Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi. 2012/5/3 Hagar Delest > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton >> >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right >>> now. >>> Should be interesting. >>> >> >> >> Good! >> >> How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb >> > > No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have donwloaded > the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, no > need of the --force-all option. > > The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get the > LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem (for me). > > Understand, thanks. Albino
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:42 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > http://sourcefreedom.com > Apache developer: > wolfhal...@apache.org > On May 3, 2012 5:20 PM, "drew" wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 16:29 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Hagar Delest >wrote: > > > > > > > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > > > > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton > > > >> > > > >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system > right > > > >>> now. > > > >>> Should be interesting. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Good! > > > >> > > > >> How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb > > > >> > > > > > > > > No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have > donwloaded > > > > the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, > no > > > > need of the --force-all option. > > > > > > > > The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get > the > > > > LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem > (for me). > > > > > > > > Hagar > > > > > > > > > > I am one of the odd ones who actually enjoys having multiple > very-similar > > > office suites available, if I can choose the one I want to work with. > > > :-) I have both sets of icons in my main menu on Ubuntu_Studio > > > 12.04 > > > > > > > Right - well, Hagar is referring not to the application icons, having > > multiple installs (including as it has been for a long time, both the > > distro version of OO.o and the vanilla version) - it's the file > > association icons. Installing the vanilla packages doesn't update the > > system settings for the file association. > > > > That's more a question IMO about how we would want the files in the PPA > > to install - as the current vanilla deb packages do, my first vote would > > be for this. Though I would be in favor of offering an option to change > > the file type (mime type) associations, ala Windows install. > > > > //drew > > > Oh, right. I see. > I agree with offering a choice rather than just clobbering the old > associations or leaving them alone as they were. Hi Wolf, My opinion would be that for the first step we would to deliver from the PPA exactly the same results one would get downloading the binary DEB files and following the manual installation procedure. Once we actually have that, checked and functioning well, IMO we should look at what extensions are appropriate - that issue of mime/assoc one, integration support for Unity, what do about Evolution.. etc. Anyway so I'd think. //drew
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
http://sourcefreedom.com Apache developer: wolfhal...@apache.org On May 3, 2012 5:20 PM, "drew" wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 16:29 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > > > > > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > > > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton > > >> > > >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right > > >>> now. > > >>> Should be interesting. > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> Good! > > >> > > >> How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb > > >> > > > > > > No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have donwloaded > > > the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, no > > > need of the --force-all option. > > > > > > The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get the > > > LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem (for me). > > > > > > Hagar > > > > > > > I am one of the odd ones who actually enjoys having multiple very-similar > > office suites available, if I can choose the one I want to work with. > > :-) I have both sets of icons in my main menu on Ubuntu_Studio > > 12.04 > > > > Right - well, Hagar is referring not to the application icons, having > multiple installs (including as it has been for a long time, both the > distro version of OO.o and the vanilla version) - it's the file > association icons. Installing the vanilla packages doesn't update the > system settings for the file association. > > That's more a question IMO about how we would want the files in the PPA > to install - as the current vanilla deb packages do, my first vote would > be for this. Though I would be in favor of offering an option to change > the file type (mime type) associations, ala Windows install. > > //drew > Oh, right. I see. I agree with offering a choice rather than just clobbering the old associations or leaving them alone as they were. -Wolf
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 16:29 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > > > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton > >> > >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right > >>> now. > >>> Should be interesting. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Good! > >> > >> How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb > >> > > > > No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have donwloaded > > the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, no > > need of the --force-all option. > > > > The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get the > > LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem (for me). > > > > Hagar > > > > I am one of the odd ones who actually enjoys having multiple very-similar > office suites available, if I can choose the one I want to work with. > :-) I have both sets of icons in my main menu on Ubuntu_Studio > 12.04 > Right - well, Hagar is referring not to the application icons, having multiple installs (including as it has been for a long time, both the distro version of OO.o and the vanilla version) - it's the file association icons. Installing the vanilla packages doesn't update the system settings for the file association. That's more a question IMO about how we would want the files in the PPA to install - as the current vanilla deb packages do, my first vote would be for this. Though I would be in favor of offering an option to change the file type (mime type) associations, ala Windows install. //drew
