Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

[Gildas Lanilis]

Thanks Andrei for putting the deck together. It helps to move forward.
It was my intention to build a similar table based on the dependencies 
input
 for each and every project.
I posted your table as a reference on wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning#ReleasePlanning-ReleaseDependencies
 and started to build directly into the wiki the same table (so far with only 
approved projects). That should help into avoiding the question “what is the 
latest version?”.

A couple of questions:


1)  I was wondering how to read the dependency table. In other words who is 
the API provider and who is the API consumer? In the Release Planning 
Template,
 I called it “API Incoming Dependencies” (provider) and “API Outgoing 
Dependencies” (consumer). Your clarification would help (my guess is that the 
projects in the column have dependencies on the projects in the row). Thanks to 
confirm.

2)  Would you mind clarifying the blue boxes “Interact but no direct 
interface”? To some extend everything interact through a different level of 
connection in ONAP.

3)  For the red boxes “Likely but not mentioned”. Would you mind explaining 
where it is not mentioned?  May be we should wait until all projects have 
created their release plan.

4)  Not sure what are the “Change Man”, “Ext Sys Reg” projects. To my 
knowledge, none have not been approved so far, and I do not see them in the 
list of “proposed project”. 
May be it is just a wording issue. It would help if you could provide a link.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Andrei Kojukhov
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:17 AM
To: Alla Goldner; Phil Robb; Arul Nambi
Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Alla, Phil,

Please take an updated slide (attached) – I sent you an email twice by mistake.

BR

Andrei

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 4:06 PM
To: Phil Robb ; Arul Nambi 
Cc: Elhay Efrat ; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Phil, all,

Given the huge number of approved projects and their complexity, from one side, 
and lack of well-defined interactions and interfaces between those 
projects/modules representing the projects, from the other side, I would say we 
may need a meeting to define those, to synchronize on those, to see if all 
needed interfaces are indeed defined etc.

We’ve been trying to access the complexity internally and came up with the list 
of all potential interactions which will have to be developed, attached. The 
list may not be fully correct, I will be happy to upload it (just needs to know 
what would be the ideal placement for it) and invite the community to respond 
and introduce all required modifications. The list will have to be extended 
once we approve more projects.
(Please note that Integration and Documentation interfaces with all projects, 
but there is no need to build interface, just to coordinate.)

My development experience tells me such a mission can’t be achieved by project 
calls only, or even project-to-project calls, but requires a dedicated meeting, 
the sooner the better.

My 2 cents ☺

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D2E914.228CB470]

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:47 AM
To: Arul Nambi >
Cc: Elhay Efrat >; 
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Arul:

The problem with doing "both" is that if not enough people get in the room 
together physically, then for those that took the time, expense, and effort to 
get there they will not get much value from it.  If there is critical mass that 
get together in the room, then those remote, and on the phone *never* get 
nearly as much out of it as those in the room.

I would like to better understand what we would do at a group gathering, 
virtual or physical in late July.  Can folks propose propose 

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

[Gildas Lanilis]

Hi Phil,

I see 2 benefits in holding a real physical face 2 face developer event:

1)  Technical: it gives the project teams who have technical dependencies 
to seat together and speak on white board functional diagrams, sequence flaw 
diagrams ( good and error cases), finalize the API interface. This can be 
organized in parallel sessions (may be 3-4 sessions depending on the need).

2)  Community: Most developers in our community never had the opportunity 
to meet each other. We all know Human aspect is critical, and the relation 
between people is completely different after they meet. It creates trust and 
speed up the whole community. As we are at the inception of the ONAP, the 
sooner we do it, the better for the whole community.

A 2-3 days gathering would help. One more point regarding both approach 
(physical and virtual). We should recognize it is extremely difficult for 
remote people on the phone to understand and see (on the white board) what is 
gong on. Furthermore, I feel bad asking people who are 15 hours ahead or behind 
the wake up at 2 or 3 am to attend a meeting.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 6:06 AM
To: Phil Robb; Arul Nambi
Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Phil, all,

Given the huge number of approved projects and their complexity, from one side, 
and lack of well-defined interactions and interfaces between those 
projects/modules representing the projects, from the other side, I would say we 
may need a meeting to define those, to synchronize on those, to see if all 
needed interfaces are indeed defined etc.

We’ve been trying to access the complexity internally and came up with the list 
of all potential interactions which will have to be developed, attached. The 
list may not be fully correct, I will be happy to upload it (just needs to know 
what would be the ideal placement for it) and invite the community to respond 
and introduce all required modifications. The list will have to be extended 
once we approve more projects.
(Please note that Integration and Documentation interfaces with all projects, 
but there is no need to build interface, just to coordinate.)

