Re: [Call for Test] [Feature]Add the List Level attribute for paragraph styles in Aoo Writer

[Huaidong Qiu]

Du Jing

Test cases look fine, thanks.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Du Jing  wrote:

> Hi HuaiDong,can you review my prepared test case for this feature?
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Du Jing  wrote:
>
> > I has reviewed the feature scope,and prepared test case in Test Link-><
> http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lib/general/frmWorkArea.php?feature=editTc
> >Test
> > Specification-->AOO Writer->Styles and Formatting->List style as below
> > http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Huaidong Qiu  >wrote:
> >
> >> issue link https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
> >>
> >>
> >> Scope:
> >> 1)The list level attribute of para style will be exported to odt with
> >> defined format.
> >> 2)The exported list level attribute of para style will be imported
> >> into data model of Aoo Writer successfully
> >> 3)The list level attribute of para style will be recorded in data
> >> model of Aoo Writer
> >>
> >> Wiki:
> >>
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability
> >>
> >
> >
>

[Call For UI Review] About the attribute list level of paragraph style

[Huaidong Qiu]

Hi all,

I need some advice from the UI expert about the list
level attribute of Numbering Enhancement feature.

I need a UI to link a numbering level of a list style to a paragraph style.
 I want add a list box control into the "Options" tab page of the
"Numbering style" dialog.

The steps to open this tab page are:

1. New a writer document.
2. press F11 open the "Style and Formatting" dialog.
3. choose the "list style" tab page
4. open context menu by left click on the tab page, select "new..." menu
item
5. select the "Options" tab page of the "Numbering style" dialog.

Here is a changed UI screen shot, I put this picture into the wiki page for
this feature

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:Listlevel.png

here is the wiki page for the Numbering Enhancement feature

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability

Thanks

[Call for review] 120620 - [Feature]Add the List Level attribute for paragraph styles in Aoo Writer

[Huaidong Qiu]

I created a patch for attribute list level of paragraph style,  please
review, here is the issue link

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120620

[Call for Test] [Feature]Add the List Level attribute for paragraph styles in Aoo Writer

[Huaidong Qiu]

issue link https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120620


Scope:
1)The list level attribute of para style will be exported to odt with
defined format.
2)The exported list level attribute of para style will be imported
into data model of Aoo Writer successfully
3)The list level attribute of para style will be recorded in data
model of Aoo Writer

Wiki:http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability

Re: [Call-for-​Review] Bug 120568 Hyperlink of Graphihc with Anchor Type "As Character" lost after save as doc format.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Jian Hong,

The  scope  of this feature are supporting hyperlinks on as character
pictures of ms doc format.

test case

1. Insert a picture into word processor, change the anchor property to "as
character".
2. Add a hyperlink on this picture.
3. Save this file as "Microsoft Word 97/2000/XP .doc" file.
4. reopen this file, the hyperlink should work well.
5. open this file in MS word, the hyperlink should work well too.




On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:09 PM, chengjh  wrote:

> Huai Dong,please provide your test cases that will make the scope more
> clear..thanks.
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Huaidong Qiu 
> wrote:
>
> > Please review the patch for 120568, here is the issue link
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120568
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
>

Re: Working on a writer number enhancement.

[Huaidong Qiu]

OK, I see.

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 17.08.2012 10:13, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
>
>> Oliver ,
>>
>> Do you know how many coding works already been done about this feature?
>>
>>
> in my former life ;-) an IBMer and myself work together on this feature.
> The mentioned specification had been created and a so-called CWS has been
> created - it is CWS "parastylelistlevel02" which replaced CWS
> "parastylelistlevel".
> These CWS are quite old, I am not sure, if there had been already applied
> code.
> I think we should not rely on this work, because the code base of these
> CWS is too old.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>

Re: Working on a writer number enhancement.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Andrea ,

Yes you are right, it is part of  ODF standard now.

