Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] (seeking MassLNCer) receipt item sorting

[Thomas Berezansky]

I think you want this:

%SORT(due_date_sort_value AS DATE ASC)%

Note that the ASC is not needed, but you could change it to DESC to  
reverse the sort.


Quoting Holly Brennan :

I'm reading this awesome MassLNC Wiki (http://masslnc.org/node/2528)  
trying to figure out how to order our receipt items by due date  
(upcoming due dates at the top). I think if I just have an example  
of what this string should look like, I'll get it. Right now I'm  
stuck with what all I need to replace in this:


%SORT(field[ AS type][ ASC| DESC][,...])%

Any MassLNCer or other receipt wizard out there who could help with  
this puzzle? Thanks!


-Holly

Holly Brennan
Library Technology Specialist
Homer Public Library, Alaska

hbren...@cityofhomer-ak.gov
907-235-3180 (main)
907-435-3154 (direct)



--
Thomas Berezansky
Assistant Network Administrator
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
4 High ST, Suite 175
North Andover, MA 01845
Phone: 978-557-8161

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen on a Bookmobile

[Scott Thomas]

Hi,
   We run Evergreen live on our Bookmobile. Our county has fairly good cell 
coverage and the laptops get 3G or LTE at most stops. Despite this, the staff 
client runs poorly on the Bookmobile (slowness, error messages etc.). Equinox 
provided us with a  technical explanation of why this is so which is 
reasonable. Are any other libraries out there running Evergreen on a Bookmobile 
using a cell connection? If so, are you experiencing latency? If yes, how do 
you work around it?

Thank you,
Scott


Scott  Thomas, MLS
Head of Information Technologies and Technical Services
Scranton Public Library
Lackawanna County Library System
2006 N. Main Ave.
Scranton, PA 18508
Ph: 570-207-2379
Fx: 570-348-3020
Email: sc...@albright.org

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] (seeking MassLNCer) receipt item sorting

[Holly Brennan]

Thanks, Thomas!

-Holly

-Original Message-
From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Thomas 
Berezansky
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 4:50 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] (seeking MassLNCer) receipt item sorting

I think you want this:

%SORT(due_date_sort_value AS DATE ASC)%

Note that the ASC is not needed, but you could change it to DESC to reverse the 
sort.

Quoting Holly Brennan :

> I'm reading this awesome MassLNC Wiki (http://masslnc.org/node/2528) 
> trying to figure out how to order our receipt items by due date 
> (upcoming due dates at the top). I think if I just have an example of 
> what this string should look like, I'll get it. Right now I'm stuck 
> with what all I need to replace in this:
>
> %SORT(field[ AS type][ ASC| DESC][,...])%
>
> Any MassLNCer or other receipt wizard out there who could help with 
> this puzzle? Thanks!
>
> -Holly
>
> Holly Brennan
> Library Technology Specialist
> Homer Public Library, Alaska
>
> hbren...@cityofhomer-ak.gov
> 907-235-3180 (main)
> 907-435-3154 (direct)


--
Thomas Berezansky
Assistant Network Administrator
Merrimack Valley Library Consortium
4 High ST, Suite 175
North Andover, MA 01845
Phone: 978-557-8161

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Donald Butterworth]

Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we
discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a
MARC record.

It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It
also never shows on the MARC View screen.

What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don

-- 
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen on a Bookmobile

[McCanna, Terran]

I don't think any of our libraries are currently trying to run the staff client 
live on their bookmobiles - they typically use the standalone client for 
circulation and then process the offline transactions when they get back to 
their base. 

We have not yet tested how well the web client will work on a cell connection, 
but hopefully it will be a lot more usable.

Terran McCanna 
PINES Program Manager 
Georgia Public Library Service 
1800 Century Place, Suite 150 
Atlanta, GA 30345 
404-235-7138 
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org 


- Original Message -
From: "Scott Thomas" 
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 7:53:00 AM
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen on a Bookmobile

Hi,
   We run Evergreen live on our Bookmobile. Our county has fairly good cell 
coverage and the laptops get 3G or LTE at most stops. Despite this, the staff 
client runs poorly on the Bookmobile (slowness, error messages etc.). Equinox 
provided us with a  technical explanation of why this is so which is 
reasonable. Are any other libraries out there running Evergreen on a Bookmobile 
using a cell connection? If so, are you experiencing latency? If yes, how do 
you work around it?

