap breaks home directory
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482500 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Scarlett Moore from comment #3) > Fix is in once merged: > https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/pull/4698/commits/ > 221e23cc28896b1098ed4a0c646f00b4b61464f0 Scarlett: thanks Though this report might be about the qt5 snap ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482249] Okular text selection glitch confuses beginning and end of selection in PDFs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482249 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liusish...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- *** Bug 483968 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 483968] Okular now moves the starting point of the text selection region when I position my cursor before the original starting point.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483968 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Thanks for your great report. It looks very much like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482249 which is fixed in next patch release. Marking as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 482249 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482682] Digital Signature not referenced in AcroForm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482682 --- Comment #9 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi Tobias After much investigation, I think I'm heading towards rejecting this bug report. When the AcroForm section is embedded directly into the Catalog dict, Poppler must rewrite the entire Catalog dict in order to update it. (As I understand PDF spec ISO 32000-2:2020 section 7.5.6 about incremental updates) Your signed form is seen with Adobe Reader. I'm writing a bug report to the ec.europa.eu validator to check this, and also filing a issue with LibreOffice to suggest them to always do the indirect references for the AcroForm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 483678] Signing with Luxtrust's non-repudiation certificate just hangs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483678 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #9 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Alain Knaff from comment #6) > I retried with okular 23.08.1 from Debian testing, and with a poppler that I > compiled myself (24.03.0), and GPG still didn't show up :-( Unfortunately you need a newer gpg than what is currently available in debian (We needed some fixes for handling of padding in signatures) You could find the gnupg appimage which should contaain a okular and a gnupg that just works together. It can be started with adding `-c okular` to the app image call. Alternatively, if you can sign a using either gpgsm on the command line, or the graphical KDE Application `Kleopatra`, with your luxtrust key then it is likely that the okular-with-gnupg-smime setup would also work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482682] Digital Signature not referenced in AcroForm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482682 --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- (Note to the other okular people; This is most probably an issue in poppler, and I'm looking at that. While it would be most correct to close the bug here and reopen it in poppler ( https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/ ), I'm keeping the bug open here 'cause that's where the user are) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482682] Digital Signature not referenced in AcroForm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482682 --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- Created attachment 166594 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=166594=edit Unsigned document with form I guess we should investigate how this form differs from your form ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482682] Digital Signature not referenced in AcroForm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482682 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Tobias Wich from comment #2) > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #1) > > Hi Tobias > > > > Any chance you can try again with an okular built with a less ancient > > poppler ? > > > > Note that quite some work have gotten into digital signatures in both okular > > and poppler over the last year, and your poppler library is from december > > 1st, 2022. > > > > I just uploaded a signed test pdf to the europa.eu link, and except for it > > disliking my custom certificate authority chain, it was all green ? > > Fair point. At the moment I only have the debian packages at my disposal. > The okular version 23.08.1 is the latest in the repo. It is using > libpoppler-qt5-1 which I can update to 24.02.0 from deb experimental. With > that I get the same result. > > I have to build the programs myself to see for sure, but given fact, that > the newer poppler version shows the same behaviour, it is probably something > that is related to the okular code and has been fixed there already okular > code. > > Just to make sure it's not related to my test document, have you tried > signing this and checking in the EU validator? I have now tried signing your document and checking it in the eu validator, and I see it complaining quite a bit. I have tried another simple document with forms and signing that, and that was validated quite okay I think (except certificate chain) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482682] Digital Signature not referenced in AcroForm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482682 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi Tobias Any chance you can try again with an okular built with a less ancient poppler ? Note that quite some work have gotten into digital signatures in both okular and poppler over the last year, and your poppler library is from december 1st, 2022. I just uploaded a signed test pdf to the europa.eu link, and except for it disliking my custom certificate authority chain, it was all green ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 482443] okular - add build options for wayland (non X11) build options
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482443 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Please submit the patch on invent.kde.org. I think there is things wrong (if built with x11 support and run under wayland; probably the most normal case), but it is better to discuss on invent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 463647] Slow start on network mounts because of image icon lookups + may broken UI
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463647 --- Comment #9 from Sune Vuorela --- https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/777/diffs (in 23.08) is at least fixing a big part of it. Can anyone try apply that on their local setups and check ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 463647] Slow start on network mounts because of image icon lookups + may broken UI