Regards

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

> On 17/08/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>> On 17.08.2012 10:06, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>
>>> On 17.08.2012 10:02, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am working on a writer number enhancement, to support a new ODF
>>>> attribute
>>>> "List Level" for paragraph style
>>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/**specs/writer/index.html<http://www.openoffice.org/specs/writer/index.html>
>> [2] 
>> http://www.openoffice.org/**specs/writer/numbering/**ListLevel.odt<http://www.openoffice.org/specs/writer/numbering/ListLevel.odt>
>>
>
> Just to have it clear: this is "new" in the sense that it would be new to
> support it in OpenOffice but it is already part of the ODF standard, right?
> Link #2 says it "has been integrated to ODF1.2 Draft8", so I'd expect it to
> have made its way into the final ODF 1.2 specification.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>

Re: Working on a writer number enhancement.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Oliver ,

Do you know how many coding works already been done about this feature?

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Huaidong Qiu  wrote:

> Thanks,  Oliver
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 17.08.2012 10:02, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I am working on a writer number enhancement, to support a new ODF
>>> attribute
>>> "List Level" for paragraph style, and with this new ODF attribute we can
>>> get better MS numbering interoperability. I will keep recording my
>>> progress
>>> in this wiki page.
>>>
>>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/Writer/**
>>> NumberingEnhancementforMSInter**operability<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability>
>>>
>>> Suggestions and comments are welcome.
>>>
>>>
>> you can count on me regarding code review and support on the code of the
>> Writer numbering and bullet stuff.
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>
>

Re: Working on a writer number enhancement.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Thanks,  Oliver

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 17.08.2012 10:02, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I am working on a writer number enhancement, to support a new ODF
>> attribute
>> "List Level" for paragraph style, and with this new ODF attribute we can
>> get better MS numbering interoperability. I will keep recording my
>> progress
>> in this wiki page.
>>
>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/Writer/**NumberingEnhancementforMSInter
>> **operability<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability>
>>
>> Suggestions and comments are welcome.
>>
>>
> you can count on me regarding code review and support on the code of the
> Writer numbering and bullet stuff.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>

Working on a writer number enhancement.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Hi all

I am working on a writer number enhancement, to support a new ODF attribute
"List Level" for paragraph style, and with this new ODF attribute we can
get better MS numbering interoperability. I will keep recording my progress
in this wiki page.

http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/NumberingEnhancementforMSInteroperability

Suggestions and comments are welcome.

Thanks

[Call-for-​Review] Bug 120568 Hyperlink of Graphihc with Anchor Type "As Character" lost after save as doc format.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Please review the patch for 120568, here is the issue link
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120568

Re: [Call-for-​Review] Bug 119948 [Windows 8 certification]Windows App Certification Kit - Test for "Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible installation" is failed.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Add a new patch per Rob's information to replace the old one, please review.

Just changed the Attributes for font files in the component table
to msidbComponentAttributesSharedDllRefCount, the font will be deinstallled
when the ref count of the files down to 0, so other apps can use those
fonts as well when AOO installed.


On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:10 PM, O.Felka  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> > Please review the patch for 119948, for the win 8 certification check.
>
>>
>> Issue link:
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119948
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> As I have commented in the issue I still don't think that it's a good idea
> to move the fonts to the program directory.
> I also don't like the idea that the installer removes the installed fonts.
> But this option is not as bad as having them in program/fonts.
>
> Registering fonts to the system is an essential feature of an Office Suite
> as it has system wide impact.
>
> Is there no way to change the MSI that the fonts will be removed at
> uninstall?
> Do we know what is MS Office doing?
>
> Groetjes,
> Olaf
>

[Call-for-​Review] Bug 119948 [Windows 8 certification]Windows App Certification Kit - Test for "Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible installation" is failed.

[Huaidong Qiu]

Please review the patch for 119948, for the win 8 certification check.

Issue link:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119948


Thanks.

Re: Windows 8 Compatibility?

[Huaidong Qiu]

About the fonts AOO installed into the system font directory, I did some
verification on Windwos XP.

