[QA CALLFORREVIEW] bug 121227 - [testUNO patch]Sort Criteria and Sort Options scrip

2012-10-16 Thread YangTerry 

Hi all,
Is there anyone help me review my UNO script about Data Sort.
In this script it include Sort Criteria and Sort Options

Sort by one Column

Sort by two Columns

Sort by three Columns

Sort Options testing

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121227


Thanks,
Terry Yang

[QA CALLFORREVIEW] Bug 121108 - [testUNO patch]validity test script include Criterial/Error Alert/Input Help

2012-09-26 Thread YangTerry 


Hi all,
I have write a UNO script about validity related funcion can anyone help review 
this patch
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121108
In this script it include validity related funciton
Set/Get Criteria
Vlidation Type
ValidationType.ANY
ValidationType.DATE
ValidationType.DECIMAL
ValidationType.LIST
ValidationType.TEXT_LEN
ValidationType.TIME
ValidationType.WHOLE

Allow Blank Cells
IgnoreBlankCells

ConditionOperator
ConditionOperator.EQUAL
ConditionOperator.BETWEEN
ConditionOperator.GREATER
ConditionOperator.GREATER_EQUAL
ConditionOperator.LESS
ConditionOperator.LESS_EQUAL
ConditionOperator.NOT_BETWEEN
ConditionOperator.NOT_EQUAL

Set/Get Error Alert
Error Alert title
Show/Hide Error Alert

Error Alert type
ValidationAlertStyle.MACRO
ValidationAlertStyle.WARNING
ValidationAlertStyle.STOP
ValidationAlertStyle.INFO

Error meassage

Set/Get Input Help
Show/Hide help message
Help title
Input Help

[QA Report]Name Scope enhancement for spreadsheet

2012-09-09 Thread YangTerry 







Hi All,
 
Here is the report of Name Scope enhancement for spreadsheet
 
Please review.
 
1. Total test case number: 11
2. Total execution number: 22
3. Testing platforms
   - SuSE Linux 64-bit
   - Windows XP
   - Ubuntu Linux 32-bit
   - Windows 7
   - MacOS X
   - Redhat Linux 32-bit
4. Pass rate: 55%
5. Bug analysis
 
   Totally 3 bugs were opened. 1 of them maybe feature related, others can
be reproduced in build AOO 341 1372282, so they are not feature related bug.
 
Feature related bug:
Bug 120818 - When import the saved .ods file which contain duplicate names, it 
will not update and refresh the formula result 
This bug make lost of case fail in export .ods and import the saved .ods file.

Other bug
Bug 120820 -  Define name which cell range in other file will saved incorrect 
to .xls and .ods
Bug 120860 - AOO can't change define names, we can only change define names 
cell range

Thanks,
Terry Yang

[QA Call For Review] Test Plan and Test Case for bug 120478

2012-09-04 Thread YangTerry 

Hi,
 
Can anyone help to review my test plan and test case for bug 1120478
 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120804
 
Thanks!

RE: [Call for Test] Enhancement 120478 is done, support sheet scoped named ranges in Calc

2012-09-02 Thread YangTerry 

Hi,
I will take this test activity.

Thanks,
Terry Yang

> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:36:34 +0800
> Subject: [Call for Test] Enhancement 120478 is done, support sheet scoped 
> named ranges in Calc
> From: l...@apache.org
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The  enhancement 120478(https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120478)
> is done,  support sheet scoped named ranges in Calc.
> 
> Code is committed in revision
> 1379349The
> build will be ready.
> 
> Please test it when build is ready. Any problem please open bugs or
> send mail to discuss. Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> The description of this enhancement is
> 
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Calc/Features/Calc_name_range_enchancement%28step1%29

[QA CALLFORREVIEW] Bug 120763 - [testuno patch]Advance filter and Filter option

2012-08-30 Thread YangTerry 

Hi all,
In this patch, it including Advance filter and below  Filter Option test
IsCaseSensitive 
SkipDuplicates 
UseRegularExpressions
SaveOutputPosition 
ContainsHeader 
CopyOutputData 
OutputPosition 

Please help review.

Thanks,
Terry Yang

[QA CALLFORREVIEW]Bug 120755 - [testUNO patch]Standard filter operator

2012-08-29 Thread YangTerry 

This patch check Standard filter operator including 


FilterOperator.BOTTOM_PERCENT
FilterOperator.BOTTOM_VALUES
FilterOperator.EMPTY
FilterOperator.EQUAL
FilterOperator.GREATER
FilterOperator.GREATER_EQUAL
FilterOperator.LESS
FilterOperator.LESS_EQUAL
FilterOperator.NOT_EMPTY
FilterOperator.NOT_EQUAL
FilterOperator.TOP_PERCENT
FilterOperator.TOP_VALUES
Also add one open sc document method in SCUtil.java and add one sample file 
used in this script

https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120755


Please help review.