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton >> >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right >>> now. >>> Should be interesting. >>> >> >> >> Good! >> >> How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb >> > > No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have donwloaded > the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, no > need of the --force-all option. > > The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get the > LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem (for me). > > Hagar > I am one of the odd ones who actually enjoys having multiple very-similar office suites available, if I can choose the one I want to work with. :-) I have both sets of icons in my main menu on Ubuntu_Studio 12.04 -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Le Wed, 2 May 2012 19:30:22 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto a écrit : 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right now. Should be interesting. Good! How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb No need. If the Ubuntu package has been removed and you have donwloaded the tarball from the LibO site, then just use the same command line, no need of the --force-all option. The only remaining thing however seems to be the icons: I still get the LibO icons in Nautilus. But they are not bad so it's not a problem (for me). Hagar
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >> We can of course create a further link aoo, aooffice, apacheoo or >> apacheopenoffice. But I would like to keep soffice as well because it >> is used in many places. >> > > It would definitely make sense to continue using soffice. And, unless it > gets political (and I hope it won't), Ubuntu could modify its packaging. > > If another name is needed in addition to soffice, then the best option > would probably be ooffice, which is already in use with, e.g., the Red Hat > packaging of 3.3. No need to add "a" or "apache" as a prefix: Apache > Subversion uses "svn", not "asvn"; and the same for Tomcat and other Apache > software. > > Regards, > Andrea. > It is nice to know ooffice is already in production use. I was thinking that the install script (in the Ubuntu installs) could have a case structure that checks for existing /usr/bin soft links, for instance: if soffice exists # Means openOffice, LibreOffice or StarOffice may be installed follow the link to get the app and version echo to dialog "You appear to have %Existing_App% installed, if you would like to keep %Existing_App% and install %Current_AOO_Product% beside it, click %Button_1% [default unattended install behaviour]. If you would like to replace %Existing_App% with %Current_AOO_Product% click %Button_2% and if you would like to abort the installation and make no changes to your computer, click %Button_3%. end_if if ooffice exists # - Means OpenOffice is installed follow the link to get the app and version echo to dialog that software "You appear to have %Existing_App% installed, if you would like to keep %Existing_App% and install %Current_AOO_Product% beside it, click %Button_1%. If you would like to replace %Existing_App% with %Current_AOO_Product% click %Button_2% [default action for unattended install] and if you would like to abort the installation and make no changes to your computer, click %Button_3%. end_if This would work regardless of which Linux you are installing into.and offer an option that was never available before. It would also mean that the Distribution packagers would not have to change very much to add AOO back into their software repositories. We always play well with others. :-) Wolf -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Juergen Schmidt wrote: We can of course create a further link aoo, aooffice, apacheoo or apacheopenoffice. But I would like to keep soffice as well because it is used in many places. It would definitely make sense to continue using soffice. And, unless it gets political (and I hope it won't), Ubuntu could modify its packaging. If another name is needed in addition to soffice, then the best option would probably be ooffice, which is already in use with, e.g., the Red Hat packaging of 3.3. No need to add "a" or "apache" as a prefix: Apache Subversion uses "svn", not "asvn"; and the same for Tomcat and other Apache software. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On 03.05.2012 06:11, Juergen Schmidt wrote: On Thursday, 3. May 2012 at 00:01, eric b wrote: Hi, Le 2 mai 12 à 22:53, Wolf Halton a écrit : I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. Not very kind :-/ well we used it since many years and people will expect that OpenOffice will start. Let us wait what happens when users complain. We can of course create a further link aoo, aooffice, apacheoo or apacheopenoffice. But I would like to keep soffice as well because it is used in many places. I share the sentiment. But soffice, probably a shortcut for star office, felt already strange to start OpenOffice (no s in the name). Maybe it is time for a change? -Andre
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Thursday, 3. May 2012 at 00:01, eric b wrote: > Hi, > > Le 2 mai 12 à 22:53, Wolf Halton a écrit : > > > I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. > > > Not very kind :-/ > well we used it since many years and people will expect that OpenOffice will start. Let us wait what happens when users complain. We can of course create a further link aoo, aooffice, apacheoo or apacheopenoffice. But I would like to keep soffice as well because it is used in many places. > > > > Can we just change that in the integration code so it s-links to / > > usr/bin/aooffice, or > > would it be better to push that over to the Ubuntu packagers? > > > > > No idea about the packagers. What I know, is that change all soffice > inside the $INSTALL_DIR/program is difficult, but change the shell > name calling it is easy. That's even what I did with OOo4Kids and > OOoLight. For that, I created OOo4Kids.sh, located in sysui/desktop/ > share, and containing: > > -8< > #!/bin/sh > > exec /%PREFIX/program/soffice "$@" > > -8< > > PREFIX contains the install path, and you can rename it > ApacheOffice.sh, or whatever name, of course. > > Next step : the code to be modified stands in sysui/dekstop/share/ > create_tree.sh file + some little things in the makefile and in the > Debian control file maybe. Of course, if you need, you can reuse what > I did in OOo4Kids and I'll relicense it under Apache License. > > We should analyze careful what we change or have to change. But right now I am not willing to change anythings that belongs to OpenOffice and is taken by others. Juergen > > > My 2 cts > > Eric > > > -- > qɔᴉɹə > Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page > L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org > Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news > >
