Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #57926] RE: [LOG][AAI][SDNC] for [POMBA] Request for 10 additional Repos - CIMAN-169

2018-07-05 Thread dt5...@att.com via RT 
Geora,

I think I can field that one __

Yes, there is - the groupId basically has to match the structure of the 
repository name.  So, for example, the code in the ccsdk/sli/core repository 
all has to have groupIds that start with org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.   They can 
have additional levels, as long as they start with that prefix.

Dan

-- 
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP Development
ONAP Project Technical Lead : CCSDK and SDNC 
 
Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
 for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.
 

On 7/5/18, 12:28 PM, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org on behalf of BARSKY, GEORA" 
 wrote:

Hi Gildas, 



Is there any LF requirement to have separate Maven Group ID for each repo ?



Geora Barsky

Amdocs Technology

647-688-1039







Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google+ and the Amdocs 
blog network.







-Original Message-

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gildas Lanilis via RT

Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 7:52 PM

To: Michael O'Brien 

Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Subject: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #57926] RE: [LOG][AAI][SDNC] for 
[POMBA] Request for 10 additional Repos - CIMAN-169



Hi Michael,



I have updated the wiki at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DLoggingEnhancements=DwIGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=qLcfee4a2vOwYSub0bljcQ=gGA1KNVucLI8QV4SIpbhGdiGexehBD9t9e_1dqaSjJo=Yl92MzsSDK2e7sNSpcaLYKW0rCtQycR5jx_dP9_6g9Q=
 to update the "Maven Group ID" field.

Please review and confirm this is what you intended and we will take it 
from there for Log project.

As you mentioned, we will wait request from other PTLs impacted by this 
initiative to create their repos.



I see you added 2 extra columns labelled "Maven Artifact ID" and "Java 
package name". I am not sure what is the purpose of these 2 extra columns. This 
won't be used by LF. Could you explain?



Thanks,

Gildas

ONAP Release Manager

1 415 238 6287



From: Michael O'Brien [mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com]

Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 6:28 AM

To: onap-discuss ; 'helpd...@onap.org' 


Cc: Gildas Lanilis 

Subject: [LOG][AAI][SDNC] for [POMBA] Request for 10 additional Repos - 
CIMAN-169



LF, Jessica, Gildas,

   Hi, I am putting in a formal request for some additional repos, (git, 
gerrit, nexus, nexus3, sonar, Jenkins infrastructure).



   There are 10 repos requested for the POMBA sub-project these are 
distributed across logging-analtyics, SDNC and AA  I understand the PTLs 
(Tim and Jimmy) of sdnc and aai are aware of their requests - I have included 
all information across the projects to help collaboration and consolidation of 
work for the Linux Foundation.  This includes Sharon and Prudence of the POMBA 
sub-project.

   I am including Seshu from SO because I understand new repos are coming 
in there soon as well - since we are all helping each other out - I would ask 
any other project to join the conversation on any new repos they require so we 
can compare notes..

   The repos are of the AA model - where we have 1 repo per microservice.



DevOps jira only for logging-analytics so far has all these details and 
links to the following 3 tracking jiras.


https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_CIMAN-2D169=DwIGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=qLcfee4a2vOwYSub0bljcQ=gGA1KNVucLI8QV4SIpbhGdiGexehBD9t9e_1dqaSjJo=Lvsg6omhjI1Z6k_Z4k2awxxWyIMDk5000PPHaVwe0CU=




https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_LOG-2D193=DwIGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=qLcfee4a2vOwYSub0bljcQ=gGA1KNVucLI8QV4SIpbhGdiGexehBD9t9e_1dqaSjJo=F89Uq_5pZZxPPAYesBWBPHg5OTofBvDHE4Q47TIeKak=



*   logging-analytics/pomba-context-aggregator



*   logging-analytics/pomba-aai-context-builder



*   logging-analytics/pomba-sdc-context-builder



*   logging-analytics/pomba-sdnc-context-builder



*   logging-analytics/pomba-network-discovery-context-builder



*   logging-analytics/pomba-audit-common



The 2 requests below - are for info only right now - I am deferring to the 
AAI and SDNC projects to finalize these new repo requests - adding here for 
completeness from the POMBA perspective


https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_AAI-2D1348=DwIGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=qLcfee4a2vOwYSub0bljcQ=gGA1KNVucLI8QV4SIpbhGdiGexehBD9t9e_1dqaSjJo=o4Lern9aKvkglqqakKJF9CYXW-t3i-YrT6SbcElRjDs=

TBD

*   aai/pomba/validation or aai/validation ?

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #55152] [linuxfoundation.org #55152] Re: [CCSDK] ccsdk-dgbuilder-image had no 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT until 20 April

2018-05-07 Thread dt5...@att.com via RT 
All,

You shouldn’t really be using snapshot versions of the CCSDK docker images.  
You should be using version 0.2-STAGING-latest for CCSDK (and 
1.3-STAGING-latest for SDN-C)

I noticed last week that the docker version manifest incorrectly specified 
snapshot versions for the CCSDK docker images, so I fixed that.   Sorry if that 
caused any confusion.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.