Thanks,

Terry Yang

[QA CALLFORREVIEW] [UNO Script] Bug 120655 Hide/Show sheet, Tab color, Link sheet

2012-08-21 Thread YangTerry 

Hi,
I have add 3 more UNO sheet related test method into SheetBasicTest.java, 
please help review.
Also i have update other test method use SCUtil method, and add some method 
into SCUtil.java file.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120655

Thanks,
Terry Yang

[QA CALLFORREVIEW] UNOAuto patch: Test script for Basic operator about Sheet in SpreadSheet

2012-08-15 Thread YangTerry 




Hi, all
 
One patch for UNO automation test script has been submitted with Bug 120560, 
which contains the test case about some basic Sheet operator of Spreadsheet.
 
Pls help to review it. Thanks.
 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120560 


Thanks,
Terry Yang

RE: First Experiance with Testlink

2012-08-14 Thread YangTerry 

Hi Raphael,
Thank you for your investigation in TestLink, i also try TestLink recently. 
I'm using Apach OpenOffice TestProject and do some operator on this project.
I want write a wiki to make it simple for end user, But it not complete yet, if 
you are interesting in it you can also update it. 
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink

> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:57:15 +0200
> From: r.birc...@gmx.ch
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: First Experiance with Testlink
> 
> Hi at all
> 
> I played around with the new testlink instance and I want to share my
> first experiances. First of all, Testlink is quite different to the old
> TCM. It's more complicated, but also more powerfull. And Testlink is
> extendable.
> 
> There are many different rules, for my point of view too many. But the
> rules are compleet adaptable, and so we can simplify them, if we want.
> 
> I was able to create a project. At the moment we have only testprojects.
> For my point of view, it makes sense to create a Project for each AOO
> version. (AOO341 AOO35 etc.) Also I beleve it's a good idea to have a
> basic project who all testcases are stored. The big question is, how to
> bring over the testcases from a basic project to a working project. The
> GUI from Testlink offer a possibility to build a project on the basis of
> an other project. Unfortunaly this function does not take over the
> testcases. You can export and import testcases via XML, but I don't know
> if Testlink is able to handle multiple testcases export/import.

Yes it is able to handle multiple test case export/import, but the file for 
export/import have size limitation.

> 
> I was able to create a Testcases, but what I miss is a Checkbox for the
> Testers (pass/fail) and a comment box. Also I miss a overview over all
> tests. The first one will be easy to solve. We cann add this fields. The
> seccond one is probabily not so easy.
For the first one, if you assign any test case to test plan, when you run test 
case, there should have Notes / Description comment box and result  (pass/fail) 
selection.

For the second, Once you create and active an test plan, you can see there have 
a link Test Report add into the navigation.
There are 16 kinds of report, hope it can solve your here.

Test Plan Report
Test Report
General Test Plan Metrics
Results by Tester per Build
Test Case Assignment Overview
Query Metrics
Test result matrix
Failed Test Cases
Blocked Test Cases
Not run Test Cases
Test Cases without Tester Assignment
Charts
Requirements based Report
Test Cases with Custom Fields set on Execution
Test Plan with Custom Field info
Test Cases not assigned to Any Test Plan


> 
> Greatings to all
> Raphael
> -- 
> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/

RE: [QE]3.4.1 snapshot builds installation testing

2012-07-01 Thread YangTerry 

Thanks LiuPing report.

Add 1 more result for Windows platform install testing.
There is no Microsoft VC Redistributable leaves files exist on the root folder 
after install.
Test on WinXP/Vista/Win7-64bit  build r1351960

> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:36:58 +0800
> Subject: Re: [QE]3.4.1 snapshot builds installation testing
> From: doneyours...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
>  I tested WinXP/Vista/Win7-64bit  build r1351960:
> WinXp:
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_zh-CN.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_fr.exe
> 
> Vista:
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_zh-CN.exe
> 
> Win7-64bit:
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_zh-CN.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Win_x86_install_de.exe
> 
> installed on  :WinXP/Vista/Win7-64bit
> 1. Graphic user interface install, Pass
> 2. version No. in help-> is OOo-dev 3.4.1 Rev 1351960, Pass
> 3. the install directory:~/OOo-dev 3.4 (en-US) Installation Files, Pass
> 4. bundled Extensions : 5 English dictionaries, Presentation Minimizer,
> Presenter Console,  and add/remove extensions ,Pass
> 5. English dic works: red wave lines under misspelled words, suggestions
> appears in context menus,Pass
> 6. help->check for Update  Pass.
> 7. quickstar ,Pass
> 8, the simple new/open/save/reopon  operation for .odt/.odf/.ods... ,Pass
> 9. install language packs(zh) and  swith ui language ,Pass
> 10. Graphic user interface remove;Pass

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-29 Thread YangTerry 




Test again on trunk r1355082 which include modules nss and moz.
>From the result I think we can close this bug.