Thank you,
Scott


Scott  Thomas, MLS
Head of Information Technologies and Technical Services
Scranton Public Library
Lackawanna County Library System
2006 N. Main Ave.
Scranton, PA 18508
Ph: 570-207-2379
Fx: 570-348-3020
Email: sc...@albright.org

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Hardy, Elaine]

I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not 
able to add an 029



An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from 
non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British 
Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these 
numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html. Not sure why it doesn’t 
retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to OCLC, does (see 
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to be system 
supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128
404.235.7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of 
Donald Butterworth
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we 
discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a 
MARC record.

It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also 
never shows on the MARC View screen.

What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don



-- 

Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Mary Llewellyn]

We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping them? 

 

Mary

 

Mary Llewellyn

Database Manager

Bibliomation, Inc.

24 Wooster Ave.

Waterbury, CT 06708

mllew...@biblio.org

 

 

 

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea 
Nowell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

 

Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the system?  
If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We just discovered 
this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a different field.  
Once we removed the field from those that were being stripped on import we were 
able to have the field saved in the bib.  Just a thought to explore & it may 
address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
- Dea Nowell 

___ 

UCSLD logo & tagline
___
 
Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
Umatilla County Special Library District
17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
P O Box 1689
Pendleton OR 97801
(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
email: d...@ucsld.org   ||   web: www.ucsld.org

On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote: 

I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not able 
to add an 029

 

An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from 
non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British 
Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers 
to process and track records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib 
formats/en/0xx/029.html  . Not 
sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to 
OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to 
be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…

 

Elaine

 

J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library 
Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

 

404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org 
www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines

 

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Donald 
Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen Discussion 
Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

 

Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we 
discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a 
MARC record. 

It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also 
never shows on the MARC View screen. 

What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don 

-- 

Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury 
Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Dea Nowell]

Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.  
I'm just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& 
possibly Don) are unable to add them to records.

- Dea Nowell


On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:


We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be 
keeping them?


Mary

Mary Llewellyn

Database Manager

Bibliomation, Inc.

24 Wooster Ave.

Waterbury, CT 06708

mllew...@biblio.org

*From:*Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf 
Of *Dea Nowell

*Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the 
system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We 
just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently 
with a different field.  Once we removed the field from those that 
were being stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in 
the bib.  Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as 
well, I'm not sure.

- Dea Nowell

___

UCSLD logo & tagline
___
Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
Umatilla County Special Library District
17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
P O Box 1689
Pendleton OR 97801
(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
email: d...@ucsld.org    ||   web: www.ucsld.org 



On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:

I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I
was not able to add an 029

An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for
records from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and
Archives Canada, the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners
vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these numbers to process and track
records from other systems.” http://www.oclc.org/bib
formats/en/0xx/029.html
. Not sure why it
doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to
OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…

/Elaine/

J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia
Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga.
30345-4304

404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org
 www.georgialibraries.org
 www.georgialibraries.org/pines


*From:*Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On
Behalf Of *Donald Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015
11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:*
[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword
index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control
number fields to a MARC record.

It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new
search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen.

What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don

-- 


Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher
Library Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
 (859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Dea Nowell]

Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the 
system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We 
just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with 
a different field.  Once we removed the field from those that were being 
stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib.  
Just a thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not 
sure.

- Dea Nowell
___

UCSLD logo & tagline___
Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager Umatilla County Special Library 
District 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360 P O Box 1689 Pendleton OR 97801 (541) 
966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049 email: d...@ucsld.org || web: www.ucsld.org


On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:


I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was 
not able to add an 029


An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records 
from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, 
the British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC 
uses these numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/029.html. Not sure why it 
doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to 
OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 
seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…**


/Elaine/

J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public 
Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304


404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org 
www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines


*From:*Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf 
Of *Donald Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM 
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029


Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, 
we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number 
fields to a MARC record.


