Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

2015-06-17 Thread Yamil Suarez
Mike,

I can't speak for Kate, but in my situation my EG production server is
on 2.7, but it is configured more like a EG 2.5 when it comes to how
format icons are picked and how formats are filtered. This was done
right after we upgraded from 2.5.x to 2.6.x because initially the
icons and format filtering was acting weird. I have not had a chance
to research how to switch my production system to use the newer 2.6
features for icon formas or filtering. Though I hope to have it all
figured out this summer.

Hope this helps someone,
Yamil




On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Kate,

 What is the use case you have in mind?

 I ask because anyone on 2.6 or greater is actually already using them.  For
 instance, if you have a record for a DVD/Blu-Ray combo set that has two 007
 fields, one for each video recording format, you can search by either (or
 both) and find the record.

 Hope that helps!


 --
 Mike Rylander
  | President
  | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
  | email:  mi...@esilibrary.com
  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com


 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Kate Butler katebut...@rodgerslibrary.org
 wrote:

 Has anyone implemented Multi-Valued Fields in their catalogs?  We are
 considering taking a look at these later this summer and I wondered how much
 people had used this feature yet.  (Any words of wisdom?)



 Thanks,



 Kate Butler

 Technology Librarian

 Rodgers Memorial Library (Hudson, NH)

 http://www.rodgerslibrary.org/







-- 





Yamil Suarez, MCS
Library System Administrator/Developer

Stan Getz Library
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston St
Boston, MA 02215

ysua...@berklee.edu
617-747-2617


Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

2015-06-17 Thread Geoff Sams
For my library, we’ve chosen to utilize the parts system to distinguish between 
the different types of materials within a MVF record.  So for instance on a 
Blu-ray/DVD combo pack we will have a part that is for DVD and a part for the 
blu-ray.  This has seemed to work out well enough for us so far, and I’m hoping 
that I can get the rest of the consortium to adopt a similar plan of action for 
items of this nature.

There are however instances where this can be a bit misleading.  There was an 
item recently that was an Audiobook on CD that came with a disc of supplemental 
PDF files.  It showed up as “Audiobook on CD/ eBook” in the catalog.  This is a 
case where I would opt to remove the secondary value.  I believe that was what 
we ultimately did because I do believe it would have caused some non-small 
amount of confusion for the patron.

I believe that it is worth looking at the possibilities and making some 
decisions based on what works with your patronage in general.  Thankfully, as 
tends to be the case with a lot of these requests that get implemented (because 
the devs rock!), they can be tweaked quite effectively to limit how the types 
will show up in your catalog.  Otherwise, you can make minor changes to the 
marc records to fit your needs.

My experience is limited as we upgraded to 2.7.3 in February from 2.3.5.  There 
were a lot of changes to adapt to, and this was one we felt more or less safe 
letting sit in the background until we could really look things over well and 
make good decisions on.  This is my take on what I’ve seen so far.

If you have some more specific questions I’d be happy to answer them!

Thanks,
Geoff Sams
Library Manager
Roanoke Public Library

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Kate 
Butler
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 3:31 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

As far as I’m aware, our technical services department is still behaving as if 
the MVF do not exist -- if we get a combo set, we create 2 records, one for the 
DVD and one for the Blu-Ray. We have yet to start really taking advantage of 
the opportunity to have multiple values in these fields.

The information we’re really seeking is how this will end up looking on the 
staff end and on the patron end.

So, for instance, this Evergreen Indiana record has two 007 fields, which have 
caused it to have two format icons appear (I assume):
https://evergreen.lib.in.us/eg/opac/record/20360738?query=frozen;qtype=keyword;fi%3Asearch_format=dvd;locg=1;page=0

I was just hoping to see more examples like that, and how other libraries are 
taking advantage of the feature.

Kate Butler
Technology Librarian
Rodgers Memorial Library (Hudson, NH)
http://www.rodgerslibrary.org/

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Mike 
Rylander
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:10 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

Kate,

What is the use case you have in mind?

I ask because anyone on 2.6 or greater is actually already using them.  For 
instance, if you have a record for a DVD/Blu-Ray combo set that has two 007 
fields, one for each video recording format, you can search by either (or both) 
and find the record.

Hope that helps!


--
Mike Rylander
 | President
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  mi...@esilibrary.commailto:mi...@esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com


On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Kate Butler 
katebut...@rodgerslibrary.orgmailto:katebut...@rodgerslibrary.org wrote:
Has anyone implemented Multi-Valued Fields in their catalogs?  We are 
considering taking a look at these later this summer and I wondered how much 
people had used this feature yet.  (Any words of wisdom?)

Thanks,

Kate Butler
Technology Librarian
Rodgers Memorial Library (Hudson, NH)
http://www.rodgerslibrary.org/




Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

2015-06-17 Thread Kate Butler
As far as I’m aware, our technical services department is still behaving as if 
the MVF do not exist -- if we get a combo set, we create 2 records, one for the 
DVD and one for the Blu-Ray. We have yet to start really taking advantage of 
the opportunity to have multiple values in these fields.

The information we’re really seeking is how this will end up looking on the 
staff end and on the patron end.

So, for instance, this Evergreen Indiana record has two 007 fields, which have 
caused it to have two format icons appear (I assume):
https://evergreen.lib.in.us/eg/opac/record/20360738?query=frozen;qtype=keyword;fi%3Asearch_format=dvd;locg=1;page=0

I was just hoping to see more examples like that, and how other libraries are 
taking advantage of the feature.

Kate Butler
Technology Librarian
Rodgers Memorial Library (Hudson, NH)
http://www.rodgerslibrary.org/

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Mike 
Rylander
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:10 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Multi-Valued Fields in the wild

Kate,

What is the use case you have in mind?

I ask because anyone on 2.6 or greater is actually already using them.  For 
instance, if you have a record for a DVD/Blu-Ray combo set that has two 007 
fields, one for each video recording format, you can search by either (or both) 
and find the record.

Hope that helps!


--
Mike Rylander
 | President
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  mi...@esilibrary.commailto:mi...@esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com


On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Kate Butler 
katebut...@rodgerslibrary.orgmailto:katebut...@rodgerslibrary.org wrote:
Has anyone implemented Multi-Valued Fields in their catalogs?  We are 
considering taking a look at these later this summer and I wondered how much 
people had used this feature yet.  (Any words of wisdom?)

Thanks,

Kate Butler
Technology Librarian
Rodgers Memorial Library (Hudson, NH)
http://www.rodgerslibrary.org/




Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Scheduling June IRC practice time

2015-06-17 Thread Yamil Suarez
Oops, I sent in the wrong Doodle poll link

http://doodle.com/ypiunwgvwg4ar7qs

For the record, Doodle.com accounts are free, just provide an email address.

Thanks in advance,
Yamil






On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Yamil Suarez ysua...@berklee.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I wanted to see if there was interest in a second IRC practice time
 this month. We had one already in May, but a few folks asked if we
 could have one in June.

 To help find a time that the most number of people can attend I will
 be using Doodle.com. This is a free site that many groups use for free
 event scheduling.

 Just follow this link and create a free account using a valid email address…
 http://doodle.com/p4utz55z2b8pkq5v



 Here again is the link to the intro to IRC presentation…
 http://goo.gl/w3zml2

 In this presentation I postulate that if you…

 1) have ever sent a text message

 2) have a web browser

 … you can pull off giving IRC a try for yourself.


 Thanks in advance,
 Yamil



-- 





Yamil Suarez, MCS
Library System Administrator/Developer

Stan Getz Library
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston St
Boston, MA 02215

ysua...@berklee.edu
617-747-2617