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463647 --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Bernard Gray from comment #6) > We're experiencing it over a CIFS network share. Examining the calls via > wireshark we get a lot of failed attempts to open non-existant files - Hi What version of okular are you using? /Sune -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479141] Graphical glitches in presentation mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479141 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/grap |https://invent.kde.org/grap |hics/okular/-/commit/450744 |hics/okular/-/commit/aab13e |a37dbf8770b3282b47ab43a797e |3fe25e4964a9ebbbc11832db397 |d8c347e |d51453e --- Comment #17 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit aab13e3fe25e4964a9ebbbc11832db397d51453e by Sune Vuorela, on behalf of Kai Uwe Broulik. Committed on 21/02/2024 at 08:29. Pushed by sune into branch 'release/24.02'. presentationwidget: Invalidate pixmaps on dpr change Since the last rendered pixmap is usually reused, its device pixel ratio can end up different from the `devicePixelRatioF()` of the widget which is used for most size calculations which leads to an area that might be unpainted causing visual artifacts. M +19 -10 part/presentationwidget.cpp M +1-0part/presentationwidget.h https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/aab13e3fe25e4964a9ebbbc11832db397d51453e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479141] Graphical glitches in presentation mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479141 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/-/commit/450744 ||a37dbf8770b3282b47ab43a797e ||d8c347e --- Comment #16 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 450744a37dbf8770b3282b47ab43a797ed8c347e by Sune Vuorela, on behalf of Kai Uwe Broulik. Committed on 21/02/2024 at 08:11. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. presentationwidget: Invalidate pixmaps on dpr change Since the last rendered pixmap is usually reused, its device pixel ratio can end up different from the `devicePixelRatioF()` of the widget which is used for most size calculations which leads to an area that might be unpainted causing visual artifacts. M +19 -10 part/presentationwidget.cpp M +1-0part/presentationwidget.h https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/450744a37dbf8770b3282b47ab43a797ed8c347e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481262] option GPG, does not list my gpg certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481262 --- Comment #11 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 3518099a08f0b129e6be8c8216ecb5fc0bf38273 by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 20/02/2024 at 13:57. Pushed by sune into branch 'release/24.02'. Better user strings for signature settings M +9-4generators/poppler/pdfsettingswidget.cpp https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/3518099a08f0b129e6be8c8216ecb5fc0bf38273 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481534] Presentation mode broken with scaling other than 100%
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481534 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 479141 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479141] Graphical glitches in presentation mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479141 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@iyanmv.com --- Comment #12 from Sune Vuorela --- *** Bug 481534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481262] option GPG, does not list my gpg certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481262 --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Ingo Klöcker from comment #5) > I think a good name for the NSS backend depends on how it behaves on > different OSes, i.e. if it uses the Windows/macOS certificate store on > Windows/macOS then "Firefox Certificate store" is probably not a good name. > And I guess most people don't know that Mozilla Firefox was once called > Netscape. Afaik, it still uses the firefox cert store on all platforms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481262] option GPG, does not list my gpg certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481262 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3) > (In reply to Ingo Klöcker from comment #2) > > Maybe we should change the name of the backend to "GnuPG (S/MIME)" (or > that makes sense, not the first person to be confused by the naming. Sune? Sure. I didn't have any good ideas at the time, but I kind of prepared the code for it https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/blob/master/generators/poppler/pdfsettingswidget.cpp#L35 If one option should be > GnuPG (S/MIME) what should the other be > Netscape NSS > NSS > Firefox Certificate store -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 --- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #2) > In this case, it would be a good thing that Okular, at the first opening, > creates automatically an S/MIME OpenPGP certificate with Kleopatra. In general, S/Mime (x509) certificates needs to be authorized/notarized by a 3rd party (not unlike how browser https security works), so just generating something is not going to be useful in the long run. For example, in certain countries, you can get a governmental issued certificate with a government organization as trust anchor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481266] [wish] pdf signing, okular can use openPGP certificcate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481266 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi This is not specified in the pdf specification, so it would be a purely okular-to-okular feature. While it probably wouldn't be many man weeks of work to implement something that works, given it is not actually specified in the pdf spec, I don't think it is useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481262] option GPG, does not list my gpg certificate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481262 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- the gpg backend setting is still s/mime and not openpgp, so you need s/mime certificates, just like for the nss backend. The pdf standard specifies s/mime for signing pdfs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 481111] Keyboard shortcuts or menu items to rotate in okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- You can actually both add it to the toolbar and add a shortcut. I do think though that having a shortcut by default could make sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 480485] no night mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Pejman Rezaei from comment #2) > I mean dark mode like the one evince has. My kubuntu is update Color menu was added in may 2022 probably for the 22.08 release, and later on integration with the actual themes should have been added. In the report, you write you have version 21.12. Note that these releases are year.month. I'm closing this report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 480485] no night mode