My development experience tells me such a mission can’t be achieved by project 
calls only, or even project-to-project calls, but requires a dedicated meeting, 
the sooner the better.

My 2 cents ☺

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D2E911.4CCD6250]

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:47 AM
To: Arul Nambi 
Cc: Elhay Efrat ; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Hi Arul:

The problem with doing "both" is that if not enough people get in the room 
together physically, then for those that took the time, expense, and effort to 
get there they will not get much value from it.  If there is critical mass that 
get together in the room, then those remote, and on the phone *never* get 
nearly as much out of it as those in the room.

I would like to better understand what we would do at a group gathering, 
virtual or physical in late July.  Can folks propose propose agenda topics so 
we can see what we would want to accomplish, and from that we can figure out 
the best format it?

Thanks,

Phil.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Arul Nambi 
> wrote:
+1 why can we not have both?

From: Elhay Efrat
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 5:31 AM
To: jamil.cha...@orange.com; Arul Nambi 
>
Cc: Dhananjay Pavgi 
>; Gadiyar, 
Rajesh >; GILBERT, 
MAZIN E (MAZIN E) >; 
Kenny Paul >; 
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers 
Face-to-Face Meeting

Why not always add vitrual ☺ ?

From: jamil.cha...@orange.com 
[mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Arul Nambi >
Cc: Elhay Efrat >; 
Dhananjay Pavgi 

Re: [onap-tsc] Request - Call for interest ONAP Vulnerability sub-committee

[Stephen Terrill]

Hi All,

Please note that I am still looking for support regarding participation in the 
Vulnerability sub-committee.

Best Regards,

Steve.

From: Stephen Terrill
Sent: 12 June 2017 14:18
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Request - Call for interest ONAP Vulnerability sub-committee

Hi,

In the last developer face to face event, we approved the vulnerability 
management procedures 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Vulnerability+Management).  The purpose 
of this is to manage the reception  of a vulnerability until fix and 
communication.  Note, this is separate from the security team which will now 
focus on looking into more proactive activities around security for ONAP.

This will be a small team of 3-5 people (as it will work under embargo) to work 
with the projects to fix received notifications of vulnerabilities.  It will 
need a mix of people who know and are passionate about security, as well as 
people who know the code base and/or will be able to work with others to solve 
the vulnerabilities.

I am looking for people to help with working in this team, so if you are 
passionate about fixing vulnerabilities and security, have a good understanding 
of our code base(s) and the project leaders and/or have a good knowledge of 
security vulnerabilities, and can dedicate time for this activity - I would 
love to hear from you and your background.  With this email I am soliciting 
support for this with the idea of making a selection to propose to the TSC (the 
TSC should decide).  Responses before the close of Monday 19th July would be 
highly appreciated.

Note: emails directly to me appreciated, no need to broadcast to the entire 
list.

Best Regards,

Steve.


[Ericsson]
STEPHEN TERRILL
Technology Specialist
DUIC, Systems and Technology
Development Unit IP & Cloud
Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products

Ericsson
Ericsson R Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
www.ericsson.com


[http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]

Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. 
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis 
of the terms set out at 
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

[onap-tsc] The use case subcommittee email list has been created. Use case subcommittee members, please register

[Alla Goldner]

https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-usecasesub



Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D2E94F.BE1FD0D0]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Approval of Prior Meeting Minutes

[GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)]

+1

On Jun 19, 2017, at 4:58 AM, Phil Robb 
> wrote:

Hello ONAP TSC:

I would like to suggest that we approve prior TSC meeting minutes via email so 
that we don't have to go through that activity during our precious time 
together on the TSC weekly call.  TSC Members please +1 if you approve of this 
practice, -1 if you want to only approve meeting minutes in the meeting, or 0 
if you abstain from the vote.

Thanks,

Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=2dwD7a5k4V9cZl09O7uTpejnZMF8aa01W3yMqrrZC5Y=GpQiu-kj8kR6FaxdDaVqzy5cI2SHCUAAYAxI0xiDXKk=vRNBemAwIbl6_reZlnvrdG4zwfQVNKKVcd4wacQJ7Vc=

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Remaining Project Reviews

[Kenny Paul]

Thanks the following TSC Members for their responses to the TSC ONAP Project 
Reviews Doodle Poll: https://doodle.com/poll/abdu886v6i972fe3 
:
 
• Chris Donley
• Alla Goldner
• Jamil Chawki
• Stephen Terrill
• Jason Hunt
• Mazin Gilbert

For the rest of the members, please participate in this today.
Thank you!

Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org
510.766.5945

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Kenny Paul  wrote:
> 
> Please use the link below to select the best time for reviewing the remaining 
> proposed projects.
> Two separate 2-hour sessions will be required.   The time zone selected for 
> the poll is US Pacific, so please make the conversion appropriately in your 
> response.
> 
> https://doodle.com/poll/abdu886v6i972fe3 
> 
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Best Regards, 
> -kenny
> 
> Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org 
> 510.766.5945
> 

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP TSC VOTE] vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case For Release-1

[Stephen Terrill]

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: 19 June 2017 15:00
To: onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP TSC VOTE] vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case For 
Release-1

Hello again ONAP TSC.

Given that this original request came in on the edge of the weekend for some 
folks, I'm refreshing the request for you to vote on the vCPE use case.  For 
those that have already voted, please disregard this message and thanks for 
your vote.

Thanks in advance for your attention to this.

Best,

Phil.

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Phil Robb 
> wrote:
Hello ONAP TSC Members:

As we left it on the ONAP TSC call this week, please review and vote on the 
vCPE Residential Broadband Use Case proposal for inclusion in Release-1 of the 
ONAP project.

The wiki page for your review is here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Use+Case%3A+Residential+Broadband+vCPE

Please include your vote below indicating a "+1" if you approve, a "-1" if you 
deny, and :"0" if you abstain from the vote:



This vote will close at 9:00pm PDT, 12:00 midnight EDT Tuesday 6/20, and 12:00 
noon Wednesday China Time.

Thanks,

Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb



--
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

[Phil Robb]

Hi Alla:

Yea, that's a somewhat scary chart.  Thanks to you and your team for
putting it together.  It will be a great cross reference for Gildas as we
get initial project plans that include their cross-project dependencies.

Gildas, is there somewhere you would like to keep this diagram for
reference?

Best,

Phil.

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Alla Goldner 
wrote:

> Hi Phil, all,
>
>
>
> Given the huge number of approved projects and their complexity, from one
> side, and lack of well-defined interactions and interfaces between those
> projects/modules representing the projects, from the other side, I would
> say we may need a meeting to define those, to synchronize on those, to see
> if all needed interfaces are indeed defined etc.
>
>
>
> We’ve been trying to access the complexity internally and came up with the
> list of all potential interactions which will have to be developed,
> attached. The list may not be fully correct, I will be happy to upload it
> (just needs to know what would be the ideal placement for it) and invite
> the community to respond and introduce all required modifications. The list
> will have to be extended once we approve more projects.
>
> (Please note that Integration and Documentation interfaces with all
> projects, but there is no need to build interface, just to coordinate.)
>
>
>
> My development experience tells me such a mission can’t be achieved by
> project calls only, or even project-to-project calls, but requires a
> dedicated meeting, the sooner the better.
>
>
>
> My 2 cents J
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> *Alla Goldner*
>
>
>
> Open Network Division
>
> Amdocs Technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Phil Robb
> *Sent:* Monday, June 19, 2017 11:47 AM
> *To:* Arul Nambi 
> *Cc:* Elhay Efrat ; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org;
> onap-tsc 
>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> Hi Arul:
>
>
>
> The problem with doing "both" is that if not enough people get in the room
> together physically, then for those that took the time, expense, and effort
> to get there they will not get much value from it.  If there is critical
> mass that get together in the room, then those remote, and on the phone
> *never* get nearly as much out of it as those in the room.
>
>
>
> I would like to better understand what we would do at a group gathering,
> virtual or physical in late July.  Can folks propose propose agenda topics
> so we can see what we would want to accomplish, and from that we can figure
> out the best format it?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Arul Nambi  wrote:
>
> +1 why can we not have both?
>
>
>
> *From:* Elhay Efrat
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 5:31 AM
> *To:* jamil.cha...@orange.com; Arul Nambi 
> *Cc:* Dhananjay Pavgi ; Gadiyar, Rajesh <
> rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <
> ma...@research.att.com>; Kenny Paul ;
> onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* RE: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> Why not always add vitrual J ?
>
>
>
> *From:* jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com
> ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:00 AM
> *To:* Arul Nambi 
> *Cc:* Elhay Efrat ; Dhananjay Pavgi <
> dp00476...@techmahindra.com>; Gadiyar, Rajesh ;
> GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) ; Kenny Paul <
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <
> onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> My understanding the agreement was to have a virtual meeting in July and a
> physical one in September
>
> Best
>
> Jamil
>
>
> Le 14 juin 2017 à 01:11, Arul Nambi  a écrit :
>
> +1 for virtual meetings
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *Elhay
> Efrat
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:41 AM
> *To:* Dhananjay Pavgi ; Gadiyar, Rajesh <
> rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <
> ma...@research.att.com>; Kenny Paul 
> *Cc:* onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> Good , can we do also F2F over webex , skype … something J?
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org 

Re: [onap-tsc] Remaining Project Reviews

[Phil Robb]

Hello ONAP TSC members.  Please respond to this doodle poll indicating
 your preferred times to review the remaining 12 projects.  We need to get
this completed so that these projects are able to participate in Release-1
if they so choose.

