Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
Hey Sean, Great idea. I think tying it into the Maven build would be a real help, especially for someone like me whose first inclination is to type mvn install. Let's file an issue to update this post 0.1-incubating. As far as what other projects do, I know that Avro has some Python bindings built using Setuptools/Distribute and I think they do it separately as is our current setup. Not sure though... Cheers, Chris On 11/1/10 10:21 AM, Sean Kelly ke...@apache.org wrote: Build succeeds, all tests pass! Don't forget to run: cd agility; python setup.py test Maybe we could tie it into the mvn build? What do other podlings projects do? ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote: [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating Just did a visual comparison (diff -ru) between RC1 and RC4. Changes look fine. +1 for release. Thanks. -- justin
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
Hi, [x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is 41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote: The release was made from the OODT 0.1-incubating branch (r1028792) at: https://cwiki.apache.org/OODT/release-process.html I believe the revision is 1029464 and the branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubating/. It would be nice if there was an svn tag for the release. Note that most of the information you have in the NOTICE.txt file should really go to LICENSE.txt. You may also want to check that you comply with the restrictions mentioned in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#concurrent. And it might be better to refer to Apache OODT instead of Apache Tika in the LICENSE.txt file. :-) None of these issues is IMO a blocker, but they should be addressed in the next release. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, [x] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating FTR, the SHA1 checksum of the source archive I checked is 41a8ea1222d591a168a3bb2382c9236cfe6e6668. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 AM, david woollard wooll...@gmail.com wrote: The release was made from the OODT 0.1-incubating branch (r1028792) at: https://cwiki.apache.org/OODT/release-process.html I believe the revision is 1029464 and the branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubating/. It would be nice if there was an svn tag for the release. Note that most of the information you have in the NOTICE.txt file should really go to LICENSE.txt. You may also want to check that you comply with the restrictions mentioned in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#concurrent. And it might be better to refer to Apache OODT instead of Apache Tika in the LICENSE.txt file. :-) None of these issues is IMO a blocker, but they should be addressed in the next release. The release doesn't need to be tagged? Regards, Alan
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: The release doesn't need to be tagged? It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/tags/0.1-rc4 (or just 0.1) Cheers. -- justin
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1]. Thanks for VOTE'ing guys! Cheers, Chris [1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid On 11/1/10 2:19 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: The release doesn't need to be tagged? It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/tags/0.1-rc4 (or just 0.1) Cheers. -- justin ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Tagging a release (Was: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4))
Hi, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1]. Why wait? The vote is about this exact set of bits, so everything's already in svn. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Tagging a release (Was: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4))
Hey Jukka, We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine. The intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC branch is created first, then VOTE'd on, if we find issues then we update the branch as needed and call another VOTE. Once the VOTE passes, we tag the blessed branch and the tag never changes after that (even if we want to mod the branch later and release future 0.1.x-incubating releases out of the 0.1-incubating branch). Not a super huge deal either way since they are both in SVN, though as you mention... Cheers, Chris [1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid On 11/1/10 3:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1]. Why wait? The vote is about this exact set of bits, so everything's already in svn. BR, Jukka Zitting ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
+1 to release RC4 -brian On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1]. Thanks for VOTE'ing guys! Cheers, Chris [1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid On 11/1/10 2:19 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: The release doesn't need to be tagged? It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag: svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/tags/0.1-rc4 (or just 0.1) Cheers. -- justin ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: Tagging a release (Was: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4))
You could tag both the RC and the final (GA) release. (That's what Subversion does.) Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 15:18:29 -0700: Hey Jukka, We can definitely tag what we got right now and it would work fine. The intention of the wiki page I made [1] was the RC branch is created first, then VOTE'd on, if we find issues then we update the branch as needed and call another VOTE. Once the VOTE passes, we tag the blessed branch and the tag never changes after that (even if we want to mod the branch later and release future 0.1.x-incubating releases out of the 0.1-incubating branch). Not a super huge deal either way since they are both in SVN, though as you mention... Cheers, Chris [1] http://bit.ly/d5ugid On 11/1/10 3:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Yeah the intention is to tag it from the branch we're VOTE'ing on after the VOTE is approved per our release process [1]. Why wait? The vote is about this exact set of bits, so everything's already in svn. BR, Jukka Zitting ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
Looks like the 4th time is the charm. +1 to release OODT 0.1-incubating Cameron On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote: [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... gratz. -- -Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.1-incubating release (rc4)
[X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... gratz.
