Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation Statistics

2012-09-11 Thread Sharp, Chris
Hi Chauncey,

>From the technical end, if you are willing to share your "Debugging Info" 
>(available from the reports result screen), particularly the "Generated SQL" 
>section, several of us could verify that your report is actually counting what 
>you intend it to.

Chris

- Original Message -
> From: "Chauncey Montgomery" 
> To: "Evergreen" 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:33:37 AM
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation Statistics
> 
> Greetings Evergreen Community:
> 
> Earlier this year, we migrated from TLC Library.Solution 3.3.5 to
> Evergreen 2.1.  The migration took place in March. Since then,
> circulation counts have dropped by approximately 2,500 per month.
> Originally, I thought my reports in Evergreen weren't counting
> everything.  However, I have run multiple reports and always get the
> same numbers. I am fairly certain that our circulation hasn't truly
> dropped; all other areas of library use are consistent with previous
> activity, and the drop in circulation occurs at the point of
> migration.
>   So, I am beginning to suspect that perhaps TLC counted things
> differently than Evergreen.
> 
> I am curious, are there any other libraries that had migrated from
> TLC
> to Evergreen and saw the same thing happen in circulation? If so, do
> you
> know what TLC counted that Evergreen doesn't count? Also, I have
> confirmed that I am counting all circulations and renewals in my
> Evergreen reports.
> 
> No big deal, but I'd like to be able to explain this a little more
> clearly to my board.
> 
> Thanks for the input.
> 
> Chauncey
> 
> Chauncey G. Montgomery, MLIS
> Director/Fiscal Officer
> Community Library
> Sunbury, Ohio
> 740-965-3901
> montg...@oplin.org
> 

-- 
Chris Sharp
PINES Program Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
(404) 235-7147
csh...@georgialibraries.org
http://pines.georgialibraries.org/


Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation Statistics

2012-09-11 Thread Aaron Zsembery
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 at 9:33:37 AM "Chauncey Montgomery" 
 wrote:
>   So, I am beginning to suspect that perhaps TLC counted things
> differently than Evergreen.
I have never used or heard of TLC, but here are two things that I have noticed 
in our migration from Unicorn to Evergreen:
1. Do your libraries use "in-house" circulations to track items used for 
storytime and other such activities? If so, are you looking up those 
circulations in your report? They are stored separately from "regular" 
circulations and will need to be retrieved separately.

2. How about inter library loan, did the sending library get credit for that in 
TLC? If so, you may need to add something to the report to count that as by 
default Evergreen does not "credit" the sending library for that circulation in 
most reports.

HTH

Aaron Z
Jr. Systems Administrator

Pioneer Library System
2557 State Rt. 21
Canandaigua, New York  14424
Phone: (585) 394-8260


Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation Statistics

2012-09-11 Thread Anne Murray
We have found exactly the same thing here at the SEDAR consortium in
Scotland. We migrated from Horizon last December and like you noticed a
marked drop in issues. We have done various tests and reports and verified
that the issues are correct. The only logical conclusion we came to was
that Horizon wasn't counting properly. The libraries aren't any quieter! If
you find the missing issues let us know!

Anne Murray
Kirkintilloch
Scotland

On 11 September 2012 14:33, Chauncey Montgomery  wrote:

> Greetings Evergreen Community:
>
> Earlier this year, we migrated from TLC Library.Solution 3.3.5 to
> Evergreen 2.1.  The migration took place in March. Since then, circulation
> counts have dropped by approximately 2,500 per month. Originally, I thought
> my reports in Evergreen weren't counting everything.  However, I have run
> multiple reports and always get the same numbers. I am fairly certain that
> our circulation hasn't truly dropped; all other areas of library use are
> consistent with previous activity, and the drop in circulation occurs at
> the point of migration.  So, I am beginning to suspect that perhaps TLC
> counted things differently than Evergreen.
>
> I am curious, are there any other libraries that had migrated from TLC to
> Evergreen and saw the same thing happen in circulation? If so, do you know
> what TLC counted that Evergreen doesn't count? Also, I have confirmed that
> I am counting all circulations and renewals in my Evergreen reports.
>
> No big deal, but I'd like to be able to explain this a little more clearly
> to my board.
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> Chauncey
>
> Chauncey G. Montgomery, MLIS
> Director/Fiscal Officer
> Community Library
> Sunbury, Ohio
> 740-965-3901
> montg...@oplin.org
>


[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Circulation Statistics

2012-09-11 Thread Chauncey Montgomery

Greetings Evergreen Community:

Earlier this year, we migrated from TLC Library.Solution 3.3.5 to 
Evergreen 2.1.  The migration took place in March. Since then, 
circulation counts have dropped by approximately 2,500 per month. 
Originally, I thought my reports in Evergreen weren't counting 
everything.  However, I have run multiple reports and always get the 
same numbers. I am fairly certain that our circulation hasn't truly 
dropped; all other areas of library use are consistent with previous 
activity, and the drop in circulation occurs at the point of migration. 
 So, I am beginning to suspect that perhaps TLC counted things 
differently than Evergreen.


