Just sharing Steve Winslow’s response with the discuss list.
Best Regards, 
-kenny


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Steve Winslow <swins...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Lombok not allowed in LF?
> Date: March 7, 2018 at 8:14:31 AM PST
> To: Vitaliy Emporopulo <vitaliy.emporop...@amdocs.com>
> Cc: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>, Gildas Lanilis 
> <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>, Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> (+Gildas and Kenny)
> 
> Hello Vitaly,
> 
> Thank you for reaching out on this. Some versions of Lombok being used in 
> ONAP repositories are being flagged as a result of our license scans for 
> dependencies. 
> 
> Although Lombok as a project has declared itself to be an MIT-licensed 
> project, from scans we have found that some versions of Lombok contain at 
> least one source code file stating that it is licensed under the GPL. This 
> file appears to have been replaced by version 1.16.8 of Lombok, so updating 
> to that version or later should address this.
> 
> Just to clarify, the LF does not impose restrictions on which open source 
> licenses may be used. Under the ONAP charter's IP policy, the ONAP TSC has 
> the ability to approve exceptions to the project's Apache-2.0 license policy. 
> So they may approve components under alternate licenses (there are many other 
> licenses in ONAP's dependencies). The reason Lombok and certain other ones 
> are flagged is because GPL-style licenses may be harder for the TSC to 
> approve for use in an Apache-licensed project.
> 
> I hope this is helpful. Please feel free to let me know if you have other 
> questions.
> 
> Best,
> Steve Winslow
> 
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Vitaliy Emporopulo 
> <vitaliy.emporop...@amdocs.com <mailto:vitaliy.emporop...@amdocs.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
> I am a technical architect with SDC at Amdocs.
> 
>  
> 
> Could you please help me understand what is wrong with Lombok licensing? It 
> is released under MIT license, and its Java artifact does not include and 
> does not depend on any external libraries. Moreover, in Lombok Git 
> repository, I could not find any reference to other external materials that 
> might have a problematic license.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Vitaliy Emporopulo
> 
>  
> 
> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
> <mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
> <mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>] On Behalf Of Vitaliy Emporopulo
> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 12:00
> To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
> Subject: [onap-discuss] Why Lombok not allowed in LF?
> 
>  
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> Could someone please shed some light on why Lombok 
> (https://projectlombok.org/ <https://projectlombok.org/>) is not allowed in 
> LF for licensing reasons?
> 
>  
> 
> Where can I find guidelines or tools to help me filter out unsuitable 
> libraries?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Vitaliy Emporopulo
> 
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> 
> you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
> <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
> <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Winslow
> Director of Strategic Programs
> The Linux Foundation
> Cell: +1.202.641.3047  Skype: 12026413047
> swins...@linuxfoundation.org <mailto:swins...@linuxfoundation.org>
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to