From:  on behalf of "OBRIEN, FRANK 
MICHAEL" 
Date: Monday, May 7, 2018 at 7:52 AM
To: "'onap-rele...@lists.onap.org'" , onap-discuss 

Cc: "'helpd...@onap.org'" 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [CCSDK] ccsdk-dgbuilder-image had no 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT 
until 20 April

Team,
   The image was deleted again – looks like as James M. has mentioned – the 
rule for nexus3 deletion should be “delete 2 week old images – unless there has 
been no build in the past 2 weeks” – to keep at least 1 snapshot around

http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd-master/2880/console

10:54:55 onap  onap-appc-dgbuilder-6bbd4dbdcd-xwq7k 
 0/1   ImagePullBackOff   0  1h10.42.75.136
ip-10-0-0-136.us-east-2.compute.internal


10:54:55 onap  onap-sdnc-dgbuilder-76589b66b6-bwpk2 
 0/1   ImagePullBackOff   0  1h10.42.68.150
ip-10-0-0-136.us-east-2.compute.internal


Warning Failed 5m (x14 over 2h) kubelet, 
ip-10-0-0-136.us-east-2.compute.internal Failed to pull image 
"nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/ccsdk-dgbuilder-image:0.2.1-SNAPSHOT": rpc error: 
code = Unknown desc = Tag 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT not found in repository 
nexus3.onap.org:10001/onap/ccsdk-dgbuilder-image

/michael

From: Michael O'Brien
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 5:19 PM
To: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: helpd...@onap.org
Subject: [CCSDK] ccsdk-dgbuilder-image had no 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT until 20 April

LF,
  Just would like to understand what happened to this image that broke SDNC and 
APPC for a couple days

https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDNC-285
https://jira.onap.org/browse/APPC-856

  From the logs it looks like the SNAPSHOT image was returned 4 days ago – 
before the 20th of April the dockers failed to pull.
https://nexus3.onap.org/#browse/browse:docker.snapshot:v2%2Fonap%2Fccsdk-dgbuilder-image%2Fmanifests%2F0.2.1-SNAPSHOT

Blob created

Fri Apr 20 2018 09:11:26 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

Blob updated

Tue Apr 24 2018 09:27:11 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)


  When these images disappear for a while – the pods fail to come up.



  Thank you
  /michael
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #55375] [linuxfoundation.org #55375] Re: [Onap-release] [VID][VFC][SO][AAF][AAI][APPC][CCSDK][DCAE][DMAAP][CLAMP][SDNC][SDC][INT][PORTAL][POLICY][MUSIC][MULTICLOUD][MSB]

2018-04-28 Thread dt5...@att.com via RT 
Michael

Please see the comment I just added to this ticket.  This is a much bigger 
issue than just releasing the existing docker containers.  If we can’t use 
snapshot or staging versions of Dockers any longer in integration, you are 
probably going to be looking at an average turnaround for fixes of no better 
than 24 hours (since each and every one will need 2 releases done : first of 
Maven artifact, then a rebuild Docker based on updated Maven, and then finally 
released version of Docker).

Also, if we do as requested and request release builds for our docker 
containers, there is a possibility for discrepancies between our released Maven 
artifacts and released Docker containers.

Due to this potential discrepancy, I think we need to discuss this at our PTL 
call on Monday.  We need to make the TSC aware of this potential discrepancy 
and to go on record accepting that risk.

Dan


--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.

From:  on behalf of "OBRIEN, FRANK 
MICHAEL" 
Date: Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 5:39 PM
To: onap-discuss , onap-release 
, onap-tsc , 
"helpd...@onap.org" 
Subject: [Onap-release] 
[VID][VFC][SO][AAF][AAI][APPC][CCSDK][DCAE][DMAAP][CLAMP][SDNC][SDC][INT][PORTAL][POLICY][MUSIC][MULTICLOUD][MSB]
 Nexus3 Fix breaks deployment - PTLs please reply to the LF email to release 
your snapshot dockers to return the build to de...


Team,

   Please assist the LF and Gildas to get the snapshot docker images released 
so we can pull again for Beijing deployments

   The list of containers failing because of images unable to pull are listed 
below and in the jira



See JIRA

https://jira.onap.org/browse/CIMAN-157



Check the projects below and reply to the mail below to fix your images

https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-discuss/2018-April/009317.html

PTL?

sniro

common - postgres

smsdb

vault

consul



PTLs verified

vid

vfc

so

aaf

aai

appc

ccsdk

dcae

dmaap

clamp

sdnc

sdc

integration

portal

music

policy

multicloud

msb




(+) proposal - dont wait for PTL approval - we already were running with these 
50 images - just reenable them



All CD deployments fail except those with a proxy

http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd-master/

http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd-master2-aws/

passing (with proxy?) 
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/External%20Labs/job/lab-tlab-beijing-oom-deploy/



(+) before

http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd-master2-aws/24/console

6

{noformat}

13:25:59 onap  dev-so-db-684dffd45-cmsth  0/1   
ErrImagePull0  1h

13:25:59 onap  dev-smsdb-00/2   
ErrImagePull0  1h

13:25:59 onap  dev-portal-zookeeper-db466fc-lfgf7 0/1   
ErrImagePull0  1h

13:25:59 onap  dev-policydb-5dbb9b54df-ngxwd  0/1   
ErrImagePull0  1h

13:25:59 onap  dev-consul-b5d9d5564-85vn2 0/1   
ErrImagePull0  1h

13:25:59 onap