1. AOO archive package packs those font inside the package, you can find
them here Basis\share\fonts\truetype.

2. Install AOO, then remove one of the fonts AOO
installed, Arimo-Bold.ttf, Arimo-BoldItalic.ttf, Arimo-Italic.ttf,
Arimo-Regular.ttf,
from the system font directory. Open installed AOO, the font name
disappears from the font list of AOO.

3.Copy  directory Basis\share\fonts\truetype from archive package to the
install directory. Open installed AOO, the font name come back.

So I think we can pack the needed fonts into  the installer package
as archive package did. Then we can safely remove those fonts from the
install directory without affect other applications.

Any ideas?


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Lin Yuan  wrote:

> About issue5 that support multiple user sessions,  as tested by Yan Ji on a
> Windows 2008 server. When allow one user to remote log in with multiple
> sessions, AOO 3.4 is not stable and will crash after some operations.
>
> To support multiple sessions for one user, I thinkonly  rearchitect single
> IPC to TS session managment is not enough. If allow multiple AOO instances
> can be run isolated for one user, the data in user directory must be
> synchronized correctly for those AOO instances as they all share the same
> user directory. The data may inlucde extensions, .xcu and other
> configuration files. So I think the simplest way to be able to cetifiacted
> with Windows 8 in this section is do below thing mentioned in Certification
> requirements for Windows 8
>
> "If an app does not support multiple user sessions or remote access, it
> must clearly state this when launched from this kind of session"
>
> That is, when AOO launched, check if there is another AOO instance in a
> different TS session but for the same user. If does, popup a warning dialog
> and exit.
>
>
>
>
> 2012/6/12 Liu Da Li 
>
> > I have create five items on Bugzilla to track these issue.
> >
> >   - Issue 1. Test for "Section 3 Apps support Windows security features"
> >   is failed.Bugzilla ID 119946 link:
> > [4]
> >
> >
> >   - Issue 2. Test for "Section 4 Apps must adhere to system restart
> >   manager messages" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119947 link:
> > [5]
> >
> >
> >   - Issue 3. Test for "Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible
> >   installation" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119948 link:
> > [6]
> >
> >
> >   - Issue 4. Test for "Section 6 Apps must digitally sign files and
> >   drivers" is failed.Bugzilla ID 119949 link:
> > [7]
> >
> >
> >   - Issue 5. Test for "Section 11 Apps must support multi-user sessions"
> >   is not tested by Windows App Certification Kit.Bugzilla ID 119950 link:
> >   [8] 
> >
> > Anyone please help to check them, confirm them and fix them.
> >
> > 2012/6/12 XiuLi Xu 
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I upload the detailed test result and Windows 8 related links in the
> wiki
> > > document, Windows App Certification Kit Test Results for Apache
> > OpenOffice
> > > 3.4<
> > >
> >
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Windows_App_Certification_Kit_-_Test_Results_for_Apache_OpenOffice_3.4
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Liu Da Li  wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are so many items in the Windows 8 certification list, I try to
> > go
> > > > through it and find that there is maybe about 43 TODO items for us to
> > do
> > > > the certification. Most of the TODO items  are just a verification
> > jobs,
> > > > but some code change jobs maybe are need to do for the sections
> > 4.1,5.1,
> > > > 9.1, 10.2,11.7.
> > > > I have try to verify some items, the result be marked at green.
> > > > Herbert1 also go through the list, I put his result at the end of
> each
> > > > section.
> > > >
> > > > Items which maybe need to change some codes
> > > > 
> > > > 4.1 Your app must handle critical shutdowns appropriately
> > > > In a critical shutdown, apps that return FALSE to WM_QUERYENDSESSION
> > will
> > > > be sent WM_ENDSESSION and closed, while those that time out in
> response
> > > to
> > > > WM_QUERYENDSESSION will be terminated. .
> > > > 5.1 Your app must properly implement a clean, reversible installation
> > > > If the installation fails, the app should be able to roll it back and
> > > > restore the machine to its previous state.
> > > > 9.1 Your app must have a manifest that defines execution levels and
> > tells
> > > > the operating system what privileges the app requires in order to run
> > > > The app manifest marking only applies to EXEs, not DLLs. This is
> > because
> > > > UAC does not inspect DLLs during p

[Call-for-​Review] Bug 119952 - [From Symphony]Cannot open sample file

[Huaidong Qiu]

Hi,

Please review this fix.