It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. 
It also never shows on the MARC View screen.


What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don

--

Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library 
Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu 
 (859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Donald Butterworth]

The only reason I wanted them included in our parameters is so that when we
complete this project, we can submit it to become part of the permanent
Evergreen code, if the power that be so choose. These control numbers might
be very important for libraries in the UK, Australia, and etc.


On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hardy, Elaine 
wrote:

> We do strip them on import. I did not realize that also meant it would
> strip them when added to an existing MARC record. Too me that is 2
> different procedures
>
>
>
> We don’t use them – I don’t see the need for them either. I was testing
> for Don.
>
>
>
> *Elaine*
>
>
>
> J. Elaine Hardy
> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place, Ste 150
> Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>
>
>
> 404.235.7128
> 404.235.7201, fax
> eha...@georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
> open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Dea
> Nowell
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM
>
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
>
>
> Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.  I'm
> just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& possibly
> Don) are unable to add them to records.
> - Dea Nowell
>
> On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:
>
> We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping
> them?
>
>
>
> Mary
>
>
>
> Mary Llewellyn
>
> Database Manager
>
> Bibliomation, Inc.
>
> 24 Wooster Ave.
>
> Waterbury, CT 06708
>
> mllew...@biblio.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [
> mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Dea
> Nowell
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
>
>
> Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the
> system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We just
> discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a
> different field.  Once we removed the field from those that were being
> stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib.  Just a
> thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
> - Dea Nowell
>
> ___
>
> [image: UCSLD logo & tagline]
>
> ___
>
>
>
> Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
>
> Umatilla County Special Library District
>
> 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
>
> P O Box 1689
>
> Pendleton OR 97801
>
> (541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
>
> email: d...@ucsld.org   ||   web: www.ucsld.org
>
> On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
>
> I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not
> able to add an 029
>
>
>
> An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from
> non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British
> Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these
> numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
> http://www.oclc.org/bib
> formats/en/0xx/029.html .
> Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field
> specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
> 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…
>
>
>
> *Elaine*
>
>
>
> J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public
> Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>
>
>
> 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [
> mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Donald
> Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen
> Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we
> discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a
> MARC record.
>
> It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It
> also never shows on the MARC View screen.
>
> What do we need to do to add these fields?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don
>
> --
>
> Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library
> Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859)
> 858-2227
>
>


-- 
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Hardy, Elaine]

We do strip them on import. I did not realize that also meant it would strip 
them when added to an existing MARC record. Too me that is 2 different 
procedures



We don’t use them – I don’t see the need for them either. I was testing for 
Don.



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128
404.235.7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea 
Nowell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.  I'm 
just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& possibly Don) 
are unable to add them to records.
- Dea Nowell



On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:

We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping 
them?



Mary



Mary Llewellyn

Database Manager

Bibliomation, Inc.

24 Wooster Ave.

Waterbury, CT 06708

mllew...@biblio.org







From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea 
Nowell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the 
system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We just 
discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a 
different field.  Once we removed the field from those that were being 
stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib.  Just a 
thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
- Dea Nowell

___

UCSLD logo & tagline
___

Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
Umatilla County Special Library District
17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
P O Box 1689
Pendleton OR 97801
(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
email: d...@ucsld.org   ||   web: www.ucsld.org

On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:

I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not 
able to add an 029



An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from 
non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British 
Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these 
numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
http://www.oclc.org/bib formats/en/0xx/029.html 
 . Not sure why it doesn’t 
retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to OCLC, does (see 
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to be system 
supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public 
Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org 
www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of 
Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen 
Discussion Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we 
discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a 
MARC record.

It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also 
never shows on the MARC View screen.

What do we need to do to add these fields?

Thanks!

Don

-- 

Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library Asbury 
Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Donald Butterworth]

Ah Ha! That would explain it. We strip those fields as well. As a U.S.A.
library they aren't all that necessary for us.