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi, Le 2 mai 12 à 18:47, drew jensen a écrit : 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. No order is required that I know of - just dpkg -i *.deb works just fine for me - well, I do install the desktop integration pieces after installing the main application, but even that could I think be done in a single command, I just don't. Before to enter "dpkg -i *.deb" I'd suggest to type : cp desktop-integration/*.deb . # don't forget the last point ! (else no menu entries ;-) Maybe you'lll have to delog yourself, to cleanup the menu cache, not sure. Regards, Eric -- qɔᴉɹə Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi, Le 2 mai 12 à 22:53, Wolf Halton a écrit : I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. Not very kind :-/ Can we just change that in the integration code so it s-links to / usr/bin/aooffice, or would it be better to push that over to the Ubuntu packagers? No idea about the packagers. What I know, is that change all soffice inside the $INSTALL_DIR/program is difficult, but change the shell name calling it is easy. That's even what I did with OOo4Kids and OOoLight. For that, I created OOo4Kids.sh, located in sysui/desktop/ share, and containing: -8< #!/bin/sh exec /%PREFIX/program/soffice "$@" -8< PREFIX contains the install path, and you can rename it ApacheOffice.sh, or whatever name, of course. Next step : the code to be modified stands in sysui/dekstop/share/ create_tree.sh file + some little things in the makefile and in the Debian control file maybe. Of course, if you need, you can reuse what I did in OOo4Kids and I'll relicense it under Apache License. My 2 cts Eric -- qɔᴉɹə Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi, I installed the AOO 3.4 on all computers that have access. Where had OpenOffice.org 3.3 I decided not to move. I think the moment is to increase the installed base and begin to see if there are complaints. For my part everything is working fine. rgds Luiz Oliveira > >> It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu >> (11.04 & 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there >> is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of >> course). >> >> Hagar >> > Me too. I also removed the LibO, using only the AOO. :) > > 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton > >> Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right now. >> Should be interesting. > > Good! > > How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb > > Best, > Albino >
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi. 2012/5/2 Hagar Delest > It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu > (11.04 & 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there > is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of > course). > > Hagar > Me too. I also removed the LibO, using only the AOO. :) 2012/5/2 Wolf Halton > Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right now. > Should be interesting. Good! How? You used command dpkg -i --force-all *.deb Best, Albino
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Well I have both LO and AOO running simultaneously on my system right now. Should be interesting. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > Well, no idea but it may cause problem if other applications are set to > use soffice to launch the office suite. > > > > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:53:15 -0400, Wolf Halton a > écrit : > > I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. Can we just >> change that in the integration code so it s-links to /usr/bin/aooffice, or >> would it be better to push that over to the Ubuntu packagers? >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Hagar >> Delest >> >wrote: >> >> Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:37:07 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto< >>> biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>> >>> Problems can occur in conflict with the libo about the >>> desktop-integration. To install use: dpkg -i --force-all *deb I did an article in pt-br in blog WP (was in Escritório Livre [1]) : http://va.mu/UysG Best, Albino >>> It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu >>> (11.04& 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there >>> >>> is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of >>> course). >>> >>> Hagar >>> >>> >> >> >> -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Well, no idea but it may cause problem if other applications are set to use soffice to launch the office suite. Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:53:15 -0400, Wolf Halton a écrit : I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. Can we just change that in the integration code so it s-links to /usr/bin/aooffice, or would it be better to push that over to the Ubuntu packagers? On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Hagar Delestwrote: Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:37:07 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto< biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : Problems can occur in conflict with the libo about the desktop-integration. To install use: dpkg -i --force-all *deb I did an article in pt-br in blog WP (was in Escritório Livre [1]) : http://va.mu/UysG Best, Albino It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu (11.04& 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of course). Hagar
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