Test with 3 scenario.
A. Saved with password, then remove password with same revision
B. Saved with password with OOo3.3, then remove password with r1355082
C. Saved with password with MS 2003, then remove password with r1355082

Result:
Scenario A:
ods/xls/odt/odp work fine
doc can saved with password successfully, but when reopen the saved file, it is 
under read-only mode. This also repro on OOo 3.3
ppt is weird, in OOo 3.3, In saved dialog, the password check box can check,  
input password and saved the file then reopen it, No need password, so saved 
with password in OOo3.3 for ppt format is not work.
In trunk r1355082, In saved dialog, "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled
If we saved ppt file with password protect by OpenOffice, then open in MS 
Office, no need input password, so it is totally not work.

Scenario B:
ods/xls/odt/odp work fine
doc file with password open under read-only mode, we can saved to another file 
to remove password.
ppt file can't saved with password protect


Scenario C:
xls work fine
doc file with password open under read-only mode, we can saved to another file 
to remove password.
ppt file with password protect by MS office can't open in Open Office, it said 
"Read Error. the loading of password-encrypted Microsoft PowerPint 
presentations is not supported."

For PPT issue, there have 2 bugs about saved(Bug 39527) and loading(Bug 46307)
For doc open with read-only mode issue, i think it is a know issue, but i can't 
find the bug in bugzilla, I will double check in bugzilla.


> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:20:54 +0200
> From: orwittm...@googlemail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 28.06.2012 11:08, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > sorry for top posting - it is reply to the complete discussion regarding 
> > "save
> > with password"
> > 
> > This functionality for ODF documents is available when the build includes
> > modules nss and moz.
> > 
> > I am not sure, if our buildbots include these modules. I will check it.
> > 
> 
> win7 buildbot includes nss and moz
> linux32 buildbot includes nss and moz
> linux64 buildbot includes nss and moz
> 
> But, as you may have notice since a couple of days our buildbots have problems
> to create new packages.
> last sucessful build for win7 was on 2012-06-19
> last sucessful build for linux32 was on 2012-06-20
> last sucessful build for linxu64 was on 2012-06-17
> none of these contains the fix for issue 119366
> 
> Best regards, Oliver.
> 
> > 
> > Best regards, Oliver.
> > 
> > On 28.06.2012 10:21, YangTerry wrote:
> >>
> >> Just confirm with our build owner, moz package is not in the build.
> >> Will verify and update the result after download the trunk build from 
> >> BuildBot.
> >>
> >> Thanks Fan Zheng help (*^__^*)
> >>
> >>
> >>> From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> >>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> >>> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:31 +0800
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Will confirm with our local build owner. Also download the trunk build 
> >>> from http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your investgate.
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:19:39 +0800
> >>>> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> >>>> From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> >>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> Hold a second, you guys are using the download build on verifying, right?
> >>>>
> >>>> If so, that means some problems there. Maybe the release build env 
> >>>> broken?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> >>>>
> >>>>> Muhaha, lucky for me that I have 3 build enviroment on verification 
> >>>>> this,
> >>>>> all of them are under Windows XP. The difference are:
> >>>>> In build env A, there is no moz package involved;
> >>>>> In build env B, there is moz package involved, but without my solution 
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> issue 119366;
> >>>>> In build env C, there is moz package involved and with my solution of
> >>>>> i

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-28 Thread YangTerry 

Just confirm with our build owner, moz package is not in the build.
Will verify and update the result after download the trunk build from BuildBot.

Thanks Fan Zheng help (*^__^*) 


> From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:02:31 +0800
> 
> 
> Will confirm with our local build owner. Also download the trunk build from 
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
> 
> Thanks for your investgate.
> 
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:19:39 +0800
> > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> > From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> > Hold a second, you guys are using the download build on verifying, right?
> > 
> > If so, that means some problems there. Maybe the release build env broken?
> > 
> > 
> > 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> > 
> > > Muhaha, lucky for me that I have 3 build enviroment on verification this,
> > > all of them are under Windows XP. The difference are:
> > > In build env A, there is no moz package involved;
> > > In build env B, there is moz package involved, but without my solution of
> > > issue 119366;
> > > In build env C, there is moz package involved and with my solution of
> > > issue 119366;
> 
> > > And I did the following test cases:
> > > In env A:
> > > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > > 2.2 Save into ODP, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > > Weird.
> > > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > > 3.3 Save into XLS, without password, passed;
> > > 3.4 Save into XLS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > >
> > > In env B:
> > > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > > 2.2 Save into ODP,with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > > Weird.
> > > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > > 3.3 Save into XLS, without password, passed;
> > > 3.4 Save into XLS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", failed;
> > >
> > > In env C:
> > > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", Passed;
> > > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", Passed;
> > > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > > 2.2 Save into ODP,with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > > without password", Passed;
> > > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > > Weird.
> > > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > > without p

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-28 Thread YangTerry 

Will confirm with our local build owner. Also download the trunk build from 
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/

Thanks for your investgate.

> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:19:39 +0800
> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> Hold a second, you guys are using the download build on verifying, right?
> 
> If so, that means some problems there. Maybe the release build env broken?
> 
> 
> 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> 
> > Muhaha, lucky for me that I have 3 build enviroment on verification this,
> > all of them are under Windows XP. The difference are:
> > In build env A, there is no moz package involved;
> > In build env B, there is moz package involved, but without my solution of
> > issue 119366;
> > In build env C, there is moz package involved and with my solution of
> > issue 119366;

> > And I did the following test cases:
> > In env A:
> > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > 2.2 Save into ODP, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > Weird.
> > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, failed, with error message "General
> > Error: Generral input/output error";
> > 3.3 Save into XLS, without password, passed;
> > 3.4 Save into XLS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> >
> > In env B:
> > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > 2.2 Save into ODP,with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > Weird.
> > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> > 3.3 Save into XLS, without password, passed;
> > 3.4 Save into XLS, with password, passed; But in continual case: "Save As
> > without password", failed;
> >
> > In env C:
> > 1.1 Save into ODT, without password, passed;
> > 1.2 Save into ODT, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > without password", Passed;
> > 1.3 Save into DOC, without password, passed;
> > 1.4 Save into DOC, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > without password", Passed;
> > 2.1 Save into ODP, without password, passed;
> > 2.2 Save into ODP,with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > without password", Passed;
> > 2.3 Save into PPT, without password, passed;
> > 2.4 Save into PPT, the "saveing with password" checkbox is disabled...
> > Weird.
> > 3.1 Save into ODS, without password, passed;
> > 3.2 Save into ODS, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > without password", Passed;
> > 3.3 Save into XLS, without password, passed;
> > 3.4 Save into XLS, with password, passed; In continual case: "Save As
> > without password", Passed;
> >
> > Conclution:
> >
> > Such error messages are caused missing moz package building involved.
> > And such I/O error message only occurs in the ODF format file saving with
> > password.
> > Both ODF format saving with password and OFFICE format saving with
> > password have the issue 119366;
> > My solution could work on both MS office files saving and ODF format
> > saving;
> >
> > For you review.
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/28 YangTerry 
> >
> >>
> >> I can saved .ods file witho

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-27 Thread YangTerry 

Open 2 bugs track below 2 issues
120109 Failed save (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password 
120110 Can't open (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password even password is 
correct. 


> From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:48:44 +0800
> 
> 
> Now there are 2 issues here
> 1. Failed save (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password.
> 2. Can't open (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password even password is correct.
> 
> After those 2 issues get fixed then we can back to verify remove 
> (.ods/.odt/.odp) file password.
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:28 +0800
> > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> > From: doneyours...@gmail.com
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> > I verfity the bug  119366 on build  version 1354384 on Win7 OS
> > I save .ods .odt .odp without password successfully ,but save .ods .odt
> > .odp with password ,the error message pop up
> > 
> > I verify this bug on build  version  r1351960 on Win7 OS
> > 
> >  I save .ods .odt .odp without password or password ,which is successful
> > 
> > So this defect maybe regression defect
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, YangTerry  wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > I can saved .ods file without password successfully, also can save .xls
> > > successfully.
> > >
> > > Only when i saved our format (like .ods) file with password, this error
> > > pop up.
> > >
> > > Also failed to open our format file with password.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So it should not be related with build without moz package.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:57:14 +0800
> > > > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> > > > From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> > > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >  >
> > > > And I my local, (WinXP env), seems such issues can not be reproduced.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> > > >
> > > > > The error message "General Error: Generral input/output error" looks 
> > > > > so
> > > > > farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside,
> > > such
> > > > > dialog will show up.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/6/28 YangTerry 
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
> > > > >> If we saved with our format(.ods)
> > > > >> Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is
> > > "General
> > > > >> Error: Generral input/output error", also failed open the password
> > > protect
> > > > >> .ods file, it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct
> > > > >> password. Reopen this bug.
> > > > >> My Platform is Win 7 X64 EN.If we saved with MS format (.xls),
> > > > >> successfully saved it with password and also work fine to removed the
> > > > >> password.
> > > > >> Also work fine saved file(.ods) without password.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Seems something wrong in our format save with password logic.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:27:56 +0200
> > > > >> > From: orwittm...@googlemail.com
> > > > >> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file
> > > (119366)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 26.06.2012 14:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On 26.06.2012 09:53, Fan Zheng wrote:
> > > > >> > >> Root cause:
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Seems the logic of "Save As" and "Save" inside Apache OpenOffice
> > > is
> > > > >> pretty
> > > > >> > >> weird anyway.
> > > > >> > >>

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-27 Thread YangTerry 

Now there are 2 issues here
1. Failed save (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password.
2. Can't open (.ods/.odt/.odp) file with password even password is correct.

After those 2 issues get fixed then we can back to verify remove 
(.ods/.odt/.odp) file password.


> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:28 +0800
> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> From: doneyours...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> I verfity the bug  119366 on build  version 1354384 on Win7 OS
> I save .ods .odt .odp without password successfully ,but save .ods .odt
> .odp with password ,the error message pop up
> 
> I verify this bug on build  version  r1351960 on Win7 OS
> 
>  I save .ods .odt .odp without password or password ,which is successful
> 
> So this defect maybe regression defect
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, YangTerry  wrote:
> 
> >
> > I can saved .ods file without password successfully, also can save .xls
> > successfully.
> >
> > Only when i saved our format (like .ods) file with password, this error
> > pop up.
> >
> > Also failed to open our format file with password.
> >
> >
> >
> > So it should not be related with build without moz package.
> >
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:57:14 +0800
> > > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> > > From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >  >
> > > And I my local, (WinXP env), seems such issues can not be reproduced.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> > >
> > > > The error message "General Error: Generral input/output error" looks so
> > > > farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside,
> > such
> > > > dialog will show up.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/6/28 YangTerry 
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
> > > >> If we saved with our format(.ods)
> > > >> Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is
> > "General
> > > >> Error: Generral input/output error", also failed open the password
> > protect
> > > >> .ods file, it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct
> > > >> password. Reopen this bug.
> > > >> My Platform is Win 7 X64 EN.If we saved with MS format (.xls),
> > > >> successfully saved it with password and also work fine to removed the
> > > >> password.
> > > >> Also work fine saved file(.ods) without password.
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems something wrong in our format save with password logic.
> > > >>
> > > >> > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:27:56 +0200
> > > >> > From: orwittm...@googlemail.com
> > > >> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file
> > (119366)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 26.06.2012 14:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 26.06.2012 09:53, Fan Zheng wrote:
> > > >> > >> Root cause:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Seems the logic of "Save As" and "Save" inside Apache OpenOffice
> > is
> > > >> pretty
> > > >> > >> weird anyway.
> > > >> > >> A, inside AOO, the method SfxBaseModel::StoreSelf is the entry
> > for
> > > >> storing
> > > >> > >> file into the original URL path if it has one. Which means, such
> > > >> method is
> > > >> > >> responsible to:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> 1. Directly "Save" request, but exclude the very first time on
> > "Save"
> > > >> > >> without original URL path;
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> 2. "SaveAs" request, with the same URL information as former;
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> B, as such method is only focus on storing back into to original
> > > >> file, it
> >

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-27 Thread YangTerry 

I can saved .ods file without password successfully, also can save .xls 
successfully.

Only when i saved our format (like .ods) file with password, this error pop up.

Also failed to open our format file with password.



So it should not be related with build without moz package.


> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:57:14 +0800
> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> From: zheng.easy...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> And I my local, (WinXP env), seems such issues can not be reproduced.
> 
> 
> 
> 2012/6/28 Fan Zheng 
> 
> > The error message "General Error: Generral input/output error" looks so
> > farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside, such
> > dialog will show up.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/28 YangTerry 
> >
> >>
> >> Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
> >> If we saved with our format(.ods)
> >> Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is "General
> >> Error: Generral input/output error", also failed open the password protect
> >> .ods file, it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct
> >> password. Reopen this bug.
> >> My Platform is Win 7 X64 EN.If we saved with MS format (.xls),
> >> successfully saved it with password and also work fine to removed the
> >> password.
> >> Also work fine saved file(.ods) without password.
> >>
> >> Seems something wrong in our format save with password logic.
> >>
> >> > Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:27:56 +0200
> >> > From: orwittm...@googlemail.com
> >> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 26.06.2012 14:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > On 26.06.2012 09:53, Fan Zheng wrote:
> >> > >> Root cause:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Seems the logic of "Save As" and "Save" inside Apache OpenOffice is
> >> pretty
> >> > >> weird anyway.
> >> > >> A, inside AOO, the method SfxBaseModel::StoreSelf is the entry for
> >> storing
> >> > >> file into the original URL path if it has one. Which means, such
> >> method is
> >> > >> responsible to:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 1. Directly "Save" request, but exclude the very first time on "Save"
> >> > >> without original URL path;
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2. "SaveAs" request, with the same URL information as former;
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> B, as such method is only focus on storing back into to original
> >> file, it
> >> > >> is designed as an incremental saving pattern for certain efficient
> >> > >> consideration. Which means,
> >> > >> such function do not allow external saving parameters except the
> >> ones on
> >> > >> changing "Version Comments", "Author", "Interaction Handler" and
> >> "status
> >> > >> Indicator".
> >> > >>
> >> > >> C, "Saving with password" is a kind of external saving parameter. The
> >> > >> saving parameters set will contain a password item inside, if users
> >> have
> >> > >> enable the check box
> >> > >> "Save with password" in "File Save As" dialog. Otherwise, saving
> >> parameters
> >> > >> set wont contain password corresponding items.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Combine the above 3 conditions, we can take a deeper inside look of
> >> > >> following scenarios:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 1. In the "Save" request, whatever the password originally enabled
> >> or not,
> >> > >> as no further different setting applied, the storing process will
> >> directly
> >> > >> apply the former saving parameters set, including the URL path and
> >> password
> >> > >> setting stuff. Everything is OK.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2. And in the "SaveAs" request with password originally disabled:
> >> > >> 2.1 If the user keep the "