Thanks

Issue link:  https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119952

Re: Windows 8 Compatibility?

[Huaidong Qiu]

I checked the Certification Kit report, It only complained about the
unzipped installation package of the vcredist library, not the library
itself, we can just fix this installation defect we done, I saw there is a
defect already open for this.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Huaidong Qiu  wrote:

> Can we remove the vcredist library from AOO and tell the users to download
> it from MS?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Liu Da Li  wrote:
>
>> I have create five items on Bugzilla to track these issue.
>>
>>   - Issue 1. Test for "Section 3 Apps support Windows security features"
>>   is failed.Bugzilla ID 119946 link:
>> [4]<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119946>
>>
>>
>>   - Issue 2. Test for "Section 4 Apps must adhere to system restart
>>   manager messages" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119947 link:
>> [5]<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119947>
>>
>>
>>   - Issue 3. Test for "Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible
>>   installation" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119948 link:
>> [6]<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119948>
>>
>>
>>   - Issue 4. Test for "Section 6 Apps must digitally sign files and
>>   drivers" is failed.Bugzilla ID 119949 link:
>> [7]<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119949>
>>
>>
>>   - Issue 5. Test for "Section 11 Apps must support multi-user sessions"
>>   is not tested by Windows App Certification Kit.Bugzilla ID 119950 link:
>>   [8] <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119950>
>>
>> Anyone please help to check them, confirm them and fix them.
>>
>> 2012/6/12 XiuLi Xu 
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I upload the detailed test result and Windows 8 related links in the
>> wiki
>> > document, Windows App Certification Kit Test Results for Apache
>> OpenOffice
>> > 3.4<
>> >
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Windows_App_Certification_Kit_-_Test_Results_for_Apache_OpenOffice_3.4
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Liu Da Li  wrote:
>> >
>> > > There are so many items in the Windows 8 certification list, I try to
>> go
>> > > through it and find that there is maybe about 43 TODO items for us to
>> do
>> > > the certification. Most of the TODO items  are just a verification
>> jobs,
>> > > but some code change jobs maybe are need to do for the sections
>> 4.1,5.1,
>> > > 9.1, 10.2,11.7.
>> > > I have try to verify some items, the result be marked at green.
>> > > Herbert1 also go through the list, I put his result at the end of each
>> > > section.
>> > >
>> > > Items which maybe need to change some codes
>> > > 
>> > > 4.1 Your app must handle critical shutdowns appropriately
>> > > In a critical shutdown, apps that return FALSE to WM_QUERYENDSESSION
>> will
>> > > be sent WM_ENDSESSION and closed, while those that time out in
>> response
>> > to
>> > > WM_QUERYENDSESSION will be terminated. .
>> > > 5.1 Your app must properly implement a clean, reversible installation
>> > > If the installation fails, the app should be able to roll it back and
>> > > restore the machine to its previous state.
>> > > 9.1 Your app must have a manifest that defines execution levels and
>> tells
>> > > the operating system what privileges the app requires in order to run
>> > > The app manifest marking only applies to EXEs, not DLLs. This is
>> because
>> > > UAC does not inspect DLLs during process creation. It is also worth
>> > noting
>> > > that UAC rules do not apply to Windows Services. The manifest can be
>> > either
>> > > embedded or external.
>> > > To create a manifest, create a file with the name
>> .exe.manifest
>> > > and store it in the same directory as the EXE. Note that any external
>> > > manifest is ignored if the app has an internal manifest. For example:
>> > >  > > > requireAdministrator"" uiAccess=""true|false""/>
>> > > 10.2 Your app must avoid starting automatically on startup
>> > > For example, your app should not set any of the following;
>> > > Registry run keys HKLM and, or HKCU under
>> > > Software\Microsoft\Windows

Re: Windows 8 Compatibility?