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Dea Nowell  wrote:

> Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the
> system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We just
> discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a
> different field.  Once we removed the field from those that were being
> stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib.  Just a
> thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
> - Dea Nowell
> ___
>
> [image: UCSLD logo & tagline]
> ___
> Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
> Umatilla County Special Library District
> 17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
> P O Box 1689
> Pendleton OR 97801(541) 966-0917 --> (406) 952-4049
> email: d...@ucsld.org   ||   web: www.ucsld.org
>
> On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
>
> I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not
> able to add an 029
>
>
>
> An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records
> from non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the
> British Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses
> these numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
> http://www.oclc.org/bib
> formats/en/0xx/029.html .
> Not sure why it doesn’t retain on save. An 019, which is another field
> specific to OCLC, does (see http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html).
> 029 seems to be system supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…
>
>
>
> *Elaine*
>
>
>
> J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public
> Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>
>
>
> 404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org
> www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [
> mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Donald
> Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen
> Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we
> discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a
> MARC record.
>
> It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It
> also never shows on the MARC View screen.
>
> What do we need to do to add these fields?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don
>
> --
>
> Don Butterworth Faculty Associate / Librarian III B.L. Fisher Library
> Asbury Theological Seminary don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu (859)
> 858-2227
>
>


-- 
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterwo...@asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

[Hardy, Elaine]

I thought it was a local indexing project and was wondering why you would 
want either field indexed!



I still am not sure they would be practical fields to index since they are 
control numbers analogous to OCLC TCNs. As such, they might to be in an 001 
in the originating library catalog, which is already indexed.  There are 
days, however, when I would prefer to search for a TCN in advanced or basic 
(we use OCLC TCNs as our TCNs), so would like the 035 indexed.



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128
404.235.7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of 
Donald Butterworth
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:10 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



The only reason I wanted them included in our parameters is so that when we 
complete this project, we can submit it to become part of the permanent 
Evergreen code, if the power that be so choose. These control numbers might 
be very important for libraries in the UK, Australia, and etc.



On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hardy, Elaine  
wrote:

We do strip them on import. I did not realize that also meant it would strip 
them when added to an existing MARC record. Too me that is 2 different 
procedures



We don’t use them – I don’t see the need for them either. I was testing for 
Don.



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128
404.235.7201, fax
eha...@georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea 
Nowell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM


To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them.  I'm 
just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (& possibly Don) 
are unable to add them to records.
- Dea Nowell

On 10/1/2015 10:37 AM, Mary Llewellyn wrote:

We’re stripping the 029s. Am I missing a reason why we should be keeping 
them?



Mary



Mary Llewellyn

Database Manager

Bibliomation, Inc.

24 Wooster Ave.

Waterbury, CT 06708

mllew...@biblio.org







From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea 
Nowell
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the 
system?  If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record.  We just 
discovered this with our system (Sage Library System) recently with a 
different field.  Once we removed the field from those that were being 
stripped on import we were able to have the field saved in the bib.  Just a 
thought to explore & it may address Don's query as well, I'm not sure.
- Dea Nowell

___

UCSLD logo & tagline
___

Dea Nowell, Technical Services Manager
Umatilla County Special Library District
17 SW Frazer, Suite 360
P O Box 1689
Pendleton OR 97801
(541) 966-0917   --> (406) 952-4049 

email: d...@ucsld.org   ||   web: www.ucsld.org

On 10/1/2015 9:41 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:

I was able to add an 016 to a bib record in the PINES database. I was not 
able to add an 029



An 029 is a field used by OCLC to “system control numbers for records from 
non-OCLC automated systems (e.g., Library and Archives Canada, the British 
Library, WorldCat Cataloging Partners vendors, etc.). OCLC uses these 
numbers to process and track records from other systems.” 
http://www.oclc.org/bib formats/en/0xx/029.html 
 . Not sure why it doesn’t 
retain on save. An 019, which is another field specific to OCLC, does (see 
http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/019.html). 029 seems to be system 
supplied; but, the 019 is system supplied…



Elaine



J. Elaine Hardy PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public 
Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304



404.235.7128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org 
www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of 
Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen 
Discussion Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029



Hi Everyone,

As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we 
discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control 

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Receipt template date formats?