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Do you by 'night mode' mean redshifted supposedly-less-keep-awake ui or a dark-mode ? note that your okular is quite old. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 353300] Text search does not work in Arabic
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353300 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Saladin Shaban from comment #5) > Diggin some more into the issue: > https://chat.openai.com/share/d2f74bc7-6c7b-437d-ac17-e71ae73f689b > > The problem now is the way TinyTextEntity's are sorted according to their > positions from left to right. This seems to be crucial to the text selection > logic, and cannot be changed without extensive modifications. > > I'm not sure about the right way to proceed from here. Some possibilities > are: > > 1- Reorder the text in the Find bar before performing a search, with Qt's > equivalent of fribidi_reorder_line(). > > 2- For text-based documents, delegate search and selection to the > QTextDocument class itself. > > 3- Skip sorting the text entities, and adjust the search and selection > methods accordingly. > > The first option is the least intrusive, while the second seems to offer > greater possibilities, like handling the peculiarities of Arabic search and > other languages: > > https://community.scripture.software.sil.org/t/search-arabic-text-without- > tashkeel/882 > https://help-nl.oclc.org/Discovery_and_Reference/WorldCat_Discovery/ > Release_notes/2023_release_notes/ > 040WorldCat_Discovery_release_notes_Arabic_language_support > > QTextDocument doesn't seem to support these yet, but it's something I might > be able to contribute to Qt. There is https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/595 which claims to fix it. Though it likely introduces a significant memory leak. I don't know enough about any RTL language to be able to really test and work on it, but I have prepared https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/905 which should make it easier with the memory management on top of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479777] Altium Designer PDF popup doesn't show up
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479777 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/-/commit/2609f4 ||001add186e34f4e649f6c1096e3 ||b499f2f --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 2609f4001add186e34f4e649f6c1096e3b499f2f by Sune Vuorela, on behalf of Alexis Murzeau. Committed on 17/01/2024 at 20:01. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. Add support for app.popUpMenu and submenus in popUpMenuEx These functions from `app` are JS functions that can be used by PDF files. Based on popUpMenuEx, the implementation of popUpMenu converts arguments to app.popUpMenuEx format and then call it. The popMenuEx function is improved to handle submenus as well using `oSubMenu`. app.popUpMenu is used in Altium Designer and EasyEDA exported PDFs. See an example here: https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/32f723ediscovery.html#cad-resources https://www.st.com/resource/en/schematic_pack/mb1260-f723e-d03_schematic.pdf M +146 -0autotests/jsfunctionstest.cpp M +42 -0core/script/builtin.js M +34 -10 core/script/js_app.cpp M +2-0core/script/js_app_p.h https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/2609f4001add186e34f4e649f6c1096e3b499f2f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479942] Okular crashes when saving a document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479942 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|qt6 | --- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela --- not qt6 specific, bug janitor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479942] Okular crashes when saving a document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479942 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|qt6 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479942] Okular crashes when saving a document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479942 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- So. I guess I need to discuss this with Albert and maybe read the pdf standard. The following becomes a bit technical: But apparantly the 4 options is in a 'button group' and okular assumes that all buttons on a button group is in the same page. But 4 is on a page of itself. And Okular gets confused by this (and EditFormButtonsCommand::refreshInternalPageReferences fails (It looks for the form elements on the wrong page) to succeed) and after that, okular seems to be in a bad state and starts crashing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479942] Okular crashes when saving a document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479942 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Also reproducible in 22.12. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479110] Text-to-speech is not working
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479110 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DOWNSTREAM --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Doug from comment #4) > (In reply to Carlos De Maine from comment #3) > > > The cached device pixel ratio value was stale on window expose. Please > > > file > > > a QTBUG which explains how to reproduce. > > > > > > Dont' know if that has anything to do with the issue I am having. > > > > no that should not have any relevance on your problem. i can confirm that > > after i installed speech-dispatcher and restarted okular that text-to-speech > > began to work. i will add speech-dispatcher as a runtime dep of qt6-speech > > in neon's packaging. > > > > can you retry and see is it works now, preferably after a reboot? > > OK, thank you, it seems to be working now with speechd, but flite and mock > do not work. Are they supposed to work out of the box? If not, maybe there > should be a message or something to let people know that there is extra > configuration needed to use those modules. I don't think mock should be installed. It isn't an actual working backend. Flite also requires some extra modules, but last I tried it it wasn't very good. I don't think QSpeech (the abstraction layer used) communicates non-working backends, so there is not much Okular can do about it. I think I will mark this as closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479683] Okular does not start due to missing okularpart
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479683 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/merge_requests/906 Sorry about that. Also, mail to Distributions list has been sent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479122] Konqueror on KF6 can't display PDFs using Okular part