[Huaidong Qiu]

Can we remove the vcredist library from AOO and tell the users to download
it from MS?



On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Liu Da Li  wrote:

> I have create five items on Bugzilla to track these issue.
>
>   - Issue 1. Test for "Section 3 Apps support Windows security features"
>   is failed.Bugzilla ID 119946 link:
> [4]
>
>
>   - Issue 2. Test for "Section 4 Apps must adhere to system restart
>   manager messages" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119947 link:
> [5]
>
>
>   - Issue 3. Test for "Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible
>   installation" is failed. Bugzilla ID 119948 link:
> [6]
>
>
>   - Issue 4. Test for "Section 6 Apps must digitally sign files and
>   drivers" is failed.Bugzilla ID 119949 link:
> [7]
>
>
>   - Issue 5. Test for "Section 11 Apps must support multi-user sessions"
>   is not tested by Windows App Certification Kit.Bugzilla ID 119950 link:
>   [8] 
>
> Anyone please help to check them, confirm them and fix them.
>
> 2012/6/12 XiuLi Xu 
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I upload the detailed test result and Windows 8 related links in the wiki
> > document, Windows App Certification Kit Test Results for Apache
> OpenOffice
> > 3.4<
> >
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Windows_App_Certification_Kit_-_Test_Results_for_Apache_OpenOffice_3.4
> > >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Liu Da Li  wrote:
> >
> > > There are so many items in the Windows 8 certification list, I try to
> go
> > > through it and find that there is maybe about 43 TODO items for us to
> do
> > > the certification. Most of the TODO items  are just a verification
> jobs,
> > > but some code change jobs maybe are need to do for the sections
> 4.1,5.1,
> > > 9.1, 10.2,11.7.
> > > I have try to verify some items, the result be marked at green.
> > > Herbert1 also go through the list, I put his result at the end of each
> > > section.
> > >
> > > Items which maybe need to change some codes
> > > 
> > > 4.1 Your app must handle critical shutdowns appropriately
> > > In a critical shutdown, apps that return FALSE to WM_QUERYENDSESSION
> will
> > > be sent WM_ENDSESSION and closed, while those that time out in response
> > to
> > > WM_QUERYENDSESSION will be terminated. .
> > > 5.1 Your app must properly implement a clean, reversible installation
> > > If the installation fails, the app should be able to roll it back and
> > > restore the machine to its previous state.
> > > 9.1 Your app must have a manifest that defines execution levels and
> tells
> > > the operating system what privileges the app requires in order to run
> > > The app manifest marking only applies to EXEs, not DLLs. This is
> because
> > > UAC does not inspect DLLs during process creation. It is also worth
> > noting
> > > that UAC rules do not apply to Windows Services. The manifest can be
> > either
> > > embedded or external.
> > > To create a manifest, create a file with the name
> .exe.manifest
> > > and store it in the same directory as the EXE. Note that any external
> > > manifest is ignored if the app has an internal manifest. For example:
> > >   > > requireAdministrator"" uiAccess=""true|false""/>
> > > 10.2 Your app must avoid starting automatically on startup
> > > For example, your app should not set any of the following;
> > > Registry run keys HKLM and, or HKCU under
> > > Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion
> > > Registry run keys HKLM, and or HKCU under
> > > Software\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\windows\CurrentVersion
> > > Start Menu AllPrograms > STARTUP
> > > 11.7 Your app must check other terminal service (TS) sessions for
> > existing
> > > instances of the app
> > > Note: If an app does not support multiple user sessions or remote
> access,
> > > it must clearly state this when launched from this kind of session.
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> > > Full TODO items.
> > >
> > > 1. Apps are compatible and resilient
> > > 1.1 Your app must not take a dependency on Windows compatibility modes,
> > > AppHelp message, and or any other compatibility fixes
> > > TODO 1.1 : Need verification , don't depend.
> > > 1.2 Your app must not take a dependency on the VB6 runtime
> > > TODO 1.2 : Need verification , don't depend.
> > > 1.3 Your app must not load arbitrary DLLs to intercept Win32 API calls
> > > using HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows
> > > AppInit_dlls.
> > > TODO 1.3 : Need verification , don't load.
> > > Herbert1: Win8 Cert Section 1 : ok
> > >
> > > 2. Apps must adhere to Windows Security Best Practices
> > > 2.1 Your app must use strong and appropriate ACLs to secure executable
> > > fi