[Lynn Floyd]

So, you are looking for a date like "Wednesday, October 7, 2015"? I've not ran 
across that date format.



Lynn Floyd 
lfl...@andersonlibrary.org 
Anderson County Library 
864-260-4500 x181 
http://www.andersonlibrary.org 
  


-Original Message-
From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Jane 
Sandberg
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 4:44 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Receipt template date formats?

Hi Evergreen,

We were wondering if we could change the format of the due date in
receipt templates.  The %due_date% macro gives us the -MM-DD
format, but we were interested in getting the day of the week in there
somehow.  Is this a possibility?

Thanks,

  -Jane

-- 
Jane Sandberg
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen installation

[rrodrig...@bibdata.com]

Thank you Rogan!!!


Rigo,
Sent wirelessly from my iPhone.

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Rogan Hamby  wrote:
> 
> The easiest thing is to build the staff client.  The path will vary based on 
> your installation but it will be something like
> 
> /home/opensrf/Evergreen/Open-ILS/xul/staff_client
> 
> and run 
> 
> make linux64-client
> 
> Then you can execute the staff client by running the xulrunner-bin and 
> passing it the application.ini
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Rigoberto Rodriguez 
>>  wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I have just installed Evergreen running the script from
>> 'berick/phasefx/stompro' on Debian Jessie. I am having problems finding
>> the version of this installation to then find the appropriate staff
>> client. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Rigoberto
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Rogan Hamby, MLS, CCNP, MIA
> Managers Headquarters Library and Reference Services, 
> York County Library System
> 
> “You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit 
> me.” 
> ― C.S. Lewis

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Receipt template date formats?

[Jane Sandberg]

Hi Evergreen,

We were wondering if we could change the format of the due date in
receipt templates.  The %due_date% macro gives us the -MM-DD
format, but we were interested in getting the day of the week in there
somehow.  Is this a possibility?

Thanks,

  -Jane

-- 
Jane Sandberg
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] receipt count of items

[Lynn Floyd]

This is by using the "sumout" feature. 

 

In the Header: You checked out  items

In the Line Item: 1  

 

 

Lynn Floyd 
lfl...@andersonlibrary.org 
Anderson County Library 
864-260-4500 x181 
http://www.andersonlibrary.org   
  

 

From: Open-ils-general
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Holly Brennan
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:39 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group (open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org)
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] receipt count of items

 

Another receipt question.

 

I've changed out receipt output to an unordered list, which looks great, but
I'd still like to get a count of the total items listed. I'll be using this
for the 'Checkout' and 'Items Out' receipts. Ideally, it would be a total I
could drop in the header, so it would read like this (with [#] being a count
of the items listed):

 

Today, you checked out these [#] items:

OR

Here are the [#] items on your account:

 

I've been googling my heart out today, but can't find anything on this. But
there must be a way! I swear I saw it done at a conference in the past..

 

-Holly

 

 

Holly Brennan

Library Technology Specialist

Homer Public Library, Alaska

 

hbren...@cityofhomer-ak.gov

907-235-3180 (main)

907-435-3154 (direct)

 

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Receipt template date formats?

[McCanna, Terran]

Hi Jane, 

I haven't tested this, but I think you can get the day of the week with %a:

%DATE_FORMAT(%due_date%, %a)%


Terran McCanna 
PINES Program Manager 
Georgia Public Library Service 
1800 Century Place, Suite 150 
Atlanta, GA 30345 
404-235-7138 
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org 
- Original Message -
From: "Jane Sandberg" 
To: "Evergreen Discussion Group" 
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 4:43:47 PM
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Receipt template date formats?

Hi Evergreen,

We were wondering if we could change the format of the due date in
receipt templates.  The %due_date% macro gives us the -MM-DD
format, but we were interested in getting the day of the week in there
somehow.  Is this a possibility?

Thanks,

  -Jane

-- 
Jane Sandberg
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655