I had just that issue. LO uses /usr/bin/soffice as well. Can we just change that in the integration code so it s-links to /usr/bin/aooffice, or would it be better to push that over to the Ubuntu packagers? On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:37:07 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto < > biasut...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Problems can occur in conflict with the libo about the >> desktop-integration. >> To install use: >> >> dpkg -i --force-all *deb >> >> I did an article in pt-br in blog WP (was in Escritório Livre [1]) : >> >> http://va.mu/UysG >> >> Best, >> Albino >> > > It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu > (11.04 & 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there > is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of > course). > > Hagar > -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Le Wed, 2 May 2012 16:37:07 -0300, Albino Biasutti Neto a écrit : Problems can occur in conflict with the libo about the desktop-integration. To install use: dpkg -i --force-all *deb I did an article in pt-br in blog WP (was in Escritório Livre [1]) : http://va.mu/UysG Best, Albino It occurs with the Ubuntu packaging of LibO. I've installed on Ubuntu (11.04 & 11.10) OOo/AOO and LibO from their respective websites and there is no problem (LibO default packages from Ubuntu being removed first of course). Hagar
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Hi. 2012/5/2 Rory O'Farrell > On Wed, 2 May 2012 12:40:03 -0400 > Wolf Halton wrote: > > > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like > to > > have one of 2 things. > > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 > > 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. > > Without knowing exactlky which file(s) you have downloaded, it is > difficult to give precise instructions, but the normal procedure is to > unpack the large download file (circa 140 MB), change to the DEBS directory > and there to > sudo dpkg -i *.deb > then > cd desktop-integration > and once again > sudo dpkg -i *.deb > This last step sets up the links in the Office menu. > > Problems can occur in conflict with the libo about the desktop-integration. To install use: dpkg -i --force-all *deb I did an article in pt-br in blog WP (was in Escritório Livre [1]) : http://va.mu/UysG Best, Albino -- > Rory O'Farrell >
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
Thanks Rory On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2012 12:40:03 -0400 > Wolf Halton wrote: > > > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like > to > > have one of 2 things. > > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 > > 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. > > Without knowing exactlky which file(s) you have downloaded, it is > difficult to give precise instructions, but the normal procedure is to > unpack the large download file (circa 140 MB), change to the DEBS directory > and there to > sudo dpkg -i *.deb > then > cd desktop-integration > and once again > sudo dpkg -i *.deb > This last step sets up the links in the Office menu. > > -- > Rory O'Farrell > -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 12:55 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:47 PM, drew jensen > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 12:40 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > > > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like > > to > > > have one of 2 things. > > > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 > > > > There is none - but you are welcome to create a PPA for same if you > > would like. > > > OK, I will. :-) > I will post the link up here. > > Thnx Hi Wolf That would be excellent, IMO. That said just a reminder, I think this is a great idea, that doesn't mean everyone else does. BTW are you familiar with the steps required to open a PPA? Also, a PPA can be opened by an individual or a team, perhaps it would best to see if there is anyone else here that would be interested in working with you on this, IMO, having more then one person, from the main project, working on this would be a pretty good idea. Anyway - let us know how we can help you with this. //drew ps: My launchpad id is atjensen, in case you want to say hello there.
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Wed, 2 May 2012 12:40:03 -0400 Wolf Halton wrote: > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like to > have one of 2 things. > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 > 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. Without knowing exactlky which file(s) you have downloaded, it is difficult to give precise instructions, but the normal procedure is to unpack the large download file (circa 140 MB), change to the DEBS directory and there to sudo dpkg -i *.deb then cd desktop-integration and once again sudo dpkg -i *.deb This last step sets up the links in the Office menu. -- Rory O'Farrell
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:47 PM, drew jensen wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 12:40 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like > to > > have one of 2 things. > > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 > > There is none - but you are welcome to create a PPA for same if you > would like. > OK, I will. :-) I will post the link up here. Thnx Wolf > > > 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. > > No order is required that I know of - just dpkg -i *.deb works just fine > for me - well, I do install the desktop integration pieces after > installing the main application, but even that could I think be done in > a single command, I just don't. > > //drew > > > > > Wolf > > > > > -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
Re: Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 12:40 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: > I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like to > have one of 2 things. > 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 There is none - but you are welcome to create a PPA for same if you would like. > 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. No order is required that I know of - just dpkg -i *.deb works just fine for me - well, I do install the desktop integration pieces after installing the main application, but even that could I think be done in a single command, I just don't. //drew > > Wolf >
Is there a AOO repo for ubuntu?
I am attempting to install from a sourceforge download and I would like to have one of 2 things. 1. a repo to set in my sources.list for Ubuntu 12.04 2. The list of what order to install all these deb packages. Wolf -- This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com Advancing Libraries Together - http://LYRASIS.org