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479122 --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 671107c0e53daf80065708daab7505d8f1a36371 by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 09/01/2024 at 19:17. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. KParts can extend their mimetypes with plugins Certain KParts can extend their mimetypes with plugins This feature was kind of lost in the KF6 porting that dropped the desktop files. Look for a key in the json file to see what plugins to look for for extra mimetypes. M +13 -3src/partloader.cpp https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kparts/-/commit/671107c0e53daf80065708daab7505d8f1a36371 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479122] Konqueror on KF6 can't display PDFs using Okular part
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479122 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/-/commit/dbb8ba ||635e48650b2ed8c84168c79e53e ||619ea0f --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit dbb8ba635e48650b2ed8c84168c79e53e619ea0f by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 09/01/2024 at 19:19. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. Communicate our plugin namespace to consumers This enables others to query our supported mimetypes and thus figure out what mimetypes they can open with the okular part It is needed for kpart loading to know which features we can actually do M +3-0okular_part.json https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/dbb8ba635e48650b2ed8c84168c79e53e619ea0f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479122] Konqueror on KF6 can't display PDFs using Okular part
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479122 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit 55901afcc3a0d42dbec216ec43426dd6c8e3a2fd by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 09/01/2024 at 11:10. Pushed by sune into branch 'master'. Install parts into the right folder M +1-2CMakeLists.txt https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/55901afcc3a0d42dbec216ec43426dd6c8e3a2fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479142] Bookmarks Sidebar doesn't update unless "Show for all documents" checkbox is toggled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479142 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/fram ||eworks/kbookmarks/-/commit/ ||fa97c1d8ff2f0393bbe7ac92786 ||58e63291d2e09 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit fa97c1d8ff2f0393bbe7ac9278658e63291d2e09 by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 03/01/2024 at 14:25. Pushed by cullmann into branch 'master'. Emit specific changed signal This happened before dbus removal by dbus sending messages back to current process. Reintroduce it. M +1-2src/kbookmarkmanager.cpp https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kbookmarks/-/commit/fa97c1d8ff2f0393bbe7ac9278658e63291d2e09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479108] Zoom dropdown list in toolbar not working
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479108 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap ||hics/okular/-/commit/a3f018 ||184864599161e74e5587b9aa55e ||daf360c --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Git commit a3f018184864599161e74e5587b9aa55edaf360c by Sune Vuorela. Committed on 02/01/2024 at 11:21. Pushed by aacid into branch 'master'. Fix zoom select There is a surprising api change in KSelectAction that has renamed triggered, but a base class is still having a different triggered, so code still compiles. Rename the signal to the new version M +1-1part/pageview.cpp https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/commit/a3f018184864599161e74e5587b9aa55edaf360c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 479110] Text-to-speech is not working
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479110 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Thank you for your report. Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce. I just - like in my kf5 setup - drew a square and clicked 'Speak text' from context menu, and in both cases I got the same 'machine voice' speaking the exact same words. (Note; I have only tested with speech dispatcher, and just a single pdf document) I think this might be a setup issue in your end; either by yourself or by your distribution. Do you have the package speech-dispatcher installed ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
T11542: Remove KHTML
svuorela closed subtask T11539: Port Okular away from KHTML as Resolved. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/T11542 To: svuorela Cc: cordlandwehr, ngraham, #konqueror, #plasma, #okular, #kde_applications, #frameworks, knauss, cpmontanari, ghost62, hannahk, davidre, GB_2, ahmadsamir, kpiwowarski, usta, asturmlechner, jucato, cullmann, vkrause
[okular] [Bug 478729] Does not show Text of Apple-edited PDFs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478729 --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- I did investigate the file a bit, and it is a quite bad file. I don't know if it is so bad that we shouldn't be able to recover from it, but it looks like we at least don't fully do it. This is a bit pdf-technical, but it is basically saying that now there is an object of 360 bytes and then the object is 473 bytes long and such things, and that's the most obvious errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 478729] Does not show Text of Apple-edited PDFs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478729 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Thank you for your report. It would also be helpful if you could show a screenshot of the file shown on a device where it is shown as expected. I'm also curious if you can provide the 'original' pdf before annotations so we have that for comparison. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 463647] Slow start on network mounts because of image icon lookups + may broken UI
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463647 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Stefano Rosellini from comment #3) > I notice the performance problem on sshfs mount point. > If I execute "strace okular filename.pdf" using remote mount point as > current work directory I see that okular try to open a bunch of file named > "bookmark-new.*", "help-about.", "kde.*". "okular.*" without path (these > seems to be the slow part). > If I open the same remote file but using as current work directory a local > one the open is fast. > So the problem seems to be that okular try to open these files without path. > I hope this can help to fix the problem. I did some changes here iirc for 23.08 release; which version are you using? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 478304] Okular exits every time I open a digitally signed PDF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478304 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to meso5 from comment #6) > I just emailed it to you. I'll probably end up reviewing Albert's fix, if not helping implementing it; any chance I can get a copy as well ? s...@kde.org It looks like I touched the crashing code in question last. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 402017] Cannot save PDF when loaded file has been deleted