RE: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)

2012-06-27 Thread YangTerry 

Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
If we saved with our format(.ods)
Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is "General Error: 
Generral input/output error", also failed open the password protect .ods file, 
it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct password. Reopen this 
bug.
My Platform is Win 7 X64 EN.If we saved with MS format (.xls), successfully 
saved it with password and also work fine to removed the password.
Also work fine saved file(.ods) without password.

Seems something wrong in our format save with password logic.

> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:27:56 +0200
> From: orwittm...@googlemail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 26.06.2012 14:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26.06.2012 09:53, Fan Zheng wrote:
> >> Root cause:
> >>
> >> Seems the logic of "Save As" and "Save" inside Apache OpenOffice is pretty
> >> weird anyway.
> >> A, inside AOO, the method SfxBaseModel::StoreSelf is the entry for storing
> >> file into the original URL path if it has one. Which means, such method is
> >> responsible to:
> >>
> >> 1. Directly "Save" request, but exclude the very first time on "Save"
> >> without original URL path;
> >>
> >> 2. "SaveAs" request, with the same URL information as former;
> >>
> >>
> >> B, as such method is only focus on storing back into to original file, it
> >> is designed as an incremental saving pattern for certain efficient
> >> consideration. Which means,
> >> such function do not allow external saving parameters except the ones on
> >> changing "Version Comments", "Author", "Interaction Handler" and "status
> >> Indicator".
> >>
> >> C, "Saving with password" is a kind of external saving parameter. The
> >> saving parameters set will contain a password item inside, if users have
> >> enable the check box
> >> "Save with password" in "File Save As" dialog. Otherwise, saving parameters
> >> set wont contain password corresponding items.
> >>
> >> Combine the above 3 conditions, we can take a deeper inside look of
> >> following scenarios:
> >>
> >> 1. In the "Save" request, whatever the password originally enabled or not,
> >> as no further different setting applied, the storing process will directly
> >> apply the former saving parameters set, including the URL path and password
> >> setting stuff. Everything is OK.
> >>
> >> 2. And in the "SaveAs" request with password originally disabled:
> >> 2.1 If the user keep the "Save with password" disabled in "File Save As"
> >> dialog, as no further setting applied, the storing process will directly
> >> apply the former saving parameters set, still with password disabled. Keep
> >> the consistence between UI setting and exact result and high efficiency;
> >> 2.2 If the user change the "Save with password" from disable to enable in
> >> "File Save As" dialog, as external saving parameter was added into saving
> >> parameters set, which do not satisfy the verification of parameters, such
> >> "SaveAs" request will be returned from SfxBaseModel::StoreSelf, and
> >> actually finished inside the common "SaveAs" method with password enabled.
> >> Also keep the consistence between UI setting and exact result;
> >>3. In the "SaveAs" request with password originally enabled:
> >> 3.1 If the user keep the "Save with password" enabled in "File Save As"
> >> dialog, as external saving parameter was added into saving parameters set,
> >> which do not satisfy the verification of parameters, such "SaveAs" request
> >> will be returned from SfxBaseModel::StoreSelf, and actually finished inside
> >> the common "SaveAs" method with password enabled. Keep the consistence
> >> between UI setting and exact result, but with lower efficiency;
> >> 3.2 If the user change the "Save with password" from enabled to disabled in
> >> "File Save As" dialog, as no further setting applied, the storing process
> >> will directly apply the former saving parameters set, still with password
> >> enabled, as oppose to the UI setting. The issue happens.
> >>
> >> So, a reasonable solution of this issue should be:
> >>
> >> 1. No process and saving parameter change on scenario 1 and 2;
> >> 2. In scenario 3.1, remove the external password parameter as the
> >> originally enabled, and makes it finished in StoreSelf for higher
> >> efficiency;
> >> 3. In scenario 3.2, do not trying to use StoreSelf anyway;
> >>
> >>
> >> For you reference.
> >>
> >> The code patch will be submitted for reviewing later.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for this really deep and well founded analysis.
> >
> > I am currently reviewing the new patch.
> >
> >
> 
> patch looks good - I will commit it to trunk and branch AOO34 soon.
> Thx ZhengFan.
> 
> Best regards, Oliver.