Thanks in advance for your quick response.

Best,

Phil.

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Kenny Paul 
wrote:

> Please use the link below to select the best time for reviewing the
> remaining proposed projects.
> Two separate 2-hour sessions will be required.   The time zone selected
> for the poll is US Pacific, so please make the conversion appropriately in
> your response.
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/abdu886v6i972fe3
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best Regards,
> -kenny
>
> Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org
> 510.766.5945 <(510)%20766-5945>
>
>
> ___
> ONAP-TSC mailing list
> ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
>
>


-- 
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Approval of Prior Meeting Minutes

[Alla Goldner]

+1

 Original Message 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Approval of Prior Meeting Minutes
From: Phil Robb 
Date: Jun 19, 2017, 11:58 AM
To: onap-tsc 
Hello ONAP TSC:

I would like to suggest that we approve prior TSC meeting minutes via email so 
that we don't have to go through that activity during our precious time 
together on the TSC weekly call.  TSC Members please +1 if you approve of this 
practice, -1 if you want to only approve meeting minutes in the meeting, or 0 
if you abstain from the vote.

Thanks,

Phil.
--
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

[Phil Robb]

Hi Arul:

The problem with doing "both" is that if not enough people get in the room
together physically, then for those that took the time, expense, and effort
to get there they will not get much value from it.  If there is critical
mass that get together in the room, then those remote, and on the phone
*never* get nearly as much out of it as those in the room.

I would like to better understand what we would do at a group gathering,
virtual or physical in late July.  Can folks propose propose agenda topics
so we can see what we would want to accomplish, and from that we can figure
out the best format it?

Thanks,

Phil.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Arul Nambi  wrote:

> +1 why can we not have both?
>
>
>
> *From:* Elhay Efrat
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 5:31 AM
> *To:* jamil.cha...@orange.com; Arul Nambi 
> *Cc:* Dhananjay Pavgi ; Gadiyar, Rajesh <
> rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <
> ma...@research.att.com>; Kenny Paul ;
> onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* RE: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> Why not always add vitrual J ?
>
>
>
> *From:* jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com
> ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:00 AM
> *To:* Arul Nambi 
> *Cc:* Elhay Efrat ; Dhananjay Pavgi <
> dp00476...@techmahindra.com>; Gadiyar, Rajesh ;
> GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) ; Kenny Paul <
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <
> onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> My understanding the agreement was to have a virtual meeting in July and a
> physical one in September
>
> Best
>
> Jamil
>
>
> Le 14 juin 2017 à 01:11, Arul Nambi  a écrit :
>
> +1 for virtual meetings
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *Elhay
> Efrat
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 1:41 AM
> *To:* Dhananjay Pavgi ; Gadiyar, Rajesh <
> rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <
> ma...@research.att.com>; Kenny Paul 
> *Cc:* onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> Good , can we do also F2F over webex , skype … something J?
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *Dhananjay
> Pavgi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:45 AM
> *To:* Gadiyar, Rajesh ; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN
> E) ; Kenny Paul 
> *Cc:* onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> thanks & regards,
>
> Dhananjay Pavgi
>
> Mobile : +91 98220 22264 <+91%2098220%2022264>
>
>
>
> www.techmahindra.com Platinum Member. Visit :
> http://www.onap.org
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *Gadiyar,
> Rajesh
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:12 AM
> *To:* GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) ; Kenny Paul <
> kp...@linuxfoundation.org>
> *Cc:* onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> +1 Good idea ☺
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "GILBERT, MAZIN E
> (MAZIN E)" 
> *Date: *Monday, June 12, 2017 at 2:01 PM
> *To: *Kenny Paul 
> *Cc: *"onap-disc...@lists.onap.org" ,
> onap-tsc 
> *Subject: *Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers
> Face-to-Face Meeting
>
>
>
> I was not present for this discussion. We need to have a meeting around
> the 3rd week of
>
> July to go through project by project progress. Phil and I discussed a
> virtual meeting
>
> since folks will be too busy to travel, and some may not be able to.
>
>
>
> Would like to get a sense from the TSC community if this is appropriate
> and more
>
> convenient while voting for dates.
>
>
>
> thanks
>
> Mazin
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Kenny Paul  wrote:
>
>
>
> Please respond to the doodle poll below no later than:
>
> *Thurs. 01:00 PM UTC*
>
> *Thurs.