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402017 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chronoan...@web.de --- Comment #78 from Sune Vuorela --- *** Bug 477136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 477136] If the PDF-File was modified by another program, Save As … is ALSO disabled.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477136 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED CC||k...@pusling.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- dupe of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402017 - already fixed. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 402017 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 477108] Font and text issues with Digitally Sign feature for non-english users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477108 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to igor.mach...@gmail.com from comment #2) > Regarding flatpak, that's strange indeed, and perhaps it's not related to > okular itself... For me, on Ubuntu 22.04, I'm forced to use flatpak to have > Stamps on digital signatures, otherwise the system version is too old. Maybe It is claimed to work. Signed by: should be translated into Assinado Por: according to my reading of the translation data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 477108] Font and text issues with Digitally Sign feature for non-english users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477108 --- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to igor.mach...@gmail.com from comment #2) > Ok Sune, thanks for the feedback. I opened this issue because I couldn't > find any other one, but I was imagining that others would exist somewhere > else. > Regarding flatpak, that's strange indeed, and perhaps it's not related to > okular itself... For me, on Ubuntu 22.04, I'm forced to use flatpak to have > Stamps on digital signatures, otherwise the system version is too old. Maybe > on system version the translation would work... I'll try to find a way to > upgrade my native system one. > Thanks! https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443403 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474222 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473433 and iirc a few more are variations of "visual representation of signature filed is ugly. please make it pretty." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 477108] Font and text issues with Digitally Sign feature for non-english users
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477108 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- The signed by-text is marked as translated; I'm not sure how translations for flatpacks works. https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular/-/blob/master/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp#L1378 I don't know if Albert has any knowledge here, else I think we should close it as downstream issue with the flatpacks The visual appearance is already duplicated by 2-4 other issues, but not yet any coherent solutions have been found, and all suggestions pulls in different directions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 476319] Okular crashes when trying to edit form fields
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476319 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Fixed in poppler 23.05 or 23.06. Please ask your distribution to provide an updated version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #31 from Sune Vuorela --- > It is too techie for me. What I understand is : > - the pdf standard for digital signing is only using a x509 certificate. > - in the standard, there is no way for digital signing with an OpenPGP > certificate. > > Right ? Correct. And for added knowledge: - LibreOffice can do some operations using OpenPGP. And other operations using x509 - Kleopatra works with both OpenPGP keys and x509 certificates for different and similar things - KMail cans sign and verify both with OpenPGP and with x509 (S/Mime) - GnuPG has tools to work with OpenPGP keys (gpg) and with x509 certificates (gpgsm) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #29 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #26) > :~> gpgsm --list-secret-keys > /home/roubach/.gnupg/pubring.kbx > So okular's dialog matches what you have in the keyring. That's expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #28 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #27) > >> And you have your x509 certificates in your gpg store ? > > why you speak about x509 certificate ? > > I speak about gpg certificates. Those found and used by kmail, LibreOffice, > kleopatra for digital signing. openpgp certificates are not specified to be used for pdf files. For that we need CMS - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_Message_Syntax - and CAdES - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAdES_(computing) - according to the pdf specification section 12.8. I have not seen anyone specifying CMS with openpgp keys, only with x509 certificates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #25 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #24) > Created attachment 162271 [details] > no gpg certificate > > Hello > > OpenSUSE tumbleweed supplies : > - gpg2 2.4.3 > - poppler built with gpgme support. > > Okular still does not find any gpg certificate. > > See the capture. And you have your x509 certificates in your gpg store ? What does `gpgsm --list-secret-keys` output ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #22 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #21) > Why Okular does not use the same technology as kleopatra, kmail or > LibreOffcie ? The work I did in poppler uses the exact same technology as kleopatra and kmail. Unfortunately there was a few bugs in the way. They were fixed in gnupg2.4.1. Why opensuse has buggy QA scripts; that's a good question. But I have submitted a patch for that to them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #19 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #17) > Thanks > > If I understand well, we need: > - okular default certificate folder is ~.gnupg > - gpg 2.4.1 or later > - we need poppler built with gpgme support. > > right ? point 1 is slighly wrong. Okular still uses NSS by default with whatever certificate paths. You now have a configuration option in the dialog to select gnupg or nss, if poppler supports it, in the dialog you showed earlier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #16 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #15) > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #14) > > (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #12) > > > Created attachment 162025 [details] > > > backend settings > > > > > > See the settings > > > > Please file a bug report to whomever provides your poppler binaries. > > Do you say the