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120096 (wipe up and wipe down effect works fail in Aoo 3.4,but ok in OO3.3) as release blocker‏

2012-06-26 Thread YangTerry 

Change the mail title

Regression issue, and the slide transition is basic transition.
+1

> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:07:34 +0800
> Subject: Re: [regression]the three basic slide transition effect:wipe up,wipe 
> down and box out lost
> From: bjduj...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> sorry,in OO3.3,it is ok
> 
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Du Jing  wrote:
> 
> > the three slide transition effect can't preview,and set on slide,no any
> > play effect.but in OO3.4,it is ok.
> > suggest fix it as soon as possible.
> >
> > I have submitted a bug in bugzilla to track the defect:
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120096
> >

RE: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120095(openoffice crashes when the first time to exit quickstarter after it being enabled) as release blocker

2012-06-26 Thread YangTerry 

+1 to make this issue a release blocker

> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:19:52 +0800
> Subject: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120095(openoffice crashes when the 
> first time to exit quickstarter after it being enabled) as release blocker
> From: louqin...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> since quickstarter is disabled by default now, the user who want to enable
> it will encounter this crash

RE: [RELEASE][3.4.1]Release Bloker: proposing "Bug 119803 - After upgrading to 3.4 RTF User Fields are not saving"

2012-06-20 Thread YangTerry 

Re-send it, seems failed last time.

This is a bug about user fields lost after save in RTF file.
This is a regression issue, it is work fine in OOo 3.3.
> ej19...@gmail.com
>   2012-06-07 10:23:13 UTC
> To duplicate:
> Create a rtf document with a version < 3.4.  
> Menu Options
> Insert
> -Field
> --Other
> ---User Fields
> 
> At this point the variable list is shown.
> 
> Insert a new variable and click the green check.
> 
> The variable shows up in the list and appears to be saving.
> 
> Insert the variable into the document to use it.
> 
> Close the doc and reopen.  
> 
> When the document reopens the variable is not present and is de-referenced in 
> the doc.
> 
> This appears to be a critical error.  This function is used by many 
> developers along with UNO to published merged documents.
> 
> Resolution:  Downgrade OpenOffice to <3.4.
> 
> Thanks,
> Terry Yang
>

[RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing "Bug 119803 - After upgrading to 3.4 RTF User Fields are not saving " as release blocker‏

2012-06-20 Thread YangTerry 

This is a bug about user fields lost after save in RTF file.
This is a regression issue, it is work fine in OOo 3.3.



ej19...@gmail.com







  2012-06-07 10:23:13 UTC

  



To duplicate:

Create a rtf document with a version < 3.4.  
Menu Options
Insert
-Field
--Other
---User Fields

At this point the variable list is shown.

Insert a new variable and click the green check.

The variable shows up in the list and appears to be saving.

Insert the variable into the document to use it.

Close the doc and reopen.  

When the document reopens the variable is not present and is de-referenced in 
the doc.

This appears to be a critical error.  This function is used by many developers 
along with UNO to published merged documents.

Resolution:  Downgrade OpenOffice to <3.4.

Thanks,
Terry Yang

RE: Propose testlink

2012-05-03 Thread YangTerry 

+1

This tool can help us manager the testcase easily, also in check the result.



Thanks,

Wei

> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:12:51 +0800
> Subject: Re: Propose testlink
> From: phoenix.wan...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> +1
> support to use Testlink to manage test cases and test tasks
> 
> 2012/5/4 Zhe Liu 
> 
> > +1
> > Since more and more professional QAs joined our project, I think test
> > case management system is a better choice than WIKI. If general users
> > feel it's too complex, we can customized it later.
> >
> > 2012/5/3 Yan Ji :
> >  > Hi all,
> > >As I recommend before, Testlink is an open source tool which used for
> > test management, such as test project management, test specification
> > management, test plan management, etc… If we adopt this tool in Aoo
> > project, I'm sure we will gain lots of benefit.
> > >
> > >   I built a virtual machine which host a TestLink demo. Is there any
> > place I can put it to so everybody can practice. The file(.vdi) size is
> > about 6.17 GB. Who can help?
> > >
> > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > From aliu...@gmail.com
> >

Bug 119240 - [Windows XP Only]Solver is not work

2012-04-17 Thread YangTerry 

Hi all,
Today when I try Solver on my clean windows XP machine with build r1325589 , I 
find it not work and Solver engine is com.sun.star.comp.Calc.Solver.
I have check the CoinMP.dll is under C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org 
3\Basis\program 

At last I try install OOo 3.3, the Solver work fine.

Is there any requirement or dependence need install to make this work, like JRE 
or Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable?




Thanks,
Terry

RE: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?

2012-03-13 Thread YangTerry 

I also a new comer for this project, I have half a year test experience on 
OpenOffice.
Now I'm focus on SpreadSheet testing.