I am curious, are there any other libraries that had migrated from TLC 
to Evergreen and saw the same thing happen in circulation? If so, do you 
know what TLC counted that Evergreen doesn't count? Also, I have 
confirmed that I am counting all circulations and renewals in my 
Evergreen reports.


No big deal, but I'd like to be able to explain this a little more 
clearly to my board.


Thanks for the input.

Chauncey

Chauncey G. Montgomery, MLIS
Director/Fiscal Officer
Community Library
Sunbury, Ohio
740-965-3901
montg...@oplin.org


Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] circulation statistics

2010-06-30 Thread Jason Etheridge
[changing stats]
> Has anyone else noticed this?  How do you deal with your circulation stats?  
> (We are
> currently on vers 1.4.06)  Any input would be appreciated.

Changing stats could also be a sign that you're not reporting on what
you think you're reporting on.

There are two types of reports that people tend to run, those that
depend on counting/listing things at a specific point in time (when
the report runs), and those that count/list things based on dates
within the data itself.

Trying to do the latter where possible tends to produce more stable
(and IMO accurate results), but with such things as backdated checkins
and offline transactions, even those results can be mutable.  Deleting
data however, doesn't usually make a difference, unless you set up
your report thus, since Evergreen tends to not _really_ delete
anything, but merely marks data as being deleted.

In Evergreen, a renewal counts as a circulation (it's a separate row
in a database table) unless you explicitly filter it out (using the
various boolean _renewal fields on the circ).  In the trunk version of
Evergreen, there is a way to group the initial checkout and subsequent
renewals into one entity called a "circulation chain", and you can
report on those, with the start of a circ chain being the initial
checkout time, and the end of a circ chain being the checkin time on
the last renewal.

In trunk, we also start distinguishing between the effective checkin
time due to backdating, and the actual checkin scan time, and you can
report on those as well.

It may help to share specific reports (even if this is currently
difficult) so that others can scrutinize it and determine where the
pitfalls might lay.

-- 
Jason Etheridge
 | VP, Tactical Development
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  ja...@esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com


Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] circulation statistics

2010-06-30 Thread George Tuttle
Hi Shasta!

I would recommend a single circulation report with canned results. 

Your library system or consortium would set up an official monthly
circulation report with the results stored on a web-server or shared space
that all could access. 

As oppose to running a new report anytime you needed the information and
taking the chance that the information would change, the library system or
consortium would run it once and you & the libraries within the system could
access the file as many times as needed with no chance of the results
changing.

The January circ report would be run once and the results would be put in a
"can" assessable to all.

Sound good?

George the Librarian
Piedmont Regional Library System
Winder, GA

From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Shasta Brewer
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 8:57 AM
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] circulation statistics

 Lately, I reran circ stats that I had run in January.  I noticed an
increase in some stats which is due to renewals being counted for the month
that the original circulation took place.  However, I also noticed a
decrease in other stats which I can only attribute to items that have been
deleted from the system.  (These are items which would not have their
circulating location, shelving location or circ mod changed.)  Has anyone
else noticed this?  How do you deal with your circulation stats?  (We are
currently on vers 1.4.06)  Any input would be appreciated.

Shasta P. Brewer
Deputy Director
York County Library
113 E. Main St., Ste 100
PO Box 10032
Rock Hill, SC  29731
803-981-5835
Fax: 803-981-5895





[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] circulation statistics

2010-06-30 Thread Shasta Brewer
 Lately, I reran circ stats that I had run in January.  I noticed an
increase in some stats which is due to renewals being counted for the month
that the original circulation took place.  However, I also noticed a
decrease in other stats which I can only attribute to items that have been
deleted from the system.  (These are items which would not have their
circulating location, shelving location or circ mod changed.)  Has anyone
else noticed this?  How do you deal with your circulation stats?  (We are
currently on vers 1.4.06)  Any input would be appreciated.

 

Shasta P. Brewer
Deputy Director
York County Library
113 E. Main St., Ste 100
PO Box 10032
Rock Hill, SC  29731
803-981-5835
Fax: 803-981-5895