issue is solved or what ? There is unfortunately 2-3 issues in this bug-thread. But one of them is that your certificates seen with kleopatra cannot be used with okular. If your recent poppler is built with gpgme support (and gnupg2.4.1 or later is available), okular can use the same certificate store as kleopatra. You have the new okular that has the dropdown where it should be possible to select gpg, but the underlying poppler is not built with gpg support, so it isn't there. That you need to take up with whomever delivers your binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #14 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #12) > Created attachment 162025 [details] > backend settings > > See the settings Please file a bug report to whomever provides your poppler binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #11 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #10) > okular 23.08.1 > poppler 23.09 > > Issue still there : > okular by default does not point to ~/.gnupg/ and when we customize the path > to ~/.gnupg/ then okular does not find any key. Certainly because it knows > only NSS format. Did you select gnupg in the backend dropdown ? /Sune -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #9 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #6) > It seems that kde policy is to use gpg store. Why not okular ? This was released as part of okular 23.08 (requires a similar new-ish poppler library, at least 23.07) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 439595] Replacing Epub backends to mupdf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439595 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- I do think that this is a bad bug report. The bug report should describe the problem. The problem is that okular misrenders certain epub files. The problem is not that okular does not use mupdf. Mupdf could be *one* solution to the problem, but there might also be others that would still solve the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 474299] Typing long text in PDF forms extremely slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474299 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Mostly for other people who finds this: This was iirc fixed in poppler 23.06. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/merge_requests/1384/diffs was a big part of it, but there was a few more fixes here and there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 474211] Okular crashes when filling the forms
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474211 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- This was likely poppler #1383 fixed with poppler commit 62f2eb80fb2a4d4c656e7583584aa73fbc1de511 by Albert. This is part of poppler 23.05 and newer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 443403] Reduce the size of the digital signature display
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443403 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #23 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Enrique Artal from comment #22) > In version 23.08.0 there are some nice improvements about digital signature, > but the size of the fonts is still very big and non adjustable. Any hope? It is not currently on *my* work table. What could help this would be a thorough proposal about - What fixed things should be changed - from what and to what. Be specific. - What should be adjustable? - In what dialogs should the adjustability be? How should it look like? Can you visualize it somehow? - What should the work flow be for doing this? And get several of the bug submitters behind it (and preferably also contact KDE's visual design team for support) Currently it is mostly people pulling in various directions and a lot of not-concrete things; if it can somehow be consolidated to a great proposal, it might help on progress. About visualization: I'm not picky. It can be a photo of a piece of paper with lines on. It can be mockup tools. Or kolourpaint. Or it can just be a file from QtDesigner -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 473560] Okular cashes when displaying settings configure backends PDF and D-Trust 4.1 id-card inside card reader
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473560 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Hi Can you try collect a minidump ? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/wer/collecting-user-mode-dumps should describe how to do it, and then somehow make it available ? /Sune -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 473415] Cannot see any signature information for a signed PDF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473415 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Can you provide a file showing this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 459173] Cannot use USB smartcard to sign document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Robert Riemann from comment #5) > > What version of poppler (The underlying pdf library) are you using ? > > > > The double-pin should be fixed I think, by poppler 23.04, maybe 23.05. > > I am using Poppler 23.06.0 with PDF Backend 0.6.5. Do you have a link on the > poppler bug report? If it is already merged in 23.06.0 I may reopen it. There is no bug report on it. I noticed it while doing other stuff. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/merge_requests/1339 is the merge request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 459173] Cannot use USB smartcard to sign document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Robert Riemann from comment #3) > So with this shared library, it seems to work, even though the PIN has to be > entered twice and a document password as well for no obvious reason. What version of poppler (The underlying pdf library) are you using ? The double-pin should be fixed I think, by poppler 23.04, maybe 23.05. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471792] Annotations greatly increase PDF file size and massively slow down Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471792 --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Joe Breuer from comment #2) > Trying a 23.07 bump is not immediately accessible to me, since there's > apparently no release or even git tag yet. Not sure that I want to run git > master on a production system. Just fyi; 23.07 is now released. