Hello Jessie
Answer inline == >
From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:46 AM
To: denghui (L)
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements
Hello DENG Hui,
I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling
requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you,
if you would be so kind as to answer:
1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca
Release Calendar, on 5/25. I haven't seen a poll, or anything, for the approval
of these requirements. When do you anticipate they will be officially approved?
I didn't see anything in the meeting minutes from today's meeting.
==> yesterday it was on the agenda, but due to other topics, we can’t have this
part of discussion. In this case, we have to have discussion next Tuesday and
start to poll right after if necessarily. I read through the comments on the
wiki page, there is only 1 pending comment from your question about the
consensus of service interest group, I am curious why don＇t you discuss them in
that interest group, but challenge it in the modeling subcommittee, this way
really slow down our progress
2. Again, according to the release calendar, we were to have established a
"modeling plan" by 6/28. Does such a plan exist? If so, could you point me to
where I can find it?
==> modeling plan is quite align with high level requirement, it will automate
reflect the plan, we could use same contents for plan.
3. You indicated in the modeling subcommittee meeting this morning that our
"model freeze" is in 3 weeks. With the requirements not yet agreed, and given
the number of requirements currently specified, what is your expectation of
what can actually be accomplished in 3 week's time?
== > My suggestion is to postpone to M3 other than M2 for modeling freeze, I
will bring this up to committee for discussion.
== > This is our 1st trial of procedure , we will revise it after this release
accordingly.
Opensource normally follow 3 steps : plan , freeze and RC (API is not good
reference for us)
Modeling subcommittee may need to align with them in next release.
Thank you
DENG Hui
Thank you,
Jessie
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:15 AM, denghui (L)
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello Kevin and all
I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of
Beijing event:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements
Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible,
I also moved Kevin’s draft proposal under this wiki page for your reference:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+High+Level+Modeling+Requirements+-+Draft
We are going to go through this wiki page this Tuesday, as the basis for our
release planning.
I will create a separate wiki page for release planning of those requirements
accordingly.
Thanks a lot
DENG Hui
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#10832): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10832
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22674361/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