Re: Pootle Data

[Huaidong Qiu]

Where can we get the data? I can help to check and understand the toolset
and process.

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 8 February 2012 11:49, Andre Fischer  wrote:
> > On 08.02.2012 17:31, Stuart Swales wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/02/2012 14:02, Andre Fischer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I recently had a little time to look at the pootle data. Here is what I
> >>> have found out so far. Please keep in mind that this is new for me and
> >>> that my interpretations may be wrong.
> >>>
> >>> For context I will start with a short description of the directory
> >>> structure of the 80 GB of the backup disk:
> >>>
> >>> In the top-level podirectory/ there is a sub-directory openoffice_org/
> >>> that probably is the translation data of OpenOffice.org. It contains
> >>> sub-directories for most languages (more on the exact set below.)
> >>> The content of podirectory is available at [1].
> >>>
> >>> Below the top-level backup/ there are two directories DEV_m103/ and
> >>> DEV_94/ for two milestones. Below these you can find directories like
> >>> backconvert-110326/ that probably contain backups for certain dates
> >>> (March 26 2011 in this example. The most recent is
> >>> DEV_m103/backconvert-110401 from April 1st of last year.
> >>>
> >>> After comparing time stamps I now think that we can disregard the whole
> >>> backup/ directory. There are .po files under podirectory/ that are from
> >>> later then April 1st. Some files are from May.
> >>>
> >>> I then tried to find out whether the pootle data are older or newer
> than
> >>> the data in the extras/l10n module in our SVN repository. The
> timestamps
> >>> in the .sdf files are useless, our tools set them all to 2002-02-02.
> The
> >>> file time stamps can not be used directly because of the differing
> >>> directory structures.
> >>>
> >>> Comparing the set of lanuages of the pootle server and that in
> >>> extras/l10n/ was also inconclusive:
> >>> The set of languages that are present in both data sets is
> >>> af ar as ast bg bn bo bs ca cs cy da dz es et fa fr fur ga gd gl gu he
> >>> hi hu id is it ja jbo ka kab kn ko ku lt lv ml mr my nb nl nn nr nso ny
> >>> oc om or pap pl ps pt ru sc si sk so sq ss st sv ta te th tn tr ts ug
> >>> uk uz ve vi xh zu
> >>>
> >>> Languages only in extras/l10n/ are:
> >>> be-BY br brx de dgo el eo eu fi hr kid kk km kok ks ky mai mk mn mni ne
> >>> pa-IN ro rw sa-IN sat sd sh sl sr sw-TZ tg
> >>>
> >>> Languages only on the pootle server are:
> >>> pyg son tk tlh
> >>>
> >>> See [2] for a list of language ids. (tlh for example is klingon)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So, we probably have to merge both data sets and hope for the best.
> >>> Any information from people who know the localization process better is
> >>> welcome.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Andre
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~af/index.html
> >>> [2] http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> And what has happened to en-GB and en-ZA ?
> >
> >
> > Ah, at least one person who reads my mails :-)
> >
> > I forgot to add the following languages as being present in both
> locations:
> >ca-XV en-GB en-ZA pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW
> >
> > Reason: These six language ids are written slightly differently on the
> > pootle server (with a '_' (underline) in the middle) and in l10n/ (with a
> > '-' (dash)).  I sorted them differently and then forgot about them.
> Sorry.
>
> Thanks. And I too actually read your mail messages :-)--and deep
> appreciate the work.
>
> ciao
> louis
> >
> > -Andre
>