Hi
For NFV domain, agree with option 2.
For the whole onap namespace, agree with option3
Thanks
Maopeng
原始邮件
发件人： <denglin...@chinamobile.com>
收件人： <denghu...@huawei.com>
抄送人： <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
日 期 ：2017年08月28日 09:38
主 题 ：[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc][so][vfc][vnfsdk]ONAP namingconvention
options
I suggest we consider either option 2 or option 3.
Thanks,
Lingli
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello all We hadn’t have the time to discuss this yesterday teleconf based on
the request from SDC,so I posted here to get more comments in the list
regarding to ONAP Naming convention.OPENECOMP historically follow 1st option,
and OPENO follow 2nd option.● 1st: Openecomp: org.openecomp.*● 2nd:
OPEN-O: tosca.nodes.nfv.*● 3rd : tosca.nodes.onap.● 4th:●
standard part is based on TOSCA simple/TOSCA NFV● Extension could be onap
Thank you all for your comments. Best regards, DENG Hui_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