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471792] Annotations greatly increase PDF file size and massively slow down Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471792 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Joe Breuer from comment #3) > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #1) > > Some versions did embed the same fonts multiple times, and your "big" > > document contains ~140 copies of noto fonts > > What method/tool do you use to obtain this information? poppler source package (Often in a binary package like poppler-utils or poppler-tools) contains pdffonts tool that list all of the fonts in the pdf file. > I've added a corresponding sample: > https://github.com/jmbreuer/heap/tree/main/kde-okular-bug-20230630 That file embeds noto sans and noto sans regular. It seems to have grown with 1.5 mb. For two fonts that's not that much off. > > With poppler 23.06, adding annotations should grow the document with > > approximately 600k. With poppler 23.07, it should grow the document with > > approximately 300 k, assuming noto sans (okular default) is used. > > Is that to be expected "per each annotation", or once per adding annotations > at all, or per annotation type, ...? Technically, it is per different font, assuming every font is as big as Noto Sans and compresses with zlib similar to Noto Sans. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471792] Annotations greatly increase PDF file size and massively slow down Okular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471792 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- What version of the underlying Poppler library are you using ? Some versions did embed the same fonts multiple times, and your "big" document contains ~140 copies of noto fonts It should be fixed in version 23.06 of the poppler library. With poppler 23.06, adding annotations should grow the document with approximately 600k. With poppler 23.07, it should grow the document with approximately 300 k, assuming noto sans (okular default) is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471259] Slowing down, then, sometimes crash when using inline text annotation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471259 --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to mabobakrelsedik86 from comment #2) > (In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #1) > > Is it the same okular version? > > > > What version of the underlying "Poppler" library is used ? > > yes, it is the same version of okular > poppler 23.05.0-1 Is it poppler 23.05 across all your tests, or only in your manjaro ? Any chance you can try update to 23.06 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471259] Slowing down, then, sometimes crash when using inline text annotation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471259 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Is it the same okular version? What version of the underlying "Poppler" library is used ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 471173] git okular build cmake error at 9f498c7f5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471173 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- Gentoo has patched all of the testing of okular and changes in e-c-m. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/kde-apps/okular/files/okular-21.11.80-tests.patch and https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/kde-frameworks/extra-cmake-modules/files/extra-cmake-modules-5.93.0-skip-ecm_add_test-early.patch A new set of tests has been added in a different location and gentoo should adapt their patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469829] PDF file size increases exponentially after typing in text using the Typewriter tool and Highlighter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469829 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- thanks for confirming. Marking as fixed upstream (Poppler) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470128] Saving document with resized text creates huge memory footprint
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470128 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to dorla.hutch from comment #3) > (In reply to dorla.hutch from comment #2) > > From initially 23KiB, it went to 20MiB (at least > > not 100MiB) … > > After adding the comment box before scaling, it's already 918KiB to be > honest but after scaling, it becomes 20MiB. adding ~900kb is kind of expected unless you use poppler (the pdf library underneath okular) from the newest version (released a couple of weeks ago, maybe with some of my patches on top), given that noto sans regular is the default font and it will be embeedded. But for some reason, though I didn't manage to succeed myself, your file also contains a 20mb noto sans CJK HK file, so unless you explicitly have specified it, I'm a bit puzzled. (CJK contains Chinese, Japanese, Korean and maybe other east asian glyphs) What are your exact steps to resize the text ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 467144] Support Unicode metadata
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467144 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DOWNSTREAM --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- Fixed in poppler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470128] Saving document with resized text creates huge memory footprint
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470128 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Can you provide a sample document? Several bugs regarding this has been fixed in latest poppler release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 467144] Support Unicode metadata
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467144 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/merge_requests/1397 hopefully fixes it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469829] PDF file size increases exponentially after typing in text using the Typewriter tool and Highlighter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469829 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- Poppler is the underlying library that Okular uses for rendering pdf's and for writing annotations into pdf's. What version of poppler are you using ? The version `alstjr7375` is using has a bug that was fixed recently where the same font gets embedded multiple times. In your "large file" example, the same font is embedded 6 times; a bug that was fixed probably in poppler 23.06. So please update to a newer poppler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470174] 40 Characters Annotation consuming 20MB
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470174 --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to der.wolfgang.amadeus.mozart from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 159566 [details] > Annotated File from March 2023 with "normal" storage consumption > > I found a file with a relatively big number of annotations created with > okular (i don't know the version) in march. The storage consumption is > "normal" - a few KB. I attached the file, I hope it is helpful. This is kind of interesting. The main reason the files grows are embdednig fonts. In the "normal" storage consumption, font embedding fails and it just adds "Invalid_font" instead of the requested font. In your "grows to 2mb", the font is wrongly embedded twice and not at all optimized for storage. With only one copy of noto font (The Okular default), not optimized for storage, approximately 900 kb is the expected growth. With poppler 23.06, adding a annotation is expected to grow the document with 5-700 kbytes, and when my upcoming changes hopefully lands in poppler 23.07, annotations are expected to grow the document with 250-300 kbytes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469829] PDF file size increases exponentially after typing in text using the Typewriter tool and Highlighter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469829 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- What versions of poppler is involved. There had been some bugs, but fixed by 23.06 version of poppler that make it grow extremely much (By wrongly embedding the same fonts over and over again). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470751] Process of adding digital certificates is unintuitive and cumbersome