Thanks,
Terry

> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:52:26 +0800
> Subject: Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice?
> From: phoenix.wan...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> I am a new comer of AOO project, And have nearly half a year experience
> about this project as tester.
> I will follow AOO and become faimilar with AOO gradualy.
> 
> 2012/3/13 Kevin Sisco 
> 
> > I do feel that we need to continue to focus on the issues at hand.  We
> > wouldn't want this project to fall into extinction after all these
> > years now would we?
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/12, Rob Weir  wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni  wrote:
> > >> On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm not suggesting we argue with anyone.  I'm suggesting we make
> > >>> truthful positive statements about this project and the experience
> > >>> level of its participants.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> FWIW, and just my humble opinion ...
> > >>
> > >> I don't think we should spend time discussing such arguments
> > >> when we have the one instrument that defines the true
> > >> continuation of the project, namely www.openoffice.org .
> > >>
> > >
> > > Oh, I'm sure we all have our own preferred ways of doing this.  The
> > > nice thing is that they are not mutually exclusive. We only need to
> > > agree to be accurate and positive.   We don't need to agree on a
> > > narrow set of specific communications. Some volunteers might work
> > > better with HTML, others with YouTube videos, others with graphics.
> > > Let's find more ways of saying "yes and"  instead of "no, but".
> > >
> > > -Rob
> > >
> >

RE: Success installing AOO on Windows 7

2012-02-29 Thread YangTerry 

I use OOO dev snapshot which product ID is OOo-Dev.
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1293550/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Thanks,
Wei

> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:17:17 +0800
> Subject: Re: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> From: louqin...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> On 1 March 2012 10:10, YangTerry  wrote:
> 
> >
> > Failed to send with screenshot.
> >
> > This issue repro only in Writer editor. Other editor are fine.
> > And the build number is 1293550.
> >
> 
> There are two r1293550 builds, which one are you using? I just clean
> installed the one provides full normal install sets, it works fine.
> 
> 
> > > From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> > > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:06:33 +0800
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > There is an issue at my side, After installed AOO 3.4 at my Win7 64bit
> > machine, check with all editor there is blank menu and toolbar in the UI.
> > >
> > >
> > > But other editor is fine, Is there anyone can confirm this issue on Win7
> > 64bit machine?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Terry
> > >
> > > > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:49:09 +1000
> > > > Subject: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> > > > From: jeanwe...@gmail.com
> > > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > AFAIK this Windows 7 machine has all Win7 updates installed. It has
> > > > OOo 3.3 and LO3.4 on it. I removed a previous ooo-dev (3.2!) following
> > > > instructions Rory pointed me to. When I got the most up to date
> > > > Windows installation file for AOO (from the cwiki page), it installed
> > > > with no problem and appears to be working and has all the menus and
> > > > toolbars. I'll test it more later when actually doing things.
> > > >
> > > > The only thing I noticed was that the splash screen on startup came
> > > > up, disappeared, and then came up again, before the program actually
> > > > started for the first time. This has not occurred on startup since
> > > > then.
> > > >
> > > > --Jean
> > >
> > >
> >
> >

RE: Success installing AOO on Windows 7

2012-02-29 Thread YangTerry 

Failed to send with screenshot.

This issue repro only in Writer editor. Other editor are fine.
And the build number is 1293550.

> From: polo8...@hotmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:06:33 +0800
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> There is an issue at my side, After installed AOO 3.4 at my Win7 64bit 
> machine, check with all editor there is blank menu and toolbar in the UI.
> 
> 
> But other editor is fine, Is there anyone can confirm this issue on Win7 
> 64bit machine?
> 
> Thanks,
> Terry
> 
> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:49:09 +1000
> > Subject: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> > From: jeanwe...@gmail.com
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> > AFAIK this Windows 7 machine has all Win7 updates installed. It has
> > OOo 3.3 and LO3.4 on it. I removed a previous ooo-dev (3.2!) following
> > instructions Rory pointed me to. When I got the most up to date
> > Windows installation file for AOO (from the cwiki page), it installed
> > with no problem and appears to be working and has all the menus and
> > toolbars. I'll test it more later when actually doing things.
> > 
> > The only thing I noticed was that the splash screen on startup came
> > up, disappeared, and then came up again, before the program actually
> > started for the first time. This has not occurred on startup since
> > then.
> > 
> > --Jean
> 
>

RE: Success installing AOO on Windows 7

2012-02-29 Thread YangTerry 




Hi all,
There is an issue at my side, After installed AOO 3.4 at my Win7 64bit machine, 
check with all editor there is blank menu and toolbar in the UI.


But other editor is fine, Is there anyone can confirm this issue on Win7 64bit 
machine?

Thanks,
Terry

> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:49:09 +1000
> Subject: Success installing AOO on Windows 7
> From: jeanwe...@gmail.com
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> 
> AFAIK this Windows 7 machine has all Win7 updates installed. It has
> OOo 3.3 and LO3.4 on it. I removed a previous ooo-dev (3.2!) following
> instructions Rory pointed me to. When I got the most up to date
> Windows installation file for AOO (from the cwiki page), it installed
> with no problem and appears to be working and has all the menus and
> toolbars. I'll test it more later when actually doing things.
> 
> The only thing I noticed was that the splash screen on startup came
> up, disappeared, and then came up again, before the program actually
> started for the first time. This has not occurred on startup since
> then.
> 
> --Jean