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470751 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Some things to also be aware of: - The certificate will often be hardware backed (smartcard or usb dongle), so can't really be copied around - If it is not hardware based, do *not* copy it around. People using it for real purposes wants to know where their keys are. The need to restart okular when changing the nss location could probably be fixed inside poppler, and a side effect of fixing that will probably fix all the crash-on-shutdown bugs related to nss. I'm working on adding an alternative to using nss for digital signatures (using gpg), and most of the setup bits will kind of be delegated to kleopatra, an app kind of designed for this. Also when using gpg, my patches for okular will hide the path selection for nss databases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470174] 40 Characters Annotation consuming 20MB
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470174 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela --- There are at least 3 different fixes needed here. Poppler (The pdf library used by okular) does not currently compress streams (font data) on saving. There is a very recent open merge request to address that. There is also less space consuming ways of storing font widths in pdf. There is also a very recent open merge request to address that against poppler. The pdf standard also supports the concept of only storing a font subsets so all of the above don't happen with the full font, but only font info for those needed. That is probably a major task and no current work is happening here. Using a different font than Noto could also make it grow less. That would be up to the usability people to change the default. But from a user perspective you could want to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 470446] Crash While Editing Forms
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470446 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Can you provide the document ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 462312] Okular crash on editing form
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462312 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela --- Fixed in poppler in the next version, likely called 23.06. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 462312] Okular crash on editing form
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462312 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #5 from Sune Vuorela --- So, it looks like the form in question wants to use TimesNewRoman as font but that font is not embedded. At least for the pdf file attacheb by Sylvain. TimesNewRoman is not one of the 14 base fonts, though had it been, we would still have been crashing. Poppler seems to expect that that should be the case. I guess the following question is mostly for Albert: Do we want to do the addFontToDefaultResources dance, or just ignore the concept of fonts in this case ? I'm leaning towards adding the fonts to defaults and at the same time also, if it is one of the 14 base fonts, not actually embed the fonts, but only reference it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469882] The pdf file does not open and closes with an error.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469882 --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- With a fixed poppler, it is also some degree of "cannot validate signature" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469882] The pdf file does not open and closes with an error.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469882 --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- Thanks. Crash happens in poppler. Merge-request submitted. Neither the current NSS backend nor the upcoming GPG backend supports GOST as a hash algorithm though, so neither can validate the signature. I also don't see it mentioned in GOST also isn't mentioned in neither ISO 32000-2:2020, nor in the extenisons adding more hash algorithms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469882] The pdf file does not open and closes with an error.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469882 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela --- Any chance you can share the file ? in the bug report, preferred, alternatively privately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 --- Comment #7 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #6) > It seems that kde policy is to use gpg store. Why not okular ? It's coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469705] okular does not find any certificate for digital signing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469705 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@pusling.com --- Comment #4 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Philippe ROUBACH from comment #3) > It's strange because in an issue in gitlab about poppler I read that the > code for digital signing in poppler is a copy of the code in LibreOffice. > > see https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues/465 The LibreOffice code can interact with both nss and the gpg keystore. Poppler currently can only interact with the nss keystore (There are patches under review also letting poppler (and then also okular) interact with the gpg keystore) KMail and Kleopatra only uses the gpg keystore. You can ask poppler about it's available keys with the pdfsig utility, like `pdfsig -nssdir ~/.pki/nssdb/ -list-nicks` and see what's available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[okular] [Bug 469664] Temporary freezing while editing form in pdf document
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469664 Sune Vuorela changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Sune Vuorela --- (In reply to Gaël de Chalendar (aka Kleag) from comment #7) > I built the master of poppler. Installed it in a local folder. Added its bin > and lib to PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH and started okular from this shell. The > bug seems to be effectively corrected. thank you for your quick reply. I'm going to mark this as "resolved, upstream". It does not require any more work from KDE people; only from poppler people and distributors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
